Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 8
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

An attempt at assessing the correlation between the content of fluoride in the Antarctic krill from various fishery and its.biological condition was carried out Fluoride was determined with the Dolan method, which was modified by the present authors. No statistically significant correlation was found between the degree of sexual maturity and fluoride content. There was no decisive statistical relation between the body weight and body length of individuals and the content of fluoride in the Antarctic krill.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Piotr Bykowski
Maria Kowalczuk
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The last biomonitoring study in Poland on intoxication with fluoride compounds of deer was conducted almost two decades ago. Given the fact that fluoride level in air and water is not widely monitored in Poland, it is justified to undertake monitoring of F- levels in people and other long-lived mammals. This paper provides the assessment of the present level of fluoride accumulation in mineralized tissue of large herbivorous mammals. The aim of the present study was to determine fluoride concentration in teeth of deer inhabiting the areas of Poland which are industrially uncontaminated with fluoride compounds, to establish possible correlations between the analysed parameters, and to provide a comparison of the present results with those obtained in other studies. Mean concentration of fluoride in all analysed samples amounted to 231.0 F mg/kg, with the minimum value of 22.0 F mg/kg and the maximum of 935.0 F mg/kg. This results from the development of industry and a widespread use of fluoride-supplemented caries prevention products which contributes to an intense accumulation of these substances in vertebrates, predominantly in mineralized tissue.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

M. Palczewska-Komsa
1
K. Barczak
1
K. Grocholewicz
2
J. Buczkowska-Radlińska
1
P.R. Piotrowski
3
E. Sobolewska
4

  1. Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Powstańców Wlkp. 72, 71-111 Szczecin, Poland
  2. Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Integrated Dentistry Department, Powstańców Wlkp. 72, 71-111 Szczecin, Poland
  3. University of Medical Sciences in Poznań, Professor Emeritus of the Medical Faculty, Bukowska 70, 60-812 Poznań, Poland
  4. Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Department of Dental Prosthetics, Powstańców Wlkp. 72, 71-111 Szczecin, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article presents results of studies on multicriteria optimisation in the decopperisation process of flash smelting slags coming from the process of decopperisation at the "Głogów II" Copper Smelter. Measurements of viscosity were conducted using a high-temperature viscometer manufactured by Brookfield company. An addition in the form of calcium fluoride has an advantageous influence on decreasing the liquidus temperature of slag, and the effect of decreasing viscosity at the participation of calcium fluoride is significant. A motivation to conduct studies on viscosity of decopperised slags is an optimisation of the process of decopperisation at an improvement of this process parameters, i.e. the time of melt per one production cycle and consumption of electric power in the whole process. The efficiency of optimisation of the process course depends not only on an accepted criterion of the quality of controlling, a type of technological parameters, but also, to large extent, on characteristics and features of these parameters. CaCO3 currently added to the process of decopperisation efficiently decreases viscosity of flash slag, at the same time has influence on an increase of the yield of copper in alloy, but on the other hand, it increases the mass of slag, artificially under representing concentration of this metal. The article is completed with a conclusion of discussed issues, stating that a search for a new technological addition is still necessary,
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

M. Wędrychowicz
A.W. Bydałek
