Applied sciences

Archives of Foundry Engineering

Content

Archives of Foundry Engineering | Accepted articles

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article uses the results obtained during the tests of a wide group of metal alloys using a device operating by the Coffin method. The measure of resistance to thermal-mechanical fatigue is the number of cycles that the sample withstands before a macrocrack occurs, at a fixed current and temperature range. The device offers the possibility of working in two modes of sample mounting. The first mode allows the sample to freely elongate parallel to its axis, while the second mounting mode limits this elongation by using a transducer. The aim of the publication is to present possible solutions for anomaly detection. Anomaly detection concerns traps that may occur during the measurement process. Advanced machine learning methods were used to analyze and detect anomalies in data regarding thermal fatigue resistance. Isolation Forest and One-Class SVM algorithms were used for anomaly detection, which allow for effective identification of unusual patterns in the data. The conducted research confirmed the usefulness of one of the selected methods in the process of anomaly identification using the example of elongation.
Go to article

Bibliography

  • Domengès, B., Celis, M.M., Moisy, F., Lacaze, J. & Tonn, B. (2021). On the role of impurities on spheroidal graphite degeneracy in cast irons. Carbon. 172, 529-541 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CARBON.2020.10.030.

  • Valle, N., Theuwissen, K., Sertucha, J. & Lacaze, J. (2012). Effect of various dopant elements on primary graphite growth. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 27(1), 012026, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/27/1/012026.

  • Mrvar, P., Petrič, M. & Terčelj, M. (2023). Thermal fatigue of spheroidal graphite cast iron. TMS Annual Meeting & Exhibition. 406-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22524-6_37.

  • Fourlakidis, V., Hernando, J.C., Holmgren, D. & Diószegi, A. (2023). Relationship between thermal conductivity and tensile strength in cast irons. International Journal of Metalcasting. 17, 2862-2867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-023-00970-6.

  • Wang, L., Liu, H., Huang, C., Yuan, Y., Yao, P., Huang, J. & Han, Q. (2023). A methodology to predict thermal crack initiation region of tool for high-speed milling compacted graphite iron based on three-dimensional transient thermal stress field model. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 125, 2065-2075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10832-4.

  • Coffin, L.F. & Wesley, R.P. (1954). Apparatus for study of effects of cyclic thermal stresses on ductile metals. Journal of Fluids Engineering. 76, 923-930. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4015019.

  • Seifert, T. & Riedel, H. (2010). Mechanism-based thermomechanical fatigue life prediction of cast iron. Part I: Models. International Journal of Fatigue. 32, 1358-1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2010.02.004.

  • Amaro, R.L., Antolovich, S.D., Neu, R.W., Fernandez-Zelaia, P. & Hardin, W. (2012). Thermomechanical fatigue and bithermal–thermomechanical fatigue of a nickel-base single crystal superalloy. International Journal of Fatigue. 42, 165-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2011.08.017.

  • Boto, F., Murua, M., Gutierrez, T., Casado, S., Carrillo, A., & Arteaga, A. (2022). Data driven performance prediction in steel making. Metals. 12(2), 172, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12020172.

  • Li, W., Chen, H., Guo, J., Zhang, Z., Wang, Y. (2022). Brain-inspired multilayer perceptron with spiking neurons. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 18-24 June 2022 (pp. 773-783). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.00086. New Orleans, LA, USA: IEEE.

  • Shu, X., Zhang, S., Li, Y. & Chen, M. (2022). An anomaly detection method based on random convolutional kernel and isolation forest for equipment state monitoring. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność – Maintenance and Reliability. 24(4), 758-770. https://doi.org/10.17531/EIN.2022.4.16.

  • Wu, X., Kang, H., Yuan, S., Jiang, W., Gao, Q. & Mi, J. (2023). Anomaly detection of liquid level in mold during continuous casting by using forecasting and error generation. Applied Sciences. 13(13), 7457, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137457.

  • Liu, F.T., Ting, K.M., Zhou, Z.H. (2008). Isolation forest. In Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, ICDM, 15-19 December 2008 (pp. 413-422). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2008.17.

  • Seliya, N., Abdollah Zadeh, A., Khoshgoftaar, T.M. (2021). A literature review on one-class classification and its potential applications in big data. Journal of Big Data. 8, 1-31 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-021-00514-x.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

K. Jaśkowiec
1
ORCID: ORCID
D. Wilk-Kołodziejczyk
2
ORCID: ORCID
K. Nosarzewski
2

  1. Łukasiewicz Research Network – Krakow Institute of Technology, Kraków, Poland
  2. AGH University of Science and Technology, Al. A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents the results of research on the production and application of a sintered iron-based composite reinforced with natural zeolite particles. Mechanical properties were tested and the quality of the connection between the particles and the metal matrix was assessed. Before the composite production process, the chemical composition and morphology of natural zeolite particles were examined. Zeolite particles with a diameter of less than 0.2 mm were used to produce sinters. The zeolite particles were subjected to chemical composition (EDS) and phase (XRD) analyses. Zeolite particles were introduced into the iron matrix in amounts of 5, 10, and 15% by weight. Before the sintering process, the zeolite particles were compacted in a hydraulic press at a pressure of 400 MPa. Sintering of the green compacts was carried out in a tubular furnace at 950°C in an atmosphere of dissociated ammonia for 60 minutes. The obtained composites were subjected to porosity, hardness, and density measurements. Microstructure and chemical composition studies were conducted using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Iron–zeolite composites are characterized by higher hardness and porosity compared to sintered iron. The introduction of zeolite particles also reduces the density of the composites.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Abhik, R. & Xaviora, M. (2014). Evaluation of properties for Al.-SiC reinforced metal matrix composite for brake pads. Procedia Engineering. 97, 941-950. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.370.

  2. Zakaria, H.M. (2014). Microstructural and corrosion behavior of Al/SiC metal matrix composites. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 5(3), 831-838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2014.03.003.

  3. Singla, M., Dwivedi, D., Singh, L. & Chavla, V. (2009). Development of aluminum based silicon carbide particulate metal matrix composite. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering. 8(6), 455-467. DOI: 10.4236/jmmce.2009.86040.

  4. Nuruzzaman, D., Praveen, R. & Raghuraman, S. (2016). Processing and mechanical properties of aluminum- silicon carbide metal matrix composites. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 114(1), 012123, 11-17. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/114/1/012123.

  5. Baisane, V. P., Sable, Y. S., Dhobe, M. M. & Sonawane, P. M. (2015). Recent development and challenges in processing of ceramics reinforced Al matrix composite through stir casting process: A Review. International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2(10), 257814.

  6. Taha, M.A. & Zawrah M.F. (2017). Effect of nano ZrO2 on strengthening and electrical properties of Cu- matrix nanocomposites prepared by mechanical alloying, Ceramics International. 43(15), 12698-12704. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.06.153.

  7. Samal, C.P., Parihar, J.S. & Chaira, D, (2013). The effect of milling and sintering techniques on mechanical properties of Cu-graphite metal matrix composite prepared by powder metallurgy route. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 569, 95-101, DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.03.122.

  8. Wang, C., Lin, H., Zhang, Z. & Li W. (2018). Fabrication, interfacial characteristics and strengthening mechanism of ZrB2 microparticles reinforced Cu composites prepared by hot pressing sintering. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 748, 546-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.169.

  9. Kumar, G., Rao, C. & Selvaraj, N. (2011). Mechanical and tribological behavior of particulate reinforced aluminum metal matrix composites- a review. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering. 10(1), 59-91. DOI: 10.4236/jmmce.2011.101005.

  10. Leszczyńska-Madej, B. (2013). The effect of sintering temperature on microstructure and properties of Al-SiC composites. Archives of Metallurgy and Materials. 58(1), 43-48. DOI: 10.2478/v10172-012-0148-7.

  11. Kargul, M. & Konieczny, M. (2020). Fabrication and characteristics of copper-intermetallics composites. Archives of Foundry Engineering. 20(3), 25-30. 10.24425/afe.2020.133325.

  12. Krüger, C. & Mortensen, A. (2013). In situ copper- alumina composites. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 585, 396-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.07.074.

  13. Sulima, I., Kowalik, R., Stępień, M. & Hyjek, P. (2024). Effect of ZrB2 content on properties of copper matrix composite. Materials. 17(24), 6105. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17246105.

  14. Chakthin, S., Morakotjinda, M., Yodkaew, T., Torsangtum, N., Krataithong, R., Siriphol, P., Coovattanachai, O., Vetayanugul, B., Thavarungkul, N., Poolthong, N. & Tongsri, R. (2008). Influence of carbides on properties of sintered Fe-base composites. Journal of Metals, Materials and Minerals. 18(2), 67-70.

  15. Bandura, L., Franus, M., Panek, R., Woszuk, A. & Franus W. (2015). Characterization of zeolites and their use as adsorbents of petroleum substances. Przemysł Chemiczny. 94(3). DOI: 10.15199/62.2015.3.11. (in Polish).

  16. Król, M., Mozgawa, W. & Pichór W. (2008). Application of clinoptilolite to heavy metal cations immobilization and to obtaining autoclaved building materials. Materiały Ceramiczne. 60(2), 71-80. (in Polish).

  17. Łach, M. (2010). Structure of metal matrix composites with an addition of tuff. Archives of Foundry Engineering. 10(3), 135-140.

  18. Łach, M., Mikuła, J. & Hebda M. (2016). Thermal analysis of the by-products of waste combustion. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 125(3), 1035-1045. DOI: 10.1007/s10973-016-5512-9.

  19. Mikuła, J., Łach, M. & Kowalski J.S. (2015). Copper matrix composites reinforced with volcanic tuff. Metalurgija. 54(1), 143-146.

