Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 30
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Environmental applications of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have recently attracted worldwide attentiondue to their excellent adsorption capacities and promising physical, chemical and mechanical properties, as well asthe preparation of novel membranes with attractive features for water purification. This paper critically reviews therecent progress on the preparation and applications of CNT based membranes in water and wastewater treatment. Various synthesis techniques for the preparation of CNT based membranes are discussed. The functionalization ofCNTs, which involves chemical/physical modification of pristine CNTs with different types of functional groups,improves the capabilities of CNT for water and wastewater treatment and/or removal of waterborne contaminants.The CNT-based membrane applications are found to possess a variety of advantages, including improving waterpermeability, high selectivity and antifouling capability. However, their applications at full scale are still limitedby their high cost. Finally, we highlight that CNT membranes with promising removal efficiencies for respectivecontaminants can be considered for commercialization and to achieve holistic performance for the purpose ofwater treatment and desalination. This paper may provide an insight for the development of CNT based membranesfor water purification in the future. With their tremendous separation performance, low biofouling potential andultra-high water flux, CNT membranes have the potential to be a leading technology in water treatment, especiallydesalination.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Adamczak, M., Kaminska, G. & Bohdziewicz, J. (2019). Preparation of polymer membranes by in situ interfacial polymerization. International Journal of Polymer Science, vol. 219, Article ID 6217924, 13 pages, DOI: 10.1155/2019/6217924
  2. Ahmad, A., El-Nour, K.A., Ammar, R.A.A. & Al-Warthan, A., (2012). Carbon nanotubes, science and technology part (I) structure, synthesis and characterization., Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 5, pp. 1–23, DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2010
  3. Ahmed, F., Santos, C.M., Mangadlao, J., Advincula, R. & Rodrigues, D.F. (2013). Antimicrobial PVK: SWNT nanocomposite coated membrane for water purification: performance and toxicity testing, Water Res., 47, 12, pp. 3966–3975, DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.10.055
  4. Ahn, C.H, Baek, Y., Lee, C., Kim, S.O., Kim, S., Lee, S., Kim, S.H. Bae, S.S., Park, J. & Yoon, J. (2012). Carbon nanotube-based membranes: fabrication and application to desalination. J. Ind. Eng. Chem.,18, pp. 1551–1559, DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2012.04.005.
  5. Ajmani, G.S., Goodwin, D., Marsh, K., Fairbrother, D.H., Schwab, K.J., Jacangelo, J.G. & Huang, H. (2012). Modification of low pressure membranes with carbon nanotube layers for fouling control, Water Res., 46, 17, pp. 5645–5654, DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2012.07.059.
  6. Ali, S., Ur Rehman, S.A., Luan, H.Y., Usman Farid, M. & Huang, H. (2019). Challenges and opportunities in functional carbon nanotubes for membrane-based water treatment and desalination. Science of the Total Environment, 646, pp.1126–1139, DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.348.
  7. Al-Hakami, S.M., Khalil, A.B., Laoui, T. & Atieh, M.A. (2013). Fast disinfection of Escherichia coli bacteria using carbon nanotubes interaction with microwave radiation. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl.,458943, DOI: 10.1155/2013/458943.
  8. Al-Khaldi, F.A., Abu-Sharkh, B., Abulkibash, A.M. & Atieh, M.A. (2013). Cadmium removal by activated carbon, carbon nanotubes, carbon nanofibers, and carbon fly ash: a comparative study. Desalin. Water Treat., 53, pp. 1–13, DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2013.847805.
  9. Ansari, R. & Kazemi, E. (2012). Detailed investigation on single water molecule entering carbon nanotubes. App. Math. Mech., 33, pp.1287–1300, DOI: 10.1007/s10483-012-1622-8.
  10. Atieh, M.A., Bakather, O.Y., Tawabini, B.S., Bukhari, A.A., Khaled, M., Alharthi, M., Fettouhi, M. & Abuilaiwi, F.A. (2010). Removal of chromium (III) from water by using modified and nonmodified carbon nanotubes, J. Nanomater., Article ID 232378, pp.1-9, DOI: 10.1155/2010/232378.
  11. Baek, Y., Kim, C., Kyun, D., Kim, T., Seok, J., Hyup, Y., Hyun, K., Seek, S., Cheol, S., Lim, J., Lee, K. & Yoon, J. (2014), High performance and antifouling vertically aligned carbon nanotube membrane for water purification. J. Membr. Sci., 460, 171–177, DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.042.
  12. Bahgat, M., Farghali, A.A., El Rouby, W.M.A. & Khedr, M.H. (2011). Synthesis and modification of multi-walled carbon nano-tubes (MWCNTs) for water treatment applications, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 92, 2, pp. 307–313, DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2011.07.002.
  13. Bai, L., Liang, H., Crittenden, J., Qu, F., Ding, A., Ma, J., Du, X., Guo, S. & Li, G. (2015), Surface modification of UF membranes with functionalized MWCNTs to control membrane fouling by nom fractions. J. Membr. Sci., 492, 400–411, DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.006.
  14. Balasubramanian, K. & Burghard, M. (2005). Chemically functionalized carbon nanotubes, Small, 1, pp. 180–192, DOI: 10.1002/smll.200400118.
  15. Bhadra, M., Roy, S. & Mitra, S. (2013). Enhanced desalination using carboxylated carbon nanotube immobilized membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol., 120, pp. 373–377, DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.10.020.
  16. Bodzek, M. & Konieczny, K. (2017). Membrane techniques in the treatment of geothermal water for fresh and potable water production. [In:] Geothermal Water Management, Bundschuh, J. & Tomaszewska, B. (Eds.). CRC Press/Balkema, Taylor and Francis Group, Ch. 8, pp. 157–231, DOI: 10.1201/9781315734972.
  17. Bodzek, M. (2019). Membrane separation techniques – removal of inorganic and organic admixtures and impurities from water environment – review, Archives of Environmental Protection, 45, 4, pp. 4-19. DOI: 10.24425/aep.2019.130237.
  18. Bodzek, M., Konieczny, K. & Rajca, M. (2019). Membranes in water and wastewater disinfection – review. Archives of Environmental Protection, 45 (1), pp. 3-18, DOI: 10.24425/aep.2019.126419.
  19. Bodzek, M., Konieczny, K. & Kwiecińska-Mydlak, A. (2020a). Nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment. Graphene – the nanomaterial for next generation of semipermeable membranes. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 50, 15, pp. 1515-1579, DOI: 10.1080/10643389.2019.1664258.
  20. Bodzek, M., Konieczny, K. & Kwiecińska-Mydlak, A. (2020b). The application of nanomaterial adsorbents for the removal of impurities from water and wastewaters: a review, Desalination and Water Treatment, 185, pp. 1-26, DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2020.25454
  21. Bodzek, M., Konieczny, K. & Kwiecińska-Mydlak, A. (2020c). The application for nanotechnology and nanomaterials in water and wastewater treatment. Membranes, photocatalysis and disinfection, Desalination and Water Treatment, 186, pp. 88–106, DOI:10.5004/dwt.2020.25231
  22. Brady-Estévez, A.S., Kang, S. & Elimelech, M. (2008). A single‐walled‐carbon‐nanotube filter for removal of viral and bacterial pathogens, Small, 4, 4, pp. 481–484. DOI: 10.1002/smll.200700863.
  23. Brady-Estévez, A.S., Schnoor, M.H., Kang, S. & Elimelech, M. (2010). SWNT–MWNT hybrid filter attains high viral removal and bacterial inactivation, Langmuir, 26, pp. 19153–19158. DOI: 10.1021/la103776y.
  24. Brunet, L., Lyon, D., Zodrow, K., Rouch, J.-C., Caussat, B., Serp, P., Remigy, J.-C., Wiesner, M. & Alvarez, P.J. (2008). Properties of membranes containing semi- dispersed carbon nanotubes, Environ. Eng. Sci., 25, pp. 565–575. DOI: 10.1089/ees.2007.0076.
  25. Celik, E., Park, H., Choi, H. & Choi, H. (2011). Carbon nanotube blended polyethersulfone membranes for fouling control in water treatment, Water Res., 45, pp. 274–282. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.07.060.
  26. Chan, Y. & Hill, J.M. (2012). Modeling on ion rejection using membranes comprising ultrasmall radii carbon nanotubes, Eur. Phys. J. B, 85, pp. 56. DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2012-21029-0.
  27. Chan, Y. & Hill, J.M. (2013). Ion selectivity using membranes comprising functionalized carbon nanotubes, J. Math. Chem., 53, pp. 1258–1273. DOI: 10.1007/s10910-013-0142-y.
  28. Chan ,W.-F., Chen, H.-Y., Surapathi, A., Taylor, M.G., Shao, X., Marand, E. & Johnson, J.K. (2013). Zwitterion functionalized carbon nanotube/polyamide nanocomposite membranes for water desalination, ACS Nano, 7, pp. 5308–5319.; DOI: 10.1021/nn4011494.
  29. Chen, H., Li, J., Shao, D., Ren, X. & Wang, X. (2012). Poly(acrylic acid) grafted multiwall carbon nanotubes by plasma techniques for Co(II) removal from aqueous solution, Chem. Eng. J., 210, pp. 475–481. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.08.082.
  30. Chen, X., Qiu, M., Ding, H., Fu, K. & Fan, Y. (2016). A reduced graphene oxide nanofiltration membrane intercalated by well-dispersed carbon nanotubes for drinking water purification, Nanoscale, 8, pp. 5696–5705./ DOI: 10.1039/c5nr08697c.
  31. Chi, M.F., Wu,W.L., Du,Y., Chin,C.J. & Lin, C.C. (2016). Inactivation of Escherichia coli planktonic cells by multi-walled carbon nanotubes in suspensions: Effect of surface function-nalization coupled with medium nutrition level, J Hazard. Mater., 318, pp. 507-514. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.07.013.
  32. Choi, J., Jegal, J. & Kim, W. (2006). Fabrication and characterization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes/polymer blend membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 284, pp. 406–415. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.08.013.
  33. Chung, Y.T., Mahmoudi, E., Mohammad, A.W., Benamor, A., Johnson, D. & Hilal, N. (2017). Development of polysulfone-nanohybrid membranes using ZnO-GO composite for enhanced antifouling and antibacterial control, Desalination, 402, pp. 123–132. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2016.09.030.
  34. Corry, B. (2008). Designing carbon nanotube membranes for efficient water desalination, J.Phys. Chem. B, 112, pp. 1427–1434. DOI: 10.1021/jp709845u.
  35. Corry, B. (2011). Water and ion transport through functionalised carbon nanotubes: implications for desalination technology, Energy Environ Sci., 4, pp. 751-759. DOI: 10.1039/C0EE00481B.
  36. Dalmas F., Chazeau, L., Gauthier, C., Masenelli-Varlot, K., Dendievel, R., Cavaillé, J.Y. & Forró, L. (2005). Multiwalled carbon nanotube/polymer nanocomposites: processing and properties, J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys., 43, pp.1186–1197. DOI: 10.1002/polb.20409.
  37. Das, R., Abd Hamid, S.B., Ali, M.E., Ismail, A.F., Annuar, M.S.M. & Ramakrishna, S. (2014a). Multifunctional carbon nanotubes in water treatment: the present, past and future, Desalination, 354, pp. 160–179. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.09.032.
  38. Das, R., Ali, M.E., Hamid, S.B.A., Ramakrishna, S. & Chowdhury, Z.Z. (2014b). Carbon nanotube membranes for water purification: a bright future in water desalination, Desalination, 336, pp. 97–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.12.026.
  39. Daer, S., Kharraz, J., Giwa, A. & Hasan, S.W. (2015). Recent applications of nanomaterials in water desalination: a critical review and future opportunities, Desalination, 367, pp. 37–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.03.030.
  40. de Lannoy, C.-F., Soyer, E. & Wiesner, M.R. (2013). Optimizing carbon nanotube-reinforced polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes through carboxylic acid functionalization, J. Membr. Sci.,447, pp. 395–402. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.023.
  41. Dobrzańska-Danikiewicz, A.D., Łukowiec, D., Cichocki, D. & Wolany, W. (2015). Nanokompozyty złożone z nanorurek węglowych pokrytych nanokryształami metali szlachetnych, Open Access Library, Annal V Issue 2, International OCSCO World Press. (in Polish). http://www.openaccesslibrary.com/vol22015/cover.pdf.
  42. Dufresne, A., Paillet, M., Putaux, J.L., Canet, R., Carmona, F., Delhaes, P. & Cui, S. (2002). Processing and characterization of carbon nanotube/poly(styrene-co-butyl acrylate) nanocomposites, J. Mater. Sci., 37, pp. 3915–3923. DOI: 10.1023/A:1019659624567.
  43. Dumée, L., Campbell, J.L., Sears, K., Schutz, J., Finn, N., Duke, M. & Gray, S. (2011). The Impact of hydrophobic coating on the performance of carbon nanotube bucky paper membranes in membrane distillation, Desalination, 283, pp. 64–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.02.046.
  44. Engel, M. & Chefetz, B. (2016). Adsorption and desorption of dissolved organic matter by carbon nanotubes: effects of solution chemistry, Environ. Pollut., 213, pp. 90–98. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.02.009.
  45. Fornasiero, F., Park, H.G., Holt, J.K., Stadermann, M., Grigoropoulos, C.P., Noy, A. & Bakaijn, O. (2008). Ion exclusion by sub-2-nm carbon nanotube pores, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 105, pp. 17250–17255. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0710437105.
  46. Goh, P.S, Ismail, A.F. & Ng, B.C. (2013a). Carbon nanotubes for desalination: Performance evaluation and current hurdles, Desalination, 308, pp. 2–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.07.040.
  47. Goh, K., Setiawan, L., Wei, L., Jiang, W., Wang, R. & Chen, Y. (2013b). Fabrication of novel functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotube immobilized hollow fiber membranes for enhanced performance in forward osmosis process, J. Membr. Sci., 446, pp. 244–254. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.06.022.
  48. Goh, P.S. & Ismail, A.F. (2015). Graphene-based nanomaterial: the state-of-the-art material for cutting edge desalination technology, Desalination, 356, pp. 115–128. DOI: 10.1016//j.desal.2014.10.001
  49. Goh, K., Karahan, H.E., Wei, L., Bae, T.-H., Fane, A.G., Wang, R. & Chen, Y. (2016a). Carbon nanomaterials for advancing separation membranes: a strategic perspective, Carbon, 109, pp. 694–710. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.077.
  50. Goh, P.S., Ismail, A.F. & Hilal, N. (2016b). Nano-enabled membranes technology: sustainable and revolutionary solutions for membrane desalination? Desalination, 380, pp. 100–104. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.06.002.
  51. Goh, P.S., Matsuura, T., Ismail, A.F. & Hilal, N. (2016c). Recent trends in membranes and membrane processes for desalination, Desalination, 391, pp. 43–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.12.016
  52. Gong, J.L., Wang, B., Zeng, G.M., Yang, C.P., Niu, C.G., Niu, Q.Y., Zhou, W.J. & Liang, Y. (2009). Removal of cationic dyes from aqueous solution using magnetic multi-wall carbon nanotube nanocomposite as adsorbent, J. Hazard. Mater., 164, 2-3, pp. 1517-1522. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.072.
  53. Guo, J., Zhang, Q., Cai, Z. & Zhao, K. (2016). Preparation and dye filtration property of electrospun polyhydroxybutyrate–calcium alginate/carbon nanotubes composite nanofibrous filtration membrane, Sep. Purif. Technol., 161, pp. 69-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2016.01.036.
  54. Han, Y., Xu, Z. & Gao, C. (2013). Ultrathin graphene nanofiltration membrane for water purification, Adv. Funct. Mater., 23, pp. 3693–3700. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201202601.
  55. Hinds, B.J., Chopra, N., Rantell, T., Andrews, R., Gavalas, V. & Bachas, L.G. (2004). Aligned multiwalled carbon nanotube membranes, Science, 303, pp. 62–65. DOI: 10.1126/science.1092048.
  56. Holt, J.K., Park, H.G., Wang, Y., Stadermann, M., Artyukhin, A.B., Grigoropoulos, C.P, Noy, A. & Bakajin, O. (2006). Fast mass transport through sub-2-nanometer carbon nanotubes, Science, 312, pp. 1034–1037. DOI: 10.1126/science.1126298.
  57. Hoon, C., Baek, Y., Lee, C., Ouk, S., Kim, S., Lee, S., Kim, S., Seek, S., Park, J. & Yoon, J. (2012). Carbon nanotube-based membranes: fabrication and application to desalination, J.Ind. Eng. Chem., 18, pp. 1551–1559. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2012.04.005.
  58. Hou, C.-H., Liu, N.-L., Hsu, H.-L. & Den, W. (2014). Development of multi-walled carbon nanotube/poly(vinyl alcohol) composite as electrode for capacitive deionization, Sep. Purif. Technol., 130, pp. 7–14. DOIL: 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.04.004.
  59. Huczko, A., Kurcz, M. & Popławska, M. (2015). Nanorurki węglowe. Otrzymywanie, charakterystyka, zastosowania, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa.
  60. Hummer, G., Rasaiah,i J.C. & Noworyta, J.P. (2001). Water conduction through the hydrophobic channel of a carbon nanotube, Nature, 414, pp. 188–190. DOI: 10.1038/35102535
