Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 4
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper addresses optimal control problem of mobile manipulators. Dynamic equations of those mechanisms are assumed herein to be uncertain. Moreover, unbounded disturbances act on the mobile manipulator whose end-effector tracks a desired (reference) trajectory given in a task (Cartesian) space. A computationally efficient class of two-stage cascaded (hierarchical) control algorithms based on both the transpose Jacobian matrix and transpose actuation matrix, has been proposed. The offered control laws involve two kinds of non-singular terminal sliding mode (TSM) manifolds, which were also introduced in the paper. The proposed class of cooperating sub-controllers is shown to be finite time stable by fulfilment of practically reasonable assumptions. The performance of the proposed control strategies is illustrated on an exemplary mobile manipulator whose end-effector tracks desired trajectory.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

M. Galicki
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Main topic of the paper is a problem of designing the input-output decoupling controllers for nonholonomic mobile manipulators. We propose a selection of output functions in much more general form than in [1,2]. Regularity conditions guaranteeing the existence of the input-output decoupling control law are presented. Theoretical considerations are illustrated with simulations for mobile manipulator consisting of RTR robotic arm mounted atop of a unicycle which moves in 3D-space.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

A. Mazur
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

A method of planning collision-free trajectory for a mobile manipulator tracking a line section path is presented. The reference trajectory of a mobile platform is not needed, mechanical and control constraints are taken into account. The method is based on a penalty function approach and a redundancy resolution at the acceleration level. Nonholonomic constraints in a Pfaffian form are explicitly incorporated to the control algorithm. The problem is shown to be equivalent to some point-to-point control problem whose solution may be easier determined. The motion of the mobile manipulator is planned in order to maximise the manipulability measure, thus to avoid manipulator singularities. A computer example involving a mobile manipulator consisting of a nonholonomic platform (2,0) class and a 3 DOF RPR type holonomic manipulator operating in a three-dimensional task space is also presented.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Grzegorz Pajak
Iwona Pajak
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper considers the problem of the accurate task space finite-time control susceptible to both undesirable disturbance forces exerted on the end-effector and unknown friction forces coming from joints directly driven by the actuators as well as unstructured forces resulting from the kinematic singularities appearing on the mechanism trajectory. We obtain a class of estimated extended transposed Jacobian controllers which seem to successfully counteract the external disturbance forces on the basis of a suitably defined task-space non-singular terminal sliding manifold (TSM) and the Lyapunov stability theory. Moreover, in order to overcome (or to minimise) the undesirable chattering effects, the proposed robust control law involves the second-order sliding technique. The numerical simulations (closely related to an experiment) ran for a mobile manipulator consisting of a non-holononic platform of (2;0) type and a holonomic manipulator of two revolute kinematic pairs show the performance of the proposed controllers and make a comparison with other well-known control schemes.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1.  J. Balleieul, “Kinematic programming alternatives for redundant manipulators,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, IEEE, St. Louis, MO, USA, 1985, pp. 722–728.
  2.  M. Rani, N. Kumar, and H.P. Singh, “Efficient position/force control of constrained mobile manipulators,” Int. J. Dynam. Control, vol. 6, pp. 1629–1638, 2018.
  3.  W. Dong, “On trajectory and force tracking control of constrained mobile manipulators with parameter uncertainty,” Automatica, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1475–1484, 2002.
  4.  M. Przybyla, M. Kordasz, R. Madonski, P. Herman, and P. Sauer, “Active disturbance rejection control of a 2DOF manipulator with significant modeling uncertainty,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 509–520, 2012.
  5.  C. Baspinar, “On robust position/force control of robot manipu- lators with constraint uncertainties,” Proc. of the 10th IFAC Symposium on Robot Control, vol. 45, no. 22, pp. 555–560, 2012.
  6.  Z. Li and S.S. Ge, Fundamentals of modeling and control of mobile manipulators, Boca Raton, London, New York: CRC, 2013.
  7.  Z. Li, S.S. Ge, M. Adams, and W.S. Wijesoma, “Robust adaptive control of uncertain constrained nonholonomic mobile manipulators,” Automatica, vol. 44, pp. 776–784, 2008.
  8.  M. Kaczmarek, W. Domski, and A. Mazur, “Position-force control of mobile manipulator–nonadaptive and adaptive case,” Arch. Control Sci., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 487–503, 2017.
  9.  G.D. White, R.M. Bhatt, C.P. Tang, and V.N. Krovi, “Experimental evaluation of dynamic redundancy resolution in a nonholonomic wheeled mobile manipulator,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 349–357, 2009.
  10.  G.D. White, R.M. Bhatt, and V.N. Krovi, “Dynamic redundancy resolution in a nonholonomic wheeled mobile manipulator,” Robotica, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 147–156, 2007.
  11.  B. Nemec and L. Zlaypah, “Force control of redundant robots in unstructured environment,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 233–240, 2002.