  20. Ciciszwili, G.W., Andronikaszwili, G.N., Kirow Ł.D. (1990). Zeolity naturalne. Warszawa: WNT.

  21. Gottardi, G., & Galli, E. (1985). Zeolites of the heulandite group. In Natural zeolites (pp. 256-305). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

  22. Nanbin, H., Dianyue, G., Bekkum, H., Flanigen, E., Jacobs, P. & Jansen J. (2001). Introduction to Zeolite Science and Practice. New York: Elsevier.

  23. Kocich, R., Opela, P. & Marek, M. (2023). Influence of structure development on performance of copper composites processed via intensive plastic deformation. Materials. 16(13), 4780. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16134780.

  24. Kargul, C., Konieczny, M. & Borowiecka-Jamrozek J. (2018). The effect of the addition of zeolite particles on the performance characteristics of sintered copper matrix composites. Tribologia. 282(6), 51-62. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.8421.

  25. Borowiecka-Jamrozek, J. & Depczyński W. (2017). The effect of the addition of zeolite on the properties of a sintered copper-matrix composite. In 26th International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials, 24th - 26th May 2017. Brno, Czech Republic.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

M. Kargul
1
ORCID: ORCID
J.M. Borowiecka-Jamrozek
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Kielce University of Technology, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article presents structural analysis and mechanical property evaluation of two coatings applied using the APS (Air Plasma Spraying) method on a P250GH boiler steel substrate. Two different powders were used for coating deposition: WCCoCr, based on tungsten carbide, and CrCNi, based on chromium carbide. To assess the coating-substrate bond quality, a scratch test was conducted using a Rockwell diamond indenter under a constant load of 10 N, moving from the substrate toward the coating. No delamination at the coating-substrate interface was observed, indicating a high-quality bond. Microhardness measurements were performed using a 200 g load. The average microhardness values were 886 HV0.2 for the WCCoCr coating and 904 HV0.2 for the CrCNi coating. The coatings were also tested for cavitation resistance according to the ASTM G32-16 standard. Surface roughness profiles were measured before and after 120 minutes of cavitation exposure. Cavitation wear was evaluated based on the difference in roughness values, determined by the Sz parameter, which, according to ISO 25178, is defined as the difference between the highest peak and the lowest valley on the surface. The obtained results indicate that APS thermal spray coatings based on tungsten carbide powders can be used for machine components to enhance cavitation erosion resistance.
Go to article

Bibliography

  • Kumar, K., Kumar, L. & Gill, H. (2024). Role of carbide-based thermal-sprayed coatings to prevent failure for boiler steels: a review. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention. 24(4), 1628-1663. DOI:10.1007/s11668-024-01974-y.

  • Rodolpho, V., Silveira, L., Cruz, J. & Pukasiewicz, A. (2023). Cavitation resistance of FeMnCrSi coatings processed by different thermal spray processes. Hybrid Advances. 5, 100125, 1-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.hybadv.2023.100125.

  • Cheng, F.T., Shi, P. & Man, H.C. (2001). Correlation of cavitation erosion resistance with indentation-derived properties for a NiTi alloy. Scripta Materialia. 45(9), 1083-1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(01)01143-5.

  • Stachowiak, G.B. & Stachowiak, G.W. (2010). Tribological characteristics of WC-based claddings using a ball-cratering method. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials. 28(1), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2009.07.015.

  • Murthy, J.K.N. & Venkataraman, B. (2006). Abrasive wear behaviour of WC–CoCr and Cr3C2–20(NiCr) deposited by HVOF and detonation spray processes. Surface and Coatings Technology. 200(8), 2642-2652, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.10.136.

  • Yang, X., Zhang, J. & Li, G. (2016). Cavitation erosion behaviour and mechanism of HVOF-sprayed NiCrBSi–(Cr3C2–NiCr) composite coatings. Surface Engineering. 34(3), 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670844.2016.1258770.

  • Matikainen, V., Koivuluoto, H. & Vuoristo, P. (2020). A study of Cr3C2-based HVOF-and HVAF-sprayed coatings: Abrasion, dry particle erosion and cavitation erosion resistance. Wear. 446-447, 203188, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2020.203188.

  • Silveira, L.L., Pukasiewicz, A.G.M., de Aguiar, D.J.M., Zara, A.J. & Björklund, S. (2019). Study of the corrosion and cavitation resistance of HVOF and HVAF FeCrMnSiNi and FeCrMnSiB coatings. Surface and Coatings Technology. 374, 910-922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.06.076.

  • Nowakowska, M., Łatka, L., Sokołowski, P., Szala, M., Toma, F. & Walczak, M. (2022). Investigation into microstructure and mechanical properties effects on sliding wear and cavitation erosion of Al2O3–TiO2 coatings sprayed by APS, SPS and S-HVOF. Wear. 508-509, 204462, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2022.204462.

  • Odhiambo, J.G., Li, W., Zhao, Y. & Li, C. (2019). Porosity and its significance in plasma-sprayed coatings. Coatings. 9(7), 460, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9070460.

  • Sun, P., Fang, Z.Z., Zhang, Y. & Xia Y. (2017). Review of the methods for production of spherical Ti and Ti alloy powder. JOM: the journal of the Minerals, Metals & Materials Society. 69, 1853-1860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-017-2513-5.

  • Matikainen, V., Koivuluoto, H., Vuoristo, P., Schubert, J. & Houdková, Š. (2018). Effect of nozzle geometry on the microstructure and properties of HVAF-sprayed WC-10Co4Cr and Cr3C2-25NiCr coating. Journal od Thermal Spray Technology. 27(4), 680-694. DOI: 10.1007/s11666-018-0717-z.

  • Houdková, Š., Zahálka, F., Kašparová, M. & Berger, L.M. (2011). Comparative study of thermally sprayed coatings under different types of wear conditions for hard chromium replacement. Tribology Letters. 43(2), 139-154. DOI: 10.1007/s11249-011-9791-9.

  • Lugscheider, E., Barimani, C., Eckert, P. & Eritt, U. (1996). Modeling of the APS plasma spray process. Computational Materials Science. 7(1-2), 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-0256(96)00068-7.

  • Wang, J., Wang, L., Lu, H., Du, J., Qi, X., Lu, L., Zhao, Y., Liu, Z. & Meng, W. (2025). Enhanced erosion resistance of Cr3C2-TiC-NiCrCoMo coatings: experimental and numerical investigation of erosion mechanisms. Coatings. 15(3), 294, 1-25. DOI: 10.3390/coatings15030294.

  • Houdková, Š., Česánek, Z., Smazalová, E. & Lukáč, F. (2018). The high-temperature wear and oxidation behavior of CrC-based HVOF coatings. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology. 27(1), 179-195. DOI: 10.1007/s11666-017-0637-3.

  • Padture, N.P., Gell, M., Jordan, E.H. (2002). Thermal barrier coatings for gas-turbine engine applications. Science. 296(5566), 280-284. DOI: 10.1126/science.1068609.

  • Weeks, M.D., Subramanian, R., Vaidya, A. & Mumm, D.R. (2015). Defining optimal morphology of the bond coat–thermal barrier coating interface of air-plasma sprayed thermal barrier coating systems. Surface and coating technology. 273, 50-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.02.012.

  • Sampath, S., Schulz, U., Jarligo, M.O. & Kuroda, S. (2012). Processing science of advanced thermal-barrier systems. MRS Bulletin. 37(10), 903-910. DOI: 10.1557/mrs.2012.233.

  • Mutter, M., Mauer, G., Mücke, R., Guillon, O. & Vaßen, R. (2017). Correlation of splat morphologies with porosity and residual stress in plasma-sprayed YSZ coating. Surface and coating technology. 318, 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.12.061.

  • McPherson, R. (1989). A review of microstructure and properties of plasma sprayed ceramic coatings. Surface and coating technology. 39-40(1), 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0257-8972(89)90052-2.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

M. Radoń
1
ORCID: ORCID
B. Kupiec
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Rzeszow University of Technology, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Verification of design conclusions using experimental methods is often employed and usually more justified than other techniques for producing machine or device components. Castings are characterized by complex shapes, varying sizes and, as a result, diverse physical and mechanical properties. Additionally, relatively small batches of alloys prepared for casting introduce unintended variation that affects final characteristics and acceptance criteria. It is therefore important to consider the slightly different mechanical properties of finished castings, which may vary even within the same part due to different solidification and cooling conditions. Despite these limitations, the foundry industry occupies an important position in national economies, with indicators showing steady development driven by low manufacturing costs, improved technologies, and new designs with stricter acceptance criteria. The aim of this work is to briefly present one experimental method of stress and strain analysis — the photoelastic method.
Go to article

Bibliography

  • Metzger, D., Jarrett New, K. & Dantzig, J. (2001). A sand surface element for efficient modeling of residual stress in casting. Applied Mathematical Modelling. 25(10), 825-842. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0307-904X(01)00017-8.

  • James, M.N., Hughes, D.J., Chen, Z., Lombard, H., Hattingh, D.G., Asquith, D., Yates, J.R. & Webster, P.J. (2007). Residual stresses and fatigue performance. Engineering Failure Analysis. 14(2), 384-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.02.011.

  • Rossini, N.S., Dassisti, M., Benyounis, K.Y. & Olabi, A.G. (2012). Methods of measuring residual stresses in components. Materials & Design. 35, 572-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.08.022.

  • Shet, C. & Deng, X. (2003). Residual stresses and strains in orthogonal metal cutting. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 43(6), 573-587. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00018-X.

  • Tabatabaeian, A., Ghasemi, A.R., Shokrieh, M.M., Marzbanrad, B., Baraheni M. & Fotouhi M. (2022). Residual stress in engineering materials: a review. Advanced engineering materials. 24(3), 2100786, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202100786.

  • Jun, T.-S. & Korsunsky, A.M. (2010). Evaluation of residual stresses and strains using the eigenstrain reconstruction method. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 47(13), 1678-1686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.03.002.

