Humanities and Social Sciences

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN

Description

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN (ISSN: 1896-3226; eISSN: 2719-3101) jest to rocznik wydawany przez Komitet Nauk Teologicznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk. Współwydawcą czasopisma jest Wydział Teologii Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego Jana Pawła II w Lublinie. Czasopismo ukazuje się od 2006 roku.

Celem Studiów Nauk Teologicznych PAN jest prezentowanie badań polskich i zagranicznych badaczy podejmujących problematykę z zakresu teologii, religiologii oraz dyscyplin pokrewnych. Celem pośrednim jest także promocja międzynarodowego i interdyscyplinarnego dialogu w dziedzinie teologii, a także jej powiązań z innymi obszarami badawczymi.

W parametryzacji czasopism MNiSW w 2019 roku otrzymało 20 punktów.

ISSN

ISSN 1896-3226, eISSN 2719-3101

Publishers

Polskia Akademiai Nauk - Komitet Nauk Teologicznych

Rada Naukowa:
Prof. dr hab. Clemens Breuer (Philosophisch-Theologische Hochschule St. Pölten/Austria)
Ks. prof. dr hab. Bogdan Częsz (UAM Poznań)
Ks. dr hab. prof. UKSW Stanisław Dziekoński (UKSW Warszawa)
Ks. prof. dr hab. Bogdan Ferdek (PWT Wrocław)
Ks. prof. dr hab. Krzysztof Góźdź (KUL Lublin)
Ks. bp dr hab. prof. ChAT Marcin Hintz (ChAT Warszawa)
Ks. prof. dr Dariusz Kowalczyk SJ (Pontificia Università Gregoriana Rzym/Włochy)
Ks. prof. dr hab. Józef Kulisz (Bobolanum Warszawa)
Ks. prof. Piotr Morciniec (UO Opole)
O. prof. dr hab. Andrzej Napiórkowski (UJPII)
Ks. prof. dr hab. Jan Perszon (UMK Toruń)
Ks. prof. dr hab. Jan Słomka (UŚ Katowice)

Komitet Redakcyjny:

Ks. prof. dr hab. Bartosz Adamczewski (Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie)
Ks. dr hab. Krystian Kałuża (Uniwersytet Opolski)
Ks. prof. dr hab. Dariusz Kotecki (Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu)
Ks. dr Wojciech Kućko (Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie) – sekretarz redakcji
Ks. prof. dr hab. Marian Machinek (Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie) – redaktor naczelny
Ks. prof. dr hab. Sławomir Nowosad (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II w Lublinie)
Ks. dr hab. Rajmund Porada (Uniwersytet Opolski)
Dr hab. Monika Przybysz (Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie)

Prof. dr hab. Sakowicz Eugeniusz (Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie)

Prof. dr hab. Sławiński Henryk (Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie)

Redaktorzy tematyczni:
Ks. prof. dr hab. Paweł Bortkiewicz (UAM Poznań) - teologia moralna
Ks. prof. dr hab. Waldemar Chrostowski (UKSW Warszawa) - nauki biblijne
O. prof. dr hab. Jacek Salij (UKSW Warszawa) - teologia dogmatyczna
Ks. prof. dr hab. Łukasz Kamykowski (UPJPII) - teologia fundamentalna
Prof. dr hab. Krystian Wojaczek (UO Opole) - teologia pastoralna
Ks. prof. dr hab. Henryk Pietras (AI Kraków) - patrologia, historia Kościoła

Redaktorzy językowi:
Alois Hüging - Biesdorf/Niemcy (j. niemiecki)
Raymund Brennan - Londyn/Wielka Brytania (j. angielski)

studia.nt@pan.pl

Volumes
Instructions for authors

Select number

Content

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN | 2023 | Tom 18

1 Wstęp

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN | 2023 | Tom 18

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

2 Salvation of a person or of the human nature? On a problem of the contemporary reception of traditional soteriological motifs