  61. Ihsanullah, F.A., Al-Khaldi, B. Abu-sharkh, M., Khaled Atieh, M.A., Nasser, M.S., Laoui, T., Saleh, T.A., Agarwal, S., Tyagi, I. & Gupta, V.K. (2015a). Adsorptive removal of cadmium(II) ions from liquid phase using acid modified carbon-based adsorbents, J.Mol.Liq., 204, pp. 255–263. DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2015.01.033.
  62. Ihsanullah, H.A., Asmaly, T.A., Saleh, T., Laoui, V.K., Gupta, M.A. & Atieh, M.A. (2015b). Enhanced adsorption of phenols from liquids by aluminum oxide/carbon nanotubes: comprehensive study from synthesis to surface properties, J. Mol. Liq., 206, pp 176–182. DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2015.02.028.
  63. Ihsanullah, T.L., Marwan, K., Muataz, A.A., Adnan, M.A., Amjad, B.K. & Aamir, A. (2015c). Novel anti-microbial membrane for desalination pretreatment: a silver nanoparticle-doped carbon nanotube membrane, Desalination, 376, pp. 82–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.08.017.
  64. Ihsanullah A.A., Al-Amer, A.M., Laoui, T., Al-Marri, M.J., Nasser, M.S., Khraisheh, M. & Atieh, M.A. (2016a). Heavy metal removal from aqueous solution by advanced carbon nanotubes: critical review of adsorption applications, Sep. Purif. Technol., 157, pp. 141–161. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.11.039.
  65. Ihsanullah, A., Al Amer, A.M., Laoui, T., Abbas, A., Al-Aqeeli, N., Patel, F., Khraisheh, M., Atieh, M.A., Hilal, N. (2016b). Fabrication and antifouling behaviour of a carbon nanotube membrane, Mater. Des., 89, pp. 549–558. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.018.
  66. Ihsanullah, F.A., Al-Khaldi, B., Abu-sharkh, M., A., Qureshi, M.I., Laoui, T. & Atieh, M.A. (2016c). Effect of acid modification on adsorption of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) from aqueous solution by activated carbon and carbon nanotubes, Desalin.Water Treat., 57, pp. 7232–7244. DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2015.102184.
  67. Ihsanullah, A.A. (2019). Carbon nanotube membranes for water purification: Developments, challenges, and prospects for the future, Sep Purif Technol., 209, pp. 307–337. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.07.043.
  68. Jia, G., Wang, H., Yan, L., Wang, X., Pei, R., Yan, T., Zhao, Y. & Guo, X. (2005). Cytotoxicity of carbon nanomaterials: Single-wall nanotube, multi-wall nanotube, and fullerene, Environmental Science & Technology, 39, pp. 1378-1383. DOI: 10.1021/es048729l.
  69. Kabbashi, N.A., Atieh, M.A., Al-Mamun, A., Mirghami, M.E.S., Alam, M.D.Z. & Yahya, N. (2009). Kinetic adsorption of application of carbon nanotubes for Pb(II) removal from aqueous solution, J. Environ. Sci., 21, 4, pp. 539–544. DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62305-0.
  70. Kaminska, G., Bohdziewicz, J., Palacio, L., Hernández, A. & Prádanos, P. (2016). Polyacrylonitrile membranes modified with carbon nanotubes: Characterization and micropollutants removal analysis, Desalin. Water Treat., 57, pp. 1344–1353. DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2014.1002277.
  71. Kandah, M.I. & Meunier, J.L. (2007). Removal of nickel ions from water by multi-walled carbon nanotubes, J. Hazard. Mater., 146, 1-2, pp. 283-288. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.12.019.
  72. Kang, S., Pinault, M., Pfefferle, L.D. & Elimelech, M. (2007). Single-walled carbon nanotubes exhibit strong antimicrobial activity, Langmuir, 23, pp. 8670–8673. DOI: 10.1021/la701067r.
  73. Kang, S., Herzberg, M., Rodrigues, D.F. & Elimelech, M. (2008). Antibacterial effects of carbon nanotubes: Size does matter, Langmuir, 24, pp. 6409–6413. DOI: 10.1021/la800951v.
  74. Kang G.D., Cao Y.M. (2012). Development of antifouling reverse osmosis membranes for water treatment: a review, Water Res., 46, 3, pp. 584–600. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.11.041.
  75. Kar, S., Bindal, R.C. & Tewari, P.K. (2012). Carbon nanotube membranes for desalination and water purification: challenges and opportunities, Nano Today, 7, pp. 385–389. DOI: 10.1016/j.nantod.2012.09.002.
  76. Khalid, A., Al-Juhani, A.A., Al-Hamouz, O.C., Laoui, T., Khan, Z. & Atieh, M.A. (2015). Preparation and properties of nanocomposite polysulfone/multi-walled carbon nanotubes membranes for desalination, Desalination, 367, pp. 134–144./ DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.04.001.
  77. Kim, E.-S., Hwang, G., Gamal El-Din, M. & Liu, Y. (2012). Development of nanosilver and multi-walled carbon nanotubes thin-film nanocomposite membrane for enhanced water treatment, J. Membr. Sci., pp. 394-395, 37-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.11.041.
  78. Kim, H.J., Choi, K., Baek, Y., Kim, D., Shim, J., Yoon, J. & Lee, J. (2014). High-Performance reverse osmosis CNT/polyamide nanocomposite membrane by controlled interfacial interactions, ACS Appl. Mater. Interf., 6, pp. 2819–2829. DOI: 10.1021/am405398f.
  79. Kochkodan, V. & Hilal, N. (2015). A comprehensive review on surface modified polymer membranes for biofouling mitigation, Desalination, 356, pp. 187–207. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.09.015.
  80. Lam, C.-W., James, J.T., McCluskey, R., Arepalli, S. & Hunter, R.L. (2008). A review of carbon nanotube toxicity and assessment of potential occupational and environmental health risks, Crit. Rev. Toxicol., 36, 3, pp. 189–217. DOI: 10.1080/10408440600570233.
  81. Lee, C. & Baik, S. (2010). Vertically-aligned carbon nano-tube membrane filters with superhydrophobicity and superoleophilicity, Carbon, 48, pp. 2192–2197. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.02.020.
  82. Lee, B., Baek, Y., Lee, M., Jeong, D.H., Lee, H.H., Yoon, J. & Kim, Y.H. (2015). A carbon nanotube wall membrane for water treatment, Nat. Commun., 6, pp. 7109. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8109.
  83. Lee, J., Jeong, S. & Liu, Z. (2016). Progress and challenges of carbon nanotube membrane in water treatment, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, pp. 999–1046. DOI: 10.1080/10643389.2016.1191894.
  84. Lee, J.-G., Lee, E.-J., Jeong, S., Guo, J., An, A.K., Guo, H., Kim, J., Leiknes, T. & Ghaffour, N. (2017). Theoretical modeling and experimental validation of transport and separation properties of carbon nanotube electrospun membrane distillation, J. Membr. Sci., 526, pp. 395-408. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.045
  85. Li, J., Chen, S., Sheng, G., Hu, J., Tan, X. & Wang, X., (2011). Effect of surfactants on Pb(II) adsorption from aqueous solutions using oxidized multiwall carbon nanotubes, Chem. Eng. J., 166, 2, pp. 551-558. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.11.018.
  86. Li, S., Liao, G., Liu, Z., Pan, Y., Wu, Q., Weng, Y., Zhang, X., Yang, Z. & Tsui O.K.C. (2014). Enhanced water flux in vertically aligned carbon nanotube arrays and polyethersulfone composite membranes, J. Mater. Chem. A., 2, pp. 12171–12176. DOI: 10.1039/C4TA02119C
  87. Li, S., He, M., Li, Z., Li, D. & Pan, Z. (2017). Removal of humic acid from aqueous solution by magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes decorated with calcium, J. Mole. Liquids, 230, pp. 520–528. DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.01.027
  88. Liu, L., Son, M., Chakraborty, S. & Bhattacharjee, C. (2013). Fabrication of ultra-thin polyelectrolyte/carbon nanotube membrane by spray-assisted layer-by- layer technique: characterization and its anti- protein fouling properties for water treatment, Desalin. Water Treat., 51, pp. 6194–6200. DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2013.780767.
  89. Liu, J., Wang, Y., Yu, Z., Cao, X., Tian, L., Sun, S. & Wu, P. (2017). A comprehensive analysis of blue water scarcity from the production, consumption and water transfer perspectives, Ecol. Indic., 72, pp. 870–880. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.021.
  90. Lu, C. & Chiu, H. (2006). Adsorption of zinc(II) from water with purified carbon nanotubes, Chem. Eng. Sci., 61, 4, pp. 1138–1145. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2005.08.007.
  91. Madhura, L., Kanchi, S., Myalowenkosi, I., Singh, S., Bisetty, K. & Inamuddin (2018). Membrane technology for water purification, Environmental Chemistry Letters, 16, pp. 343–365. DOI: 10.1007/s10311-017-0699-y.
  92. Majumder, M., Chopra, N., Andrews, R. & Hinds, B.J. (2005). Nanoscale hydrodynamics: enhanced flow in carbon nanotubes, Nature, 438, pp. 44. DOI: 10.1038/438044a.
  93. Manawi, Y., Kochkodan, V., Ali Hussein, M., M.A. Khaleel, M.A., Khraisheh M. & Hilal, N. (2016). Can carbon-based nanomaterials revolutionize membrane fabrication for water treatment and desalination? Desalination, 391, pp. 69–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2016.02.015.
  94. Manawi, Y.M., Ihsanullah, A. Samara Al-Ansari, T. & Atieh, M.A. (2018). A review of carbon nanomaterials’ synthesis via the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method, Materials, 11, pp. 822. DOI: 10.3390/ma11050822.
  95. Mauter, M.S. & Elimelech, M. (2008). Environmental applications of carbon-based nanomaterials, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 16, pp. 5843–5859. DOI: 10.1021/es8006904.
  96. McCarthy B., Coleman J.N., Czerw R., Dalton A.B., Panhuis M.I.H., Maiti A., Drury A., Bernier P., Nagy J.B., Lahr B., Byrne H.J., Carroll D.L., Blau W.J. (2002). A microscopic and spectroscopic study of interactions between carbon nanotubes and a conjugated polymer, J. Phys. Chem. B 106, pp. 2210–2216. DOI: 10.1021/jp013745f.
  97. McGinnis R.L., Reimund K., Ren L. Xia M.R., Chowdhury X., Sun M., Abril J.D., Moon M.M., Merrick J., Park K.A., Stevens J.R., McCutcheon B.D., Freeman. (2018). Large-scale polymeric carbon nanotube membranes with sub–1.27-nm pores, Sci. Adv. 4, e1700938. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1700938.
  98. Mechrez G., Krepker M.A., Harel Y., Lellouche J.-P., Segal E. (2014). Biocatalytic carbon nanotube paper: A ‘one-pot’ route for fabrication of enzyme-immobilized membranes for organophosphate bioremediation, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2, pp. 915–922. DOI: 10.1039/C3TB21439G.
  99. Mehwish N, Kausar A., Siddiq M. (2015). High-performance polyvinylidene fluoride/poly (styrene – butadiene – styrene)/functionalized MWCNTs-SCN-Ag nanocomposite membranes, Iran. Polym. J. 24, pp. 549–559. DOI: 10.1007/s13726-015-0346-z.
  100. Morsi R.E., Alsabagh A.M., Nasr S.A., Zaki M.M. (2017). Multifunctional nanocomposites of chitosan, silver nanoparticles, copper nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes for water treatment: Antimicrobial characteristics. Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 97, pp. 264-269. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.01.032.
  101. Mubarak N.M., Alicia R.F., Abdullah E.C., Sahu J.N., Haslija A.B.A., Tan J. (2013). Statistical optimization and kinetic studies on removal of Zn2+ using functionalized carbon nanotubes and magnetic biochar, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 1 (3), pp. 486-495. DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2013.06.011.
  102. Nie C., Yang Y., Cheng C., Ma L., Deng J., Wang L., Zhao C. (2017). Bioinspired and biocompatible carbon nanotube-Ag nanohybrid coatings for robust antibacterial applications, Acta. Biomater., 51, pp. 479-494. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.027.
  103. Ntim, S.A., Mitra, S. (2011). Removal of trace arsenic to meet drinking water standards using iron oxide coated multiwall carbon nanotubes, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 56, 2077-2083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.027.
  104. Ntim, S.A., Mitra, S. (2012). Adsorption of arsenic on multiwall carbon nanotube-zirconia nanohybrid for potential drinking water purification, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 375 (1), 154-159. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.01.063.
  105. Park O.-K., Kim N.H., Lau K.-t., Lee J.H. (2010a). Effect of surface treatment with potassium persulfate on dispersion stability of multi-walled carbon nanotubes, Mater. Lett., 64, pp. 718–721. DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2009.12.048.
  106. Park J., Choi W., Cho J., Chun B.H., Kim S.H., Lee K.B., Bang J. (2010b). Carbon nanotube based nanocomposite desalination membranes from layer-by-layer assembly, Desalin. Water Treat., 15, pp. 76–83. DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2010.1670.
  107. Park J., Choi W., Kim S.H., Chun B.H., Bang J., Lee K.B., Park J., Choi W., Kim S.H., Chun B.H., Bang J., Lee K.B. (2010c). Enhancement of chlorine resistance in carbon nanotube based nanocomposite reverse osmosis membranes, Desalin. Water Treat., 15, pp. 198–204. DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2010.1686.
  108. Park S.-M., Jung J., Lee S., Baek Y., Yoon J., Seo D.K., et al. (2014). Fouling and rejection behavior of carbon nanotube membranes, Desalination, 343, pp. 180–186. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.10.005.
  109. Peng X., Jin J., Ericsson E.M., Ichinose I. (2007). General method for ultrathin free-standing films of nanofibrous composite materials, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 129, pp. 8625–8633. DOI: 10.1021/ja0718974.
  110. Pillay K., Cukrowska E.M., Coville N.J. (2009). Multi-walled carbon nanotubes as adsorbents for the removal of parts per billion levels of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution, J. Hazard. Mater., 166 (2-3), pp. 1067-1075. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.011.
  111. Qadir D., Mukhtar H., Keong L.K. (2017). Mixed matrix membranes for water purification applications, Sep. Purif Rev. 46, pp. 62–80. DOI: 10.1080/15422119.2016.1196460.
  112. Raghavendra S. Hebbar, Arun M. Isloor, Inamuddin, Asiri A.M. (2017). Carbon nanotube- and graphene-based advanced membrane materials for desalination, Environ Chem. Lett., 15, pp. 643–671. DOI: 10.1007/s10311-017-0653-z.
  113. Rashid M., Ralph S.F. (2017). Carbon nanotube membranes: synthesis, properties, and future filtration applications, Nanomaterials, 7 (5), 99-1-99-28. DOI: 10.3390/nano7050099.
  114. Ratto T.V., Holt J.K., Szmodis A.W. (2010). Membranes with embedded nanotubes for selective permeability, Patent Application No. 20100025330 (2010), https://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?Docid=07993524.
  115. Ren X., Chen C., Nagatsu M., Wang X. (2011). Carbon nanotubes as adsorbents in environmental pollution management: a review, Chem. Eng. J., 170 (2–3) pp. 395–410. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.08.045.
  116. Roy S., Jain V., Bajpai R., Ghosh P., Pente A.S., Singh B.P., Misra D.S. (2012). Formation of carbon nanotube bucky paper and feasibility study for filtration at the nano and molecular scale, J. Phys. Chem. C, 116, pp. 19025–19031. DOI: 10.1021/jp305677h.
  117. Rodrigues D.F., Elimelech M. (2010). Toxic Effects of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in the Development of E. coli Biofilm, Environmental Science & Technology, 44, pp. 4583-4589. DOI: 10.1021/es1005785.
  118. Scoville C., Cole R., Hogg J., Farooque O., and A. Russell, (2019). CarbonNanotubes, https://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/csep590a/08sp/projects/CarbonNanotubes.pdf(Accessed:11.25.2019
  119. Sears K., Dumée L., Schütz J., She M., Huynh C., Hawkins S., Duke M., Gray S. (2010). Recent developments in carbon nanotube membranes for water purification and gas separation, Materials 3, pp. 127. DOI: 10.3390/ma3010127.
  120. Seckler, D., R. Barker R., Amarasinghe U. (1999). Water scarcity in the twenty-first century, Int. J. Water Resour. Dev., 15, pp. 29–42. DOI: 10.1080/07900629948916.
  121. Selvan M.E., Keffer D., Cui S., Paddison S. (2010). Proton transport in water confined in carbon nanotubes: a reactive molecular dynamics study, Molecular Simulation, 36 (7-8), pp. 568-578. DOI: 10.1080/08927021003752887.
  122. Shah P., Murthy C.N. (2013). Studies on the porosity control of MWCNT/polysulfone composite membrane and its effect on metal removal, J. Membr. Sci., 437, pp. 90–98. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.02.042.
  123. Shao D., Sheng G., Chen C., Wang X., Nagatsu M. (2010). Removal of polychlorinated biphenyls from aqueous solutions using beta-cyclodextrin grafted multiwalled carbon nanotubes, Chemosphere, 79 (7), pp. 679-685. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.03.008.
  124. Shawky H.A., Chae S., Lin S., Wiesner M.R. (2011). Synthesis and characterization of a carbon nanotube/polymer nanocomposite membrane for water treatment, Desalination, 272, pp. 46–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.12.051.
  125. Shen J- Nan, Yu C- Chao., Hui min R., Cong jie Gao., Van Der Bruggen B. (2013). Preparation and characterization of thin-film nanocomposite membranes embedded with poly(methyl methacrylate) hydrophobic modified multiwalled carbon nanotubes by interfacial polymerization, J. Membr. Sci., 442, pp. 18–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.04.018.
  126. Shen Y.-X., Saboe P.O., Sines I.T., Erbakan M., Kumar M. (2014). Biomimetic membranes: a review, J. Membr. Sci., 454, pp. 359–381. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.019.