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Fluorine and sodium chloride are common elements present in the water environment. According to WHO guidelines fluoride content in water cannot be not higher than 1.5 mgF-/dm3. Elevated fluoride content was observed all over the world and it leads to many health issues. It can be removed with the usage of various methods (ion exchange, membrane processes, adsorption, precipitation). In this paper fluoride removal with nanofiltration usage was described. Tests were performed with the application of Amicon 86400 filtration cells. Two types of commercial nanofiltration membranes NP010P and NP030P (Microdyn Nadir) were used. Transmembrane pressure was established as 0.3 MPa. For lower fluoride concentrations (5 mgF-/dm3) NF process allowed to decrease fluoride content under level 1.5 mgF-/dm3. Removal efficiency decreased with increasing fluoride content. Membrane NP030P showed better separation properties. Sodium chloride influenced removal efficiency as well as fluoride adsorption on/in membranes during the process. According to obtained data, better hydraulic properties exhibited membrane NP010P. For both membranes decrease in permeate flux in comparison to pure water was noticed what was observed. Relative permeability was lowered even to 0.32.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Akuno, M. H., Nocella, G., Milia, E. P. & Gutierrez, L. (2019). Factors influencing the relationship between fluoride in drinking water and dental fluorosis: A ten-year systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Water and Health, 17(6), pp. 845–862. DOI: 10.2166/wh.2019.300
  2. Ali, I., Alothman, Z. A. & Sanagi, M. M. (2015). Green Synthesis of Iron Nano-Impregnated Adsorbent for Fast Removal of Fluoride from Water. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 211, pp. 457–465. DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2015.07.034
  3. Ayala, L. I. M., Paquet, M., Janowska, K., Jamard, P., Quist-Jensen, C. A., Bosio, G. N., Mártire, D. O., Fabbri, D. & Boffa, V. (2018). Water Defluoridation: Nanofiltration vs Membrane Distillation. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 57(43), pp. 14740–14748. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b03620
  4. Banasiak, L. J. & Schäfer, A. I. (2009). Removal of boron, fluoride and nitrate by electrodialysis in the presence of organic matter. Journal of Membrane Science, 334(1–2), pp. 101–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.02.020
  5. Bannoud, A. H. & Darwich, Y. (2007). Elimination des ions fluorures et manganèses contenus dans les eaux par nanofiltration. Desalination, 206(1–3), pp. 449–456. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2006.02.071
  6. Bhatnagar, A., Kumar, E. & Sillanpää, M. (2011). Fluoride removal from water by adsorption - A review. Chemical Engineering Journal, 171(3), pp. 811–840. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.028
  7. Bowen, W. R., Mohammad, A. W. & Hilal, N. (1997). Characterisation of nanofiltration membranes for predictive purposes - Use of salts, uncharged solutes and atomic force microscopy. Journal of Membrane Science, 126(1), pp. 91–105. DOI:10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00276-1
  8. Carvalho, A. L., Maugeri, F., Silva, V., Hernández, A., Palacio, L. & Pradanos, P. (2011). AFM analysis of the surface of nanoporous membranes: Application to the nanofiltration of potassium clavulanate. Journal of Materials Science, 46(10), pp. 3356–3369. DOI:10.1007/s10853-010-5224-7
  9. Cassano, A., Bentivenga, A., Conidi, C., Galiano, F., Saoncella, O. & Figoli, A. (2019). Membrane-based clarification and fractionation of red wine lees aqueous extracts. Polymers, 11(7), pp. 1–16. DOI:10.3390/polym11071089
  10. Chatterjee, S. & De, S. (2014). Adsorptive removal of fluoride by activated alumina doped cellulose acetate phthalate (CAP) mixed matrix membrane, Sepparation and Purification Technology, 125, pp. 223–238. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2014.01.055
  11. Chen, C., Han, B., Li, J., Shang, T., Zou, J. & Jiang, W. (2001). A new model on the diffusion of small molecule penetrants in dense polymer membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 187(1–2), pp. 109–118. DOI:10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00689-X
