Al-Azary, H., Buchanan, L., (2017). Novel metaphor comprehension: Semantic neighbourhood density interacts with concreteness. Memory & Cognition, 45(2), 296–307. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0650-7
Andrews, M., Frank, S., Vigliocco, G., (2014). Reconciling embodied and distributional accounts of meaning in language. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6(3), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12096
Banaruee, H., Khoshsima, H., Khatin-Zadeh, O., Askari, A., (2017). Suppression of semantic features in metaphor comprehension. Cogent Psychology, 4(1), 1409323. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2017.1409323
Barsalou, L., W., (1987). The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In: Neisser, U., (Ed.), Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization (pp. 101–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Becker, A. H. (1997). Emergent and common features influence metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol, 12(4), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1204_3
Blasko, D.,G., Connine, C., M., (1993). Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(2), 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.295
Borghi, A., M., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Cimatti, F., Scorolli, C., Tummolini, L., (2017). The challenge of abstract concepts. Psychological Bulletin, 143(3), 263–292.
Caramazza, A., Hillis, A., E., Rapp, B., C., Romani, C., (1990). The multiple semantics hypothesis: Multiple confusions? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7(3), 161–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643 299008253441
Chiappe, D., L., Kennedy, J., M., (1999). Aptness predicts preference for metaphors or similes, as well as recall bias. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(4), 668-676. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03212977
Chiappe, D., L., Kennedy, J., M., Chiappe, P., (2003). Aptness is more important than comprehensibility in preference for metaphors and similes. Poetics, 31(1), 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-422x (03)00003-2
Chiappe, D. L., Kennedy, J. M., & Smykowski, T. (2003). Reversibility, aptness, and the conventionality of metaphors and similes. Metaphor & Symbol, 18(2), 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1802_2
Cree, G., S., McNorgan, C., McRae, K., (2006). Distinctive features hold a privileged status in the computationof word meaning: implications for theories of semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(4), 643–658.
Fernandino, L., Humphries, C. J., Seidenberg, M. S., Gross, W. L., Conant, L. L., & Binder, J. R. (2015). Predicting brain activation patterns associated with individual lexical concepts based on five sensory-motor attributes. Neuropsychologia, 76, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.643
Gernsbacher, M., A., Keysar, B., Robertson, R., R., W., Werner, N., K., (2001). The role of suppression and enhancement in understanding metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(3), 433-450. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2782
Gineste, M., D., Indurkhya, B., Scart, V., (2000). Emergence of features in metaphor comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(3), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1503_1
Glucksberg, S., (2001). Understanding Figurative Language: From metaphors to idioms. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195111095.001.0001
Glucksberg, S., (2003). The psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 92-96.
Glucksberg, S., (2008). How metaphor creates categories – quickly! In R. Gibbs (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, (pp. 67- 83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo 9780511816802.006
Glucksberg, S., Haught, C., (2006a). Can Florida become like the next Florida? When metaphoric comparisons fail. Psychological Science, 17(11), 935-938. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01807.x
Glucksberg, S., Haught, C., (2006b). On the Relation Between Metaphor and Simile: When Comparison Fails. Mind and Language, 21(3), 360–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00282.x
Glucksberg, S., Keysar, B., (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.97.1.3
Glucksberg, S., Keysar, B., (1993). How metaphors work. In: Ortony, A., (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed, pp. 401-424). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo 9781139173865.020
Glucksberg, S., Manfredi. D., A., McGlone, M., S., (1997). Metaphor comprehension: How metaphors create categories. In: Wards, T., B., Smith, S., M., Vaid, J., (Eds.), Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Metaphors and Processes (pp. 326-350). Washington, DC: American Psychology Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10227-013
Glucksberg, S., McGlone, M., S., (1999). When love is not a journey: What metaphors mean. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1541–1558. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00003-x
Glucksberg, S., McGlone, M., S., Manfredi, D., (1997). Property attribution in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36(1), 50-67. https://doi.org/10.1037/e537272012-417
Glucksberg, S., Newsome, M., R., Goldvarg, Y., (2001). Inhibition of the literal: Filtering metaphor-irrelevant information during metaphor comprehension. Metaphor & Symbol. 16(3), 277-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2001.9678898
Honeck, R., P., Kibler, C., T., Firment, M., J., (1987). Figurative language and psychological views of categorization: Two ships in the night? In: Haskell, R., E., (Ed.), Cognition and Symbolic Structures: The Psychology of Metaphoric Transformation (pp. 103-120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Jones, L., L., Estes, Z., (2005). Metaphor comprehension as attributive categorization. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(1), 110-124. https://doi.org/10.1037/e537052012-119
Jones, L., L., Estes, Z., (2006). Roosters, robins, and alarm clocks: Aptness and conventionality in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(1), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.02.004
Keysar, B., (1994). Discourse context effects: Metaphorical and literal interpretations. Discourse Processes, 18(3), 247-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539409544895
Khatin-Zadeh, O., Eskandari, Z., Banaruee, H., Marmolejo-Ramos, F., (2019). Abstract metaphorical classes: A perspective from distributed models of conceptual representations. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 50(2), 108–113.