  127. Song X., Wang L., Tang C.Y., Wang Z., Gao C. (2015). Fabrication of carbon nanotubes incorporated double-skinned thin film nanocomposite membranes for enhanced separation performance and antifouling capability in forward osmosis process, Desalination, 369, pp. 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.04. 020.
  128. Stankovich S., Dikin D.A., Dommett G.H.B., Kohlhaas K.M., Zimney E.J., Stach E.A., Piner R.D., Nguyen S.T., Ruoff R.S. (2006). Graphene-based composite materials, Nature, 442, pp. 282–286. DOI: 10.1038/nature04969.
  129. Sweetman L.J., Nghiem L., Chironi I., Triani G., In Het Panhuis M., Ralph S.F. (2012). Synthesis, properties and water permeability of swnt buckypapers, J. Mater. Chem. A, 22, pp. 13800–13810. DOI: 10.1039/C2JM31382K.
  130. Sweetman L.J., Alcock, L.J., McArthur J.D., Stewart E.M., Triani G., Ralph S.F. (2013), Bacterial filtration using carbon nanotube/antibiotic buckypaper membranes, J. Nanomater, 2013, 1-11. DOI: 10.1155/2013/781212.
  131. Tian M., Wang R., Goh K, Liao Y., Fane A.G. (2015). Synthesis and characterization of high performance novel thin film nanocomposite PRO membranes with tiered nanofiber support reinforced by functionalized carbon nanotubes, J. Membr. Sci., 486, pp. 151–160. DOI: 10.1016.j.memsci.2015.03.054.
  132. Tiede K, Hassellov M., Breitbarth E., Chaudhry Q., Boxall A.B.A. (2009). Considerations for environmental fate and ecotoxicity testing to support environmental risk assessments for engineered nanoparticles, J. Chromatogr., A, 1216, pp. 503–509. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.09.008.
  133. Tiraferri A., Vecitis C.D., Elimelech M. (2011). Covalent binding of single-walled carbon nanotubes to polyamide membranes for antimicrobial surface properties, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 3, pp. 2869–2877. DOI: 10.1021/am200536p.
  134. Tofighy, M.A., Mohammadi, T. (2011). Adsorption of divalent heavy metal ions from water using carbon nanotube sheets, J. Hazard. Mater., 185 (1), pp. 140-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.008.
  135. Tunuguntla R.H., Henley R.Y., Yao Y.-C., Pham T.A., Wanunu M., Noy A. (2017). Enhanced water permeability and tunable ion selectivity in subnanometer carbon nanotube porins, Science, 357, pp. 792–796. DOI: 10.1126/science.aan2438.
  136. Upadhyayula V.K., Deng S., Mitchell M.C., Smith G.B. (2009). Application of carbon nanotube technology for removal of contaminants in drinking water: a review, Sci. Total Environ., 408 (1), pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.09.027.
  137. Usman F.M., Luan H.-Y., Wang, Y., Huang H., An A.K., Jalil K.R. (2017). Increased adsorption of aqueous zinc species by Ar/O2 plasma-treated carbon nanotubes immobilized in hollow-fiber ultrafiltration membrane, Chem. Eng. J., 325, pp. 239–248. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.05.020.
  138. Vatanpour V., Esmaeili M., Hossein M., Abadi D. (2014). Fouling reduction and retention increment of polyethersulfone nanofiltration membranes embedded by amine-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes, J. Memb. Sci., 466, pp. 70–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.04.031.
  139. Vatanpour V., Zoqi N. (2017). Surface modification of commercial seawater reverse osmosis membranes by grafting of hydrophilic monomer blended with carboxylated multiwalled carbon nanotubes, Appl. Surf. Sci., 396, pp. 1478–1489. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.195.
  140. Vuković G.D., Marinković A.D., Čolić M., Ristić M.Đ., Aleksić R., Perić-Grujić A.A.,Uskoković P.S. (2010). Removal of cadmium from aqueous solutions by oxidized and ethylenediamine-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes, Chem. Eng. J., 157 (1), pp. 238–248. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.11.026.
  141. Wang X., Li Q., Xie J., Jin Z., Wang J., Li Y., Jiang K., Fan S. (2009). Fabrication of ultralong and electrically uniform single-walled carbon nanotubes on clean substrates, Nano Lett.,9, pp. 3137–3141. DOI: 10.1021/nl901260b
  142. Wang H., Yan N., Li Y., Zhou X., Chen J., Yu B., Gong M., Chen Q. (2012). Fe nanoparticle-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes: one-pot synthesis and their applications in magnetic removal of heavy metal ions, J. Mater. Chem., 22 (18), pp. 9230-9236. DOI: 10.1039/C2JM16584H.
  143. Wang H., Dong Z., Na C. (2013). Hierarchical carbon nanotube membrane-supported gold nanoparticles for rapid catalytic reduction of p-nitrophenol, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 1 (7), pp. 746–752. DOI: 10.1021/sc400048m.
  144. Wang S., Liang S., Liang P., Zhang X., Sun J., Wu S., Huang X. (2015a). In-situ combined dual-layer CNT/PVDF membrane for electrically-enhanced fouling resistance, J. Membr. Sci., 491, pp. 37–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.05.014.
  145. Wang Y., Zhu J., Huang H., Cho H.-H. (2015b). Carbon nanotube composite membranes for microfiltration of pharmaceuticals and personal care products: capabilities and potential mechanisms, J. Membr. Sci., 479, pp. 165–174. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.01.034.
  146. Wang Y., Ma J., Zhu J., Ye N., Zhang X., Huang H. (2016a). Multi-walled carbon nanotubes with selected properties for dynamic filtration of pharmaceuticals and personal care products, Water Res., 92, pp. 104–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.038.
  147. Wang J., Zhang P., Liang B., Liu Y., Xu T., Wang L., Cao B., Pan K. (2016b). Graphene oxide as an effective barrier on a porous nanofibrous membrane for water treatment, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 8, pp. 6211–6218. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b12723.
  148. Wang, Y., Huang, H.,Wei, X. (2018). Influence of wastewater precoagulation on adsorptive filtration of pharmaceutical and personal care products by carbon nanotube membranes, Chem. Eng. J., 333, pp. 66–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.149.
  149. WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme. Progress on household drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene 2000-2017. Geneva, Switzerland; New York, NY: WHO; UNICEF, 2019, https://washdata.org
  150. Wu H., Tang B., Wu P. (2010a). MWNTs/Polyester thin film nanocomposite membrane: an approach to overcome the trade-off effect between permeability and selectivity, J. Phys. Chem. C, 114, pp. 16395–16400. DOI: 10.1021/jp107280m.
  151. Wu H., Tang B., Wu P. (2010b). Novel ultrafiltration membranes prepared from a multiwalled carbon nanotubes/polymer composite, J. Membr. Sci., 362, pp. 374–383. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.064.
  152. www.fizyka.iss.com.pl/nanorurki/01nanorurki_.html (Accessed: 13.03.2021)
  153. Xiu Z.-M., Zhang Q.-B., Puppala H.L., Colvin V.L., Alvarez, P.J.J. (2012). Negligible particle-specific antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles, Nano Lett., 12, pp. 4271–4275. DOI: 10.1021/nl301934w.
  154. Xue S.-M., Xu Z.-L, Tang Y.-J., Ji C.-H. (2016). Polypiperazine-amide nanofiltration membrane modified by different functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 8, pp. 19135–19144. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b05545.
  155. Yan X.M., Shi B.Y., Lu J.J., Feng C.H., Wang D.S., Tang H.X. (2008). Adsorption and desorption of atrazine on carbon nanotubes, J. Colloi. Interf. Sci., 321 (1), pp. 30-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2008.01.047.
  156. Yang H.Y., Han Z.J., Yu S.F., Pey K.L., Ostrikov K., Karnik R. (2013a). Carbon nanotube membranes with ultrahigh specific adsorption capacity for water desalination and purification, Nat. Commun., 4, pp. 2220. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3220.
  157. Yang, X., Lee, J., Yuan, L., Chae, S.-R., Peterson, V.K., Minett, A.I., Yin, Y., Harris, A.T. (2013b). Removal of natural organic matter in water using functionalised carbon nanotube buckypaper, Carbon, 59, pp. 160–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.005.
  158. Yin J., Deng B. (2015). Polymer-matrix nanocomposite membranes for water treatment, J.Membr. Sci., 479, pp. 256–275. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.019.
  159. Zarrabi H., Ehsan M., Vatanpour V., Shockravi A., Safarpour M. (2016). Improvement in desalination performance of thin film nanocomposite nanofiltration membrane using amine-functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotube, Desalination, 394, pp. 83–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2016.05.002.
  160. Zhang L., Chen H. (2011). Preparation of high-flux thin film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membranes by incorporating functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes, Desalin. Water Treat., 34, pp. 19–24. DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2011.2801.
  161. Zhang J., Xu Z., Shan M., Zhou B., Li Y., Li B., Niu J., Qian X. (2013). Synergetic effects of oxidized carbon nanotubes and graphene oxide on fouling control and anti-fouling mechanism of polyvinylidene fluoride ultrafiltration membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 448, pp. 81–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.064.
  162. Zhang Y., Wu B., Xu H., Liu H., Wang M., He Y., Pan B. (2016). Nanomaterials-enabled water and wastewater treatment, NanoImpact, 3-4, pp. 22–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2016.09.004.
  163. Zhao Y.L., Stoddart J.F. (2009). Noncovalent functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes, Acc. Chem. Res., 42, pp. 1161–1171. DOI: 10.1021/ar900056z.
  164. Zhao C., Xu X., Chen J., Yang F. (2013a). Effect of graphene oxide concentration on the morphologies and antifouling properties of PVDF ultrafiltration membranes, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 1, pp. 349–354. DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2013.05.014.
  165. Zhao H., Wu L., Zhou Z., Zhang L., Chen H. (2013b). Improving the antifouling property of polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane by incorporation of isocyanate-treated Graphene oxide, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15, pp. 9084–9092. DOI: 10.1039/c3cp50955a.
  166. Zhao H., Qiu S., Wu L., Zhang L., Chen H., Gao C. (2014). Improving the performance of polyamide reverse osmosis membrane by incorporation of modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes, J. Membr. Sci., 450, pp. 249–256. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.09.014.
  167. Zheng J., Li M., Yu K., Hu J., Zhang X., Wang L. (2017). Sulfonated multiwall carbon nanotubes assisted thin-film nanocomposite membrane with enhanced water flux and anti-fouling property, J. Membr. Sci., 524, pp. 344–353. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.032
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Michał Bodzek
1
ORCID: ORCID
Krystyna Konieczny
2
ORCID: ORCID
Anna Kwiecińska-Mydlak
3
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Institute of Environmental Engineering Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland
  2. Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Poland
  3. Institute for Chemical Processing of Coal, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of this work was to investigate the influence of distilled water flowrate in two different porousmembrane modules on the size of generated nitrogen nanobubbles. Modules had different diameter and number of membrane tubes inside the module. As bubbles are cut off from the membrane surface by a shear stress induced by the liquid flow, the change in the linear liquid velocity should result in a change of the generated bubble diameter. For both modules, higher flowrate of liquid induced generation of smaller bubbles, which was consistent with our expectations. This effect can help us in generation of bubbles of desired size.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Karol Ulatowski
Paweł Sobieszuk
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Conventional membranes used in the process of premix membrane emulsification are prone to fouling, especially when biopolymers are employed as surfactants. An alternative to conventional membranes are dynamic membranes consisting of an unconsolidated porous medium. Dynamic membranes have the advantage of enabling easy cleaning of the inside of the pores. Experimental research carried out to date has focused on the application of hydrophilic dynamic membranes composed of glass microbeads for producing o/w emulsions. The aims of this study were to determine the efficiency of droplet size reduction in a w/o emulsion when passed through a dynamic hydrophobic membrane consisting of a bed of irregular polymer particles, and to assess the effect of multiple membrane passes on the properties of the w/o emulsion. The dynamic membranes evaluated in the tests were found to reduce the diameters of premix droplets when an appropriate pressure level was reached. Higher bed porosity was associated with greater fluxes achieved across the packed bed, but the resulting emulsions were less homogeneous. Multiple passes of the emulsion through the dynamic polypropylene membrane led to a further reduction in droplet size, but it was accompanied by a decline in emulsion homogeneity.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Adrianna Frankiewicz
1
ORCID: ORCID
Jacek Różański
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Poznan University of Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology and Engineering, ul. Berdychowo 4, 60-965 Poznan, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper presents the recent advances in pervaporative reduction of sulfur content in gasoline. Methods of preliminary selection of membrane active layer material are presented. Interactions between gasoline components (typical hydrocarbon and sulfur species) and membranes are showed. Influence of pervaporation process parameters i.e. feed temperature, downstream pressure and feed flow rate on the separation efficiency is discussed. Investigations of the influence of sulfur concentration in fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) gasoline on membrane performance have been conducted. A series of PV tests was carried out to investigate the separation properties of the commercial composite membrane with an active layer made of poly(dimethylsiloxane) and to determine the efficiency of organic sulphur compound (thiophene) removal from model thiophene/n-heptane mixture depending on its concentration.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Katarzyna Rychlewska
Michał Bodzek
Krystyna Konieczny
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper presents ultrafiltration results of model BSA (bovine serum albumin) and MB (myoglobin) solutions prepared with or without NaCl addition. The protein concentrations in the solutions were equal to 0.05 gdm􀀀3 for MB and 0.5 gdm􀀀3 for BSA. The ultrafiltration tests were performed using a laboratory scale unit equipped with 90 mm ceramic disc membranes with a filtration area of 5:610􀀀3 m2 and cut-off of 50 or 150 kDa. The tests were run under constant process conditions, i.e. a cross flow volume (CFV) of 5 ms􀀀1, transmembrane pressure (TMP) of 0.2 MPa, temperature of 20 ◦C and NaCl concentration of 0 or 10 wt%. The installation worked in a semi-open mode with a continuous permeate discharge and retentate recycle. The performance of the membranes was measured with the permeate volumetric flow rate, JV (m3m􀀀2s􀀀1) while their selectivity was determined by the protein rejection, R. The paper evaluates and discusses the protein rejection mechanisms as well as the influence of the membrane cut-off and sodium chloride concentration in the feed on the flux decline during the ultrafiltration of BSA and MB. Moreover, it provides an analysis of the first fouling phase by applying usual filtration laws.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Konrad Ćwirko
Elwira Tomczak
Daniela Szaniawska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents results of the field tests on membrane biogas enrichment performed with the application of mobile membrane installation (MMI) with the feed stream up to 10 Nm3/h. The mobile installation equipped with four hollow fibre modules with polyimide type membranes was tested at four different biogas plants. Two of them were using agricultural substrates. The third one was constructed at a municipal wastewater plant and sludge was fermented in a digester and finally in the fourth case biogas was extracted from municipal waste landfill site. Differences in the concentration of bio-methane in feed in all cases were observed and trace compounds were detected as well. High selectivity polyimide membranes, in proper module arrangements, can provide a product of high methane content in all cases. The content of other trace compounds, such as hydrogen sulphide, water vapour and oxygen on the product did not exceed the values stated by standard for a biogas as a vehicle fuel. The traces of hydrogen sulphide and water vapour penetrated faster to the waste stream enriched in carbon dioxide, which could lead to further purification of the product – methane being hold in the retentate (H2O > H2S > CO2 > O2 > CH4 > N2). In the investigated cases, when concentration of N2 was low and concentration of CH4 higher than 50%, it was possible to upgrade methane to concentration above 90% in a two-stage cascade.