  12. Chibani, A., Barhoumi, A., Ncib, S., Bouguerra, W. & Elaloui, E. (2019). Fluoride removal from synthetic groundwater by electrocoagulation process: parameters ad energy evaluation. Desalination and Water Treatment, 157, pp. 100–109. DOI:10.5004/dwt.2019.24087
  13. Damtie, M. M., Woo, Y. C., Kim, B., Hailemariam, R. H., Park, K. D., Shon, H. K., Park, C. & Choi, J. S. (2019). Removal of fluoride in membrane-based water and wastewater treatment technologies: Performance review. Journal of Environmental Management, 251, pp. 1–24. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109524
  14. Diawara, C. K., Paugam, L., Pontié, M., Schlumpf, J. P., Jaouen, P. & Quéméneur, F. (2005). Influence of chloride, nitrate, and sulphate on the removal of fluoride ions by using nanofiltration membranes. Separation Science and Technology, 40, pp. 3339–3347. DOI:10.1080/01496390500423706
  15. Elimelech, M., Zhu, X., Childress, A. E. & Hong, S. (1997). Role of membrane surface morphology in colloidal fouling of cellulose acetate and composite aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 127(1), pp. 101–109. DOI:10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00351-1
  16. Epsztein, R., Shaulsky, E., Dizge, N., Warsinger, D.M. & Elimelech, M. (2018). Role of ionic charge density in Donnan exclusion of monovalent anions by nanofiltration. Environmental Science and Technology, 52, pp. 4108–4116. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.7b06400
  17. Fierro, D., Boschetti-de-Fierro, A. & Abetz, V. (2012). The solution-diffusion with imperfections model as a method to understand organic solvent nanofiltration of multicomponent systems. Journal of Membrane Science, 413–414, pp. 91–101. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2012.04.027
  18. Gomes, A.C., Cabral Goncalves, I. & de Pinho, M.N, The role of adsorption on nanofiltration of azo dyes (2005). Journal of Membrane Science, 255, pp. 157–165. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2005.01.031
  19. He, J., Yang, Y., Wu, Z., Xie, C., Zhang, K., Kong, L. & Liu, J. (2020). Review of fluoride removal from water environment by adsorption. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 8(6), pp. 1–101. DOI:10.1016/j.jece.2020.104516
  20. Hirose, M., Ito, H. & Kamiyama, Y. (1996). Effect of skin layer surface structures on the flux behaviour of RO membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 121(2), pp. 209–215. DOI:10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00181-0
  21. Hoinkis, J., Valero-Freitag, S., Caporgno, M. P. & Pätzold, C. (2011). Removal of nitrate and fluoride by nanofiltration - A comparative study. Desalination and Water Treatment, 30(1–3), pp. 278–288. DOI:10.5004/dwt.2011.2103
  22. Hong, S.U., Malaisamy, R. & Bruening, M.L. (2007). Separation of fluoride from other monovalent anions using multilayer polyelectrolyte nanofiltration membranes, Langmuir, 23, 1716 –1722. DOI:10.1021/la061701y
  23. Hu, K. & Dickson, J. M. (2006). Nanofiltration membrane performance on fluoride removal from water. Journal of Membrane Science, 279(1–2), pp. 529–538. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.047
  24. Kambarani, M., Bahmanyar, H., Mousavian, M. A. & Mousavi, S. M. (2016). Crossflow filtration of sodium chloride solution by a polymeric nanofilter: Minimization of concentration polarization by a novel backpulsing method. Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 80, pp. 135–141. DOI:10.30492/IJCCE.2016.23595
  25. Klimonda, A. & Kowalska, I. (2019). Application of polymeric membranes for the purification of solutions containing cationic surfactants. Water Science and Technology, 79(7), pp. 1241–1252. DOI:10.2166/wst.2019.115
  26. Kowalik-Klimczak, A., Zalewski, M. & Gierycz, P. (2016). Removal of Cr(III) ions from salt solution by nanofiltration: Experimental and modelling analysis. Polish Journal of Chemical Technology, 18(3), pp. 10–16. DOI:10.1515/pjct-2016-0042
  27. Krieg, H. M., Modise, S. J., Keizer, K. & Neomagus, H. W. J. P. (2004). Salt rejection in nanofiltration for single and binary salt mixtures in view of sulphate removal. Desalination, 171, pp. 205–215. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2004.05.005
  28. Labarca, F. & Bórquez, R. (2020). Comparative study of nanofiltration and ion exchange for nitrate reduction in the presence of chloride and iron in groundwater. Science of the Total Environment, 723, pp. 1–12. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137809
