Details
Title
Konsumpcja mediów a negatywna identyfikacja partyjna w Polsce w 2015 i 2019 rokuJournal title
Studia SocjologiczneYearbook
2022Issue
No 4Affiliation
Żerkowska-Balas, Marta : Uniwersytet SWPSAuthors
Keywords
media ; polaryzacja ; negatywna identyfikacja partyjna ; teoria identyfikacji społecznej ; polaryzacja afektywnaDivisions of PAS
Nauki Humanistyczne i SpołeczneCoverage
67-97Publisher
Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN ; Komitet Socjologii PAN ; Wydział Socjologii UWBibliography
1. Bakshy, Eytan, Messing Solomon, Adamic Lada A. 2015. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348: 1130–32. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa1160.2. Barber, Michael, Nolan McCarty. 2015. Causes and Consequences of Polarization. Political Negotiation: A Handbook, 15–58. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316091906.002.
3. Baumeister, Roy, Ellen Bratslavsky, Catrin Finkenauer, Kathleen Vohs. 2001. Bad Is Stronger than Good. Review of General Psychology, 5: 323–370. DOI: 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323.
4. Boxell, Levi, Gentzkow Matthew, Shapiro Jesse M. 2017. Greater Internet use is not associated with faster growth in political polarization among US demographic groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, 40: 10612–10617. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1706588114.
5. Brewer, Marilynn B. 1991. The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 5: 475–82. DOI: 10.1177/0146167291175001.
6. Cacioppo, John, Gary Berntson. 1994. Relationship between Attitudes and Evaluative Space: A Critical Review, with Emphasis on the Separability of Positive and Negative Subtrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115: 401–23. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.401.
7. Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American voter. Oxford, England: John Wiley.
8. Carlson, Jon, Mayra Chavez, Luis Miramontes, Abraham Olivares, Llonel Onsurez. 2009. Political Party Realignment in Mexico: Fragmentation, Consolidation, and Party Identification. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1472555.
9. Caruana, Nicholas J., R. Michael McGregor, Laura B. Stephenson. 2015. The Power of the Dark Side: Negative Partisanship and Political Behaviour in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 48, 4: 771–89. DOI: 10.1017/S0008423914000882.
10. Conover, Pamela Johnston, Stanley Feldman. 2004. The Origins and Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self-Identifications. Political psychology: Key readings. New York, NY, US: Psychology Press. DOI: 10.4324/9780203505984-11.
11. Crewe, Ivor. 1976. Party Identification Theory and Political Change in Britain. W: I. Budge, I. Crewe, D. Farlie, eds. Party Identification and Beyond. London: Wiley.
12. Garry, John. 2007. Making ‘party identification’ more versatile: Operationalisingthe concept for the multiparty setting. Electoral Studies, 26, 2: 346–358. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2006.07.003.
13. Gawrońska-Nowak, Bogna, Piotr Lis, Joanna Konieczna-Sałamatin. 2021. Media and Populism. Springer Books, w: Trade Wins or Trade Wars: 161–70. Springer. https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-030-76997-0_8.html.
14. Grabe, Maria Elizabeth, Annie Lang, Shuhua Zhou, Paul David Bolls. 2000. Cognitive Access to Negatively Arousing News: An Experimental Investigation of the Knowledge Gap. Communication Research 27, 1: 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365000027001001.
15. Gutmann, Amy, Dennis Thompson. 2010. The Mindsets of Political Compromise. Perspectives on Politics, 8, 4: 1125–1143. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592710003270.
16. Hetherington, Marc J., Thomas J. Rudolph. 2015. Why Washington Won’t Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis. Why Washington Won’t Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/9780226299358.
17. Iyengar, Raghuram, Sangman Han, Sunil Gupta. 2009. Do Friends Influence Purchases in a Social Network? SSRN Scholarly Paper 1392172. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1392172.
18. Iyengar, Shanto, Masha Krupenkin. 2018. The Strengthening of Partisan Affect. Political Psychology, 39: 201–18. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12487.
19. Iyengar, Shanto, Gaurav Sood, Yphtach Lelkes. 2012. Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 3: 405–31. DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfs038.
20. Iyengar, Shanto, Sean J. Westwood. 2015. Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59, 3: 690–707. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12152.
21. Johnston, Richard. 1992. Party Identification Measures in the Anglo-American Democracies: A National Survey Experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 2: 542–59. DOI: 10.2307/2111490.
22. Klimkiewicz, Beata. 2021. The Public Sphere and the Changing News Media Environment in Poland: Towards Structural Polarisation. Javnost – The Public, 28, 1: 53–74. DOI: 10.1080/13183222.2021.1861408.
23. Kosiara-Pedersen, Karina, Kasper M. Hansen. 2015. Gender Differences in Assessments of Party Leaders. Scandinavian Political Studies, 38, 1: 26–48. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9477.12033.
24. Lelkes, Yphtach, Gaurav Sood, Shanto Iyengar. 2017. The Hostile Audience: The Effect of Access to Broadband Internet on Partisan Affect. American Journal of Political Science, 61, 1: 5–20. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12237.
25. Levendusky, Matthew, Neil Malhotra. 2016. Does Media Coverage of Partisan Polarization Affect Political Attitudes? Political Communication, 33, 2: 283–301. DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2015.1038455.
26. Levendusky, Matthew S. 2013. Why Do Partisan Media Polarize Viewers? American Journal of Political Science, 57, 3: 611–23. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12008.