To performsimulation ofCH4 andCO2 permeation through polyimide membrane,MATLABwas used. Simulation program has included permeation gaseous mixture with methane contents as observed at field tests in the range of 50 and 60% vol. The mass transport process was estimated for a concurrent hollow fibre membrane module for given pressure and temperature conditions and different values of stage cut. The obtained results show good agreement with the experimental data. The highest degree of methane recovery was obtained with gas concentrating in a cascade with recycling of the retentate.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Andrzej Grzegorz Chmielewski
Agata Urbaniak
Jacek Palige
Otton Roubinek
Katarzyna Wawryniuk
Andrzej Dobrowolski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents the basic input data and modelling results of IGCC system with membrane CO2 capture installation and without capture. The models were built using commercial software (Aspen and GateCycle) and with the use of authors’ own computational codes. The main parameters of the systems were calculated, such as gross and net power, auxiliary power of individual installations and efficiencies. The models were used for the economic and ecological analysis of the systems. The Break Even Point method of analysis was used. The calculations took into account the EU emissions trading scheme. Sensitivity analysis on the influence of selected quantities on break-even price of electricity was performed

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Anna Skorek-Osikowska
Łukasz Bartela
Janusz Kotowicz
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The influence of ion implantation on the structure and properties of polymers is a very complex issue. Many physical and chemical processes taking place during ion bombardment must be taken into consideration. The complexity of the process may exert both positive and negative influence on the structure of the material. The goal of this paper is to investigate the influence of H+, He+ and Ar+ ion implantation on the properties of polypropylene membranes used in filtration processes and in consequence on fouling phenomena. It has appeared that the ion bombardment caused the chemical modification of membranes which has led to decrease of hydrophobicity. The increase of protein adsorption on membrane surface has also been observed.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Karolina Kotra-Konicka
Joanna Kalbarczyk
Jakub M. Gac
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Fluorine and sodium chloride are common elements present in the water environment. According to WHO guidelines fluoride content in water cannot be not higher than 1.5 mgF-/dm3. Elevated fluoride content was observed all over the world and it leads to many health issues. It can be removed with the usage of various methods (ion exchange, membrane processes, adsorption, precipitation). In this paper fluoride removal with nanofiltration usage was described. Tests were performed with the application of Amicon 86400 filtration cells. Two types of commercial nanofiltration membranes NP010P and NP030P (Microdyn Nadir) were used. Transmembrane pressure was established as 0.3 MPa. For lower fluoride concentrations (5 mgF-/dm3) NF process allowed to decrease fluoride content under level 1.5 mgF-/dm3. Removal efficiency decreased with increasing fluoride content. Membrane NP030P showed better separation properties. Sodium chloride influenced removal efficiency as well as fluoride adsorption on/in membranes during the process. According to obtained data, better hydraulic properties exhibited membrane NP010P. For both membranes decrease in permeate flux in comparison to pure water was noticed what was observed. Relative permeability was lowered even to 0.32.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Akuno, M. H., Nocella, G., Milia, E. P. & Gutierrez, L. (2019). Factors influencing the relationship between fluoride in drinking water and dental fluorosis: A ten-year systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Water and Health, 17(6), pp. 845–862. DOI: 10.2166/wh.2019.300
  2. Ali, I., Alothman, Z. A. & Sanagi, M. M. (2015). Green Synthesis of Iron Nano-Impregnated Adsorbent for Fast Removal of Fluoride from Water. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 211, pp. 457–465. DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2015.07.034
  3. Ayala, L. I. M., Paquet, M., Janowska, K., Jamard, P., Quist-Jensen, C. A., Bosio, G. N., Mártire, D. O., Fabbri, D. & Boffa, V. (2018). Water Defluoridation: Nanofiltration vs Membrane Distillation. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 57(43), pp. 14740–14748. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b03620
  4. Banasiak, L. J. & Schäfer, A. I. (2009). Removal of boron, fluoride and nitrate by electrodialysis in the presence of organic matter. Journal of Membrane Science, 334(1–2), pp. 101–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.02.020
  5. Bannoud, A. H. & Darwich, Y. (2007). Elimination des ions fluorures et manganèses contenus dans les eaux par nanofiltration. Desalination, 206(1–3), pp. 449–456. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2006.02.071
  6. Bhatnagar, A., Kumar, E. & Sillanpää, M. (2011). Fluoride removal from water by adsorption - A review. Chemical Engineering Journal, 171(3), pp. 811–840. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.028
  7. Bowen, W. R., Mohammad, A. W. & Hilal, N. (1997). Characterisation of nanofiltration membranes for predictive purposes - Use of salts, uncharged solutes and atomic force microscopy. Journal of Membrane Science, 126(1), pp. 91–105. DOI:10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00276-1
  8. Carvalho, A. L., Maugeri, F., Silva, V., Hernández, A., Palacio, L. & Pradanos, P. (2011). AFM analysis of the surface of nanoporous membranes: Application to the nanofiltration of potassium clavulanate. Journal of Materials Science, 46(10), pp. 3356–3369. DOI:10.1007/s10853-010-5224-7
  9. Cassano, A., Bentivenga, A., Conidi, C., Galiano, F., Saoncella, O. & Figoli, A. (2019). Membrane-based clarification and fractionation of red wine lees aqueous extracts. Polymers, 11(7), pp. 1–16. DOI:10.3390/polym11071089
  10. Chatterjee, S. & De, S. (2014). Adsorptive removal of fluoride by activated alumina doped cellulose acetate phthalate (CAP) mixed matrix membrane, Sepparation and Purification Technology, 125, pp. 223–238. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2014.01.055
  11. Chen, C., Han, B., Li, J., Shang, T., Zou, J. & Jiang, W. (2001). A new model on the diffusion of small molecule penetrants in dense polymer membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 187(1–2), pp. 109–118. DOI:10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00689-X
  12. Chibani, A., Barhoumi, A., Ncib, S., Bouguerra, W. & Elaloui, E. (2019). Fluoride removal from synthetic groundwater by electrocoagulation process: parameters ad energy evaluation. Desalination and Water Treatment, 157, pp. 100–109. DOI:10.5004/dwt.2019.24087
  13. Damtie, M. M., Woo, Y. C., Kim, B., Hailemariam, R. H., Park, K. D., Shon, H. K., Park, C. & Choi, J. S. (2019). Removal of fluoride in membrane-based water and wastewater treatment technologies: Performance review. Journal of Environmental Management, 251, pp. 1–24. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109524
  14. Diawara, C. K., Paugam, L., Pontié, M., Schlumpf, J. P., Jaouen, P. & Quéméneur, F. (2005). Influence of chloride, nitrate, and sulphate on the removal of fluoride ions by using nanofiltration membranes. Separation Science and Technology, 40, pp. 3339–3347. DOI:10.1080/01496390500423706
  15. Elimelech, M., Zhu, X., Childress, A. E. & Hong, S. (1997). Role of membrane surface morphology in colloidal fouling of cellulose acetate and composite aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 127(1), pp. 101–109. DOI:10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00351-1
  16. Epsztein, R., Shaulsky, E., Dizge, N., Warsinger, D.M. & Elimelech, M. (2018). Role of ionic charge density in Donnan exclusion of monovalent anions by nanofiltration. Environmental Science and Technology, 52, pp. 4108–4116. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.7b06400
  17. Fierro, D., Boschetti-de-Fierro, A. & Abetz, V. (2012). The solution-diffusion with imperfections model as a method to understand organic solvent nanofiltration of multicomponent systems. Journal of Membrane Science, 413–414, pp. 91–101. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2012.04.027
  18. Gomes, A.C., Cabral Goncalves, I. & de Pinho, M.N, The role of adsorption on nanofiltration of azo dyes (2005). Journal of Membrane Science, 255, pp. 157–165. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2005.01.031
  19. He, J., Yang, Y., Wu, Z., Xie, C., Zhang, K., Kong, L. & Liu, J. (2020). Review of fluoride removal from water environment by adsorption. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 8(6), pp. 1–101. DOI:10.1016/j.jece.2020.104516
  20. Hirose, M., Ito, H. & Kamiyama, Y. (1996). Effect of skin layer surface structures on the flux behaviour of RO membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 121(2), pp. 209–215. DOI:10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00181-0
  21. Hoinkis, J., Valero-Freitag, S., Caporgno, M. P. & Pätzold, C. (2011). Removal of nitrate and fluoride by nanofiltration - A comparative study. Desalination and Water Treatment, 30(1–3), pp. 278–288. DOI:10.5004/dwt.2011.2103
  22. Hong, S.U., Malaisamy, R. & Bruening, M.L. (2007). Separation of fluoride from other monovalent anions using multilayer polyelectrolyte nanofiltration membranes, Langmuir, 23, 1716 –1722. DOI:10.1021/la061701y
  23. Hu, K. & Dickson, J. M. (2006). Nanofiltration membrane performance on fluoride removal from water. Journal of Membrane Science, 279(1–2), pp. 529–538. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.047
  24. Kambarani, M., Bahmanyar, H., Mousavian, M. A. & Mousavi, S. M. (2016). Crossflow filtration of sodium chloride solution by a polymeric nanofilter: Minimization of concentration polarization by a novel backpulsing method. Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 80, pp. 135–141. DOI:10.30492/IJCCE.2016.23595
  25. Klimonda, A. & Kowalska, I. (2019). Application of polymeric membranes for the purification of solutions containing cationic surfactants. Water Science and Technology, 79(7), pp. 1241–1252. DOI:10.2166/wst.2019.115
  26. Kowalik-Klimczak, A., Zalewski, M. & Gierycz, P. (2016). Removal of Cr(III) ions from salt solution by nanofiltration: Experimental and modelling analysis. Polish Journal of Chemical Technology, 18(3), pp. 10–16. DOI:10.1515/pjct-2016-0042
  27. Krieg, H. M., Modise, S. J., Keizer, K. & Neomagus, H. W. J. P. (2004). Salt rejection in nanofiltration for single and binary salt mixtures in view of sulphate removal. Desalination, 171, pp. 205–215. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2004.05.005
  28. Labarca, F. & Bórquez, R. (2020). Comparative study of nanofiltration and ion exchange for nitrate reduction in the presence of chloride and iron in groundwater. Science of the Total Environment, 723, pp. 1–12. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137809
  29. Lee, S., Lee, E., Elimelech, M. & Hong, S. (2011). Membrane characterization by dynamic hysteresis: Measurements, mechanisms, and implications for membrane fouling. Journal of Membrane Science, 366, pp. 17–24. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2010.09.024
  30. Ma, W. F., Liu, W. J. & Chen, G. W. (2009). Factors influencing the removal of fluoride from groundwater by Nanofiltration. 3rd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, ICBBE 2009, pp. 1–5. DOI:10.1109/ICBBE.2009.5162848
  31. Madaeni, S. S. & Salehi, E. (2009). Adsorption of cations on nanofiltration membrane: Separation mechanism, isotherm confirmation and thermodynamic analysis. Chemical Engineering Journal, 150(1), pp. 114–121. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2008.12.005
  32. Mnif, A., Ali, M. B. S. & Hamrouni, B. (2010). Effect of some physical and chemical parameters on fluoride removal by nanofiltration. Ionics, 16, pp. 245–253. DOI:10.1007/s11581-009-0368-7
  33. Nasr, A. B., Charcosset, C., Amar, R. B. & Walha, K. (2013). Defluoridation of water by nanofiltration. Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, 150, pp. 92–97. DOI:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2013.01.021
  34. Nechifor, G., Pascu, D.E. & Pascu, M. (2013). Study of adsorption kinetics and zeta potential of phosphate and nitrate ions on a cellulosic membrane. Revue Roumaine de Chimie, 58 (7–8), pp. 591–597
  35. Park, N., Cho, J., Hong, S. & Lee, S. (2010). Ion transport characteristics in nanofiltration membranes: Measurements and mechanisms. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology - AQUA, 59(2–3), pp. 179–190. DOI:10.2166/aqua.2010.034
  36. Richards, L. A., Vuachère, M. & Schäfer, A. I. (2010). Impact of pH on the removal of fluoride, nitrate and boron by nanofiltration/reverse osmosis. Desalination, 261(3), pp. 331–337. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2010.06.025
  37. Salgado, C., Carmona, F.J., Palacio, L., Hernández, A. & Prádanos, P. (2016). Fouling study of nanofiltration membranes for sugar control in grape must: Analysis of resistances and the role of osmotic pressure. Separation Science and Technology, 51(3), pp. 525–541. DOI:10.1080/01496395.2015.1094490
  38. Shen, J. & Schäfer, A. (2014a). Removal of fluoride and uranium by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis: A review. Chemosphere, 117(1), pp. 679–691. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.090
  39. Shen, J. & Schäfer, A. (2015). Factors affecting fluoride and natural organic matter (NOM) removal from natural waters in Tanzania by nanofiltration/reverse osmosis. Science of the Total Environment, 527–528, pp. 520–529. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.037
  40. Shu, L., Waite, T. D., Bliss, P. J., Fane, A. & Jegatheesan, V. (2005). Nanofiltration for the possible reuse of water and recovery of sodium chloride salt from textile effluent. Desalination, 172, pp. 235–243. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2004.07.037
  41. Shurvell, T., Keir, G., Jegatheesan, V., Shu, L. & Farago, L. (2014). Removal of ametryn through nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52, pp. 643–649. DOI:10.1080/19443994.2013.829594
  42. Silva, F. C. (2018). Fouling of Nanofiltration Membranes, IntechOpen, London 2018, DOI:10.5772/intechopen.75353
  43. Steele, D. (1966). Group la: the Alkali Metals Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs, Fr, Pergamon, Tallahassee 1966. DOI:10.1016/b978-0-08-011853-6.50010-2
  44. Szmagara, A. & Krzyszczak, A. (2019). Monitoring of fluoride content in bottled mineral and spring waters by ion chromatography. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 202, pp. 27–34. DOI:10.1016/j.gexplo.2019.03.008
  45. Tahaikt, M., El Habbani, R., Ait Haddou, A., Achary, I., Amor, Z., Taky, M., Alami, A., Boughriba, A., Hafsi, M. & Elmidaoui, A. (2007). Fluoride removal from groundwater by nanofiltration. Desalination, 212(1–3), pp. 46–53. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2006.10.003
  46. Teixeira, M. R., Rosa, M. J. & Nyström, M. (2005). The role of membrane charge on nanofiltration performance. Journal of Membrane Science, 265(1–2), pp. 160–166. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2005.04.046
  47. Tsuru, T., Nakao, S.I. & Kimura, S. (1991). Calculation of ion rejection by extended nernst-planck Equation with charged reverse osmosis membranes for single and mixed electrolyte solutions. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 24(4), pp. 511–517. DOI:10.1252/jcej.24.511
  48. Van der Bruggen, B. & Vandecasteele, C. (2001). Flux decline during nanofiltration of organic components in aqueous solution. Environmental Science Technology, 35, pp. 3535–3540. DOI: 10.1021/es0100064
  49. Van Der Bruggen, B., Braeken, L. & Vandecasteele, C. (2002). Flux decline in nanofiltration due to adsorption of organic compounds. Separation and Purification Technology, 29(1), pp. 23–31. DOI:10.1016/S1383-5866(01)00199-X
  50. Vieira, G.S, Moreira, F.K.V., Matsumoto, R.L.S., Michelon, M., Filho, F.M. & Hubinger, M.D. (2018). Influence of nanofiltration membrane features on enrichment of jussara ethanolic extract (Euterpe edulis) in anthocyanins. Journal of Food Engineering, 226, pp. 31–41. DOI:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2018.01.013
  51. Vinati, A., Mahanty, B. & Behera, S. K. (2015). Clay and clay minerals for fluoride removal from water: A state-of-the-art review. Applied Clay Science, 114, pp. 340–348. DOI:10.1016/j.clay.2015.06.013
  52. Vigneswaran, S. & Kwon, D.-Y. (2015). Effect of ionic strength and permeate flux on membrane fouling: analysis of forces acting on particle deposit and cake formation. Environmental Engineering, 19, pp. 1604–1611. DOI:10.1007/s12205-014-0079-0
  53. Wang, Y., Shu, L., Jegatheesan, V. & Gao, B. (2010). Removal and adsorption of diuron through nanofiltration membrane: The effects of ionic environment and operating pressures. Separation and Purification Technology, 74(2), pp. 236–241. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2010.06.011
  54. WHO, Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, 2017 (4th ed.), World Health Organization, 763 Geneva
  55. Xi, B., Wang, X., Liu, W., Xia, X., Li, D., He, L., Wang, H., Sun, W., Yang, T. & Tao, W. (2014). Fluoride and Arsenic Removal by Nanofiltration Technology from Groundwater in Rural Areas of China: Performances with Membrane Optimization. Separation Science and Technology (Philadelphia), 49, pp. 2642–2649. DOI:10.1080/01496395.2014.939761
  56. Xu, H., Xiao, K., Yu, J., Huang, B., Wang, X., Liang, S., Wei, C., Wen, X. & Huang, X. (2020). A simple method to identify the dominant fouling mechanisms during membrane filtration based on piecewise multiple linear regression. Membranes, 10(8), 1–14. DOI:10.3390/membranes10080171
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Martyna Grzegorzek
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Wrocław University of Science and Technology,Wrocław, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Polymer mixed-matrix nanocomposite membranes were prepared by a wet-phase inversion method and used in ultrafiltration processes to treat wastewater treatment plant effluent spiked with organic micropollutants. The effects of halloysite (Hal), TiO2, and functionalized single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT-COOH) nanofillers on the treatment efficiency, permeability loss, and fouling behavior of polyethersulfone (PES) membranes were investigated and compared with those of a pristine PES membrane. The nanocomposite membranes exhibited lower porosity and stronger negative surface charge because of the added hydrophilic nanofillers. The PES-Hal membrane achieved the optimal balance of permeability and micropollutant removal owing to enhanced pollutant adsorption on the membrane surface and the creation of an easily removable cake layer (i.e., reversible fouling). The PES-SWCNT-COOH membrane demonstrated the highest treatment efficiency, but also the high permeability loss. In contrast, PES-TiO2 exhibited excellent antifouling properties, but poorer treatment capabilities.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Adeniyi, A., Mbaya, R., Popoola, P., Gomotsegang, F., Ibrahim, I. & Onyango, M. (2020). Predicting the fouling tendency of thin film composite membranes using fractal analysis and membrane autopsy, Alexandria Engineering Journal, 59, 6, pp. 4397-4407. DOI:10.1016/j.aej.2020.07.046
  2. Arif, Z., Sethy, N.K., Mishra, P.K. & Verma, B. (2019). Antifouling behaviour of PVDF/TiO2 composite membrane: a quantitative and qualitative assessment, Iranian Polymer Journal, 19, 28, pp. 301-312. DOI:10.1007/s13726-019-00700-y
  3. Bassyouni, M., Abdel-Aziz, M.H., Zoromba, M.Sh., Abdel-Hamid, S.M.S. & Drioli, E. (2019). A review of polymeric nanocomposite membranes for water purification, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 73, pp. 19-46. DOI:10.1016/j.jiec.2019.01.045
  4. Bodzek, M., Konieczny, K. & Kwiecińska-Mydlak, A. (2021). New generation of semipermeable membranes with carbon nanotubes for water and wastewater treatment: Critical review, Archives of Environmental Protection, 47, 3, pp. 3-27, DOI:10.24425/aep.2021.138460
  5. Bohdziewicz, J., Dudziak, M., Kamińska, G. & Kudlek, E. (2016). Chromatographic determination and toxicological potential evaluation of selected micropollutants in aquatic environment - analytical problems, Desalination and Water Treatment, 57, pp. 1361-1369. DOI:10.1080/19443994.2015.1017325
  6. Bu, F., Gao, B., Yue, Q., Liu, C., Wang, W. & Shen, X. (2019). The Combination of Coagulation and Adsorption for Controlling Ultrafiltration Membrane Fouling in Water Treatment, Water, 11, pp. 1-13. DOI:10.3390/w11010090
  7. Buruga, K., Song, H., Shan, J., Bolan, N., Thimmarajampet Kalathi, J. & Kim, K-H. (2019). A review on functional polymer-clay based nanocomposite membranes for treatment of water, Journal of Hazardous. Materials, 379, pp. 1-27. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.04.067
  8. Dudziak, M. & Burdzik-Niemiec, E. (2017). Ultrafiltration through modified membranes in wastewater treatment containing 17β-estradiol and bisphenol A, Przemysł Chemiczny, 96, pp. 448-452, DOI: 10.15199/62.2017.2.35 (in Polish).
  9. Esfahani, M.R., Aktij, S.A., Dabaghian, Z., Firouzjaei, M.D., Rahimpour, A., Eke, J.; Escobar, I.C., Abolhassani, M., Greenlee, L.F., Esfahani, A.R., Sadmani, A. & Koutahzadeh, N. (2019). Nanocomposite membranes for water separation and purification: Fabrication, modification, and applications, Separation and Purification Technolology, 213, pp. 465-499. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2018.12.050
  10. Farjami, M., Vatanpour, V. & Moghadassi, A. (2020). Effect of nanoboehmite/poly(ethylene glycol) on the performance and physiochemical attributes EPVC nano-composite membranes in protein separation, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 156, pp. 371-383. DOI:10.1016/j.cherd.2020.02.009
  11. Gamoń, F., Tomaszewski, M., Cema, G. & Ziembińska-Buczyńska, A. (2022). Adsorption of oxytetracycline and ciprofloxacin on carbon-based nanomaterials as affected by pH, Archives of Environmental Protection, 48, 2, pp. 34-41. DOI:10.24425/aep.2022.140764
  12. Ghaemi, N., Madaeni, S.S., Alizadeh, A., Rajabi, H. & Daraei, P. (2011). Preparation, characterization and performance of polyethersulfone/organically modified montmorillonite nanocomposite membranes in removal of pesticides, Journal of Membrane Science, 382, pp. 135-147. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.08.004
  13. Haas, R., Opitz, R. & Grischek, T. (2019). The AquaNES Project: Coupling Riverbank Filtration and Ultrafiltration in Drinking Water Treatment, Water, 11, pp. 1-14. DOI:10.3390/w11010018.
  14. Hao, S., Jia, Z., Wen, J., Li, S., Peng, W., Huang, R. & Xu, X. (2021). Progress in adsorptive membranes for separation – A review, Separation and Purification Technology, 255, 117772. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117772.
  15. Inurria, A., Cay-Durgun, P., Rice, D., Zhang, H., Seo, D.-K., Lind, M.L. & Perreault, F. (2019). Polyamide thin-film nanocomposite membranes with graphene oxide nanosheets: Balancing membrane performance and fouling propensity, Desalination, 451, pp. 139-147. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2018.07.004.
  16. Kamińska, G. (2022). Modification of ultrafiltration membranes with nanoparticles and their application, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, Gliwice 2022. (in Polish)
  17. Kamińska, G. & Bohdziewicz, J. (2018). Separation of selected organic micropollutants on ultrafiltration membrane modified with carbon nanotubes.Ochrona. Środowiska, 40, 4, pp. 37-42. (in Polish)
  18. Kamińska, G., Bohdziewicz, J., Calvo, J.I., Prádanos, P., Palacio, L. & Hernández, A. (2015). Fabrication and characterization of polyethersulfone nanocomposite membranes for the removal of endocrine disrupting micropollutants from wastewater. Mechanisms and performance, Journal of Membrane Science, 493, pp. 66-79. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2015.05.047
  19. Kamińska, G., Bohdziewicz, J., Palacio, L., Hernández, A. & Prádanos, P. (2016). Polyacrylonitrile membranes modified with carbon nanotubes: characterization and micropollutants removal analysis, Desalination and Water Treatment, 57, pp. 1344-1353. DOI:10.1080/19443994.2014.1002277
  20. Kamińska, G., Pronk, W. & Traber, J. (2020). Effect of coagulant dose and backflush pressure on NOM membrane fouling in inline coagulation-ultrafiltration, Desalination and Water Treatment, 199, pp. 188-197. DOI:10.5004/dwt.2020.25657.
  21. Leo, C.P.; Chai, W.K.; Mohammad, A.W., Qi, Y., Hoedley, A.F.A. & Chai, S.P. (2011). Phosphorus removal using nanofiltration membranes, Water Science and Technology 64, pp.199-205. DOI:10.2166/wst.2011.598.
  22. Mao, Y., Huang, Q. Meng, B., Zhou, K., Liu, G., Gigliuzza, A., Drioli, E. & Jin, W. (2020). Roughness-enhanced hydrophobic graphene oxide membrane for water desalination via membrane distillation, Journal of Membrane Science, 611, 118364. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118364.
  23. Marszałek, A. (2022). Encapsulation of halloysite with sodium alginate and application in the adsorption of copper from rainwater, Archives of Environmental Protection, 48, 1, pp. 75-82. DOI:10.24425/aep.2022.140546.
  24. Maximous, N., Nakhla, G., Wan, W. & Wong, K. (2009). Preparation, characterization and performance of Al2O3/PES membrane for wastewater filtration, Journal of Membrane Science, 341, pp. 67–75. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2009.05.040.
  25. Mozia, S.; Grylewicz, A.; Zgrzebnicki, M.; Darowna, D. & Czyżewski, A. (2019). Investigations on the properties and performance of mixed matrix polyethersulfone membranes modified with halloysite nanotubes, Polymers-Basel. 11, 671, pp. 1-18. DOI:10.3390/polym11040671.
  26. Muthumareeswaran, M.R. & Agarwal, G.P. (2014). Feed concentration and pH effect on arsenate and phosphate rejection via polyacrylonitrile ultrafiltration membrane, Journal of Membrane Science, 468, pp. 11-19. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2014.05.040.
  27. Nasir, A., Masood, F., Yasin, T. & Hammed, A. (2019). Progress in polymeric nanocomposite membranes for wastewater treatment: Preparation, properties and applications, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 79, pp. 29-40. DOI:10.1016/j.jiec.2019.06.052.
  28. Nguyen, M.N., Trinh, P.B., Butkhardt, C.J. & Schafer, A.I. (2021). Incorporation of single-walled carbon nanotubes in ultrafiltration support structure for the removal of steroid hormone micropollutants, Separation and Purification Technology, 264, 118405. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118405.
  29. Niedergall, K., Bach, M., Hirth, T., Tovar, G.E.M. & Schiestel, T. (2014). Removal of micropollutants from water by nanocomposite membrane adsorbers, Separation and Purification Technology, 131, 27, pp. 60-68. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2014.04.032.
  30. Rogowska, J., Cieszynska-Semenowicz, M., Ratajczyk, W. & Wolska, L. (2020). Micropollutants in treated wastewater, Ambio, 49(2), pp. 487-503. DOI:10.1007/s13280-019-01219-5
  31. Saki, H., Alemayehu, E., Schomburg, J. & Lennartz, B. (2019). Halloysite nanotubes as adsorptive material for phosphate removal from aqueous solution, Water 11, 2, 203. DOI:10.3390/w11020203.
  32. Shaban, M., AbdAllah, H., Said, L. & Ahmed, A.M. (2019). Water desalination and dyes separation from industrial wastewater by PES/TiO2NTs mixed matrix membranes, Journal of Polymer Research, 26, 181, pp. 1-12. DOI:10.1007/s10965-019-1831-4.
  33. Shakak, M., Rezaee, R., Maleki, A., Jafari, A., Safari, M., Shahmoradi, B., Daraei, H. & Lee, S-M. (2019). Synthesis and characterization of nanocomposite ultrafiltration membrane (PSF/PVP/SiO2) and performance evaluation for the removal of amoxicillin from aqueous solutions, Environmental Technology & Innovation, 17, 100529. DOI:10.1016/j.eti.2019.100529.
  34. Suhalim, N.S., Kasim, N., Mahmoudi, E., Shamsudin, I.J., Mohammad, A.W., Zuki, F.M. & Jamari, N. (2022). Rejection Mechanism of Ionic Solute Removal by Nanofiltration Membranes: An Overview, Nanomaterials, 12, 437. DOI:10.3390/nano12030437.
  35. Vatanpour, V., Mansourpanah, Y., Soroush Mousavi Khadem, S., Zinadini, S., Dizge, N., Reza Ganjali, M., Mirsadeghi, S., Rezapour, M., Reza Saeb, M. & Karimi-Male, H. (2021). Nanostructured polyethersulfone nanocomposite membranes for dual protein and dye separation: Lower antifouling with lanthanum (III) vanadate nanosheets as a novel nanofiller, Polymer Testing, 94, pp. 107040. DOI:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.107040.
  36. Vatanpour, V., Madaeni, S.S., Rajabi, L., Zinadini, S. & Derakhshan, A.A. (2012). Boehmite nanoparticles as a new nanofiller for preparation of antifouling mixed matrix membranes, Journal of Membrane Science, 401-402, pp. 132-143. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2012.01.040.
  37. Wang, S., Yao, S., Du, K., Yuan, R., Chen, H., Wang, F. & Zhou, B. (2021). The mechanisms of conventional pollutants adsorption by modified granular steel slag, Environmental Engineering Research, 26, 1, 190352. DOI:10.4491/eer.2019.352.
  38. Zhang, J., Nguyen, M.N., Li, Y., Yang, C. & Schafer, A.I. (2020). Steroid hormone micropollutant removal from water with activated carbon fiber-ultrafiltration composite membranes, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 391, 122020. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122020.
  39. Zhang, X., Wang, D.K., Lopez, D.R.S. & Diniz da Costa, J. (2014). Fabrication of nanostructured TiO2 hollow fiber photocatalytic membrane and application for wastewater treatment, Chemical Engineering Journal, 236, pp. 314-322. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.059.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Gabriela Kamińska
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Institute of Water and Wastewater Engineering, Gliwice, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Electrospun membranes exhibit very promising properties, such as high surface area, high surface area-to-pore volume ratio, high pore interconnectivity, and uniform pore distribution. Nanoparticles are a promising alternative for improving the properties of the electrospun membranes. Titania nanoparticles, which are stable, resistant, and non-toxic, have various applications including water treatment, sensors, food additive and cosmetics. Due to the high hydrophilicity of titania nanoparticles, membrane fouling is reduced in titania nanoparticles doped membranes. Titania nanoparticle doped polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanocomposite electrospun membranes were prepared by electrospinning method in this work. Compared to bare PAN electrospun membranes 0.05% titania nanoparticles doped electrospun membranes have thinner nanofibers, higher hydrophilicity and almost 2 times lower bovine serum albumin adsorption, which shows lower fouling tendency.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