  29. Lee, S., Lee, E., Elimelech, M. & Hong, S. (2011). Membrane characterization by dynamic hysteresis: Measurements, mechanisms, and implications for membrane fouling. Journal of Membrane Science, 366, pp. 17–24. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2010.09.024
  30. Ma, W. F., Liu, W. J. & Chen, G. W. (2009). Factors influencing the removal of fluoride from groundwater by Nanofiltration. 3rd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, ICBBE 2009, pp. 1–5. DOI:10.1109/ICBBE.2009.5162848
  31. Madaeni, S. S. & Salehi, E. (2009). Adsorption of cations on nanofiltration membrane: Separation mechanism, isotherm confirmation and thermodynamic analysis. Chemical Engineering Journal, 150(1), pp. 114–121. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2008.12.005
  32. Mnif, A., Ali, M. B. S. & Hamrouni, B. (2010). Effect of some physical and chemical parameters on fluoride removal by nanofiltration. Ionics, 16, pp. 245–253. DOI:10.1007/s11581-009-0368-7
  33. Nasr, A. B., Charcosset, C., Amar, R. B. & Walha, K. (2013). Defluoridation of water by nanofiltration. Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, 150, pp. 92–97. DOI:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2013.01.021
  34. Nechifor, G., Pascu, D.E. & Pascu, M. (2013). Study of adsorption kinetics and zeta potential of phosphate and nitrate ions on a cellulosic membrane. Revue Roumaine de Chimie, 58 (7–8), pp. 591–597
  35. Park, N., Cho, J., Hong, S. & Lee, S. (2010). Ion transport characteristics in nanofiltration membranes: Measurements and mechanisms. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology - AQUA, 59(2–3), pp. 179–190. DOI:10.2166/aqua.2010.034
  36. Richards, L. A., Vuachère, M. & Schäfer, A. I. (2010). Impact of pH on the removal of fluoride, nitrate and boron by nanofiltration/reverse osmosis. Desalination, 261(3), pp. 331–337. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2010.06.025
  37. Salgado, C., Carmona, F.J., Palacio, L., Hernández, A. & Prádanos, P. (2016). Fouling study of nanofiltration membranes for sugar control in grape must: Analysis of resistances and the role of osmotic pressure. Separation Science and Technology, 51(3), pp. 525–541. DOI:10.1080/01496395.2015.1094490
  38. Shen, J. & Schäfer, A. (2014a). Removal of fluoride and uranium by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis: A review. Chemosphere, 117(1), pp. 679–691. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.090
  39. Shen, J. & Schäfer, A. (2015). Factors affecting fluoride and natural organic matter (NOM) removal from natural waters in Tanzania by nanofiltration/reverse osmosis. Science of the Total Environment, 527–528, pp. 520–529. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.037
  40. Shu, L., Waite, T. D., Bliss, P. J., Fane, A. & Jegatheesan, V. (2005). Nanofiltration for the possible reuse of water and recovery of sodium chloride salt from textile effluent. Desalination, 172, pp. 235–243. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2004.07.037
  41. Shurvell, T., Keir, G., Jegatheesan, V., Shu, L. & Farago, L. (2014). Removal of ametryn through nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52, pp. 643–649. DOI:10.1080/19443994.2013.829594
  42. Silva, F. C. (2018). Fouling of Nanofiltration Membranes, IntechOpen, London 2018, DOI:10.5772/intechopen.75353
  43. Steele, D. (1966). Group la: the Alkali Metals Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs, Fr, Pergamon, Tallahassee 1966. DOI:10.1016/b978-0-08-011853-6.50010-2
  44. Szmagara, A. & Krzyszczak, A. (2019). Monitoring of fluoride content in bottled mineral and spring waters by ion chromatography. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 202, pp. 27–34. DOI:10.1016/j.gexplo.2019.03.008
  45. Tahaikt, M., El Habbani, R., Ait Haddou, A., Achary, I., Amor, Z., Taky, M., Alami, A., Boughriba, A., Hafsi, M. & Elmidaoui, A. (2007). Fluoride removal from groundwater by nanofiltration. Desalination, 212(1–3), pp. 46–53. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2006.10.003
  46. Teixeira, M. R., Rosa, M. J. & Nyström, M. (2005). The role of membrane charge on nanofiltration performance. Journal of Membrane Science, 265(1–2), pp. 160–166. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2005.04.046