Ks. Jacek Kempa

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN | 2023 | Tom 18 | 9-31 | DOI: 10.24425/snt.2023.146519

Keywords: soteriology dispute over universals in theology Athanasius of Alexandria Augustine of Hippo Anselm of Canterbury

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper assumes that the modern period differs from earlier epochs in terms of thinking about universals: in the ancient and medieval dispute about universals, the general took precedence, and the subject of debates was the identity of what was individual. Ockham’s revolution of thinking in this area is one of the significant points of the beginning modernity. In this context, it is reasonable to ask to what extent classical soteriological concepts, created in the ancient climate marked by the primacy of universals, can be understood today, in an atmosphere of nominalism. After presenting the specificity of this issue, the article discusses three works of three authors, who are significant for the history of soteriology (Athanasius, Augustine, Anselm). The conclusions do not confirm the simple thesis about the indisputable primacy of thinking about “man as human nature” in the case of Athanasius and Augustine. But Anselm’s much later theory is consistently based on such thinking. Hence, the reflections of the first two authors, insofar as they emphasize the interpersonal salvific bond between God and man, seem to be still understandable today. On the other hand, Anselm’s conception, based on the perception of the work of salvation as an impact on human nature, easily exposes itself to narrow interpretations, which are inconsistent with the original intention of its author. Heil der Person oder der menschlichen Natur? Über ein Problem der heutigen Rezeption der traditionellen soteriologischen Motive.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Jacek Kempa

e-mail:

ORCID:

Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach

3 When the human being is separated from the human person and thus also from the concept of human rights. Some aspects of criticism of peter singer’s biocentric conception of life

Inocent-Mária V. Szaniszló

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN | 2023 | Tom 18 | 33-52 | DOI: 10.24425/snt.2023.146520

Keywords: Peter Singer antispeciesism human being and human person freedom andresponsibility of the acting subject human dignity human rights

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The question of the human person is very important for moral theology because of the possibility of responsible human action. Nevertheless, the old utilitarianism that already comes from the empiricist position of Hume reduces the calculation of costs and benefits to an evaluation of the pleasant/unpleasant of the individual subject. The new utilitarianism takes its inspiration from Bentham and Mill and can be summarized in a threefold injunction: maximizing pleasure, minimizing pain, and expanding the sphere of personal freedom for the greatest number of persons. One of the popular promoters of preference utilitarianism in modern times is the Australian ethicist Peter Singer, whose controversial views attracted much attention not only from the scientific community in the late 1970s. In this paper we will try to show a critique of this position in several figures of philosophical and theological ethics as well as a defence of the importance of the notion of the human person and human dignity for the integral protection of human life from conception to natural death and of anthropocentrism as such in respect for all creation and all of nature.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Inocent-Mária V. Szaniszló

e-mail:

ORCID:

Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas (Angelicum) in Rome, Italy

4 Beyond monism and dualism. Five arguments for the thesis that the anthropological hylomorphism of st. Thomas Aquinas is not a dualistic position

Janusz Pyda

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN | 2023 | Tom 18 | 53-71 | DOI: 10.24425/snt.2023.146521

Keywords: metaphysical anthropology materialistic monism dualism hylemorphism Thomas Aquinas Descartes

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article is an attempt to present the main reasons why the anthropological hylomorphism of St. Thomas Aquinas goes beyond the monism-dualism dichotomy in metaphysical anthropology. It cannot, as is most often done, be classified as a substance dualism of the Cartesian type. It is also not a position that can be included in the group of materialistic monisms, even of the non-reductionist type. Aquinas‘s anthropological hylomorphism seems to be a position that contains both the intuitions of materialistic and dualistic positions in metaphysical anthropology, although not reducible to either of them. On closer examination of positions such as Aquinas‘s anthropological hylomorphism, the question must arise whether the dichotomous and disjunctive division of positions in metaphysical anthropology into materialistic and dualistic is justified and operational.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Janusz Pyda

e-mail:

ORCID:

Instytut Tomistyczny w Warszawie, Akademia Katolicka w Warszawie

5 Postmodern versus christian vision of the identity of the person

Antoni Jucewicz

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN | 2023 | Tom 18 | 73-92 | DOI: 10.24425/snt.2023.146522

Keywords: person identity of the person postmodernism Christianity personalism

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The subject of the research of this article is the vision of the identity of the person in the light of postmodernism in confrontation with the Christian personalist vision of the person. The person in the perspective of postmodernism is deprived of nature and transcendent sense of existence. The identity of the person is understood as relative, fluid. It is not conceived as something permanent, stable, immanent and universal. The identity of a person in the personalist perspective is the resultant of unquestionable certainty regarding his subjectivity. It is an objective, permanent, universal characteristic, constitutive of the person, existing regardless of circumstances. The personalistic, Christian perspective allows one to see the fullness of a person’s existence, the richness of his spiritual dimensions, which is not guaranteed by identity understood postmodernistically. Only in the ontological perspective can the foundation of the uniqueness, distinctiveness and ultimate constitution of the person be found.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Antoni Jucewicz

Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie

6 Elements of theological anthropology in the scientific work of Fr prof. Marian Rusecki

Ks. Jacenty Mastej

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN | 2023 | Tom 18 | 93-111 | DOI: 10.24425/snt.2023.146523

Keywords: Jesus Christ creation man theological anthropology homo Paschalis Christianity meaning of life fundamental theology Marian Rusecki

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of the study is to show the essential elements of theological anthropology contained in the scientific work of Fr prof. Marian Rusecki. The problem is presented and resolved in five points. The following issues were presented in turn: man created by God (1); the Christ dimension of the human person (2); Homo Paschalis (3); the anthropogenic dimension of Christianity (4) and showing the meaning of life as a task for fundamental theology (5). Rusecki’s constitutive belief, which is the core of the above anthropological themes, is that understanding the mystery of man is possible only through divine Revelation. The definitive truth about man has its source and explanation in the Logos, Jesus Christ, true God and true Man. Therefore, the professor’s anthropology can be described as theological, Christocentric and ecclesiological. Particularly interesting are the elements of paschal anthropology, in which the issue of homo Paschalis was highlighted. Rusecki’s postulate that fundamental theology even more clearly undertakes to study the issue of the meaning of life, which is crucial for man, is also reasonable.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Jacenty Mastej

Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II w Lublinie

7 The dispute over the foundations of moral judgment. Neuroscience vs. moral philosophy

Szczepan Kaleciak

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN | 2023 | Tom 18 | 113-133 | DOI: 10.24425/snt.2023.146524

Keywords: moral judgement neuroethics neuroscience experimental moral psychology Social Intuitionist Model (SIM) Dual-Process Theory of Moral Judgement Somatic MarkerHypothesis (SMH) conscience

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Neuroscience deals with the issue of moral judgment. That term already has a long history in philosophical reflection. Both fields, the neurosciences and the philosophy, use different methodologies when applying it. The approach of neuroscientists tends to be reductionist. This article seeks to overcome this reductionism. The main question is: How the term “moral judgment” is understood in neurosciences? Is its understanding very different from that which is present in moral philosophy? To answer, in the first part of the article, the author investigates the meaning of the term “moral judgment” in four scientifical models: in the moral intuitionism of experimental psychology, in Social Intuitionist Model by Jonathana Haidt, in Dual-Process Theory by Joshua Green, and finaly, in Somatic Marker Hypothesis by Antonio Damasio. These reflections introduce the second part of which the subject is an examination of Christian moral philosophy and its confrontation with the findings of neuroscientists.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Szczepan Kaleciak

e-mail:

ORCID:

Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie

8 Molecular editing and christian bioethics

Pavol Dancák

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN | 2023 | Tom 18 | 135-152 | DOI: 10.24425/snt.2023.146525