  12.  F. Inoue, T. Murakami, and K. Ohnishi, “A motion control of mobile manipulator with external force,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 137–142, 2001.
  13.  T. Shamir and Y. Yomdin, “Repeatability of redundant manipulators: Mathematical solution of the problem,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1004–1009, 1988.
  14.  M. Boukattaya, N. Mezghani, and T. Damak, “Adaptive motion/force control of uncertain nonholonomic mobile manipulator with estimation of unknown external force,” Multibody Sys. Dyn. vol. 44, pp. 223–250, 2018.
  15.  S. Dehghan, M. Danesh, and F. Sheikholeslam, “Adaptive hybrid force/position of robot manipulators using an adaptive force estimator in the presence of parametric uncertainty,” Adv. Rob. vol. 29, no 4, pp. 209–223, 2015.
  16.  M. Boukattaya, M. Jallouli, T. Damak, “On trajectory tracking control for nonholonomic mobile manipulators with dynamic uncertainties and external torque disturbances,” Rob. Auton. Syst. vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 1640–1647, 2012.
  17.  P. Gierlak and M. Szuster, “Adaptive position/force control for robot manipulator in contact with a flexible environment,” Rob. Auton. Syst., vol. 95, pp. 80–101, 2017.
  18.  C. Edwards and S.K. Spurgeon, Sliding mode control: Theory and Application, London, Taylor and Francis, 1998.
  19.  V.I. Utkin, Sliding Modes in Control and Optimization, Springer- Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992.
  20.  L. Fridman, “Singularly perturbed analysis of chattering in relay control systems,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 2079–2084, 2002.
  21.  M. Galicki, “Tracking the kinematically optimal trajectories by mobile manipulators,” J. Intell. Rob. Syst. vol. 93, pp. 635–648, 2018.
  22.  M. Galicki, “Optimal sliding control of mobile manipulators,”  Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 777–788, 2019.
  23.  G. Campion, G. Bastin, and B.D. Andrea-Novel, “Structural properties and classification of kinematic and dynamic models of wheeled mobile robots,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 47–62, 1996.
  24.  H. Seraji, “A unified approach to motion control of mobile manipulators,” Int. J. Rob. Res. vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 107–118, 1998.
  25.  H. Seraji and R. Colbaugh, “Improved configuration control for redundant robots,” J. Robotic Syst. vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 897–928, 1990.
  26.  M. Galicki, “Inverse kinematics solution to mobile manipulators” Int. J. Rob. Res. vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1041–1064, 2003.
  27.  M. Galicki, “Finite-time control of robotic manipulators,” Automatica, vol. 51, pp. 49–54, 2015.
  28.  A.F. Filippov, Differential Equations with Discontinuous Righthand Side, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands, 1988.
  29.  J. Wang and Y. Li, “Manipulation of a mobile modular manip- ulator interacting with the environment with the assistance of tactile sensing feedback,” Int. J. Humanoid Rob. vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 777–793, 2011.
  30.  D. Phong, J. Choi, W. Lee, and S. Kang, “A novel method for estimating external force: simulation study with a 4-DOF robot manipulator,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 755– 766, 2015.
  31.  C.C. Cheah, K. Lee, S. Kawamura, and S. Arimoto, “Asymptotic stability control with approximate Jacobian matrix and its application to visual servoing,” in Proc. 39th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2000, vol. 4, pp. 3939–3944.
  32.  C.C. Cheah, “On duality of inverse Jacobian and transpose Jaco- bian in task-space regulation of robots,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2006), Orlando, FL, USA, 2006, pp. 2571–2576.
  33.  S.A.A. Moosavian and E. Papadopoulos, “Modified transpose Jacobian control of robotic systems,” Automatica, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 1226–1233, 2007.
  34.  M. Defoort, T. Floquet, A. Kokosy, and W. Perruquetti, “A novel higher order sliding mode control scheme,” Syst. Control Lett. vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 102–108, 2009.
  35.  M. Defoort, T. Floquet, A. Kokosy, and W. Perruquetti, “Higher order sliding modes in collaborative robotics,” in Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences Book Series (LNCIS), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2017, vol. 412, pp. 409–437.
  36.  M. Galicki, “Finite-time trajectory tracking control in a task space of robotic manipulators,” Automatica, vol. 67, pp. 165– 170, 2016.
  37.  A.N. Atasi and H.K. Khalil, “Separation results for the stabilization of nonlinear systems using different high-gain observer designs,” Syst. Control Lett. vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 183–191, 2000.
  38.  A. Levant, “Higher-order sliding modes, differentiation and output-feedback control,” Int. J. Control, vol. 76, no. 9-10, pp. 924–941, 2003.
  39.  A. Levant and M. Livne, “Exact differentiation of signals with unbounded higher derivatives,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1076–1080, 2012.
  40.  U. Ozbay, H.T. Sahin, and E. Zergeroglu, “Robust tracking con- trol of kinematically redundant robot manipulators subject to multiple selfmotion criteria,” Robotica, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 711– 728, 2008.
  41.  J.D. Han, Y.Q. He, and W.L. Xu, “Angular acceleration esti- mation and feedback control: An experimental investigation,” Mechatronics, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 524–532, 2007.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Mirosław Galicki
1

  1. Centrum Badan Kosmicznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk, ul. Bartycka 18A, 00-716 Warsaw, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more