  47. Tsuru, T., Nakao, S.I. & Kimura, S. (1991). Calculation of ion rejection by extended nernst-planck Equation with charged reverse osmosis membranes for single and mixed electrolyte solutions. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 24(4), pp. 511–517. DOI:10.1252/jcej.24.511
  48. Van der Bruggen, B. & Vandecasteele, C. (2001). Flux decline during nanofiltration of organic components in aqueous solution. Environmental Science Technology, 35, pp. 3535–3540. DOI: 10.1021/es0100064
  49. Van Der Bruggen, B., Braeken, L. & Vandecasteele, C. (2002). Flux decline in nanofiltration due to adsorption of organic compounds. Separation and Purification Technology, 29(1), pp. 23–31. DOI:10.1016/S1383-5866(01)00199-X
  50. Vieira, G.S, Moreira, F.K.V., Matsumoto, R.L.S., Michelon, M., Filho, F.M. & Hubinger, M.D. (2018). Influence of nanofiltration membrane features on enrichment of jussara ethanolic extract (Euterpe edulis) in anthocyanins. Journal of Food Engineering, 226, pp. 31–41. DOI:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2018.01.013
  51. Vinati, A., Mahanty, B. & Behera, S. K. (2015). Clay and clay minerals for fluoride removal from water: A state-of-the-art review. Applied Clay Science, 114, pp. 340–348. DOI:10.1016/j.clay.2015.06.013
  52. Vigneswaran, S. & Kwon, D.-Y. (2015). Effect of ionic strength and permeate flux on membrane fouling: analysis of forces acting on particle deposit and cake formation. Environmental Engineering, 19, pp. 1604–1611. DOI:10.1007/s12205-014-0079-0
  53. Wang, Y., Shu, L., Jegatheesan, V. & Gao, B. (2010). Removal and adsorption of diuron through nanofiltration membrane: The effects of ionic environment and operating pressures. Separation and Purification Technology, 74(2), pp. 236–241. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2010.06.011
  54. WHO, Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, 2017 (4th ed.), World Health Organization, 763 Geneva
  55. Xi, B., Wang, X., Liu, W., Xia, X., Li, D., He, L., Wang, H., Sun, W., Yang, T. & Tao, W. (2014). Fluoride and Arsenic Removal by Nanofiltration Technology from Groundwater in Rural Areas of China: Performances with Membrane Optimization. Separation Science and Technology (Philadelphia), 49, pp. 2642–2649. DOI:10.1080/01496395.2014.939761
  56. Xu, H., Xiao, K., Yu, J., Huang, B., Wang, X., Liang, S., Wei, C., Wen, X. & Huang, X. (2020). A simple method to identify the dominant fouling mechanisms during membrane filtration based on piecewise multiple linear regression. Membranes, 10(8), 1–14. DOI:10.3390/membranes10080171
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Martyna Grzegorzek
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Wrocław University of Science and Technology,Wrocław, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents the result of hydrogeological studies of Lublin Coal Basin (LCB), particularly at Jurassic level. It is arranged in several parts: I) stratigraphy, tectonics and lithology of Jurassic system at LCB territory, 2) groundwater dynamics, 3) chemical composition of waters, 4) hyclrogeochemical stability conditions. The paper also suggests a few main directions of using the Jurassic waters in prophylaxis and therapy of many diseases. The waters, containing considerably elevated quantities of fluorine compounds come from Jurassic formation lying at the considerable depth. Coal mine joins them with saline Carboniferous waters. After pretreatment, they are discharged to the surface ancl to the river. Jurassic waters belong to the group of low mineralised waters. They contain 6-1 I mg F/dm3 fluorides. Thus they can be usefu I in prophylactics of teeth ancl paradental illnesses, particularly in risk groups. Thanks to, fluorides contained in these waters they can be used during and after treatment and to support surgical operations or rehabilitation effects.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Małgorzata Ciosmak
