Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Keywords

Search results

Number of results: 2
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article directly and indirectly refers to anthropological and philosophical texts which strive to discover and present the gender factor as important in the light of the humanities. The author refers to “Literackie nie-nazywanie. Onomastykon polskiej prozy współczesnej” (Literary Not-naming. Onomasticon of the modern Polish prose) by Magdalena Graf and indicates the femininity factor as a relevant one also in onomastics.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Katarzyna Skowronek
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Interpretative strategies are explored as a type of textual strategies alongside narrative and receptive ones. We illustrate modern, prose‑bound interpretative strategies targeting various types of perception and aesthetic delight. The interpretative strategies of modern Ukrainian and Polish prose are affected by the author’s choice of the convention lines implemented in the story, and the types of perception the story is targeting. These parameters help implement the story’s semantic structure, which determines the way it is interpreted by the reader. The reader’s own life, emotional, and receptive experience builds a criterion for the story’s maturity. The reader’s interpretative effort is seen in the text as a game which is divided into separate milestones and requires a shift in the interpretative vector at each of them or implies the reader’s ability to perceive the virtual worlds of the rhizomatic plot that maps a modern person’s mental processes. The ability to notice in one text various interpretative strategies constitutes one of the ways for the reader to take aesthetic delight as well as building within them man‑world interaction skills, the ability to accept the world’s uncertainty, someone else’s different attitude.
Go to article

Bibliography

Andrukhovych S., Amadoka, Lʹviv 2020.
Andrukhovych Yu., Chuvyrla i chudovys'ko, [v:] 100 tysyach sliv pro lyubov, vklyuchayuchy vyhuky, Kharkiv 2008.
Andrukhovych Yu., Tayemnytsya, Kharkiv 2007.
Bieńczyk M., Fragmenty posłowia miłosnego, Warszawa 2011.
Boellstorff T., Digital Anthropology, [in:] https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199766567‑0087.
Brandel A., Literature and Anthropology, [in:] https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.013.85.
Czapliński P., Poruszona mapa, Kraków 2016.
Dibrova V., Perekazky, Kyyiv 2013.
Dnistrovyy A., Drozofila nad tomom Kanta, Lʹviv 2010.
Dnistrovyy A., Fioletovyy krolyk, [v:] A. Dnistrovyy, Snidanok na snihu, Kharkiv 2014.
Domańska I., Antropologia literatury – projekt interdyscyplinarny czy transdyscyplinarny?, „Przegląd Kulturoznawczy” 2011, nr 1 (9).
Dorofeev D.Yu., Estetika obraza Lyudviga Vitgenshtejna, «Vіsnik Unіversytetu іmenі Alfreda Nobelya. Serіya: Fіlolohіchnі nauky / Bulletin of Alfred Nobel University. Series: Philology» 2017, № 1 (13).
Dukaj J., Starość aksolotla, Allegro, 2015, wydanie elektroniczne [epub3].
Haleta O., Eks‑tsentrychne literaturoznavstvo: vid teoriyi literatury do literaturnoyi antropolohiyi, «Visnyk Lʹvivsʹkoho universytetu. Seriya filolohichna» 2014, vyp. 60 (2), [v:] http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vlnu_fil_2014_60(2)__8.
Karpowicz I., Sońka, Kraków 2014.
Kremen V., Ilin V., Transformation of the Human Image in the Paradigm of Knowledge Evolution, „Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research” 2021, No. 19.
Kropyvko I., Ukrayins'ka i pol'ska postmoderna proza: karnaval, frahmentatsiya, frontyr, Kyyiv 2019.
Łebkowska A., Między antropologią literatury i antropologią literacką, „Teksty Drugie” 2007, nr 6.
Lem S., Doskonała próżnia, Lublin 1971.
Markowski M.P., Anthropology and Literature, przeł. A. Warso, „Teksty Drugie” 2012, nr 2.
Masłowska D., Wojna polsko‑ruska pod flagą biało‑czerwoną, Warszawa 2002.
Nycz R., Antropolohiya literatury. Kul'turna teoriya literatury. Poetyka dosvidu, per. O. Haleta, Lʹviv 2007.
Nycz R., Svit tekstu: poststrukturalizm i literaturoznavstvo, per. O. Haleta, Lʹviv 2007.
Rapport N., Literary Anthropology, [in:] https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199766567‑0067.
Rembowska‑Płuciennik M., Poetyka intersubiektywności: Kognitywistyczna teoria narracji a proza XX wieku, Toruń, 2012.
Rorty R., Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Cambridge 1989.
Tarnashynsʹka L., Literaturna antropolohiya: nabuttya «sebe‑dosvidu» (prolehomeny do napratsyuvannya metodolohichnoyi svidomosti), „Studia methodologica” 2008, vyp. 24.
Tokarczuk O., Prowadź swój pług przez kości umarłych, Kraków 2009.
Tulli M., Sny i kamienie, Warszawa 1999.
Wiles E., Three branches of literary anthropology: Sources, styles, subject matter, „Ethnography” 2020, nr 21 (2), [in:] https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138118762958.
Williams B., Virtual Ethnography, [in:] https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199766567‑0107.
Polishchuk O., Literaturna antropolohiya yak aktual'na naukova propozytsiya, „Studia Philologica” 2020, nr 1, [v:] https://studiap.kubg.edu.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/64.
Yurchuk O., Antropolohiya literatury: suchasnyy stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku, «Suchasni literaturoznavchi studiyi» 2014, vyp. 11.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Iryna Kropyvko
1

  1. Дніпро, Дніпровський національний університет ім. Олеся Гончара

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more