  • Wyatt, J.E., Berry, J.T. & Williams, A.R. (2007). Residual stresses in aluminum castings. Journal of materials processing technology. 191(1-3), 170-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.03.018.

  • Carrera, E., Rodríguez, A., Talamantes, J., Valtierra, S. & Colás, R. (2007). Measurement of residual stresses in cast aluminium engine blocks. Journal of materials processing technology. 189(1-3), 206-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.01.023.

  • Guan, J., Dieckhues, G.W. & Sahm, P.R. (1994) Analysis of residual stresses and cracking of γ-TiAl castings. Intermetallics. 2(2), 89-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0966-9795(94)90002-7.

  • Skarbiński, M. (1957). Construction of Castings. Warszawa: PWT.

  • Training materials from Vishay.

  • Maj, M. (2024). The formation of the strength of castings including stress and strain analysis. Materials. 17(11), 2484, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17112484.

  • Maj, M. (2012). Fatigue endurance of selected casting alloys. Katowice-Gliwice: Archives of Foundry Engineering.

  • Wolna, M. (1993). Elastooptic Materials. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

  • Jakubowicz, A., Orłoś, Z. (1972), Strength of Materials. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Techniczne.

  • Orłoś, Z. (1977). Experimental Analysis of Deformations and Stresses [Doświadczalna analiza odkształceń i naprężeń.]; Warszawa: PWN. (in Polish)

  • Stachurski, W., Siemieniec, A. (2005). Structural Studies of Castings Using Elastooptics Methods. Kraków: WN AKAPIT.

  • Siemieniec, A. (1977). Elastooptics. Kraków: Wydawnictwo AGH. (in Polish).

  • Zandman, F., Redner, S., & Dally, J. W. (1977). Photoelastic coatings (SESA Monograph No. 3). Iowa State University Press.

  • Ulutan, D., Ulutan, B., Erdem, A. & Lazoglu, I. (2007). Analytical modelling of residual stresses in machining. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 183(1), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.09.032.

  • Raptis, K.G., Costopoulos, Th.Ν., Papadopoulos, G.,Α. & Tsolakis, Α.D. (2010). Rating of spur gear strength using photoelasticity and the finite element method. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 3(1), 222-231. ISSN 1941-7020.

  • Umezaki, E. & Terauchi, Sh. (2002). Extraction of isotropic points using simulated isoclinics obtained by photoelasticity-assisted finite element analysis. Optics and lasers in engineering. 38(1-2), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-8166(01)00158-0.

  • Marle Ramachandra, P., Sungar, S., Mohan Kumara, G.C. (2022). Stress analysis of a gear using photoelastic method and Finite element method. Materials Today: Proceedings. 65(8), 3820-3828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.579.

  • Corby Jr, T.W., Nickola Wayne, E. (1997). Residual strain measurement using photoelastic coatings. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 27(1), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-8166(95)00012-7.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

M.L. Maj
1
ORCID: ORCID
W. Stachurski
1

  1. AGH University of Krakow, Faculty of Foundry Engineering, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper presents 419 test data from 6 months continuous production. The results show that, through strict control of raw materials, melting, and spheroidization processes, high-quality, as-cast ductile iron casting with stable composition and stable as-cast structure are obtained, and with using advanced professional heat treatment equipment for austempering treatment, the ADI properties are excellent, all higher than the minimum requirements of ASTM and Chinese national standards. The results also show that the dispersion of high strength grade ADI properties is relatively small, while that of high ductility grade ADI is relatively high. By analyzing the statistical data, in order to further reduce the dispersion of mechanical properties in high-volume production and improve the stability and consistency of ADI products, it is necessary to strictly control the production process, ensuring that ADI products for one grade have as similar chemical compositions and as-cast microstructures as possible. Additionally, precise control of the austempering treatment process should be implemented in a categorized manner based on factors such as casting section thickness, chemical and alloying composition, and as-cast microstructure.
Go to article

Bibliography

  • Elliott, R. (1997). The role of research in promoting austempered ductile iron. Heat treatment of Metals. 3, 55-59.
  • Keough, J. R. (2002). ADI developments in North America – revisited 2002. In Proceedings of the 2002 World Conference on ADI, September 26–27 (pp. 111–122). Louisville, KY, United States.
  • Keough J.R., Hayrynen, K.L. (2006). Developments in the technology and engineering application of austempered ductile iron (ADI). In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on the Science and Processing of Cast Irion (SPCI8), 16-19 October 2006 (pp. 474-479). Beijing, China.
  • Nofal, A.A. (2014). The current status of the metallurgy and processing of austempered ductile iron (ADI). In the 10th International Symposium on the Science and Processing of Cast Irion (SPCI10), 10-13 November 2014 (pp. 69-82).
  • Li Kerui, Li Zengli, Cui Yu, Wei Donghai, & Chen Zhao. (2022). Status and development trend of cast iron production technology in China. Foundry (Chinese Journal). 71(2), 123-135.
  • Liu J. & Gong W. (2020). Some recent progresses of ADI research and development abroad. Modern Casting (Chinese Journal). 40(3), 1-4.
  • Gong W., Liu J., Xiang G. (2020). Austempered Ductile Iron (ADI) - Theory, Production Technology and Application. China Machine Press, ISBN 978-7-111-66450-5, September.
  • Yan Q., Gong W., Liu J. (2024). The current status, problems and prospects of ADI in China: A Review. In the 75th World Foundry Congress, 25-30 October 2024. Deyang, Sichuan, China.
  • Yan Q., Gong X., Gong W. & Liu J. (2024). Lightweight innovation ADIs help development of renewable energy and new technology industries in China. China Foundry. 21(5), 507-515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41230-024-4141-3.
  • Gong W., Liu J., Yuan Z., Sun L., Zhang M., & Li C. (2020). Design and control of suitable carbon-silicon content of austempered ductile iron. Foundry (Chinese Journal). 69(8), 816-821.
  • Nazarboland, A. & Elliott, R. (1997). The relationship between austempering parameters, microstructure and mechanical properties in a Mn-Mo-Cu alloyed ductile iron. International Journal of Cast Metals Research. 9, 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/13640461.1997.11819671.
  • Darwish, N. & Elliott, R. (1993). Austempering of low manganese ductile irons. Materials Science and Technology. 9(7), 572-585. https://doi.org/10.1179/mst.1993.9.7.57.
  • Bayati, H. & Elliott, R. (1995). Relationship between structure and mechanical properties in high manganese alloyed ductile iron. Materials Science and Technology. 11(3), 284-293. https://doi.org/10.1179/mst.1995.11.3.284.

 

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Wenbang Gong
1
Zhongding Zhou
1
Mintang Zhang
2
Wenqing Yang
2
Li Sun
1

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Wuhan Textile University, China
  2. Henan ADI Casting Co., Ltd, China
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This study addresses an existing gap by examining the foundry properties of Ravi River sands, a subject that has not been explored in earlier studies. Several mechanical and physical tests were used to assess the foundry qualities of sands from different areas. These local sands were used to make molds for Al alloy castings, and the parts' surface roughness (Ra) was assessed. The findings showed that the grain size of the sand varied by location, with the highest grain fineness number (GFN) being 106 and the lowest being 71. All samples exhibited a pH > 7, confirming their suitability for strong binder adhesion. The sand from Syed Wala Bridge had the highest grain fineness number (~106), whereas the sand from Sheraza Pattan Bridge had the lowest (~71). All sand samples showed a constant increase in mold strength when the binder (bentonite clay) percentage was raised from 5% to 25%. The study demonstrates the potential of Ravi River sands to eliminate reliance on imported materials and reduce costs.
Go to article