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) is one of the most important piezoelectric polymers. Piezoelectricity in PVDF appears in polar b and ɣ phases. Piezoelectric fibers obtained by means of electrospinning may be used in tissue engineering (TE) as a smart analogue of the natural extracellular matrix (ECM). We present results showing the effect of rotational speed of the collecting drum on morphology, phase content and in vitro biological properties of PVDF nonwovens. Morphology and phase composition were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), respectively. It was shown that increasing rotational speed of the collector leads to an increase in fiber orientation, reduction in fiber diameter and considerable increase of polar phase content, both b and g. In vitro cell culture experiments, carried out with the use of ultrasounds in order to generate electrical potential via piezoelectricity, indicate a positive effect of polar phases on fibroblasts. Our preliminary results demonstrate that piezoelectric PVDF scaffolds are promising materials for tissue engineering applications, particularly for neural tissue regeneration, where the electric potential is crucial.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

A. Zaszczyńska
P.Ł. Sajkiewicz
A. Gradys
R. Tymkiewicz
O. Urbanek
D. Kołbuk
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The phytotoxic effects of fluoride and its derivatives on the seeds and seedlings of the Colobanthus apetalus and Colobanthus quitensis were studied. This is a first study to evaluate the influence of sodium fluoride (NaF) on the morphophysiological and biochemical processes on two Colobanthus species. The influence of various concentrations of NaF (9 mM, 19 mM, 29 mM) on the germination capacity and germination rate of seeds, seedlings growth and the proline content of plant tissues was analyzed under laboratory conditions (20/10°C, 12/12 h). The seeds of C. apetalus were collected from a greenhouse, whereas the seeds of C. quitensis were collected in Antarctica and in a greenhouse (Olsztyn, Poland). The tested concentrations of NaF did not suppress the germination of C. apetalus seeds, but the germination of C. quitensis seeds was inhibited. Sodium fluoride mainly inhibited root growth of C. apetalus and C. quitensis. In both analyzed species, the free proline content of seedlings increased significantly under exposure to NaF. The results of this study clearly indicate that C. apetalus and C. quitensis are highly resistant to NaF stress.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Justyna Dulska
Janusz Wasilewski
Piotr Androsiuk
ORCID: ORCID
Wioleta Kellmann-Sopyła
Katarzyna Głowacka
Ryszard Górecki
Katarzyna Chwedorzewska
Irena Giełwanowska
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Polymer coatings are increasingly used in varied fields and applications from simple coatings of barrier to intricated nanotechnology based composite. In the present study, polyvinylidene fluoride(PVDF)/Hydroxyapatite (HA )coatings were produced by spin coating technique over 316L SS. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) were used to observe the coated 316L SS substrates surface morphology. The corrosion protection efficiency of pure polyvinylidene fluoride and polyvinylidene fluoride/HA nanocomposite coatings on 316L SS was inspected using potentiodynamic polarization along with the ions release techniques in Hank’s solution. A superior biocompatibility and an improved protection performance against corrosion were obtained for the 316L SS samples with nanocomposite coatings compared with the pure polyvinylidene fluoride coatings and pristine 316L SS counterparts. The 316L SS samples coated by PVDF/HA nanocomposite showed enhanced corrosion protection within Hank’s solution. The corrosion of 316L SS samples within Hank’s solution increased from 92.99% to 99.99% when using 3wt% HA due to increasing the PVDF inhibition efficiency. Good agreements in the electrochemical corrosion parameters were obtained from using ions release and potentiodynamic polarization tests.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1.  H. Hermawan, D. Ramdan, and J.R.P. Djuansjah, Metals for Biomedical Applications, ch. 17, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering and Health Science, University Teknologi Malaysia, 2011.
  2.  Y. Okazaki, E. Gotoh, T. Manabe, and K. Kobayashi, “Comparison of metal concentrations in rat tibia tissues with various metallic implants”, Biomaterials 25, 5913–5920 (2004), doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.064.