Khatin-Zadeh, O., Khoshsima, H., Yarahmadzehi, N., (2018). Suppression from the perspective of distributed models of conceptual representation. Activitas Nervosa Superior, 60, 90–94. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2019.17.1.1919
Khatin-Zadeh, O., Vahdat, S., (2015). Abstract and concreto representation in structure-mapping and class-inclusion. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 2(2), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.2.2.07kha
Kintsch, W., (2000). Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(2), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03212981
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M., (2003). Metaphors we Live by. London: University of Chicago Press.
Louwerse, M., M., Jeuniaux, P., (2010). The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing. Cognition, 114(1), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.002
Masson, M., (1995). A distributed memory model of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.3
McRae, K., Cree, G., S., (2002). Factors underlying category-specific semantic deficits. In: Forde, E., M., E., Humphreys, G. Category specificity in mind and brain. Psychology Press, East Sussex, 211–50.
McRae, K., Cree, G., S., Westmacott, R., de Sa, V., R., (1999). Further evidence for feature correlations in semantic memory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53(4), 360–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087323
McRae, K., de Sa, V., R., Seidenberg, M., S., (1997). On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(2), 99–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.126.2.99
Moss, H., E., Tyler, L., K., Taylor, K., I., (2007). Conceptual Structure. In: Gaskell, G., editor. Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 217- -234, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Onifer, W., Swinney, D., A., (1981). Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias. Memory and Cognition, 9(3), 225-236. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196957
Ortony, A., (1979). Metaphor, language, and thought. In: Ortony, A., (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 1-19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139173865.003
Schwanenflugel, P., J., Akin, C., Luh, W., M., (1992). Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words. Memory & Cognition, 20(1), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03208259
Schwanenflugel, P., J., Harnishfeger, K., K., Stowe, R., W., (1988). Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concreto words. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(5), 499–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596x(88)90022-8
Taylor, K., I., Devereux, B., J., Tyler, L., K., (2011). Conceptual structure: Towards an integrated neuro-cognitive account. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(9), 1368–1401. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.568227
Thibodeau, P., H., Durgin, F., H., (2011). Metaphor aptness and conventionality: A processing fluency account. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(3), 206–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2011.583196
Trick, L., Katz, A., N., (1986). The domain interaction approach to metaphor processing: Relating individual differences and metaphor characteristics. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 1(3), 185–213. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0103_3
Tyler, L., K., Moss, H., E., (2001). Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(6), 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01651-x
Tyler, L., K., Moss, H., E., Durrant-Peatfield, M., R., Levy, J., P., (2000). Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: A distributed account of category-specific deficits. Brain and Language, 75(2), 195–231.
Utsumi, A., (2005). The role of feature emergence in metaphor appreciation. Metaphor and Symbol, 20(3), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2003_1
Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D., Lewis, W., Garrett, M., (2004). Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 48(4), 422-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.09.001
Xu, X., (2010). Interpreting metaphorical statements. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6),1622–1636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.11.005

[1] Sharif A., Raza S.A., Ozturk I., Afshan S., The dynamic relationship of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption with carbon emission: a global study with the application of heterogeneous panel estimations, Renewable Energy, vol. 133, pp. 685–691 (2019), DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.052.
[2] Ossowska L.J., Janiszewska D.A., Toward sustainable energy consumption in the European Union, Archives of Electrical Engineering, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 37–48 (2020), DOI: 10.33223/epj/119371.
[3] Zhang W.Q., Zhang X.Y., Huang S.W., Xia Y.K., Fan X.C., Evolution of a transmission network with high proportion of renewable energy in the future, Renewable Energy, vol. 102, pp. 372–379 (2017), DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.10.057.
[4] Zhou Q., Wang N.B., Shen C.Y., Zhao L., Wang D.M., Zhang J.M., Analysis of the reasons and prospect for the abandonment of new energy power in China, Proceedings of the 2016 5th International Conference on Energy and Environmental Protection, Shenzhen, China (2016).
[5] Tang Z.Y., Hill D.J., Liu T., Two-stage voltage control of subtransmission networks with high penetration of wind power, Control Engineering Practice, vol. 62, pp. 1–10 (2017), DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2017.02.013.
[6] da Costa J.N., Passos J.A., Henriques R.M., Loading margin sensitivity analysis in systems with significant wind power generation penetration, Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 175, pp. 1–9 (2019), DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2019.105900.
