Wyniki wyszukiwania

Filtruj wyniki

  • Czasopisma
  • Data

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyników: 3
Wyników na stronie: 25 50 75
Sortuj wg:
Pobierz PDF Pobierz RIS Pobierz Bibtex

Abstrakt

In the paper the new paradigm for structural optimization without volume constraint is presented. Since the problem of stiffest design (compliance minimization) has no solution without additional assumptions, usually the volume of the material in the design domain is limited. The biomimetic approach, based on trabecular bone remodeling phenomenon is used to eliminate the volume constraint from the topology optimization procedure. Instead of the volume constraint, the Lagrange multiplier is assumed to have a constant value during the whole optimization procedure. Well known MATLAB topology based optimization code, developed by Ole Sigmund, was used as a tool for the new approach testing. The code was modified and the comparison of the original and the modified optimization algorithm is also presented. With the use of the new optimization paradigm, it is possible to minimize the compliance by obtaining different topologies for different materials. It is also possible to obtain different topologies for different load magnitudes. Both features of the presented approach are crucial for the design of lightweight structures, allowing the actual weight of the structure to be minimized. The final volume is not assumed at the beginning of the optimization process (no material volume constraint), but depends on the material’s properties and the forces acting upon the structure. The cantilever beam example, the classical problem in topology optimization is used to illustrate the presented approach.
Przejdź do artykułu

Bibliografia

  1.  W. Wang et al., “Space-time topology optimization for additive manufacturing”, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 1‒18, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00158-019-02420-6.
  2.  Y. Saadlaoui, et al., “Topology optimization and additive manufacturing: Comparison of conception methods using industrial codes”, J. Manuf. Syst., vol. 43, pp. 178‒286, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.03.006.
  3.  J. Zhu, et al., “A review of topology optimization for additive manufacturing: Status and challenges”, Chin. J. Aeronaut., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 9‒110, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2020.09.020.
  4.  O. Sigmund, “A 99 line topology optimization code written in Matlab”, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 120‒127, 2001, doi: 10.1007/s001580050176.
  5.  M. Bendsoe and O. Sigmund, Topology optimization. Theory, methods and applications, Berlin Heidelberg New York, Springer, 2003, doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-05086-6.
  6.  M. Bendsoe and N. Kikuchi, “Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method”, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 71, pp. 197‒224, 1988.
  7.  O. Sigmund and K. Maute, “Topology optimization approaches”, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol. 48, pp. 1031‒1055, 2013, doi: 10.1007/ s00158‒013‒0978‒6.
  8.  Z. Ming and R. Fleury, “Fail-safe topology optimization”, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 1225‒1243, 2016, doi: 10.1007/ s00158-016-1507-1.
  9.  L. Krog et al., “Topology optimization of aircraft wing box ribs”, AIAA Paper, 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Albany, New York, 2004, doi: 10.2514/6.2004-4481.
  10.  Z. Luo et al., “A new procedure for aerodynamic missile designs using topological optimization approach of continuum structures”, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., vol. 10, pp. 364‒373, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2005.12.006.
  11.  M. Zhou et al., “Industrial application of topology optimization for combined conductive and convective heat transfer problems”, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol. 54, no 4, pp. 1045‒1060, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s00158-016-1433-2.
  12.  G. Allaire et al., “The homogenization method for topology optimization of structures: old and new”, Interdiscip. Inf. Sci., vol.25/2, pp. 75‒146, 2019, doi: 10.4036/iis.2019.B.01.
  13.  G. Allaire and R.V. Kohn, “Topology Optimization and Optimal Shape Design Using Homogenization”, Topology Design of Structures. NATO ASI Series – Series E: Applied Sciences, M. Bendsoe, C. Soares – eds., vol. 227, pp. 207‒218, 1993, doi: 10.1007/978-94-011- 1804-0_14.
  14.  G. Allaire et al., ”Shape optimization by the homogenization method”, Numer. Math., vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 27‒68, 1997, doi: 10.1007/ s002110050253.
  15.  G. Allaire, Shape Optimization by the Homogenization Method, Springer, 2002, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-9286-6.
  16.  J. Wolff, “The Classic: On the Inner Architecture of Bones and its Importance for Bone Growth”, Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res., vol. 468, no. 4, pp. 1056‒1065, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1239-2.
  17.  H. M. Frost, The Laws of Bone Structure, C.C. Thomas, Springfield, 1964.
  18.  R. Huiskes et al., ”Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis”, J. Biomech., vol. 20, pp. 1135‒1150, 1987.
  19.  R. Huiskes, “If bone is the answer, then what is the question?”, J. Anat., vol. 197, no. 2, pp. 145‒156, 2000.
  20.  D.R. Carter, “Mechanical loading histories and cortical bone remodeling”, Calcif. Tissue Int., vol. 36, no. Suppl. 1, pp. 19‒24, 1984, doi: 10.1007/BF02406129.
  21.  R.F.M. van Oers, R. Ruimerman, E. Tanck, P.A.J. Hilbers, R. Huiskes, “A unified theory for osteonal and hemi-osteonal remodeling”, Bone, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 250‒259, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.10.009.
  22.  M. Nowak, J. Sokołowski, and A. Żochowski, “Justification of a certain algorithm for shape optimization in 3D elasticity”, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 721‒734, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s00158-017-1780-7.
  23.  M. Nowak, J. Sokołowski, and A. Żochowski, “Biomimetic approach to compliance optimization and multiple load cases”, J. Optim. Theory Appl., vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 210‒225, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10957-019-01502-1.
  24.  J. Sokołowski and J-P. Zolesio, Introduction to Shape Optimization. Shape Sensitivity Analysis, Springer-Verlag, 1992, doi: 10.1007/978- 3-642-58106-9.
  25.  D. Gaweł et al., “New biomimetic approach to the aircraft wing structural design based on aeroelastic analysis”, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 741‒750, 2017, doi: 10.1515/bpasts-2017-0080.
Przejdź do artykułu