Keywords: CRISPR/Cas9 gene therapy germline gene therapy human rights Christianethics

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Research in molecular genetics has made great advances in recent years that have wide practical applications. At the same time, it has been confirmed that not everything provided by modern genetic research is good and beneficial for humans. In particular, the discovery of the CRISPR/CAS9 method has made it possible to interfere very effectively with an individual’s hereditary characteristics, which has forced doctors, lawyers, ethicists, sociologists, theologians and representatives of churches to take a clear stance on the issue. The need for further scientific development requires the limits of research to be defined in order to avoid irreparable damage to the gene pool of humanity. The aim of this article is to examine the Magisterium of the Catholic Church in dealing with current bioethical issues arising from new scientific discoveries and to present Christian principles in the context of the possibilities offered by molecular editing using CRISPR/CAS9. The position of the Catholic Church on current developments in the field of biomedicine, even at a time of significant biomedical discoveries, is based on a holistic view on human life, its value and mission. In the deepest sense of the word, gene therapy should be a therapy for a specific disease of a given organism that respects the integral good of the human person. Clinical interventions aimed at improving the genome of an individual, and therefore of society, are unacceptable. Human life must not become the object of a eugenic positivist-materialist mentality. The teaching office of the Church promotes scientific development for the common good of humanity and, at the same time, strives to preserve the dignity and integrity of every human being.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Pavol Dancák

e-mail:

ORCID:

University of Prešov in Prešov, Slovakia

9 Anthropological foundations of the Christian concept of education

ks. Wojsław Czupryński

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN | 2023 | Tom 18 | 153-166 | DOI: 10.24425/snt.2023.146526

Keywords: personalism upbringing personalistic pedagogy Christian anthropology

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Pedagogy is not an autonomous science, independent in terms of cognitive theory and methodology from other sciences. Both the subject – man, the method – a specific way of explaining and justifying key statements, and the goal – the fullness of a person’s personal life, are not formulated without a philosophical, especially anthropological reference. Each of the existing pedagogical concepts naturally assumes a specific vision of the world and man, which remains beyond the competence of pedagogy. Pedagogy only assumes it, makes it a starting point for further discourse in the area of its research. It follows that pedagogy is not an autonomous science in relation to philosophy. Therefore, the educator must be aware of what kind of philosophy it is and whether it meets the criteria of rationality and reasonableness of scientific discourse. In the face of the contemporary confusion of thinking about man, referred to as the “anthropological error,” especially when confronted with the dynamically spreading ideology of the so-called multiculturalism proclaiming the equality of different anthropologies and different theories of education, there is an urgent need to recall and critically rebuild the tradition of personalistic pedagogy. Upbringing should be anchored in ethics as a theory of morality and understood as the actualization of human potential in the perspective of “being-for-others.”

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

ks. Wojsław Czupryński

Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie

10 Is aesthetic surgery morally acceptable?

Jan Polák

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN | 2023 | Tom 18 | 167-197 | DOI: 10.24425/snt.2023.146527

Keywords: aesthetic surgery body magisterium doctor ethical principles bioethics committee scandal

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This contribution points out the most important aspects to consider in the ethical (in) acceptability of aesthetic operations. Starting from the value of the human body seen from a biblical perspective, it introduces the reader to the essential magisterial statements concerning aesthetic surgery, among which the speech of Pope Pius XII occupies a particular position. It also refers to ethical principles, especially the principle of double effect and totality, and outlines the basic argumentative positions of selected bioethics committees. There is also a brief introduction to the positions of several contemporary bioethicists. In conclusion, the author presents his point of view and briefly explains what the patient should take into account and what the aesthetic surgeon should look for to avoid ethically wrong actions

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jan Polák

Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic

11 Religiosity and theological views of Nicolaus Copernicus

ks. Paweł Rabczyński

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN | 2023 | Tom 18 | 199-2016 | DOI: 10.24425/snt.2023.146528

Keywords: Nicolaus Copernicus Copernican religiosity Copernican theology theism creationism