E. Celik Madenli
ORCID: ORCID
Z.I. Ciftci
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Provincial Directorate of Environment and Urbanization Ministry, Governorship of Burdur, 15100, Burdur, Turkey
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The main goal of the present study was to examine the operating characteristics and mechanisms of membrane fouling in integrated membrane bioreactors (IMBRs) at diff erent temperatures. Two IMBRs, each with identical dimensions and confi gurations, were used in the study using synthetic domestic sewage at a low temperature (10°C) and high temperature (25°C). The results indicated that the removal effi ciency of chemical oxygen demand reached 93–96%, but the membrane contribution rate of IMBR2 (10°C) was higher than that of IMBR1 (25°C). The separation burden of the membrane on organic compounds increased at low temperature, which may have sped up the rate of membrane biofouling. The absolute rate of trans-membrane pressure build-up was faster at low temperature, leading to shorter IMBR operating times. Soluble microbial products (SMPs) and extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) in the IMBRs signifi cantly increased at low temperature. These substances intensifi ed defl occulation, with an accompanying reduction of fl oc size and the release of EPSs at low temperature, which facilitated the formation of cake foulants on the surface, covering the entire membrane area. The protein and polysaccharide concentrations of SMPs and EPSs in the IMBRs were correlated with the concentration of C8-HSL. It was demonstrated that temperature aff ected the concentration of C8-HSL, which controlled the excretion of EPSs and SMPs and thus the membrane biofouling process.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Yaqin Yu
1