Bibliography

  • Perry, N., Bosch-Mauchand, M., Bernard, A. (2010). Costs models in design and manufacturing of sand casting products. In A. Bramley, D.Brissaud, D. Coutellier, C. McMahon (Eds.), Advances in Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering (pp. 69-80). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  • Saikaew, C. & Wiengwiset, S. (2012). Optimization of molding sand composition for quality improvement of iron castings. Applied Clay Science. 67-68, 26-31, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2012.07.005.
  • Shilpa, M., Prakash, G.S. & Shivakumar, M.R. (2021). A combinatorial approach to optimize the properties of green sand used in casting mould. Materials Today: Proceedings. 39(4), 1509-1514, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.465.
  • Paluszkiewicz, C., Holtzer, M. & Bobrowski, A. (2008). FTIR analysis of bentonite in moulding sands. Journal of Molecular Structure. 880(1-3), 109-114, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2008.01.028.
  • Kundu, R.R. & Lahiri, B.N. (2008). Study and statistical modelling of green sand mould properties using RSM. International Journal of Materials and Product Technology. 31, 143-158. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMPT.2008.018016.
  • Sadarang, J., Nayak, R.K. & Panigrahi, I. (2021). Effect of binder and moisture content on compactibility and shear strength of river bed green sand mould. Materials Today: Proceedings. 46(11), 5286-5290, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.640.
  • Khandelwal, H. & Ravi, B. (2016). Effect of molding parameters on chemically bonded sand mold properties. Journal of manufacturing processes. 22, 127-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.03.007.
  • Atanda, P., Olorunniwo, O., Alonge, K. & Oluwole, O. (2012). Comparison of bentonite and cassava starch on the moulding properties of silica sand. International Journal of materials and chemistry. 2(4), 132-136.
  • Samociuk, B., Nowak, D. & Medyński, D. (2024). Effect of matrix type on properties of moulding sand with barley malt. Archives of Foundry Engineering. 24(2), 11-16. DOI:10.24425/afe.2024.149266.
  • Samociuk, B., Medyński, D., Nowak, D., Kawa-Rygielska, J., Świechowski, K., Gasiński, A. & Janus, A. (2022). The use of barley malt as a binder in molding sand technology. 15(9), 3375, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15093375.
  • Ocheri, C., Agboola, J.B., Mbah, C.N., Onyia, C.W., Ezeanyanwu, J.N., Njoku, R.E. & Urama, N.A. (2021). The study on acacia gum for the production of cores for foundry processes. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals. 74, 851-870. DOI:10.1007/s12666-021-02190-0.
  • Kausarian, H., Choanji, T., Karya, D., Gevisioner & Willyati, R. (2017). Distribution of silica sand on the muda island and ketam island in the estuary of kampar river. International Journal of Advances in Science Engineering and Technology. 5(2), 37-40.
  • Guharaja, S., Noorul Haq, A. & Karuppannan, K.M. (2006). Optimization of green sand casting process parameters by using Taguchi’s method. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 30, 1040-1048, DOI:10.1007/s00170-005-0146-2.
  • Ganesan, T., Vasant, P. & Elamvazuthi, I. (2013). Normal-boundary intersection based parametric multi-objective optimization of green sand mould system. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 32(1), 197-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2012.10.004.
  • Bala, K. C., & Khan, R. H. (2013). Characterization of beach/river sand for foundry application. Leonardo Journal of Sciences. 12(23), 77-83. ISSN: 1583-233.
  • Shuaib-Babata, Y., Kabiru Suleiman, A., Ambali, I. & Bello, M. (2019). Evaluation of the foundry properties of oyun river (ilorin) moulding sand. Adeleke University Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2(1), 12-24.
  • Aweda, J. & Jimoh, Y. (2009). Assessment of properties of natural moulding sands in Ilorin and Ilesha, Nigeria. Journal of Research Information in Civil Engineering. 6(2), 68-77.
  • Ugwuoke, J. (2018). Investigation on the suitability of Adada river sand and Nkpologwu clay deposit as foundry moulding sand and binder. International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering. 3, 19-27.
  • Beeley, P. (2001). The moulding material: Properties, preparation and testing. Foundry Technology. 178-238.
  • Brown, J. (2000). Foseco ferrous foundryman's handbook. Butterworth-Heinemann: 2000.
  • Kumar, S., Kumar, P. & Shan, H.S. (2006). Parametric optimization of surface roughness castings produced by Evaporative Pattern Casting process. Materials Letters. 60(25-26), 3048-3053, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2006.02.069.
  • Loto, C. & Adebayo, H. (1990). Effects of variation in water content, clay fraction and sodium carbonate additions on the synthetic moulding properties of Igbokoda clay and silica sand. Applied clay science. 5(2), 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-1317(90)90021-G.
  • Jasim, H.H., Selman, M.H. & Mohammed, S.I. (2022). Quality assessment of river sand from different sources used in construction purposes in duhok governorate at kurdistan – iraq. Eurasian Journal of Science And Engineering. 7(2), 139-148. DOI: 10.23918/eajse.v7i2p139.
  • Zhang, L., Chen, S., Li, Q. & Chang, G. (2020). Formation mechanism and conditions of fine primary silicon being uniformly distributed on single αAl matrix in Al-Si alloys. Materials & Design. 193, 108853, 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108853.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

F. Hussain
1
ORCID: ORCID
M. Kamran
1
A. Inam
1
M. Ishtiaq
1
M.H. Hassan
1
ORCID: ORCID
F. Riaz
1
T. Khan
1
M. Ammar
1
M. Salman
1

  1. Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Austempered Ductile Iron (ADI) casting technology is a combination of the smelting process, its post-furnace treatment and the heat treatment of castings. Maintaining the process parameter stability of this innovative high quality cast iron with high Tensile Strength UTS and ductility properties is the aim of a number of studies on the control of graphitization inoculation and inoculation of the metal matrix. The ability to graphitise the liquid alloy decreases with its holding in the furnace, time of pouring into moulds from pouring machines. The tendency to dendritic grains crystallization and the segregation of elements such as Si, Ni and Cu decrease the ductile properties. The austenitizing process can introduce austenite grains growth negatively affecting of the ausferrite morphology. The modifying effect of small amounts of additives on the metal matrix in steel and low alloy cast steel, well known in materials engineering, has been applied to ADI. The addition of cast iron chips, Fe-V and Fe-Nb to the liquid alloy in the first inoculation is an example of a hybrid interaction. The introduction of graphitization nucleus particles and austenite crystallisation nucleus particles resulted in a stabilisation of the ductility of ADI and an increase in mechanical properties. Grains refinement of the primary austenite and precipitation hardening of ausferrite stabilise the mechanical properties of ADI. As a result of graphitization and additive structure inoculation, graphite and ausferrite morphology is improved. The obtained results point the way to further research in the field of hybrid inoculation of Ductile Cast Iron.
Go to article

Bibliography

  • Guzik, E., Sokolnicki, M. & Nowak, A. (2016). Effect of heat treatment parameters on the toughness of unalloyed ausferritic ductile iron. Archives of Foundry Engineering. 16(2), 79-84. DOI: 10.1515/afe-2016-0030.
  • Sokolnicki, M., Nowak, A., Królikowski, M., Ronduda, M., Guzik, E., Kopyciński, D. (2018). Effect of austenitizing temperature on microstructures and mechanical properties of low alloyed ausferritic cast iron. In The 73rd World Foundry Congress "Creative Foundry", 23-27 September 2018 (pp. 1-2). Kraków, Poland.
  • Benam, S. (2015). Effect of alloying elements on austempered ductile iron (ADI) properties and its process: Review. China Foundry. 12(1), 54-70.
  • Li, Y., Wilson, J.A., Crowther, D., Mitchell, P.S., Craven, A.J & Baker, T.N. (2004). The effects of vanadium, niobium, titanium and zirconium on the microstructure and mechanical properties of thin slab cast steels. ISIJ International. 44(6), 1093-1102.
  • Li, Y., Wilson, J.A., Craven, A.J., Mitchell, P.S., Crowther, D.N. & Baker, T.N. (2007) Dispersion strengthening particles in vanadium micro-alloyed steels processed by simulated thin slab casting and direct charging. Part 1- processing parameters, mechanical properties and microstructure. Materials Science and Technology. 23(5), 509-518.  
  • Pluphrach, G. (2016). Effect of vanadium and niobium alloying elements on the microstructure and mechanical properties of a drop forging micro-alloyed HSLA steel. Songklanakarin Journal of Science & Technology. 38(4), 357-363.
  • Wachelko, T., Nowak, A. & Soiński, M.S. (1986). Effect of micro-alloying by vanadium and niobium on microstructure of cast steel with elevated manganese content. Giessereiforschung. 38(4), 137-145. ISSN: 0046-5933.
  • Fraś, E., Górny, M. & Kawalec, M. (2007). Effect of small additions of vanadium and niobium on structure and mechanical properties of ductile iron. Archives of Foundry Engineering. 7(1), 89-92. ISSN (1897-3310).
  • Das, A. K., Dhal, J. P., Panda, R. K., Mishra, S. C. & Sen, S. (2013). Effect of alloying elements and processing parameters on mechanical properties of austempered ductile iron. Journal of Materials and Metallurgical Engineering. 3(1), 8-16. ISSN (2231-3818).
  • Sckudlarek, W., Krmasha, M., Al-Rubaie, K.S., Preti, O., Milana, J.C.G. & da Costa C.E. (2021). Effect of austempering temperature on microstructure and mechanical properties of ductile cast iron modified by niobium. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 12, 2414-2425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.04.041.
  • Abdullah, B., Alias, S., Jaffar, A. & Amiral, A.R. (2012). Tensile strength properties of niobium alloyed austempered ductile iron on different austempering time. Advanced Materials Research. 457-458, 1155-1158. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.457-458.1155.
  • García, E.C., Ramirea, A.C., Castellanos, G. R., Alcala, J.F.Ch., Ramirez, J.T. & Hernandez, A.M. (2021). Heat Treatment Evaluation for the Camshafts Production of ADI Low Alloyed with Vanadium. Metals. 11, 1036. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1171036.
  • Gol'dshtein, M. I. (1979). Carbonitride strengthening of low-alloy steels. Metallovedenie i Termicheskaya Obrabotka Metallov. (7), 2–5.
  • Guzik, E. (2001). Cast iron refining processes, selected issues. Monography, Foundry Archives, Polish Academy of Sciences – Katowice Branch.
  • Nofal, A.A., El-din H. & Ibrahim, M.M. (2006). Thermomechanical treatment of austempered ductile iron. International Journal of Cast Metals Research. 20(2), 47-52. https://doi.org/10.1179/136404607X216613.
  • Myszka, D., Olejnik, L. & Kłębczyk, M. (2009). Microstructure transformation during plastic deformation of the austempered ductile iron. Archives of Foundry Engineering. 9(1), 169-174. ISSN (1897-3310).