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Nicolaus Copernicus (1473–1543), brilliant explorer and great scientist, creator of the heliocentric system, was a deeply religious person. He dealt mainly with astronomy. He was a man of science and a faithful son of the Catholic Church. He was not a theologian and did not leave behind theological or ascetical writings. Nevertheless, important theological ideas can be found in his legacy, above all in his life’s work De revolutionibus: theism and creationism. These should be read in the context of the scientist’s astronomical and cosmological research. Observing the beauty, harmony and order of the universe, Copernicus points to its perfect Creator ( Opifex omnium). The cosmos and all created works are an epiphany of God. Copernicus’ God is the Best and Greatest Being ( Optimus Maximus), who manages the ‘divine factory’ of the universe ( Regularissimus). Man is at the centre of creation. Exploring and contemplating the cosmos gives him joy, detaches him from evil, ennobles him and leads him to God. Copernicus’ theological views bear the mark of Renaissance humanism.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

ks. Paweł Rabczyński

Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie

12 Walter Charleton against the darkness of atheism

Adam Drozdek

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN | 2023 | Tom 18 | 217-230 | DOI: 10.24425/snt.2023.146529

Keywords: Walter Charleton proofs of God’s existence the immortality of the soul physico-theology

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Walter Charleton, a physician and a Christian believer, was on the first advocates of physico-theology that started on a large scale at the end of the 17 ^th century and flourished in the 18th century. In his battle with the English deism and atheism, he used the arguments of the orderliness of nature to prove the existence of God. He was one of few authors trying to reconcile atomism with Christian theology. He also grappled with the problem of the immortality of the soul supporting at one point Gassendi’s idea that humans have two souls, sensitive and rational.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Adam Drozdek

e-mail:

ORCID:

Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

13 The relationship between theology/philosophy and science in the aristotelian-thomistic perspective

Michał Mrozek

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN | 2023 | Tom 18 | 231-258 | DOI: 10.24425/snt.2023.146530

Keywords: philosophy science methodology assumptions new atheism intellectual virtues wisdom Aristotle Aquinas

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Today, there is a growing sense of the need to abandon philosophy or theology in favour of science and the convictions of specialists. The analyses presented by Aristotle and St Thomas in terms of the hierarchy of intellectual virtues allow us to draw attention to the conditions and consequences of these demands. In their view, knowledge grows out of certain principles and presuppositions, the evaluation of which belongs to the virtue of wisdom. The virtue of wisdom has as its object the highest principles, the reaching of which requires special methodological and metaphysical attention. In the case of Christian theology, this wisdom is enriched by faith in what God reveals to man. Faith understood in this way goes beyond natural cognition while at the same time having a strong rational basis of a historical and doctrinal nature. Scientific knowledge devoid of metaphysical reflection, as well as methodically dissociating itself from religious faith, can lead to a lack of awareness of one’s own act of faith in relation to one’s own presuppositions. This can entail unconscious transformations of one’s own scientific assumptions into principles of a universal philosophical nature. This can consequently lead to a misjudgement of all that is beyond the competence and methodology of the sciences.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Michał Mrozek

Instytut Tomistyczny, Warszawa

14 Theory and pragmatics of dialogue with Islam according to pope Benedict XVI

Eugeniusz Sakowicz

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN | 2023 | Tom 18 | 259-279 | DOI: 10.24425/snt.2023.146531

