Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Keywords
  • Date

Search results

Number of results: 6
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of the article is to bring closer a part of the world’s image that is characteristic for the rural community and the richness and variety of the folk culture inscribed in the proprial structures. As a result, this subject requires an integration of different research methods elaborated within the fields of onomastics and dialectology, including linguistic methods of researching a lingual image of the world. The onymic material is as follows: appellative surnames, originating from nicknames formed from dialectal lexemes, surnames motivated by nominal, dialectal hypocorisms, and finally, surnames formed from matronymic phrases (female names), which are an example of an aberrance of the patriarchal family model. Phonetic and formative phenomena should also be focused upon. These are crucial for certain social micro-communities, and are inscribed in the dialectal inflexions of anthroponyms (which function as separate surnames) and marginally in the female surnames with dialectal formants. Onyms with dialectal motivation refer to, and indirectly point, to the contemporary user, the past realities of living in the village community and the lingual and cultural background.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Halszka Górny
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The author highly appreciates the fi rst issue of the third volume of the fundamental “Dictionary of folk stereotypes and symbols” (ed. prof. E. Bartminsky), dedicated to the symbolism of plants. This issue presents rich materials (language, folklore, ethnographic) related to cereals, which in the popular perception have a mythological interpretation, the daily bread is God’s gift, endowed with sacred significance.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Светлана М. Толстая
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The next (and not yet the last) issue of the second volume Plants of the Dictionary of Folk Stereotypes and Symbols, published in Lublin under the editorship of prof. E. Bartminsky and S. Niebrzegowska‑Bartminska, contains the topics Shrubs and Little bushes. The ethnolinguistic “portraits” of the plants are given at the broad Slavic and European background. Like the previous issues, it is a significant contribution to the study of Polish and Slavic folk culture. It also provides various material for linguistic studies of Polish and Slavic phytonymy thanks to a rich dialect corpus of plant names and related folklore and ethnographic contexts. Moreover, the Dictionary of Folk Stereotypes and Symbols provides a new method of ethnolinguistic lexicography, which can be successfully applied to the study of other Slavic and non‐Slavic languages and cultural traditions.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Наталья Б. Корина
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Очередной выпуск Словаря народных стереотипов и символов
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The next issue of the Dictionary of folk stereotypes and symbols, published in Lublin under the editorship of Prof. E. Bartminski, is dedicated to the theme Flowers. Unlike many types of plants, whose cultural semantics "superimpose" on their practical significance in human life, flowers have an almost exclusively symbolic function – they serve as a decoration of the home space and a means of marking persons and objects that perform special ceremonial roles.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Светлана М. Толстая
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The next three issues of the second volume “Plants” of the “Dictionary of Folk Stereotypes and Symbols”, published in Lublin under the editorship of prof. E. Bartminsky, are devoted to the topics"Herbs","Fruit and coniferous trees",-"Deciduous trees". Like the previous issues, they are a valuable contribution to the study of Polish and Slavic folk culture, as well as to the development of such a complex discipline as ethnobotany. They also provide rich material for linguistic studies of Polish and Slavic phytonymy, since they contain a rich dialect corpus of plant names and related ethnographic and folklore contexts. But the important thing is that the Lublin dictionary gives researchers a new method of ethnolinguistic lexicography, which can be successfully applied to the study of other Slavic and non‑Slavic languages and cultural traditions.
Go to article

