Genetic Diversity Among Xanthomonas Citri Subsp. Citri Strains in Iran

Journal title

Journal of Plant Protection Research




vol. 52


No 1


Divisions of PAS

Nauki Biologiczne i Rolnicze


Committee of Plant Protection PAS ; Institute of Plant Protection – National Research Institute




DOI: 10.2478/v10045-012-0001-z ; ISSN 1427-4345 ; eISSN 1899-007X


Journal of Plant Protection Research; 2012; vol. 52; No 1


Albufera U. (2009), Molecular characterization of <i>Salmonella</i> isolates by REP-PCR and RAPD analysis, Infect. Genet. Evol, 9, 3, 322, ; Alizadeh A. (1990), Citrus canker in Kerman province, Iranian J. Plant Pathol, 26, 118. ; Al-Saadi A. (2007), All five host-range variants of <i>Xanthomonas citri</i> carry one <i>pthA</i> homolog with 17.5 repeats that determines pathogenicity on citrus, but not host-range variation, Mol. Plant Microbe Interaction, 20, 8, 934, ; Bruning A. (2003), <i>Xanthomonas citri</i>: breking the surface, Mol. Plant Pathol, 4, 3, 141, ; Buithingoc L. (2009), Development of 14 minisatellite markers for the citrus canker bacterium, <i>Xanthomonas citri</i> subsp. <i>citri</i>, Mol. Ecol. Res, 9, 125, ; Chadha S. (2007), Comparative assessment of REMAP and ISSR marker assays for genetic polymorphism studies in <i>Magnaporthe grisea</i>, Current Sci, 93, 5, 688. ; Civerolo E. (1984), Bacterial canker disease of citrus, J. Rio Grande Valley Hortic. Soc, 37, 127. ; Coletta-Filho H. (2005), Primers based on the <i>rpf</i> gene region provide improved detection of <i>Xanthomonas axonopodis</i> pv. <i>citri</i> in naturally and artificially infected citrus plants, J. Appl. Microbiol, 100, 2, 279, ; Cubero J. (2002), Genetic relationship among worldwide strains of Xanthomonas causig canker in citrus species and design of new primers for their identification by PCR, Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 68, 3, 1256, ; Dye D. (1980), International standards for naming pathovars of phytopathogenic bacteria and a list of pathovar names and pathotype strains, Rev. Plant Pathol, 59, 4, 153. ; Egel D. (1991), Genomic relatedness of <i>Xanthomonas campestris</i> strains causing diseases of citrus, Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 57, 9, 2724. ; Fahy P. (1983), Plant Bacterial Disease. A Diagnostic Guide, 393. ; Gottwald T. (1993), Differential host range reaction of citrus and citrus relatives to citrus canker and citrus bacterial spot determined by leaf mesophyll susceptibility, Plant Dis, 77, 10, 1004, ; Graham J. (1990), Pathological, restriction-fragment length polymorphism, and fatty acid profile relationship between <i>Xanthomonas campestris</i> from citrus and noncitrus hosts, Phytopathology, 80, 9, 829, ; Hartung J. (1992), Plasmid-based hybridization probes for detection and identification of <i>Xanthomonas campestris</i> pv. <i>citri</i>, Plant Dis, 76, 9, 889, ; Hasse C. (1915), <i>Pseudomonas citri</i>, the cause of citrus canker, J. Agric. Res, 4, 1, 97. ; Hu J. (2007), Avirulence gene and insertion element-based RFLP as well as RAPD markers reveal high levels of genomic polymorphism in the rice pathogen <i>Xanthomonas oryzae</i> pv. <i>oryzae</i>, Syst. Appl. Microbiol, 30, 8, 587, ; Khodakaramian G. (2002), AFLP fingerprinting of the strains of <i>Xanthomonas axonopodis</i> including citrus canker disease in southern Iran, J. Phytopathol, 150, 4, 227, ; Khodakaramian G. (1999), Phenotypic features, host range and distribution of the strains <i>Xanthomonas axonopodis</i> including citrus canker in southern Iran, Iranian J. Plant Pathol, 35, 102. ; Laemmli U. (1970), Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriphage T<sub>4</sub>, Nature, 227, 5259, 680, ; Lee Y. (2008), Difference of physiochemical characteristics between citrus bacterial canker pathotypes and identification isolates with repetitive sequence PCRs, Plant Pathol. J, 24, 4, 423, ; Louws F. (1994), Specific genomic fingerprints of phytopathogenic <i>Xanthomonas</i> and <i>Pseudomonas</i> pathovars and strain generated with repetitive sequences and PCR, Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 60, 7, 2286. ; Louws F. (1995), Differentiation of genomic structure