Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 3
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Electric cars (SE) are currently considered to be one of the best ways to reduce CO2 and other air emissions in the transport sector as well as noise in cities. They can reduce the dependency of road transport on imported oil in a visible way. Nevertheless, the demand for electricity for a large amount of SE in road transport is not insignificant and has an impact on the power system. The article analyzes the potential impact of SE on the demand, supply, structure and costs of electricity generation as well as emissions as a result of introducing 1 million SEs by 2025 on Polish roads, and tripling this number by 2035. The competitive electricity market model ORCED was used for the calculations. The results of the analysis indicate that regardless of the charging strategy, the demand for SEs causes a slight increase in the overall electricity demand in Poland and consequently also a slight increase in power generating costs. Even a large increase in SEs in road transport will result in a rather moderate demand for additional generation capacity, assuming that power companies will have some control over the mode of charging cars. The introduction of SEs will not reduce CO2 emissions compared to conventional cars in 2025, on the contrary will increase them regardless of the loading strategy. In 2035 however, the result depends on the charging scenario and both the increase or decrease of emissions is possible. Electric vehicles will increase SO2 net emissions, but they will contribute to a decrease in the net emissions of particulates and NOx.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Uroš Radović
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of the sustainable development of generation sources in the Polish National Electric Power System (NEPS). First, the criteria for this development were formulated. The paper also discusses the current status of generation sources, operating in power plants and combined heat and power (CHP) plants of NEPS. Furthermore, it includes a prediction of power balance in NEPS, determining; predicted electricity gross use, predicted demand for peak capacity during the winter peak, predicted demand for peak capacity during the summer peak and required new capacity of centrally dispatched generation units (CDGUs) in 2025, 2030, 2035 and 2040 that would ensure NEPS operational security. Twenty prospective technologies of electricity generation and combined electricity and heat production were analyzed. These were divided into three groups: system power plants, high- and medium-capacity combined heat and power (CHP) plants, as well as small-capacity power plants and CHP plants (dispersed sources). The unit costs of electricity generation discounted for 2021 were calculated for the analyzed technologies, taking the costs of CO2 emission allowances into account. These costs include: capital costs, fuel costs, maintenance costs, operation costs and environmental costs (CO2 emission allowances). This proceeds to a proposal of a program of the sustainable development of generation sources in NEPS, which includes the desired capacity structure of power plants and CHP plants, and the optimal structure of electricity production in 2030 and 2040. The results of calculations and analyses are presented in tables and figure.
Go to article

Bibliography

ARE 2021. Statistical Information on Electricity (Informacja statystyczna o energii elektrycznej). Agencja Rynku Energii SA, Nr 6, Warszawa (in Polish).
BP 2021. BP Statistical Review of World Energy, Edition 2021. [Online] https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html [Accssed: 2021-09-17].
Directive 2005/89. Directive 2005/89/UE of the European Parliament and Council of 18 January 2006 on concerning measures to safeguarded security of electricity supply and infrastructure investment. Official Journal of the European Union, 2006, L 33/1 – L33/22.
Directive 2012/27. Directive 2012/27/UE of the European Parliament and Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency. Official Journal of the European Union, 2012, L315/1 – L315/56.
KPEiK 2019. National Energy and Climate Plan 2021–2030 (Krajowy plan na rzecz energii i klimatu na lata 2021–2030). Ministerstwo Aktywów Państwowych, 2019 (in Polish).
MP 2020. Polish Nuclear Power Programme (Program polskiej energetyki jądrowej). Monitor Polski 2020, poz. 946 (in Polish).
PSE 2016. Forecast of Peak Capacity Demand Coverage in 2016–2035 (Prognoza pokrycia zapotrzebowania szczytowego na moc w latach 2016–2035). Polskie Sieci Elektroenergetyczne SA. [Online] https://www.pse.pl/-/prognoza-pokrycia-zapotrzebowania-szczytowego-na-moc-w-latach-2016-2035 [Accessed: 2021-08-10] (in Polish).
PSE 2020. Development Plan of Present and Future Electricity Satisfaction Demand Coverage in 2021–2035 (Plan rozwoju w zakresie zaspokojenia obecnego i przyszłego zapotrzebowania na energię elektryczną na lata 2021–2030). Polskie Sieci Elektroenergetyczne SA. [Online] https://www.pse.pl/ documents/20182/21595261/Dokument_glowny_PRSP_2021-2030_20200528.pdf [Accessed: 2021-08-10] (in Polish).
PEP2040 2021. Energy Policy of Poland until 2040 (Polityka energetyczna Polski do 2040 roku). MP 2021, poz. 128 (in Polish). Statistics 2019. Statistics of Polish Heat Industry 2018 (Statystyka Ciepłownictwa Polskiego 2018). Warszawa: Agencja Rynku Energii SA (in Polish).
Statistics 2020. Statistics of Polish Electric Power Industry 2019 (Statystyka Elektroenergetyki Polskiej 2019). Warszawa: Agencja Rynku Energii SA (in Polish).
URE 2020. Information about Investment Plans in New Generation Capacity in 2020–2034 (Informacja na temat planów inwestycyjnych w nowe moce wytwórcze w latach 2020–2034). Urząd Regulacji Energetyki. [Online] https://www.ure.gov.pl>download>Raport-Plany inwestycyjne w nowe moce wytwórcze latach 2020-2034 [Accessed: 2021-08-10] (in Polish).
Zaporowski, B. 2016. Sustainable development of the electricity generation sources (Zrównoważony rozwój źródeł energii elektrycznej). Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 19(3), pp. 35–48 (in Polish).
Zaporowski, B. 2019. Energy and economic effectiveness of prospective generation technologies for Polish electric power industry (Efektywność energetyczna i ekonomiczna perspektywicznych dla polskiej elektroenergetyki technologii wytwórczych). Zeszyty Naukowe Wydziału Elektrotechniki i Automatyki Politechniki Gdańskiej 63, część 2, pp. 87–90 (in Polish).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Bolesław Zaporowski
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Institute of Electric Power Engineering of Poznań University of Technology, Poznań, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a cost-effectiveness analysis and a cost-benefit analysis for the production of X-type zeolites from fly ash.
Positive results of the laboratory tests on the quality of zeolites derived from fly ash initiated a cost analysis on the production of this materials on an industrial scale. The cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using the dynamic generation cost indicator (DGC). The calculated DGC expresses the technical manufacturing cost of 1 Mg of synthetic zeolites. Whereas the cost-benefit analysis (CBA) was completed using the economic net present value (ENP V) and the economic internal rate of return (EIRR ) indicators.
The calculated unit technical cost of producing 1 Mg of zeolites using an installation consisting of five reactors with a capacity of 25 m3 each is 211 EUR and is lower than the current market price of this product, including transportation costs. This proves the financial viability of the investment. The calculations of the economic efficiency of the installation (CBA method) show that it is fully economically viable to operate and use the products from a social point of view.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Barbara Białecka
1
ORCID: ORCID
Magdalena Cempa
1
ORCID: ORCID
Zdzisław Adamczyk
2
ORCID: ORCID
Henryk Świnder
1
ORCID: ORCID
Piotr Krawczyk
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. GIG Research Institute, Katowice, Poland
  2. Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more