[7] Cai Y., Wang Z.C., Li Y., Cao Y.J., Tan Y.D., Tang X., A novel operation of regional power grids in china: the generator voltage-class-reduction scheme, IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 132841–132850 (2019), DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939925.
[8] Kumar V.S.S., Reddy K.K., Thukaram D., Coordination of reactive power in grid-connected wind farms for voltage stability enhancement, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 29, pp. 2381–2390 (2014), DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2300157.
[9] Liu Q.J., Yu L.F., Li Z.H., Zeng J., Chen S.Y., Regional grid voltage reactive power optimization strategy based on voltage qualification rate evaluation function, 2018 International Conference on Power System Technology, Guangzhou, China, pp. 3875–3882 (2018).
[10] Mahela O.P., Khan B., Alhelou H.H., Siano P., Power quality assessment and event detection in distribution system with wind energy penetration using S-transform and fuzzy clustering, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 6922–6932 (2020), DOI: 10.1109/TII.2020.2971709.
[11] Mahela O.P., Khan B., Alhelou H.H., Tanwar S., Assessment of power quality in the utility grid integrated with wind energy generation, IET Power Electronics, vol. 13, no. 13, pp. 2917–2925 (2020), DOI: 10.1049/iet-pel.2019.1351.
[12] Swain S., Ray P.K., Short circuit fault analysis in a grid connected DFIG based wind energy system with active crowbar protection circuit for ride through capability and power quality improvement, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy System, vol. 84, pp. 64–75 (2017), DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.05.006.
[13] Wang S.X., Ge L.J., Cai S.X., Wu L., Hybrid interval AHP-entropy method for electricity user evaluation in smart electricity utilization, Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, vol. 6, pp. 701–711 (2018), DOI: 10.1007/s40565-017-0355-3.
[14] Huang Y.S., Jiang Y.Q., Wang J., Li J., Adaptability evaluation of distributed power sources connected to distribution network, IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 42409–42423 (2021), DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3066206.
[15] Du J., Cai C., Xie Z.J., Geng M.Z., Comprehensive energy efficiency evaluation of municipal power grid based on TOPSIS method, 2020 5th Asia Conference on Power and Electrical Engineering, Chengdu, China, pp. 829–833 (2020).
[16] Xu J.Z., Tong G.Q., Chen Q.,Wu M., A new evaluation method of the fault recovery scheme for mediumlow voltage dc distribution network, 2020 5th Asia Conference on Power and Electrical Engineering, Chengdu, China, pp. 1730–1735 (2020).
[17] Cheng Y.M., Liu C., Wu J., Liu H.M., Lee I.K., Niu J., Cho J.P., Koo K.W., Lee M.W., Woo D.G., A back propagation neural network with double learning rate for PID controller in phase-shifted full-bridge soft-switching power supply, Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 2811–2822 (2020), DOI: 10.1007/s42835-020-00523-5.
[18] Li J.J., Zhang M.Y., Li Z.G., Zhang T., Zhang Q., Chi C., Study on grid planning method considering multiple energy access, 2018 International Conference on Smart Grid and Electrical Automation, Changsha, China, pp. 59–62 (2018).
[19] Malengret M., Gaunt C.T., Active currents, power factor, and apparent power for practical power delivery systems, IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 133095–133113 (2020), DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3010638.
[20] Wiczynski G., Determining location of voltage fluctuation source in radial power grid, Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 180, pp. 1–10 (2020), DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2019.106069.
[21] Hong Y., Bie Z.H., Li G.F., Liu S.Y., Berizzi A., The integrated reliability evaluation of distribution system considering the system voltages adjustment, 2017 1st IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2017 17th IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe, Milan, Italy (2017).
[22] Truong D.N., Ngo V.T., Estimation of parameters associated with individual sources of voltage fluctuations, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 425–431 (2015), DOI: 10.1109/TPWRD.2020.2976707.
[23] Zhang W.M., Zhang Y.X., The reactive power and voltage control management strategy based on virtual reactance cloud control, Archives of Electrical Engineering, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 921–936 (2020), DOI: 10.24425/aee.2020.134639.
[24] Bian H.H., Zhong Y.Q., Sun J.S., Shi F.C., Study on power consumption load forecast based on K-means clustering and FCM-BP model, Energy Reports, vol. 6, pp. 693–700 (2020), DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.148.
[25] Chen Z., Du Z.B., Zhan H.Q., Wang K., An evaluation method of reactive power and voltage control ability for multiple distributed generators in an islanded micro-grid, 2018 International Conference on Power System Technology, Guangzhou, China, pp. 1819–1825 (2018).
[26] Lin C.F., Fang C.Z., Chen Y.L., Liu S.Y., Bie Z.H., Scenario generation and reduction methods for power flow examination of transmission expansion planning, 2017 IEEE 7th International Conference on Power and Energy Systems, Toronto, Canada, pp. 90–95 (2017).