Autorzy i Afiliacje

Michał Nowak
1
ORCID: ORCID
Aron Boguszewski
1

  1. Poznan University of Technology, Division of Virtual Engineering, ul. Jana Pawła II 24, 60-965 Poznań, Poland

Abstrakt

Optimizing the aerodynamic structure of composite insulators can guarantee the safe operation of power systems. In this study, we construct a simulation model for composite insulator contaminant deposition using the COMSOL simulation software, and the rationality of the simulation model and method is verified through wind tunnel experiments. Taking the FXBW4-110/100 composite insulator as an example, we adopt a progressive optimization plan to explore the impacts of shed spacing s, and shed inclination angles α and β on its contaminant deposition characteristics under DC and AC voltages. Based on the numerical simulation results, we analyze the antifouling performance of insulators before and after structural optimization. The results indicate the following: 1) The contaminant deposition of the insulator under AC and DC voltages is negatively correlated with the shed spacing s, but positively correlated with the lower inclination angle β. 2) Under AC voltages, the contaminant deposition of the insulator increases with the upper inclination angle α, while under DC voltages, the contaminant deposition shows an uptrend first, then a downtrend and then an uptrend again with the increase of the upper inclination angle α. 3) Compared with the original model, the AC-optimized model ( α = 6°, β = 2° and s = 98 mm) with a larger shed spacing s, and smaller shed inclination angles α and β showed superior antifouling performance at wind speeds of no less than 2 m/s, and under the typical conditions ( v = 2.5 m/s, d = 20 μm, and ρ = 2 200 kg/m 3), its contaminant deposition is 15% less than that of the original model ( α = 10°, β = 2° and s = 80 mm).
Przejdź do artykułu

Autorzy i Afiliacje

Yukun Lv
1
Zeze Chen
1
ORCID: ORCID
Qian Wang
1
Yao Lu
1
Xiaojing Li
1

  1. Department of Power Engineering, School of Energy, Power and Mechanics, North China Electric Power University, China

Abstrakt

The problem of optimal design of a steel plated girder according to the Eurocode 3 is considered. Code regulations admit the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) in designing plated structures with variable cross-sections. A technique of determining an approximate solution to the optimization problem is presented. It is determined a solution of a control theory optimization task, in which Eurocode requirements regarding the Ultimate Limit State (bearing capacity, local and global stability) as well as Serviceability Limit State (flexural rigidity) are used as appropriate inequality constraints. Static analysis is performed within the framework of linear elasticity and Bernoulli-Euler beam theory making an account for second-order effects due to prescribed imperfections. Obtained solutions, after regularization, may be used for direct verification with the use of FEA or as the first guess for iterative topology optimization algorithms. Code requirements governing the determination of optimal shape are visualized in the constraint activity diagram, which is a proposed tool for analysis of optimization process.
Przejdź do artykułu

Autorzy i Afiliacje

Paweł Szeptyński
1
ORCID: ORCID
Leszek Mikulski
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Cracow University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, ul. Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, Poland

Ta strona wykorzystuje pliki 'cookies'. Więcej informacji