27. Maggiotto, Michael A., James E. Piereson. 1977. Partisan Identification and Electoral Choice: The Hostility Hypothesis. American Journal of Political Science, 21, 4: 745–67. DOI: 10.2307/2110735.
28. Mason, Lilliana. 2013. The Rise of Uncivil Agreement: Issue Versus Behavioral Polarization in the American Electorate. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 1: 140–59. DOI: 10.1177/0002764212463363.
29. Medeiros, Mike, Alain Noël. 2014. The Forgotten Side of Partisanship: Negative Party Identification in Four Anglo-American Democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 47, 7: 1022–46. DOI: 10.1177/0010414013488560.
30. Meeus, Wim, Rens Van De Schoot, Loes Keijsers, Seth J. Schwartz, Susan Branje. 2010. On the Progression and Stability of Adolescent Identity Formation: A Five-Wave Longitudinal Study in Early-to-Middle and Middle-to-Late Adolescence. Child Development, 81, 5: 1565–1581. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01492.x.
31. McGregor, Michael, R., Nicholas J. Caruana, Laura B. Stephenson. 2015. Negative Partisanship in a Multi-party System: The Case of Canada. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 25, 3: 300–316. DOI: 10.1080/17457289.2014.997239.
32. Mudde, Cas. 2017. Populism: An Ideational Approach. https://works.bepress.com/cas_mudde/121/.
33. Puglisi, Riccardo, James M. Snyder. 2011. Newspaper Coverage of Political Scandals. The Journal of Politics, 73, 3: 931–950. DOI: 10.1017/S0022381611000569.
34. Ray, Devin G., Diane M. Mackie, Robert J. Rydell, Eliot R. Smith. 2008. Changing Categorization of Self Can Change Emotions about Outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 4: 1210–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.014.
35. Reiljan, Andres. 2020. ‘Fear and Loathing across Party Lines’ (Also) in Europe: Affective Polarisation in European Party Systems. European Journal of Political Research, 59, 2: 376–396. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12351.
36. Rekker, Roderik, Loes Keijsers, Susan Branje, Wim Meeus. 2019. The Formation of Party Preference in Adolescence and Early Adulthood: How and When Does It Occur in the Multiparty Context of the Netherlands? YOUNG 27, 1: 48–68. DOI: 10.1177/1103308818757037.
37. Richardson, Bradley M. 1991. European Party Loyalties Revisited. The American Political Science Review, 85, 3: 751–75. DOI: 10.2307/1963849.
38. Rogowski, Jon C., Joseph L. Sutherland. 2016. How ideology fuels affective polarization. Political Behavior, 38, 2: 485–508.
39. Rose, Richard, William Mishler. 1998. Negative and Positive Party Identification in Post-Communist Countries. Electoral Studies, 17, 2: 217–234. DOI: 10.1016/S0261-3794(98)00016-X.
40. Ruszkowski, Paweł, Andrzej Przestalski, Paweł Maranowski. 2020. Polaryzacja światopoglądowa społeczeństwa polskiego a klasy i warstwy społeczne. Collegium Civitas Press Warszawa.
41. Szczerbiak, Aleks. 2013. Poland (mainly) chooses stability and continuity: the October 2011 Polish Parliamentary election. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 14, 4: 480–504.
42. Tajfel, Henri. 1979. Individuals and Groups in Social Psychology. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 2: 183–90. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1979.tb00324.x.
43. Tajfel, Henri, John Turner. 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. W: W. G. Austin. S Worchel. red. The social psychology of intergroup relations: 33–37. Monterrey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
44. Taylor, Shelley E. 1991. Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization – minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110: 67–85.
45. Tworzecki, Hubert, Radoslaw Markowski. 2014. Knowledge and Partisan Bias: An Uneasy Relationship. East European Politics & Societies, 28: 836–62. DOI: 10.1177/0888325414535626.
46. Van Bavel, Jay J., Elizabeth A. Harris, Philip Pärnamets, Steve Rathje, Kimberly C. Doell, Joshua A. Tucker. 2021. Political psychology in the digital (mis)information age: A model of news belief and sharing. Social Issues and Policy Review, 15: 84–113. DOI: 10.1111/sipr.12077.
47. Vlachová, Klára. 2001. Party Identification in the Czech Republic: Inter-Party Hostility and Party Preference. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 34, 4: 479–99. DOI: 10.1016/S0967-067X(01)00015-0.
48. Webster, Steven, Alan Abramowitz. 2017. The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the U.S. Electorate. American Politics Research, 45: 621–647. DOI: 10.1177/1532673X17703132.
49. Wenzel, Michał, Marta Żerkowska-Balas. 2018. Reading, Writing and Political Competence. Polish Sociological Review, 2, 202: 147–165. DOI: 10.26412/psr202.01.
50. Zhong, Chen-Bo, Katherine Phillips, Geoffrey Leonardelli, Adam Galinsky. 2008. Negational Categorization and Intergroup Behavior. Personality & social psychology bulletin, 34: 793–806. DOI: 10.1177/0146167208315457.
51. Żerkowska-Balas, Marta. 2022. Of Love and Hate. Origins and Effects of Positive and Negative Party Identification in Poland. Polish Sociological Review, 1: 3–22. DOI: 10.26412/psr217.01.
52. Żerkowska-Balas, Marta, Mikołaj Cześnik, Mateusz Zaremba. 2017. Dynamika wiedzy politycznej Polaków. Studia Socjologiczne, 3: 7–31.