Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 3
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Two fundamental challenges in investigation of nonlinear behavior of cantilever beam are the reliability of developed theory in facing with the reality and selecting the proper assumptions for solving the theory-provided equation. In this study, one of the most applicable theory and assumption for analyzing the nonlinear behavior of the cantilever beam is examined analytically and experimentally. The theory is concerned with the slender inextensible cantilever beam with large deformation nonlinearity, and the assumption is using the first-mode discretization in dealing with the partial differential equation provided by the theory. In the analytical study, firstly the equation of motion is derived based on the theory of large deformable inextensible beam. Then, the partial differential equation of motion is discretized using the Galerkin method via the assumption of the first mode. An exact solution to the obtained nonlinear ordinary differential equation is developed, because the available semi analytical and approximated methods, due to their limitations, are not always sufficiently reliable. Finally, an experiment set-up is developed to measure the nonlinear frequency of oscillations of an aluminum beam within a domain of initial displacement. The results show that the proposed analytical method has excellent convergence with experimental data.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Majid Jamal-Omidi
Mahdi Shayanmehr
Saeid Sazesh
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The central theme of this work was to analyze high aspect ratio structure having structural nonlinearity in low subsonic flow and to model nonlinear stiffness by finite element-modal approach. Total stiffness of high aspect ratio wing can be decomposed to linear and nonlinear stiffnesses. Linear stiffness is modeled by its eigenvalues and eigenvectors, while nonlinear stiffness is calculated by the method of combined Finite Element-Modal approach. The nonlinear modal stiffness is calculated by defining nonlinear static load cases first. The nonlinear stiffness in the present work is modeled in two ways, i.e., based on bending modes only and based on bending and torsion modes both. Doublet lattice method (DLM) is used for dynamic analysis which accounts for the dependency of aerodynamic forces and moments on the frequency content of dynamic motion. Minimum state rational fraction approximation (RFA) of the aerodynamic influence coefficient (AIC) matrix is used to formulate full aeroelastic state-space time domain equation. Time domain dynamics analyses show that structure behavior becomes exponentially growing at speed above the flutter speed when linear stiffness is considered, however, Limit Cycle Oscillations (LCO) is observed when linear stiffness along with nonlinear stiffness, modeled by FE-Modal approach is considered. The amplitude of LCO increases with the increase in the speed. This method is based on cantilevered configuration. Nonlinear static tests are generated while wing root chord is fixed in all degrees of freedom and it needs modification if one requires considering full aircraft. It uses dedicated commercial finite element package in conjunction with commercial aeroelastic package making the method very attractive for quick nonlinear aeroelastic analysis. It is the extension of M.Y. Harmin and J.E. Cooper method in which they used the same equations of motion and modeled geometrical nonlinearity in bending modes only. In the current work, geometrical nonlinearities in bending and in torsion modes have been considered.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Kamran Ahmad
Shigang Wu
Hammad Rahman
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper concerns the computations of mast guys taking into account both geometric and physical nonlinearities. Experimental studies have been conducted, the aim of which was to determine σ - ε (stress – deformation) relation for steel rope and to determine the value of modulus of elasticity after its pre-stretching. Results of the research were used to create appropriate computational cable models within the elastic and inelastic range in SOFiSTiK software, based on FEM. The computational cable models were then used to perform parametric analyses of single cables with horizontal and diagonal chords and computations of a lattice guyed mast. The computational single cables results obtained in the SOFiSTiK software were confronted with the results obtained by the analytical method, based on the cable equation. The FEM analyses performed for single cables have proven usefulness of presented analytical procedure for computation of structures with cable elements (e.g. guyed masts) taking into account both the geometric and physical nonlinearity of the cables. It has been shown that while using steel ropes without pre-stretching, permanent deformations in the cables may occur, which affect the shape of the cable and may significantly reduce values of forces in the cables. This phenomenon can be particularly dangerous in the case of guyed masts, as it may affect the reduction in rigidity of the mast structure.
Go to article

Bibliography

[1] Eurocode 3. EN 1993-3-1: Design of steel structures. Part 3–1: Towers, masts and chimneys – Towers and masts. CEN Brussels 2006.
[2] S.A. Sadrnejad, “Numerical solution of base shear in high tensioned cable antenna”, Numerical Methods in Civil Engineering, 2016, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 21–30, http://nmce.kntu.ac.ir/article-1-24-en.html.