by rep-PCR fingerprinting to rapidally classify <i>Xanthomonas campestris</i> pv. <i>vesicatoria</i>, Phytopathology, 85, 5, 528, ; Mohammadi M. (2001), Physiological and biochemical characteristics of Iranian strains of <i>Xanthomonas axonopodis</i> pv. <i>citri</i>, the casual agent of citrus bacterial canker disease, J. Phytopathol, 149, 2, 65, ; Mohammadi S. (2003), Analysis of genetic diversity in crop plants-salient statistical tools and considerations, Crop Sci, 43, 3, 1235, ; Opgenorth D. (1996), Identification of <i>Xanthomonas fragariae</i> filed isolates by rep-PCR genomic fingerprinting, Plant Dis, 80, 8, 868, ; Powell W. (1996), The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsattlite) markers for germplasm analysis, Mol. Breed, 2, 3, 225, ; Pruvost O. (1992), Plasmid DNA fingerprinst distinguish pathotypes of <i>Xanthomonas campestris</i> pv. <i>citri</i>, the casual agent of citrus bacterial canker disease, Phtopathology, 82, 4, 485, ; Rademarker J. (1997), DNA Markers: Protocols, Application and Overviews, 151. ; Rohlf F. (2000), NTSYSpc: Numerical Taxonomy System, ver. 2.1. ; Schaad N. (2001), Laboratory Guide for Identification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, 373. ; Schaad N. (2005), Reclassification of <i>Xanthomonas campestris</i> pv. <i>citri</i> (ex Hasse 1915) Dye1978 forms A, B/C/D, and E as <i>X. smithii</i> subsp. <i>citri</i> (ex Hasse) sp. nov.nom. rev. comb. nov., <i>X. fuscans</i> subsp. <i>aurantifolii</i> (ex Gabriel 1989) sp. nov. nom. rev. comb. nov., and <i>X. alfalfae</i> subsp. <i>citrumelo</i> (ex Riker and Jones) Gabriel et al., 1989 sp. nov. nom. rev. comb. nov.; <i>X. campestris</i> pv. <i>malvacearum</i> (ex Smith 1901) Dye 1978 as <i>X. smithii</i> subsp. <i>smithii</i> nov. comb. nov. nom. nov.; <i>X. campestris</i> pv. <i>alfalfae</i> (ex Riker and Jones, 1935) Dye 1978 as <i>X. alfalfae</i> subsp. <i>alfalfae</i> (ex Riker et al., 1935) sp.nov. nom. rev.; and "var. fuscans" of <i>X. campestris</i> pv. <i>phaseoli</i> (ex Smith, 1987) Dye 1978 as <i>X. fuscans</i> subsp. <i>fuscans</i> sp. nov, Syst. Appl. Microbiol, 28, 6, 494, ; Schaad N. (2006), Emended classification of xanthomonad pathogens on citrus, Syst. Appl. Microbiol, 29, 8, 690, ; Stall R. (1991), Research relating to the recent outbreaks of citrus canker in Florida, Annu. Rev. Phytopathol, 29, 399, ; Sun X. (2004), Detection and characterization of a new strain of citrus canker bacteria from Key/Mexican lime and alemow in South Florida, Plant Dis, 88, 11, 1179, ; Trebaol G. (2001), Assessment of the genetic diversity among strains of <i>Xanthomonas cynarae</i> by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis and development of specific characterized amplified regions for the rapid identification of <i>X. cynarae</i>, Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 67, 8, 3379, ; Vauterin L. (1991), Differentiation of <i>Xanthomonas campestris</i> pv. <i>citri</i> strains by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophresis of proteins, fatty acid analysis, and DNA-DNA hybridization, Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol, 41, 4, 535, ; Vauterin L. (1995), Reclassification of <i>Xanthomonas</i>, International. J. Syst. Bacteriol, 45, 3, 472, ; Vernière C. (1998), Characterization of phenotypically distinct strains of <i>Xanthomonas axonopodis</i> pv. <i>citri</i> from Southwest Asia, Eur. J. Plant Pathol, 104, 5, 477, ; Versalovic J. (1991), Distribution of repetitive DNA sequences in Eubacteria and application to fingerprinting of bacterial genomes, Nucleic Acid Res, 19, 24, 6823, ; Versalovic J. (1994), Genomic fingerprinting of bacteria using repetitive sequence based PCR (rep-PCR), Methods Cell Mol. Biol, 5, 1, 25. ; Welsh J. (1990), Fingerprinting genome using PCR with arbitrary primers, Nucleic Acid Res, 18, 24, 7213, ; Williams J. (1990), DNA polymorphism amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers, Nucleic Acid Res, 18, 22, 6531, ; Witeside J. (1993), Compendium of Citrus Disease, 80. ; Young J. (1978), A proposed nomenclature and classification for plant pathogenic bacteria, New Zealand J. Agric. Res, 21, 153,