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Yancheng Institute of Technology, China
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents the experimental study of a novel unsteady-statemembrane gas separation approach for recovery of a slow-permeant component in the membrane module with periodical retentate withdrawals. The case study consisted in the separation of binary test mixtures based on the fast-permeant main component (N2O, C2H2) and the slow-permeant impurity (1%vol. of N2) using a radial countercurrent membrane module. The novel semi-batch withdrawal technique was shown to intensify the separation process and provide up to 40% increase in separation efficiency compared to a steady-state operation of the same productivity.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Stanislav V. Battalov
Maxim M. Trubyanov
Egor S. Puzanov
Tatyana S. Sazanova
Pavel N. Drozdov
Ilya V. Vorotyntsev
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

CO2 emission from combustion fossil fuels is considered as the primary factor in the global warming. Different methods for separation CO2 from combustion flue gases are extensively used across the world. The aim of this study is to analyze the most important technological solutions of CO2 separation. For this reason chemical absorption, physical absorption, adsorption approach, membrane filtration and cryogenic process were researched. Concluding, selection of the right method for carbon dioxide capture separation is a complex issue and a range of technological and economic factors should be taken into consideration prior to application on the industrial scale.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Robert Czarnota
Ewa Knapik
Paweł Wojnarowski
Damian Janiga
Jerzy Stopa
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The literature on membrane distillation and forward osmosis for treating natural and recovered wastewaters is reviewed. There is renewed interest in these membrane technologies as alternatives to pressure driven processes such as reverse osmosis, which are expensive in both capital and energy, and generally require pre-treatment of the feed water. Membrane distillation with hydrophobic microfiltration membranes can make use of low-grade heat energy, and give higher yields of product water from concentrated feed waters. Forward osmosis uses hydrophilic membranes akin to reveres osmosis, and needs a draw solution that is appropriate in the product water. or must be recovered and reused in large-scale operation. Although they show great promise as simple low energy systems, no large-scale installation of either process exists as yet. Membrane distillation has considerable potential for desalination to produce drinking water, whereas FO is currently confined to small-scale systems, especially as a source of energy drinks in emergency situations.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Brian Bolto
Manh Hoang
Thuy Tran
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Due to the increasing problem resulting from environmental pollution with heavy metals, great emphasis is placed on the development of removal methods of these pollutants from the environment. This study presents a literature review on the methods for the removal of nickel ions from aqueous solutions such as sorption, especially using low-cost sorbents which are very popular in 21���� century, electrochemical processes and membrane techniques. It is often impossible to use a single technique for efficient removal of heavy metals from wastewater as the process depends on many factors, such as wastewater composition, pH, temperature and many others. The aim of this review is to present some selected removal techniques of nickel(II) from wastewater from the point of view of their efficiency and applicability.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Izabela Kruszelnicka
1
ORCID: ORCID
Dobrochna Ginter-Kramarczyk
1
ORCID: ORCID
Wojciech Góra
1
ORCID: ORCID
Katarzyna Staszak
2
ORCID: ORCID
Marek Baraniak
3
Grzegorz Lota
3
ORCID: ORCID
Magdalena Regel-Rosocka
2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Poznan University of Technology, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Environmental Engineering and Building Installations, Berdychowo 4, 60-965 Poznan
  2. Poznan University of Technology, Faculty of Chemical Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology and Engineering, Berdychowo 4, 60-965 Poznan
  3. Poznan University of Technology, Faculty of Chemical Technology, Institute of Chemistry and Technical Electrochemistry, Berdychowo 4, 60-965 Poznan
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