[3] M. Matuszkiewicz, R. Orzłowska, “The influence of the second order effects on the results of computations of guyed masts with lattice shaft” (in Polish), Inzynieria i Budownictwo, 2017, no. 6, pp. 329–332.
[4] Sz. Pałkowski, Cable structures. Warszawa: WNT, 1994.
[5] Y.B. Yang, J.Y. Tsay, “Geometric nonlinear analysis of cable structures with a two-node cable element by generalized displacement control method”, International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 2007, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 571–588, DOI: 10.1142/S0219455407002435.
[6] H. Shi, H. Salim, “Geometric nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of guyed towers using fully nonlinear element formulations”, Engineering Structures, 2015, vol. 99, pp. 492–501, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.05.023.
[7] P.M. Páez, B. Sensale, “Analysis of guyed masts by the stability functions based on the Timoshenko beamcolumn”, Engineering Structures, 2017, vol. 152, pp. 597–606, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.036.
[8] Sz. Pałkowski, “Zur statischen Berechnung von Seilkonstruktionen im elastisch-plastischen Bereich”, Bauingenieur, 1992, no. 67, pp. 359–364.
[9] M. Matuszkiewicz, “Computations of cable structures in the elastic-plastic range” (in Polish), Inzynieria i Budownictwo, 2003, no. 7, pp. 393–396.
[10] F. Foti, A. de Luca di Roseto, “Analytical and finite element modeling of the elastic-plastic behaviour of metallic strands under axial-torsional loads”, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2016, vol. 115– 116, pp. 202–214, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.06.016.
[11] F. Meng, Y. Chen, M. Du, X. Gong, “Study on effect of inter-wire contact on mechanical performance of wire rope strand based on semi-analytical method”, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2016, vol. 115–116, pp. 416–427, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.07.012.
[12] Y.A. Onur, “Experimental and theoretical investigation of prestressing steel strand subjected to tensile load”, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2016, vol. 118, pp. 91–100, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.09.006
[13] B. Liang, Z. Zhao, X. Wu, H. Liu, “The establishment of a numerical model for structural cables including friction”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017, vol. 139, pp. 424–436, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.09.031.
[14] R. Pigon, “Experimental study of mechanical properties of steel cables”, in The 2nd Baltic Conference for Students and Young Researches (BalCon 2018), 20-23 April 2018, Gdynia, Poland. MATEC Web of Conferences, 2018, vol. 219, no. 02004, DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201821902004.
[15] GmbH, Pfeifer Seil – und Hebetechnik. Pfeifer Tension Members. 2015, no. 10. https://www.pfeifer.info/out/assets/PFEIFER_TENSION-MEMBERS_BROCHURE_EN.PDF
[16] PN-EN 12385-1 ¸ A1: Steel wire ropes. Safety. Part 1: General requirements. Warszawa: Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny, 2009.
[17] PN-EN 13411-4: Terminations for steel wire ropes. Safety. Part 4: Metal and resin socketing. Warszawa: Polski Komitet Normalizayjny, 2013.
[18] Millfield Enterprises (Manufacturing) Limited, WIRELOCK. Technical data manual. 2017. [Online]. https://www.wirelock.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Wirelock-Technical-Data-Manual-2-11-17.pdf
[19] PN ISO 3108: Steel wire ropes for general purposes. Determination of actual breaking load. Warszawa: Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny, 1996.
[20] Eurocode 3. PN-EN 1993-1-11: Design of steel structures. Part 1–11: Design of structures with tension components. Warszawa: Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny, 2008.
[21] Chr. Petersen, Stahlbau. Vieweg, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden, 1993.
[22] U. Peil, “Bauen mit Seilen”, in Stahlbau-Kalender. 2000, pp. 690–755.
[23] A. Der Kiureghian, J.L. Sackman, “Tangent geometric stiffness of inclined cables under self-weight”. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, 2005, vol. 131, no. 6, pp. 941–945, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:6(941).
[24] SOFiSTiK 2016 FEA. Oberschleissheim, Germany 2016.
[25] Eurocode 1. PN-EN 1991-1-4: Actions on structures. Part 1–4: General actions – Wind actions. Warszawa: Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny, 2008.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Monika Matuszkiewicz
1
ORCID: ORCID
Renata Pigoń
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Koszalin University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Environmental and Geodetic Sciences, Sniadeckich 2, 75-453 Koszalin, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more