The author analyzes attitudes to the phenomenon of sexuality on the basis of two theoretical perspectives, the evolutionary and the feminist, between which there has long been conflict. In his opinion, however, they are only seemingly contrary. The main texts of both trends of thought concern entirely different problems and at the substantive level there is basically no contradiction between them. It is important that evolutionary theory often undermines existing cultural schemas, although this is rarely perceived by proponents of feminist theories. Evolutionists, in turn, rather too often identify feminism with radical social constructivism. Another extreme is a view that could be described as evolutionary sexism, consisting in justifying the gender status quo by reference to biological essentialism. After elimination of the extreme approaches, which are rare in any case, it is possible to use the results of evolutionary research in the debate over gender equality and to transform the two monologues into a cohesive dialogue; this, in the author’s opinion, is an important task for empirically oriented social theory.

This article examines the relationship of disgust and perversion in Lovetown (Lubiewo bez cenzury) by Michał Witkowski. An overview of the reception of the book reveals that reviewers and critics have focused mainly on Witkowski’s portrayal of the LGBT community, the structure of the novel (dubbed the ‘queer Decameron’), and the textual (meta) creation of the writer’s voice, but it ignored his handling of disgust and perversion. Central to this reading of Lovetown, which draws on Sigmund Freud’s analyses of disgust and perversion, is the observation that the narrator interlards his lingo with neutral, ‘objective’ explanations of the main characters’ deviant behaviours. This glossary, written for the general reader, tends, in effect, to legitimize deviance. An in-depth analysis of the writer’s handling of the categories of the disgusting, the perverse and the sacred leads to the conclusion that Lovetown exemplifies a cathartic-therapeutic narrative in which disgust becomes a tool of self-fulfi llment.

The author considers the mechanisms limiting women’s access to power and the validity of their advance to positions of authority. She uses research into two extremely different social institutions–the Italian Mafia and the Polish Sejm (parliament)–in an attempt to illustrate that the contemporary process of redefining traditional cultural concepts of gender is not only an indicator of the spread of pro-equality attitudes but could equally well be considered an element of activity intended to preserve the patriarchal order. From this viewpoint, the ad hoc reconstructing of cultural concepts of gender is chiefly aimed at maintaining the constituting principle of the patriarchy–maintaining men’s domination at the price of breaking men’s monopoly on power. This process could therefore be perceived also as a symptom of the durability of the patriarchal model of social ties.

W artykule, wychodząc od pojęcia prekaryjności, opisujemy, jak osoby biorące udział w konkursie na pamiętniki bezrobotnych z 2017 roku starają się ograniczyć konsekwencje braku zatrudnienia i jakie trudności z tym związane napotykają. Odwołujemy się przy tym do czterech głównych mechanizmów ochrony związanych z pracą, instytucją państwa, wspólnotą oraz rodziną. Wnioski wskazują na silne powiązanie czterech wymienionych ob- szarów przeciwdziałania prekaryzacji osób bezrobotnych. Główną rolę odgrywa rodzina, znacznie mniejszą natomiast instytucja państwa oraz wspólnota. Szczególnie negatywnie oceniane są rynek pracy oraz urzędy. W artykule szczegółowo przyglądamy się wysiłkom bezrobotnych w obszarze poszukiwania i wykonywania prac, które wbrew przypuszcze- niom podtrzymują, a niekiedy nawet pogłębiają ich prekaryjność. Analizujemy również dwa instrumenty w postaci staży oraz świadczenia pieniężnego na dzieci tzw. 500+. O ile staże nie spełniają swojej funkcji i służą raczej przedłużaniu sytuacji niepewności, o tyle świadczenie 500+, zarządzane w większości przez kobiety, ma raczej pozytywny efekt.

Celem artykułu jest ukazanie i porównanie doświadczeń rodzinności migrantów osiedlonych i tymczasowych na różnych etapach cykli życia rodzin (CŻR), tj. od powstania pary, przez posiadanie i wychowanie potomstwa, aż do fazy schyłkowej rodziny. Przekrojowe spojrzenie na jakościowy materiał empiryczny z trzech projektów badawczych pozwala na aplikację soczewki CŻR do rodzin migracyjnych w kontekście polskim. Sytuacje dwóch typów rodzin nuklearnych, tj. Polaków wychowujących dzieci poza krajem i rodzin, które doświadczają migracji sezonowej/czasowej jednego z partnerów/rodziców, analizowane są z uwzględnieniem wymiaru temporalnego (reprezentowanego przez kolejne fazy cyklu życia rodzin oraz przez pryzmat płci (doświadczenia migrujących kobiet versus mężczyzn).

The author analyses the identity strategies appearing in women’s social movements in contemporary Poland. She considers the importance of gender in the process of constructing collective identity and how specific gender identity strategies influence their social reception and, in consequence, the success or failure of women’s initiatives as well. The aim of her considerations is to deepen critical reflection on the category of gender in the intersectional perspective, particularly in the context of research into social movements. The analysis includes two examples of women’s mass movements in the last decade: the movement to restore the Child Support Fund and the Women’s Congress. Her conclusions are based on a qualitative analysis of the media discussion, the self-representations of proponents of both initiatives (in publications and online), as well as interviews with their representatives and participants conducted in the years 2009–2013.

The situation of transsexual persons in Poland is not precisely known; there are only estimates determining the scale of the phenomenon. The lack of information fosters stereotypes and, not infrequently, injurious appraisal; fear of the unknown is also produced, and is gradually turning into widespread prejudice. A social analysis of the phenomenon of transsexuality is hampered by the predominance of the hetero-normative discourse, including in scholarly spheres. The basic issue addressed by the author is the acceptance of transsexual persons, viewed from the perspective of their own personal experiences. These observations concern both the sphere of personal life as well as functioning in the macro-social space (school, work, etc.). In each of these spheres, a change of gender produces complications with which transsexual persons must grapple as they strive to live in harmony with their psychologically intuited gender.

One of the main traits of a society of reflexive modernity is the critical analysis of categories that in the past appeared unquestionable. Socio-cultural gender and health or illness/mental disorders are categories of this type. Above all, they are socially constructed, that is, they are dependent on culture and on political, economic, and religious factors. The author undertakes to analyse the relations between the diagnostic criteria used in the international system of classifying mental diseases (DSM-IV and ICD-10) and traditional schemas of masculinity and femininity. Confirmation of the incidence of particular diseases in connection with gender is the author’s entry point for seeking answers to why individuals suffering from certain illnesses/mental disorders display behaviour corresponding to traditional gender roles, even though contemporary gender roles are fluid in many respects, and hypotheses about biological differences as causes of incidence of disease in men and women have not been empirically confirmed.

Ruth Klüger, a writer of Jewish origin born in Austria in 1931, initiates discourse on ethical issues in the modern humanities by suggesting that women displayed greater morality in the context of the drama of the Shoah. This discourse requires emphasis, but also critical analysis. Referring to the philosophical and psychological as well as to the historical context, that is specifically to the events of World War II, I attempt to reflect on the women’s ethics of care and answer the question whether the indicated differences undermine the existence of a human morality shared by both sexes, that is whether morality depends on sex. The purpose of the interdisciplinary interpretations in the present analysis is to recognize the challenges and problems related to the condition of human dignity raised by Klüger in her argumentation.