Bibliography

Acta Linguistica 2010 = „Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Trudy Instituta lingvisticheskikh issledovaniy RAN”, vol. 6, part 1: Etnobotanika: rasteniya v yazyke i kul'ture, eds. V.B. Kolosova, A.B. Ippolitova.
Acta Linguistica 2017 = „Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Trudy Instituta lingvisticheskikh issledovaniy RAN”, vol. 13, part 2: Etnobotanika: rasteniya v yazyke i kul'ture, eds. N.N. Кazanskiy, V.B. Kolosova.
Agapkina Т.А., 2019, Derev'ya v slavyanskoy narodnoy traditsii. Ocherki, Moskva: Indrik.
Bielak A., 2007, Wybrane zioła w ludowym językowym obrazie świata. Master thesis, Lublin: UMCS.
Cieliszek A., 1999, Ciągi definicyjne w polu semantycznym drzewo we współczesnym języku polskim. Master thesis, Lublin: UMCS.
Kolosova V.B., 2009, Leksika i simvolika slavyanskoy narodnoy botaniki, Moskva: Indrik.
Myl B., 1999, Zioła w ludowym językowym obrazie świata. Master thesis, Lublin: UMCS.
Pacławska E., 2011, Językowo‑kulturowy obraz ziół w polskiej tradycji ludowej. PhD thesis. Lublin: UMCS.
Smyk K., 1995, Drzewa i krzewy iglaste. Master thesis, Lublin: UMCS.
SSSL = Słownik stereotypów i symboli ludowych, koncepcja całości i redakcja: J. Bartmiński, t. 1. Kosmos, cz. 1: Niebo. Światła niebieskie. Ogień. Kamienie, 1996; cz. 2: Ziemia. Woda. Podziemie, 1999; cz. 3: Meteorologia, 2012; cz. 4: Świat. Światło. Metale, 2012; t. 2: Rośliny, cz. 1: Zboża, 2017; cz. 2: Warzywa. Przyprawy. Rośliny przemysłowe, 2018; cz. 3: Kwiaty, 2019; cz. 4: Zioła; 2020; cz. 5: Drzewa owocowe i iglaste, 2020; cz. 6: Drzewa liściaste, 2021, Lublin.
Steckiewicz M., 1991, Konotacja semantyczna nazw niektórych ziół w polszczyźnie ludowej. Master thesis, Lublin: UMCS.
Śpiewak B., 1979, Konotacja semantyczna nazw drzew w języku folkloru. Master thesis, Lublin: UMCS.
Tolstaya S.M., (rev.), 1997, Slovar' narodnykh stereotipov i simvolov, vol. 1: Kosmos, part 1, „Zhivaya starina”, no. 4, pp. 52–53.
Tolstaya S.M., (rev.), 2000, Slovar' narodnykh stereotipov i simvolov, vol. 1: Kosmos, part 2, „Zhivaya starina”, no. 2, pp. 58–59.
Tolstaya S.M., (rev.), 2014, Słownik stereotypów i symboli ludowych, koncepcja całości i redakcja: J. Bartmiński; zastępca redaktora: S. Niebrzegowska‑Bartmińska, Lublin, t. 1: Kosmos, cz. 3: Meteorologia, 521 s.; cz. 4: Świat. Światło. Metale, „Slavyanovedeniye”, no. 6, pp. 104–109.
Tolstaya S.M., (rev.), 2018, Simvolika rasteniy v pol'skoy narodnoy traditsii. Zlaki, “Rocznik Slawistyczny”, vol. 67, pp. 189–195.
Tolstaya S.M., (rev.), 2020, Novyy vypusk «Slovarya narodnykh stereotipov i simvolov» [rev.: Słownik stereotypów i symboli ludowych, Koncepcja całości i redakcja J. Bartmiński, t. 2: Rośliny, cz. 3: Kwiaty. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie‑Skłodowskiej, 2019, 295 s.], „Rocznik Slawistyczny”, vol. 69, pp. 237–244.
Tołstojowa S., 1998, Słownik ludowych stereotypów i symboli – pomysł i jego realizacja, „Literatura ludowa”, vol. 42, no. 6 (november – december), pp. 55–59.
Wawrzęta K., 1991, Konotacja semantyczna wybranych nazw drzew liściastych w po1szczyźnie ludowej. Master thesis, Lublin: UMCS.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Светлана М. Толстая
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Институт славяноведения РАН, Москва
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article examines the problem of the significance of literature, not just folk literature, in Ryszard Berwiński's Studies in Folk Literature from the Historical and the Scholarly Perspective, published in Poznań in 1854. This subject was largely marginalized in discussions of this magisterial work because of what could seem as the author's inordinate preoccupation with demonology. This article looks again at his approach, which deserves a reappraisal. The discussion is divided into three parts. The first part examines the terms used by Berwiński to describe folk literature and texts that are connected with it in various ways, which for him and other 19th‑century researches constituted the essence of folklore. The second part focuses on those types of texts Berwiński regarded as crucial for the study of the sources of folk belief, while the third reviews his vision of the cultural and social role of literature in the 19th century. Together, these analyses reconstruct Berwiński's view on the functioning of literature in folklore studies and, more broadly, in the processes of the creation of a communal identity.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Sabina Raczyńska
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. doktorantka, Wydział Polonistyki Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more