 

 

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

A. Zaczyński
1
ORCID: ORCID
M. Królikowski
1
ORCID: ORCID
A. Nowak
1
ORCID: ORCID
M. Sokolnicki
1
ORCID: ORCID
J. Jaroszek
1
A. Burbelko
2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Odlewnie Polskie S.A., 27-200 Starachowice, inż. Władysława Rogowskiego Street 22, Poland
  2. AGH University of Krakow, Faculty of Foundry Engineering, 23 Reymonta Str., 30-059 Krakow, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article focuses on the mechanical properties of mould parts created using 3D printing technology, for use in the production of castings by High-Pressure Die Casting (HPDC). The mould shapes produced by 3D printing technology bring innovative approaches to optimising production processes. H13 tool steel is widely used for its excellent mechanical properties and resistance to thermal stress. The study focuses on the comparison of the mechanical properties of mould parts produced by traditional methods and 3D printing, with emphasis on their strength, hardness and wear resistance under repeated working cycles. The experimental part includes roughness measurements and tests of mechanical properties, which provide important data on the ability of these components to withstand high mechanical loads and temperature fluctuations during the HPDC process. The results of the study show the advantages and limitations of 3D printing compared to traditional manufacturing processes and give insight into the use of additive technologies in industrial manufacturing. Specifically, the study identified clear quantitative differences in mechanical properties: the 3D printed mould parts had comparable ultimate tensile strength and yield strength to conventionally manufactured parts, but significantly lower ductility (below 1% compared to about 20% in traditional parts) due to higher porosity (0.25–0.30% compared to 0.03–0.04%). Additive mould parts exhibited higher hardness (approximately 510 HV) compared to conventional parts (approximately 450 HV). Surface roughness of the 3D printed parts was more variable, highlighting the need for optimising printing parameters. Thus, additive technology offers benefits in stable hardness and comparable strength, albeit at the expense of reduced ductility and increased variability in surface quality. The research also includes an analysis of the effect of repetitive loading on the mechanical properties of the mould parts made of H13, which provides valuable information for improving their durability and reliability in practice. This research contributes to the development of 3D printing technologies in the field of HPDC and offers new opportunities for improving the efficiency and quality of manufacturing processes in industrial applications.
Go to article

Bibliography

  • Véle, F., Ackermann, M., Bittner, V. & Šafka, J. (2021). Influence of selective laser melting technology process parameters on porosity and hardness of AISI H13 tool steel: statistical approach. 14(20), 6052, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14206052.
  • Nguyen, V.L., Kim, E., Lee, S.-R., Yun, J., Choe, J., Yang, D., Lee, H.-S., Lee, C.-W. & Yu, J.-H. (2018). Evaluation of strain-rate sensitivity of selective laser melted H13 tool steel using nanoindentation tests. 8(8), 589, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8080589.
  • Wang, S., Ning, J., Zhu, L., Yang, Z., Yan, W., Dun, Y., Xue, P., Xu, P., Bose, S. & Bandyopadhyay, A. (2022). Role of porosity defects in metal 3D printing: Formation mechanisms, impacts on properties and mitigation strategies. Additive Manufacturing. 60(A), 103256, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.103256.
  • Garcias, J.F., Martins, R. F., Branco, R., Marciniak, Z., Macek, W., Pereira, C. & Santos, C. (2021). Quasistatic and fatigue behavior of an AISI H13 steel obtained by additive manufacturing and conventional method. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures. 44(1), 3384-3398. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.13565.
  • Lei, F., Wen, T., Yang, F., Wang, J., Fu, J., Yang, H., Wang, J., Ruan, J. & Ji, S. (2022). Microstructures and mechanical properties of H13 tool steel fabricated by selective laser melting. Materials. 15(7), 2686, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15072686.
  • Kim, Y.W., Park, H. & Park, J.M. (2023). High-speed manufacturing-driven strength-ductility improvement of H13 tool steel fabricated by selective laser melting. Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining. 66(5), 582-592. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325899.2023.2241245.
  • Ahn, W., Park, J., Lee, J., Choe, J., Jung, I., Yu, J. H., Kim, S. & Sung, H. (2018). Correlation between microstructure and mechanical properties of the additive manufactured H13 tool steel. Korean Journal of Materials Research. 28(11), 663-670. https://doi.org/10.3740/MRSK.2018.28.11.663.
  • Bose, A., Reidy, J.P. & Pötschke, J. (2024). Sinter-based additive manufacturing of hardmetals: Review. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials. 119, 106493, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2023.106493.
  • Giarmas, E., Tsakalos, V., Tzimtzimis, E., Kladovasilakis, N., Kostavelis, I., Tzovaras, D. & Tzetzis, D. (2024). Selective laser melting additive manufactured H13 tool steel for aluminum extrusion die component construction. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 133, 4385-4400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-14007-7.
  • Pirinu, A., Primo, T., Del Prete, A., Panella, F.W. & De Pascalis, F. (2022). Mechanical behaviour of AlSi10Mg lattice structures manufactured by the Selective Laser Melting (SLM). The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 1651-1680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10390-1.
  • Hu, Z., Xu, P., Pang, C., Liu, Q., Li, S. & Li, J. (2022). Microstructure and mechanical properties of a high-ductility Al-Zn-Mg-Cu aluminum alloy fabricated by wire and arc additive manufacturing. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. 31, 6459-6472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-022-06715-6.
  • Leon, A. & Aghion, E. (2017). Effect of surface roughness on corrosion fatigue performance of AlSi10Mg alloy produced by Selective Laser Melting (SLM). Materials Characterization. 131, 188-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2017.06.029.
  • Balachandramurthi, A.R., Moverare, J., Dixit, N. & Pederson, R. (2018). Influence of defects and as-built surface roughness on fatigue properties of additively manufactured Alloy 718. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 735, 463-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.08.072.
  • Pechlivani, E.M., Melidis, L., Pemas, S., Katakalos, K., Tzovaras, D. & Konstantinidis, A.A. (2023). On the effect of volumetric energy density on the characteristics of 3D-printed metals and alloys. Metals. 13(10), 1776, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13101776.
  • SLM SOLUTIONS. (2023). H13 – Material data sheet. Retrieved March 18, 2025, from https://www.slm-solutions.com/fileadmin/Content/Powder/MDS/MDS_H13_2023-06_EN.pdf
  • Professional Exported Steel Supplier. (2023). H13 tool steel. Retrieved March 25, 2025, from https://cz.coldrolledsteels.com/info/h13-tool-steels-88814121.html
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

M. Pinta
1
ORCID: ORCID
L. Socha
1
ORCID: ORCID
J. Sviželová
1
ORCID: ORCID
L. Kucerova
2
ORCID: ORCID
M. Dvořák
3
J. Häusler
4

  1. Department of Applied Technologies and Materials Research, Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice, Okružní 517/10, 370 01 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
  2. Department of Materials and Engineering Metallurgy, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of West Bohemia, Univerzitní 2732/8, 301 00 Plzeň, Czech Republic
  3. Tool Shop Division, MOTOR JIKOV Fostron a.s., Kněžskodvorská 2277, 370 04 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
  4. MOTOR JIKOV Strojírenská a.s., Zátkova 495, 392 01 Soběslav II, Czech Republic
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper presents the results of research concerning manganese cast steel, also called Hadfield cast steel. The aim of the research was to determine the effect of Ni addition on the usable properties, i.e., hardness and impact resistance of manganese cast steel for cast components of railway crossovers. The scope of the research included making test castings with a unit weight of 1.5 kg in molds from molding sand prepared using Alphaset technology on a chromite sand matrix. The technological process of the test castings included heat treatment, i.e., oversaturation in water from a temperature of 1050°C. The effect of Ni addition from approx. 0,1 to approx. 1,5 wt.% on the usable properties of manganese cast steel were assessed through impact resistance tests performed in a railway impact bending test, Brinell hardness measurements, and microstructure analysis using light optical and scanning electron microscopy. Analysis of the obtained experimental results allowed for the optimization of the chemical composition of manganese cast steel for cast elements of railway infrastructure.
Go to article

Bibliography

  • Hadfield R.A. (1888). Hadfield’s manganese steel. Science. 12, 284-286.
  • Petrov Y., Gavriljuk V., Berns H. & Schmalt F. (2006). Surface structure of stainless and Hadfield steel after impact wear. Wear. 260(6), 687-691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2005.04.009.
  • Zhang G., Xing J. & Gao Y. (2006). Impact wear resistance of WC/Hadfield steel composite and its interfacial characteristic. Wear. 260(7-8), 728-734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2005.04.010.
  • Atabaki M., Jafari S. & Abdollah-Pour H. (2012). Abrasive wear behavior of high chromium cast iron and Hadfield steel - a comparison. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, International. 19(4), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(12)60086-7.
  • Kalandyk B., Tęcza G., Zapała R. & Sobula S. (2015). Cast high-manganese steel – the effect of microstructure on abrasive wear behaviour in Miller test. Archives of Foundry Engineering. 15(2), 35-38. DOI: 10.1515/afe-2015-0033.
  • Efstathiou C. & Sehitoglu H. (2010). Strain hardening and heterogeneous deformation during twinning in Hadfield steel. Acta Materialia. 58(5), 1479-1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.054.
  • Jabłońska M. (2016). Structure and properties of a high-manganese austenitic steel strengthened in the result of mechanical twinning in processes of dynamic deformation. Doctoral dissertation, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland. (in Polish).
  • Głownia J. (2002). Alloy steel castings – application. Kraków: Fotobit. (in Polish).
  • Sobczak J. (2013). Foundrymens handbook – Modern foundry engineering. Kraków: STOP. (in Polish).  
  • Aniołek K. & Herian J. (2013). Burdening and wearing railway switches in exploitation conditions and materials applied for their construction. 2-3, 85-89. (in Polish).
  • Havlíček P., Bušová K. (2012). Experience with explosive hardening of railway frogs from Hadfield steel. In Conference Proceedings of 21st International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials METAL, 23 – 25 May 2012 (pp. 705-711). Brno, Czech Republic.
  • Dhar S., Danielsen H., Fæster S., Rasmussen C., Zhang Y. & Jensen D. (2019). Crack formation within a Hadfield manganese steel crossing nose. Wear. 438-439, 203049, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2019.203049.
  • Ma Y., Mashal A. & Markine V. (2018). Modelling and experimental validation of dynamic impact in 1:9 railway crossing panel. Tribology International. 118, 208-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2017.09.036.
  • Wu T., Ieong H., Hsu W., Chang C. & Lai Y. (2024). Assessment of fatigue crack growth in metro cast manganese steel frogs and inspection strategy. Engineering Failure Analysis. 163(A), 108512, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108512.
  • Zambrano O., Tressia G. & Souza R. (2020). Failure analysis of a crossing rail made of Hadfield steel after severe plastic deformation induced by wheel-rail interaction. Engineering Failure Analysis. 115, 104621, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104621.
  • Machado P., Pereira J., Penagos J., Yonamine T. & Sinatora A. (2017). The effect of in-service work hardening and crystallographic orientation on the micro-scratch wear of Hadfield steel. Wear. 376-377(B), 1064-1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2016.12.057.
  • Harzallah R., Mouftiez A., Felder E., Hariri S. & Maujean J. (2010). Rolling contact fatigue of Hadfield steel X120Mn12. Wear. 269(9-10), 647-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2010.07.001.
  • Wróbel T., Jezierski J., Bartocha D., Feliks E. & Paleń A. (2024). Quality assessment method for chromite sand to reduce the number of cast steel surface defects. Archives of Foundry Engineering. 24(4), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.24425/afe.2024.151307.