One of the problems limiting the use of vanadium as hydrogen permeable membranes is its high dilatation upon hydrogen dissolution in it. The information available for the dilatation coefficient value (Δυ/Ω) is contradictory, experimental information on the hydrogen solubility in vanadium within 100-1000 kPa at from 250 to 700°С is very limited. It does not enable to calculate the membrane dilatation. The article contains the measuring results for dilatation of strips made of vanadium foil 100 μm thick in a hydrogen atmosphere in the pressure range from 75 to 1000 kPa, temperatures from 250 to 700°С. The dilatation coefficient (Δυ/Ω) of polycrystalline vanadium was calculated based on the data obtained for dilatation and data previously published for the hydrogen concentration in the α-solid solution at 400°С. It is 0.165. Isobars for the temperature dependence of the hydrogen concentration in vanadium are calculated and constructed using the dilatation measuring results and the dilatation coefficient values. These data are agreed with theoretical and experimental data published previously. The limiting change in concentration and linear dimensions over the cross section of a hydrogen-permeable membrane from V was estimated at various temperatures and operating pressures at the membrane outlet based on the isobars plotted for temperature dependences of the CH/V. The conclusions are made on the optimal working conditions of Pd/V/Pd membranes when hydrogen is released from hydrogen-containing gas mixtures in accordance with Fick’s 1st law and data published previously for hydrogen concentration value at which solid hydrogen solutions in vanadium become brittle.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