Keywords: interreligious dialogue Islam God truth peace Benedict XVI

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Benedict XVI, as the Supreme Shepherd of the Church and the head of the Vatican state (Vatican City), maintained contacts with representatives of the authorities of Muslim countries or those dominated by Islamic culture. He supported and built good relations between representatives of different religions, including Islam, through openness and honesty in the interreligious dialogue and bearing witness to the essential values of Christianity and Islam – justice and peace. In the article, we indicated the essence, purpose and challenges of interreligious dialogue, especially dialogue with Islam. People and environments involved in its conduct should be guided by the idea of searching for the true good of man and society. At the same time, it is important to remain faithful to one’s own religious identity, especially on the doctrinal level. Dialogue, in fact, should aim, first of all, at seeking the truth and bearing witness to it. This will only be possible if you respect your own faith and show respect for the identity of the followers of Islam. In the dialogue with Islam, the most important is Almighty God, who must be given his rightful place. For faith in one God obliges His believers to be responsible for peace. Benedict XVI’s theory of dialogue found confirmation in the papal meetings, either with the “world of Islam” or with various bodies (ecclesiastical, political, people involved in the so-called dialogue of specialists). For Benedict XVI, the most important criterion for dialogue was fidelity to Christian identity.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Eugeniusz Sakowicz

Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie

15 Paul Jorion (red.), Humanism and Its Discontents: The Rise of Transhumanism and Posthumanism, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan 2022, ss. X+225

Ks. Sławomir Nowosad

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN | 2023 | Tom 18 | 281-285

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Authors and Affiliations

Ks. Sławomir Nowosad

16 John Hugh Garvey, The Virtues, Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press 2022, ss. 200

Marek Rozpłochowski

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN | 2023 | Tom 18 | 287-289

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Authors and Affiliations

Marek Rozpłochowski

17 Wiesław Przyczyna, Katarzyna Czarnecka, Marek Ławreszuk (red.), Słownik polskiej terminologii prawosławnej, Warszawa – Białystok: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku 2022, ss. 606

Eugeniusz Sakowicz

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN | 2023 | Tom 18 | 291-295

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Authors and Affiliations

Eugeniusz Sakowicz

Instructions for authors

1. Wymagania dotyczące tekstu

Redakcja "Studiów Nauk Teologicznych PAN" przyjmuje teksty dotychczas nigdzie niepublikowane. Teksty z zakresu teologii, religiologii i dyscyplin pokrewnych nie powinny przekraczać objętości 40 tys. znaków (ze spacjami), czyli 20-23 strony. Preferowana edytor tekstu Times New Roman 12, interlinia 1,5; przypisy: 10, interlinia pojedyncza. Wystarczy nadesłanie wersji elektronicznej na adres:

studia.nt@pan.pl

Nadesłane prace zostaną poddane procedurze recenzyjnej. O jej wyniku, treści nadesłanych recenzji, jak też decyzji redakcji odnośnie do publikacji autor zostanie poinformowany.

Przyjmujemy teksty w języku polskim oraz językach kongresowych.

Do każdego tekstu należy dołączyć:

- krótką notę biograficzną

- streszczenie w języku angielskim i polskim, każdorazowo o objętości ok. 1000 znaków,

- wykaz słów kluczowych,

- wykaz skrótów stosowanych przez autora w tekście lub przypisach

2. Zasady sporządzania przypisów

1. Numer przypisu w tekście umieszczamy przed znakiem interpunkcyjnym kończącym zdanie lub jego część, np. W napisanych krótko przed śmiercią testamencie¹, poeta wspomina swoich dobroczyńców².

2. Cytowanie książek: inicjał imienia, nazwisko (-a) autora (-ów), tytuł dzieła (pisany kursywą bez cudzysłowu), wydawnictwo, miejsce i rok wydania (przed rokiem zaznaczamy części wydawnicze (np. ³2007), wykaz cytowanych stron. Fragmenty opuszczone w cytatach należy zaznaczyć trzema kropkami w nawiasach kwadratowych.

3. Powtarzanie przypisu: nie stosujemy takich słów, jak np. tamże, tenże, itp., ale powtarzamy skrócony zapis bibliograficzny (inicjał imienia, nazwisko, tytuł lub jego część oraz strony).

4. Przykład zapisu przypisów

¹A. Derdziuk, Teologia moralna w służbie wiary Kościoła, Wydawnictwo KUL Lublin 2010, 125-134.

² A. Derdziu