 

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

T. Wróbel
1 2
ORCID: ORCID
S. Sobula
3
ORCID: ORCID
G. Tęcza
3
ORCID: ORCID
D. Bartocha
1 2
ORCID: ORCID
J. Jezierski
1 2
ORCID: ORCID
K. Kostrzewa
2

  1. Silesian University of Technology, Department of Foundry Engineering, Towarowa 7, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
  2. Huta Małapanew Sp. z o.o., Kolejowa 1, 46-040 Ozimek, Poland
  3. AGH University of Science and Technology, Department of Alloys and Cast Composites Engineering, Reymonta 23, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This study investigates the formation and influence of the Fe₂Al₅ intermetallic phase in Al–Fe sintered composites produced via solid-state powder metallurgy. Aluminium–iron powder mixtures containing 25, 29, and 34 at.% Fe were compacted under a pressure of 400 MPa and vacuum-sintered at 580 °C. Microstructural characterisation was performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Image analysis confirmed the presence of three distinct regions: an aluminium matrix, Fe-rich zones, and a newly formed η-phase (Fe₂Al₅). The formation of the Fe₂Al₅ phase was observed locally at the interfaces between the aluminium matrix and iron particles, as a result of solid-state diffusion during sintering. The growth direction of this phase suggests that aluminium diffused into iron, resulting in the formation of reaction layers characteristic of aluminium-rich compositions. XRD analysis revealed no detectable peaks corresponding to FeAl₃ or FeAl₂ phases, confirming that intermetallic phase evolution proceeded entirely in the solid state. Microhardness measurements showed significantly elevated values in Fe₂Al₅-rich regions, highlighting its strengthening potential. The results confirm that Fe₂Al₅ can be effectively synthesised via solid-state diffusion, without liquid phase formation. This approach enables the controlled development of intermetallic phases in Al–Fe systems and offers promising prospects for low-temperature manufacturing of materials with improved mechanical properties.
Go to article

Bibliography

  • Matysik, P., Jóźwiak, S., & Czujko, T. (2015). Characterization of low-symmetry structures from phase equilibrium of Fe–Al system—Microstructures and mechanical properties. 8(3), 914-931. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8030914.
  • Šesták, P., Friák, M., Holec, D., Všianská, M. & Šob, M. (2018). Strength and brittleness of interfaces in Fe–Al superalloy nanocomposites under multiaxial loading: An ab initio and atomistic study. 8(11), 873, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8110873.
  • Zhang Y., Zhao T., Yu X. & Huang J. (2023). The Al-Fe intermetallic compounds and the atomic diffusion behavior at the interface of aluminum-steel welded joint. 13(2), 334, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13020334.
  • Wang, Q., Leng, X.S., Yang, T.H. & Yan, J.C. (2014). Effects of Fe–Al intermetallic compounds on interfacial bonding of clad materials. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China. 24(1), 279-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63058-2.
  • Krasnowski, M., Gierlotka, S. & Kulik, T. (2016). Nanocrystalline Al₅Fe₂ intermetallic and Al₅Fe₂–Al composites manufactured by high-pressure consolidation of milled powders. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 656, 82-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.09.224.
  • Rabin, B.H. & Wright, R.N. (1991). Synthesis of iron–aluminides from elemental powders: Reaction mechanisms and densification behavior. Metallurgical Transactions A. 22A, 277-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02656797.
  • Liu, Y., Chong, X., Jiang, Y., Zhou, R. & Feng, J. (2017). Mechanical properties and electronic structures of Fe–Al intermetallic. Physica B: Condensed Matter. 506, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2016.10.032.
  • Karwan-Baczewska, J., Dymkowski, T. & Seetharaman, S. (2000). Manufacturing of intermetallic alloys by conventional powder metallurgy technology and thermochemical treatment. Archives of Metallurgy. 45(3), 261-275.
  • Ashby, M.F. (2005). Materials Selection in Mechanical Design. (3rd ed.). Burlington, MA, USA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Novák, P., Knotek, V., Šerák, J., Michalcová, A. & Vojtěch, D. (2011). Synthesis of Fe–Al–Si intermediary phases by reactive sintering. Powder Metallurgy. 54(2), 167-171. https://doi.org/10.1179/174329009X449314.
  • Kim, Y.I., Lee, W., Jang, J.M., Ui, S.W., An, G.S., Kwon, H. & Ko, S.H. (2018). Effects of aluminum content and particle size on volume expansion during the sintering of Fe–Al mixed powders. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 747, 211-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.299.
  • Silvayeh, Z., Götzinger, B., Karner, W., Hartmann, M. & Sommitsch, C. (2018). Calculation of the intermetallic layer thickness in cold metal transfer welding of aluminum to steel. 12(1), 35, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12010035.
  • Dudina, D.V., Legan, M.A., Fedorova, N.V., Novoselov, A. N., Anisimov, A.G. & Esikov, M.A. (2017). Structural and mechanical characterization of porous iron aluminide FeAl obtained by pressureless spark plasma sintering. Materials Science and Engineering A. 695, 309-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.04.051.
  • Que, Z., Wang, Y., Mendis, C. L., Fang, C., Xia, J., Zhou, X., & Fan, Z. (2022). Understanding Fe-Containing intermetallic compounds in Al alloys: An overview of recent advances from the LiME Research Hub. 12(10), 1677, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12101677.
  • Kang, H.Z. & Hu, C.T. (2004). Swelling behavior in reactive sintering of Fe–Al mixtures. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 88(2-3), 264-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.03.001.
  • Lee, D.J. & German, R.M. (1985). Sintering behavior of iron–aluminium powder mixes. International Journal of Powder Metallurgy. 21, 9-21.
  • Murray, J.L. (1992). Fe–Al binary phase diagram. In: H. Baker (Eds.), Alloy Phase Diagrams (p. 54). Materials Park, OH, USA: ASM International.
  • Takata, N., Nishimoto, M., Kobayashi, S. & Takeyama, M. (2015). Crystallography of Fe₂Al₅ phase at the interface between solid Fe and liquid Al. 67, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2015.07.011.
  • Školáková, A., Pinc, J. & Novák, P. (2022). The preferential formation of Ni₂Al₃, Fe₂Al₅, and Ti₂Al₅ phases in aluminide systems. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 280, 125859, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.125859.
  • Durejko, T. (2016). Structure and properties of the Fe₃Al-type intermetallic alloys fabricated by powder metallurgy. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 674, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.08.060.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

M. Majchrowska
1
ORCID: ORCID
M. Nowak
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. AGH University of Science and Technology, Poland

Instructions for authors

Submission


To submit the article, please use the Editorial System provided here:

https://www.editorialsystem.com/afe


Papers submitted in any other way will not be accepted.



The Journal does not have submission charges.


The APC Article Processing Charge is 110 euros (500zł for Polish authors). In some cases, the APC is paid as a part of the scientific conference fee, for which the AFE journal is a supportive one. If not, it is payable after the acceptance of the final article by direct money transfer.


Bank account details:


Account holder: Stowarzyszenie Wychowankow Politechniki Slaskiej Kolo Odlewnikow
Account holder address: ul. Towarowa 7, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Account numbers: BIC BPKOPLPW IBAN PL17 1020 2401 0000 0202 0183 3748


Instructions for the preparation of an Archives of Foundry Engineering Paper

Publication Ethics Policy


Publication Ethics Policy

The standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in publishing in the Archives of Foundry Engineering journal: the author, the journal editor and editorial board, the peer reviewers and the publisher are listed below.

All the articles submitted for publication in Archives of Foundry Engineering are peer reviewed for authenticity, ethical issues and usefulness as per Review Procedure document.

Duties of Editors
1. Monitoring the ethical standards: Editorial Board monitors the ethical standards of the submitted manuscripts and takes all possible measures against any publication malpractices.
2. Fair play: Submitted manuscripts are evaluated for their scientific content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, citizenship, political ideology or any other issues that is a personal or human right.
3. Publication decisions: The Editor in Chief is responsible for deciding which of the submitted articles should or should not be published. The decision to accept or reject the article is based on its importance, originality, clarity, and its relevance to the scope of the journal and is made after the review process.
4. Confidentiality: The Editor in Chief and the members of the Editorial Board t ensure that all materials submitted to the journal remain confidential during the review process. They must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the parties involved in the publishing process i.e., authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher.
5. Disclosure and conflict of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in the submitted manuscript must not be used by the Editor and the Editorial Board in their own research without written consent of authors. Editors always precludes business needs from compromising intellectual and ethical standards.
6. Maintain the integrity of the academic record: The editors will guard the integrity of the published academic record by issuing corrections and retractions when needed and pursuing suspected or alleged research and publication misconduct. Plagiarism and fraudulent data is not acceptable. Editorial Board always be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed.

Retractions of the articles: the Editor in Chief will consider retracting a publication if:
- there are clear evidences that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabrication) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error)
- the findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper cross-referencing, permission or justification (cases of redundant publication)
- it constitutes plagiarism or reports unethical research.
Notice of the retraction will be linked to the retracted article (by including the title and authors in the retraction heading), clearly identifies the retracted article and state who is retracting the article. Retraction notices should always mention the reason(s) for retraction to distinguish honest error from misconduct.
Retracted articles will not be removed from printed copies of the journal nor from electronic archives but their retracted status will be indicated as clearly as possible.