A. Panichkin
1
ORCID: ORCID
A. Mamaeva
1
ORCID: ORCID
A. Kenzhegulov
1
ORCID: ORCID
Z. Karboz
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Satbayev University; Engineer of Laboratory Metallurgical Sciences, Institute of Metallurgy and Ore Beneficiation, 050010, Almaty City, Shevchenko str., 29/133, The Republic of Kazakhstan
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The third eyelid rotation associated with the nictitans gland prolapse and third eyelid cartilage eversion is a rarely encountered ocular disorder. The present retrospective study includes the distribution of the relevant deformations in the cartilage and nictitans gland accompanying the third eyelid rotation in the cat according to breed, age, and gender-based differences, as well as the clinical manifestations, surgical therapeutic approach (partial resection of the scrolled car- tilage portion combined with the Morgan pocket technique), and the outcome of the procedure, concurrently monitoring whether or not the functions of the nictitating membrane were preserved after the procedure, the likelihood of relapse and the potential complications. A total of sixteen eyes surgically treated with the above-mentioned surgical method that belonged to thirteen cats diagnosed with the nictitans gland prolapse and cartilage eversion accompanying the third eyelid rotation were included in the study. The most common breeds were Persian (38.4%) and British shorthair (38.4%), with five cases from each. Three cats (20%) were bilaterally affected, while there was a unilateral involvement in ten of the cases (80%). Out of the ten cases with a unilateral lesion, the right eye was affected in 6 (60%) individuals, while the left eye was involved in four (40%). Nine cats were male, and four were female. The study was conducted in an attempt to surgically correct the third eyelid cartilage eversion and prolapsed nictitans gland responsible for the nictitating membrane rotation in cats by the partial removal of the everted cartilage com- bined with the Morgan pocket technique. Follow-ups were performed twice every other week in the postoperative period, followed by a one-time clinical inspection at the end of the first, third, and sixth months.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

A. Demir
Y. Altundağ
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article presents the results of the research on thermal actions on the materials occurring in the cross section along the depth of the bridge deck and bituminous pavement during its construction. The impulse to curried out the research was the need to explain the causes of the blistering of bituminous waterproofing membranes and asphalt pavements often observed on the bridge decks. The paper presents the examples of such failures and the analyses of possible mechanisms of the phenomenon. Research indicates a significant influence of all technological processes on the temperature of materials in the cross section as well as daily temperature changes. The probability of initiation of reactions between concrete components with gaseous products has been confirmed in such conditions. The susceptibility of bituminous materials to gas emission and blistering is the subject of a separate study. The research was part of a research project carried out under the contract INNOTECHK3/IN3/50/229332/NCBR /14 [13].

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

B. Chmielewska
A. Garbacz
G. Adamczewski
B. Rymsza
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Power generation units, suitable for individual users and small scale applications, are mainly based on spark ignition engines. In recently performed research, reductions of emissions coming from such units, especially considering carbon dioxide emissions, are deemed as the issue of particular importance. One of solutions, postponed to reduce impact of spark ignition engine-based units on the natural environment, is transition from fossil fuels into renewable gaseous fuels, as products of organic digestion. Nonetheless, development of new solutions is required to prevent further carbon dioxide emissions. The paper presents a novel dual approach developed to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from stationary power units, basing on spark ignition engine. The discussed approach includes both reduction in carbon content in the fuel, which is realized by its enrichment with hydrogen produced using the solar energy-supported electrolysis process, as well as application of post-combustion carbon dioxide separation. Results of the performed analysis suggest profitability of transition from fossil into the hydrogen-enriched fuel mixture, with significant rise in operational parameters of the system following increase in the hydrogen content. Nevertheless, utilization of the carbon dioxide separation leads to vital soar in internal energy demand, causing vital loss in operational and economical parameters of the analyzed system.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Katarzyna Janusz-Szymańska
1
Krzysztof Grzywnowicz
1
Grzegorz Wiciak
1
Leszek Remiorz
1

  1. Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Akademicka 2A, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

To realize a structure which can be conveniently tuned to multiple and wideband frequency ranges, a geometrical-stiffening membrane acoustic metamaterial (MAM) with individually tunable multiple frequencies is presented. The MAM is realized by a stacked arrangement of two membrane-magnet elements, each of which has a membrane with a small piece of steel attached in the centre. It can be tuned individually by adjusting the position of its compact magnet. The normal incidence sound transmission loss of the MAM is investigated in detail by measurements in an impedance tube. The test sample results demonstrate that this structure can easily achieve a transmission loss with two peaks which can be shifted individually in a wide low-frequency range. A theoretical consideration is analysed, the analysis shows that the magnetic effect related to this distance leads to a nonlinear attractive force and, consequently, nonlinear geometrical stiffening in each membrane-magnet element, which allows the peaks to be shifted. A reasonable design can make the structure have a good application prospect for low-frequency noise insulation where there is a need to adjust the transmission loss according to the spectrum of the noise source.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Junjuan Zhao
1
Xianhui Li
1
David Thompson
2
Yueyue Wang
1
Wenjiang Wang
1
Liying Zhu
1
Yunan Liu
1

  1. Beijing Key Lab of Environmental Noise and Vibration, Beijing Municipal Institute of Labor Protection, Beijing, China, 100054
  2. Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, SO171BJ
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Easy-to-handle and effective methods of juice clarification and concentration by membrane technologies are still under exploration. The current article presents results of research on the technological development of an alternative natural sweetener of high biological value and improved organoleptic properties. Sorghum saccharatum stem juice is used in research. It is pre-clarified enzymatically with α-amylase and glucoamylase, clarified by ultrafiltration, and concentrated by the direct contact membrane distillation in various temperature ranges. The study shows the efficacy of membrane methods for improving juice purity, total soluble solids ( TSS), and total sugar (TS) content in the syrup obtained. Clarification depends on membrane characteristics at the beginning of the process, as there are no differences at the end of it. Juice concentration at high-temperature differences allows to accelerate the process by approx. 60% comparing to low-temperature differences. A lower temperature difference ( ΔТ = 20–30°С) in the concentration process results in a longer process and syrup acidisation, whereas a higher temperature difference ( ΔТ = 70°С) affects physicochemical properties of syrup due to local overheating and formation of Maillard reaction products. The juice concentration at ΔТ = 50–60°С allows to obtain high values of total soluble solids without significant degradation of physicochemical and organoleptic properties.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Vadym Chibrikov
1 2
ORCID: ORCID
Polina Vakuliuk
2
ORCID: ORCID
Nataliia Hryhorenko
3
Sergiy Gunko
4
ORCID: ORCID
Henryk Sobczuk
5
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lublin, Poland
  2. National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Kyiv, Ukraine
  3. Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beet of the NAAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  4. National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  5. Institute of Technology and Life Sciences – National Research Institute, Ave. Hrabska, 3, 05-090, Falenty, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In the present study, a novel PVA–g–PMA hybrid membrane was developed for application in direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC). Maleic anhydride (MA) was grafted on polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) both ionically and chemically using potassium persulfate (KPS), for the first time. ThePVA–g–PMA thus synthesized was then blended with 3–Amino–4–[3–(triethylammonium sulfonato)phenyl amino]phenylene hydrochloride. The prepared membranes were characterized by FT–IR, TGA. 0.0104 S/cm of proton conductivity was found for the membrane. The ion exchange capacity was found to be 2.175 meq/g and the water uptake capacity as 14.9%. The single-chamber fuel cell power density was higher (34.72 mW/cm2) and current density (62.11 mA/cm2) when compared to Nafion 117 membrane.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Pratima Gajbhiye
1
A.K. Tiwari
2
Karan Mann
1
J.S. Kahlon
1
H. Upadhyay
3

  1. School of Chemical Engineering and Physical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab-144 411, India
  2. Department of Chemical Engineering, NIT Jalandhar, Punjab-144011, India
  3. School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab-144 411, India
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Different approaches to enhance healing of hard or soft tissues include the use of cytokines and growth factors to modify cellular behaviour. Numerous growth factors are found in autologous blood concentrates – platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF). Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) may improve tissue healing via amelogenins. Bilayered collagen matrix (CM) is used for soft tissue augmentation.

The aim of the present study was to assess potential benefits of PRP, PRF and EMD in combination with bilayered collagen matrix or CM alone in treatment of oral mucosal defects in rabbits.

Twenty-seven New Zealand white rabbits were included in this randomized controlled trial. Artificial oral mucosal defects were treated with one of these five approaches: PRP+CM, PRF+CM, EMD+CM, CM alone, or left untreated as a negative control - CO. The animals were euthanized 1 day, 7 days, or 28 days after surgery and necropsies were harvested. Histological and molecular biological analyses were performed.

All defects were healed by day 28. No differences between PRP+CM, PRF+CM, CM alone and CO groups were recorded at any time point. Slower angiogenesis and a higher presence of inflammatory infiltrate were observed in the EMD+CM group 28 days after surgery. Molecular biological analyses did not reveal any statistically significant changes.

In conclusion, no improvement in mucosal healing of wounds covered with a collagen membrane and PRP, PRF, or EMD was observed, compared with CM alone or untreated controls.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

J. Vokurka
F. Hromcik
M. Faldyna
E. Gopfert
M. Vicenova
L. Pozarova
L. Izakovicova Holla

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more