@ARTICLE{Czupryński_ks._Wojsław_Anthropological_2023,
 author={Czupryński, ks. Wojsław},
 volume={Tom 18},
 pages={153-166},
 journal={Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2023},
 publisher={Polskia Akademia Nauk - Komitet Nauk Teologicznych},
 abstract={Pedagogy is not an autonomous science, independent in terms of cognitive theory and methodology from other sciences. Both the subject – man, the method – a specific way of explaining and justifying key statements, and the goal – the fullness of a person’s personal life, are not formulated without a philosophical, especially anthropological reference. Each of the existing pedagogical concepts naturally assumes a specific vision of the world and man, which remains beyond the competence of pedagogy. Pedagogy only assumes it, makes it a starting point for further discourse in the area of its research. It follows that pedagogy is not an autonomous science in relation to philosophy. Therefore, the educator must be aware of what kind of philosophy it is and whether it meets the criteria of rationality and reasonableness of scientific discourse. In the face of the contemporary confusion of thinking about man, referred to as the “anthropological error,” especially when confronted with the dynamically spreading ideology of the so-called multiculturalism proclaiming the equality of different anthropologies and different theories of education, there is an urgent need to recall and critically rebuild the tradition of personalistic pedagogy. Upbringing should be anchored in ethics as a theory of morality and understood as the actualization of human potential in the perspective of “being-for-others.”},
 type={Artykuł},
 title={Anthropological foundations of the Christian concept of education},
 URL={http://www.czasopisma.pan.pl/Content/128906/PDF/08_CZUPRY%C5%83SKI_%20146526_do%20publikacji.pdf},
 doi={10.24425/snt.2023.146526},
 keywords={personalism, upbringing, personalistic pedagogy, Christian anthropology},
}