Duties of Authors
1. Reporting standards: Authors of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. The paper should contain sufficient details and references to permit others to replicate the work. The fabrication of results and making of fraudulent or inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and will cause rejection or retraction of a manuscript or a published article.
2. Originality and plagiarism: Authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others they need to be cited or quoted. Plagiarism and fraudulent data is not acceptable.
3. Data access retention: Authors may be asked to provide the raw data for editorial review, should be prepared to provide public access to such data, and should be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication of their paper.
4. Multiple or concurrent publication: Authors should not in general publish a manuscript describing essentially the same research in more than one journal. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
5. Authorship of the manuscript: Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the report study. All those who have made contributions should be listed as co-authors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included in the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
6. Acknowledgement of sources: The proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. The authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the scope of the reported work.
7. Fundamental errors in published works: When the author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Duties of Reviewers
1. Contribution to editorial decisions: Peer reviews assist the editor in making editorial decisions and may also help authors to improve their manuscript.
2. Promptness: Any selected reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its timely review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself/herself from the review process.
3. Confidentiality: All manuscript received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except those authorized by the editor.
4. Standards of objectivity: Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewers should express their views clearly with appropriate supporting arguments.
5. Acknowledgement of sources: Reviewers should identify the relevant published work that has not been cited by authors. Any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper should be reported to the editor.
6. Disclosure and conflict of Interest: Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider evaluating manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relations with any of the authors, companies, or institutions involved in writing a paper.

Peer-review Procedure


Review Procedure


The Review Procedure for articles submitted to the Archives of Foundry Engineering agrees with the recommendations of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education published in a booklet: ‘Dobre praktyki w procedurach recenzyjnych w nauce’ (MNiSW, Dobre praktyki w procedurach recenzyjnych w nauce, Warszawa 2011).

Papers submitted to the Editorial System are primarily screened by editors with respect to scope, formal issues and used template. Texts with obvious errors (formatting other than requested, missing references, evidently low scientific quality) will be rejected at this stage or will be sent for the adjustments.

Once verified each article is checked by the anti-plagiarism system Cross Check powered by iThenticate®. After the positive response, the article is moved into: Initially verified manuscripts. When the similarity level is too high, the article will be rejected. There is no strict rule (i.e., percentage of the similarity), and it is always subject to the Editor’s decision.
Initially verified manuscripts are then sent to at least four independent referees outside the author’s institution and at least two of them outside of Poland, who:

have no conflict of interests with the author,
are not in professional relationships with the author,
are competent in a given discipline and have at least a doctorate degree and respective
scientific achievements,
have a good reputation as reviewers.


The review form is available online at the Journal’s Editorial System and contains the following sections:

1. Article number and title in the Editorial System

2. The statement of the Reviewer (to choose the right options):

I declare that I have not guessed the identity of the Author. I declare that I have guessed the identity of the Author, but there is no conflict of interest

3. Detailed evaluation of the manuscript against other researches published to this point:

Do you think that the paper title corresponds with its contents?
Yes No
Do you think that the abstract expresses the paper contents well?
Yes No
Are the results or methods presented in the paper novel?
Yes No
Do the author(s) state clearly what they have achieved?
Yes No
Do you find the terminology employed proper?
Yes No
Do you find the bibliography representative and up-to-date?
Yes No
Do you find all necessary illustrations and tables?
Yes No
Do you think that the paper will be of interest to the journal readers?
Yes No

4. Reviewer conclusion

Accept without changes
Accept after changes suggested by reviewer.
Rate manuscript once again after major changes and another review
Reject


5. Information for Editors (not visible for authors).

6. Information for Authors


Reviewing is carried out in the double blind process (authors and reviewers do not know each other’s names).

The appointed reviewers obtain summary of the text and it is his/her decision upon accepting/rejecting the paper for review within a given time period 21 days.

The reviewers are obliged to keep opinions about the paper confidential and to not use knowledge about it before publication.

The reviewers send their review to the Archives of Foundry Engineering by Editorial System. The review is archived in the system.

Editors do not accept reviews, which do not conform to merit and formal rules of scientific reviewing like short positive or negative remarks not supported by a close scrutiny or definitely critical reviews with positive final conclusion. The reviewer’s remarks are sent to the author. He/she has to consider all remarks and revise the text accordingly.

The author of the text has the right to comment on the conclusions in case he/she does not agree with them. He/she can request the article withdrawal at any step of the article processing.

The Editor-in-Chief (supported by members of the Editorial Board) decides on publication based on remarks and conclusions presented by the reviewers, author’s comments and the final version of the manuscript.

The final Editor’s decision can be as follows:
Accept without changes
Reject


The rules for acceptance or rejection of the paper and the review form are available on the Web page of the AFE publisher.

Once a year Editorial Office publishes present list of cooperating reviewers.
Reviewing is free of charge.
All articles, including those rejected and withdrawn, are archived in the Editorial System.

Reviewers

List of Reviewers 2022

Shailee Acharya - S. V. I. T Vasad, India
Vivek Ayar - Birla Vishvakarma Mahavidyalaya Vallabh Vidyanagar, India
Mohammad Azadi - Semnan University, Iran
Azwinur Azwinur - Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe, Indonesia
Czesław Baron - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Dariusz Bartocha - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Iwona Bednarczyk - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Artur Bobrowski - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków
Poland Łukasz Bohdal - Koszalin University of Technology, Koszalin Poland
Danka Bolibruchova - University of Zilina, Slovak Republic
Joanna Borowiecka-Jamrozek- The Kielce University of Technology, Poland
Debashish Bose - Metso Outotec India Private Limited, Vadodara, India
Andriy Burbelko - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków
Poland Ganesh Chate - KLS Gogte Institute of Technology, India
Murat Çolak - Bayburt University, Turkey
Adam Cwudziński - Politechnika Częstochowska, Częstochowa, Poland
Derya Dispinar- Istanbul Technical University, Turkey
Rafał Dojka - ODLEWNIA RAFAMET Sp. z o. o., Kuźnia Raciborska, Poland
Anna Dolata - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Tomasz Dyl - Gdynia Maritime University, Gdynia, Poland
Maciej Dyzia - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Eray Erzi - Istanbul University, Turkey
Flora Faleschini - University of Padova, Italy
Imre Felde - Obuda University, Hungary
Róbert Findorák - Technical University of Košice, Slovak Republic
Aldona Garbacz-Klempka - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Katarzyna Gawdzińska - Maritime University of Szczecin, Poland
Marek Góral - Rzeszow University of Technology, Poland
Barbara Grzegorczyk - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Grzegorz Gumienny - Technical University of Lodz, Poland
Ozen Gursoy - University of Padova, Italy
Gábor Gyarmati - University of Miskolc, Hungary
Jakub Hajkowski - Poznan University of Technology, Poland
Marek Hawryluk - Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Poland
Aleš Herman - Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic
Mariusz Holtzer - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Małgorzata Hosadyna-Kondracka - Łukasiewicz Research Network - Krakow Institute of Technology, Poland
Dario Iljkić - University of Rijeka, Croatia
Magdalena Jabłońska - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Nalepa Jakub - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Jarosław Jakubski - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Aneta Jakubus - Akademia im. Jakuba z Paradyża w Gorzowie Wielkopolskim, Poland
Łukasz Jamrozowicz - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Krzysztof Janerka - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Karolina Kaczmarska - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Jadwiga Kamińska - Łukasiewicz Research Network – Krakow Institute of Technology, Poland
Justyna Kasinska - Kielce University Technology, Poland
Magdalena Kawalec - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Gholamreza Khalaj - Islamic Azad University, Saveh Branch, Iran
Angelika Kmita - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Marcin Kondracki - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice Poland
Vitaliy Korendiy - Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine
Aleksandra Kozłowska - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Ivana Kroupová - VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic
Malgorzata Lagiewka - Politechnika Czestochowska, Częstochowa, Poland
Janusz Lelito - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Jingkun Li - University of Science and Technology Beijing, China
Petr Lichy - Technical University Ostrava, Czech Republic
Y.C. Lin - Central South University, China
Mariusz Łucarz - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Ewa Majchrzak - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Barnali Maji - NIT-Durgapur: National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, India
Pawel Malinowski - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Marek Matejka - University of Zilina, Slovak Republic
Bohdan Mochnacki - Technical University of Occupational Safety Management, Katowice, Poland
Grzegorz Moskal - Silesian University of Technology, Poland
Kostiantyn Mykhalenkov - National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Ukraine
Dawid Myszka - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Maciej Nadolski - Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland
Krzysztof Naplocha - Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland
Daniel Nowak - Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland
Tomáš Obzina - VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic
Peiman Omranian Mohammadi - Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Iran
Zenon Opiekun - Politechnika Rzeszowska, Rzeszów, Poland
Onur Özbek - Duzce University, Turkey
Richard Pastirčák - University of Žilina, Slovak Republic
Miroslawa Pawlyta - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Jacek Pezda - ATH Bielsko-Biała, Poland
Bogdan Piekarski - Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny, Szczecin, Poland
Jacek Pieprzyca - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Bogusław Pisarek - Politechnika Łódzka, Poland
Marcela Pokusová - Slovak Technical University in Bratislava, Slovak Republic
Hartmut Polzin - TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany
Cezary Rapiejko - Lodz University of Technology, Poland
Arron Rimmer - ADI Treatments, Doranda Way, West Bromwich, West Midlands, United Kingdom
Jaromír Roučka - Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic
Charnnarong Saikaew - Khon Kaen University Thailand Amit Sata - MEFGI, Faculty of Engineering, India
Mariola Saternus - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Vasudev Shinde - DKTE' s Textile and Engineering India Robert Sika - Politechnika Poznańska, Poznań, Poland
Bozo Smoljan - University North Croatia, Croatia
Leszek Sowa - Politechnika Częstochowska, Częstochowa, Poland
Sławomir Spadło - Kielce University of Technology, Poland
Mateusz Stachowicz - Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland
Marcin Stawarz - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Grzegorz Stradomski - Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland
Roland Suba - Schaeffler Skalica, spol. s r.o., Slovak Republic
Maciej Sułowski - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Jan Szajnar - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Michal Szucki - TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany
Tomasz Szymczak - Lodz University of Technology, Poland
Damian Słota - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Grzegorz Tęcza - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Marek Tkocz - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Andrzej Trytek - Rzeszow University of Technology, Poland
Mirosław Tupaj - Rzeszow University of Technology, Poland
Robert B Tuttle - Western Michigan University United States Seyed Ebrahim Vahdat - Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran
Iveta Vaskova - Technical University of Kosice, Slovak Republic
Dorota Wilk-Kołodziejczyk - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Ryszard Władysiak - Lodz University of Technology, Poland
Çağlar Yüksel - Atatürk University, Turkey
Renata Zapała - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Jerzy Zych - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Andrzej Zyska - Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland



List of Reviewers 2021

Czesław Baron - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Imam Basori - State University of Jakarta, Indonesia
Leszek Blacha - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice
Poland Artur Bobrowski - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Danka Bolibruchova - University of Zilina, Slovak Republic
Pedro Brito - Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Brazil
Marek Bruna - University of Zilina, Slovak Republic
Marcin Brzeziński - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Andriy Burbelko - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Alexandros Charitos - TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany
Ganesh Chate - KLS Gogte Institute of Technology, India
L.Q. Chen - Northeastern University, China
Zhipei Chen - University of Technology, Netherlands
Józef Dańko - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Brij Dhindaw - Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, India
Derya Dispinar - Istanbul Technical University, Turkey
Rafał Dojka - ODLEWNIA RAFAMET Sp. z o. o., Kuźnia Raciborska, Poland
Anna Dolata - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Agnieszka Dulska - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Maciej Dyzia - Silesian University of Technology, Poland
Eray Erzi - Istanbul University, Turkey
Przemysław Fima - Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science PAN, Kraków, Poland
Aldona Garbacz-Klempka - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Dipak Ghosh - Forace Polymers P Ltd., India
Beata Grabowska - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Adam Grajcar - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Grzegorz Gumienny - Technical University of Lodz, Poland
Gábor Gyarmati - Foundry Institute, University of Miskolc, Hungary
Krzysztof Herbuś - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Aleš Herman - Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic
Mariusz Holtzer - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Małgorzata Hosadyna-Kondracka - Łukasiewicz Research Network - Krakow Institute of Technology, Kraków, Poland
Jarosław Jakubski - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Krzysztof Janerka - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Robert Jasionowski - Maritime University of Szczecin, Poland
Agata Jażdżewska - Gdansk University of Technology, Poland
Jan Jezierski - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Karolina Kaczmarska - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Jadwiga Kamińska - Centre of Casting Technology, Łukasiewicz Research Network – Krakow Institute of Technology, Poland
Adrian Kampa - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Wojciech Kapturkiewicz- AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Tatiana Karkoszka - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Gholamreza Khalaj - Islamic Azad University, Saveh Branch, Iran
Himanshu Khandelwal - National Institute of Foundry & Forging Technology, Hatia, Ranchi, India
Angelika Kmita - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Grzegorz Kokot - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Ladislav Kolařík - CTU in Prague, Czech Republic
Marcin Kondracki - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Dariusz Kopyciński - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Janusz Kozana - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Tomasz Kozieł - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Aleksandra Kozłowska - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice Poland
Halina Krawiec - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Ivana Kroupová - VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic
Wacław Kuś - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Jacques Lacaze - University of Toulouse, France
Avinash Lakshmikanthan - Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology, India
Jaime Lazaro-Nebreda - Brunel Centre for Advanced Solidification Technology, Brunel University London, United Kingdom
Janusz Lelito - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Tomasz Lipiński - University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Mariusz Łucarz - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Maria Maj - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Jerzy Mendakiewicz - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Hanna Myalska-Głowacka - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Kostiantyn Mykhalenkov - Physics-Technological Institute of Metals and Alloys, National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Ukraine
Dawid Myszka - Politechnika Warszawska, Warszawa, Poland
Maciej Nadolski - Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland
Daniel Nowak - Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland
Mitsuhiro Okayasu - Okayama University, Japan
Agung Pambudi - Sebelas Maret University in Indonesia, Indonesia
Richard Pastirčák - University of Žilina, Slovak Republic
Bogdan Piekarski - Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny, Szczecin, Poland
Bogusław Pisarek - Politechnika Łódzka, Poland
Seyda Polat - Kocaeli University, Turkey
Hartmut Polzin - TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany
Alena Pribulova - Technical University of Košice, Slovak Republic
Cezary Rapiejko - Lodz University of Technology, Poland
Arron Rimmer - ADI Treatments, Doranda Way, West Bromwich West Midlands, United Kingdom
Iulian Riposan - Politehnica University of Bucharest, Romania
Ferdynand Romankiewicz - Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Zielona Góra, Poland
Mario Rosso - Politecnico di Torino, Italy
Jaromír Roučka - Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic
Charnnarong Saikaew - Khon Kaen University, Thailand
Mariola Saternus - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Karthik Shankar - Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham , Amritapuri, India
Vasudev Shinde - Shivaji University, Kolhapur, Rajwada, Ichalkaranji, India
Robert Sika - Politechnika Poznańska, Poznań, Poland
Jerzy Sobczak - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Sebastian Sobula - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Marek Soiński - Akademia im. Jakuba z Paradyża w Gorzowie Wielkopolskim, Poland
Mateusz Stachowicz - Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland
Marcin Stawarz - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Andrzej Studnicki - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Mayur Sutaria - Charotar University of Science and Technology, CHARUSAT, Gujarat, India
Maciej Sułowski - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Sutiyoko Sutiyoko - Manufacturing Polytechnic of Ceper, Klaten, Indonesia
Tomasz Szymczak - Lodz University of Technology, Poland
Marek Tkocz - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Andrzej Trytek - Rzeszow University of Technology, Poland
Jacek Trzaska - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Robert B Tuttle - Western Michigan University, United States
Muhammet Uludag - Selcuk University, Turkey
Seyed Ebrahim Vahdat - Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran
Tomasz Wrobel - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Ryszard Władysiak - Lodz University of Technology, Poland
Antonin Zadera - Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic
Renata Zapała - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Bo Zhang - Hunan University of Technology, China
Xiang Zhang - Wuhan University of Science and Technology, China
Eugeniusz Ziółkowski - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Sylwia Żymankowska-Kumon - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Andrzej Zyska - Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland



List of Reviewers 2020

Shailee Acharya - S. V. I. T Vasad, India
Mohammad Azadi - Semnan University, Iran
Rafał Babilas - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Czesław Baron - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Dariusz Bartocha - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Emin Bayraktar - Supmeca/LISMMA-Paris, France
Jaroslav Beňo - VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic
Artur Bobrowski - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Grzegorz Boczkal - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Wojciech Borek - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Pedro Brito - Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Brazil
Marek Bruna - University of Žilina, Slovak Republic
John Campbell - University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
Ganesh Chate - Gogte Institute of Technology, India
L.Q. Chen - Northeastern University, China
Mirosław Cholewa - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Khanh Dang - Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Viet Nam
Vladislav Deev - Wuhan Textile University, China
Brij Dhindaw - Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, India
Derya Dispinar - Istanbul Technical University, Turkey
Malwina Dojka - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Rafał Dojka - ODLEWNIA RAFAMET Sp. z o. o., Kuźnia Raciborska, Poland
Anna Dolata - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Agnieszka Dulska - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Tomasz Dyl - Gdynia Maritime University, Poland
Maciej Dyzia - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Eray Erzi - Istanbul University, Turkey
Katarzyna Gawdzińska - Maritime University of Szczecin, Poland
Sergii Gerasin - Pryazovskyi State Technical University, Ukraine
Dipak Ghosh - Forace Polymers Ltd, India
Marcin Górny - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Marcin Gołąbczak - Lodz University of Technology, Poland
Beata Grabowska - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Adam Grajcar - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Grzegorz Gumienny - Technical University of Lodz, Poland
Libor Hlavac - VSB Ostrava, Czech Republic
Mariusz Holtzer - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Philippe Jacquet - ECAM, Lyon, France
Jarosław Jakubski - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Damian Janicki - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Witold Janik - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Robert Jasionowski - Maritime University of Szczecin, Poland
Jan Jezierski - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Jadwiga Kamińska - Łukasiewicz Research Network – Krakow Institute of Technology, Poland
Justyna Kasinska - Kielce University Technology, Poland
Magdalena Kawalec - Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza, Kraków, Poland
Angelika Kmita - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Ladislav Kolařík -Institute of Engineering Technology CTU in Prague, Czech Republic
Marcin Kondracki - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Sergey Konovalov - Samara National Research University, Russia
Aleksandra Kozłowska - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Janusz Krawczyk - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Halina Krawiec - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Ivana Kroupová - VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic
Agnieszka Kupiec-Sobczak - Cracow University of Technology, Poland
Tomasz Lipiński - University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Aleksander Lisiecki - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Krzysztof Lukaszkowicz - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Mariusz Łucarz - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Katarzyna Major-Gabryś - AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Pavlo Maruschak - Ternopil Ivan Pului National Technical University, Ukraine
Sanjay Mohan - Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University, India
Marek Mróz - Politechnika Rzeszowska, Rzeszów, Poland
Sebastian Mróz - Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland
Kostiantyn Mykhalenkov - National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Ukraine
Dawid Myszka - Politechnika Warszawska, Warszawa, Poland
Maciej Nadolski - Czestochowa University of Technology, Częstochowa, Poland
Konstantin Nikitin - Samara State Technical University, Russia
Daniel Pakuła - Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland


This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more