  3.  T. Tański, W. Matysiak, D. Kosmalska, and A. Lubos, “Influence of calcination temperature on optical and structural properties of TiO2 thin films prepared by means of sol-gel and spin coating”, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 66(2), 151‒156 (2018).
  4.  J.R. Smith and D.A. Lamprou, “Polymer coatings for biomedical applications: a review”, Trans. IMF 92(1), 9‒19 (2014).
  5.  M. Srimathi, R. Rajalakshmi, and S. Subhashini, “Polyvinyl alcohol–sulphanilic acid water soluble composite as corrosion inhibitor for mild steel in hydrochloric acid medium”, Arab. J. Chem. 7(5), 525‒855 (2014).
  6.  B.P. Singh, B.K. Jena, S. Bhattacharjee, and L. Besra, “Development of oxidation and corrosion resistance hydrophobic graphene oxide- polymer composite coating on copper”, Surf. Coat. Technol. 232(15), 475‒481 (2013).
  7.  S. Rajendran, S.P. Sridevi, N. Anthony, A.A. John, and M. Sundearavadivelu, “Corrosion behaviour of carbon steel in polyvinyl alcohol”, Anti-Corros. Methods Mater. 52, 102‒107 (2005).
  8.  A.H. Asra and H.S. Ohood, “Preparation and Facilitation Of Antibactirial Activity, Hydrophilicity Of Piezo–PVDF/n-MgO Film By Electro-Spinning and Spin Coated For Wound Dressing: A Comparative Study”, J. Mech. Eng. Res. Develop. (JMERD) 42(4), 23‒31 (2019).
  9.  N. Maqsood, A. Khan, M.K. Alamgir, S.A. Shah, and M.Fahad, “PTFE Thin Film Coating on 316L Stainless Steel for Corrosion Protection in Acidic Environment”, J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 36(1), 183‒190 (2017).
  10.  J. Blitstein and D. Kathrein, “Corrosion-Resistant coating Composition Containing Hollow Microballoons”, US Patent US4374874A, Dec. 22, 1981
  11.  S. Vidhate, A. Shaito, J. Chung, and N.A. D’Souza, “Crystallization, mechanical, and rheological behavior of polyvinylidene fluoride/ carbon nanofiber composites”, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 112, 254–260 (2009).
  12.  J. Ma, J. Zhao, Z. Ren, and L. Li, “Preparation and characterization of PVDF-PFSA flat sheet ultrafiltration membranes”, Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 6, 301–310 (2012).
  13.  S. Liang, Y. Kang, A. Tiraferri, E.P. Giannelis, X. Huang, and M. Elimelech, “Highly hydrophilic polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) ultrafiltration membranes via postfabrication grafting of surface-tailored silica nanoparticles”, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 6694‒6703 (2013).
  14.  V.F. Cardoso, D.M. Correia, and C. Ribeiro, “Review: Fluorinated Polymers as Smart Materials for Advanced Biomedical Applications”, Polymers 10, 161 (2018) doi: 10.3390/polym10020161
  15.  C.T. Kwok, P.K. Wong, F.T. Cheng, and H.C. Man, “Characterization and corrosion behaviour of hydroxyapatite coating on Ti6Al4V fabricated by electrophoretic deposition”, Appl. Surf. Sci. 7, 6736–6744 (2009).
  16.  J. Zhu, X. Chen, J. Wang, and W. Chen, “Hydroxyapatite/β-tricalcium phosphate composite for guiding bone tissue growth into a titanium tube in 8 mm dog tibia cavity defects”, J. Wuhan Univ. Technol.-Mater. Sci. Ed. 31, 468–473 (2016).
  17.  R. Raja, S. Jannet, and M.A. Thampy, “Synthesis and characterization of AA5083 and AA2024 reinforced with SiO2 particles”, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 66(2), 127‒132 (2018).
  18.  N.M. Dawood, “Preparation And Characterization of Bio Nitinol With Addition of Copper”, Ph. D. thesis, Materials Engineering Department, University Of Technology, Iraq, 2014.
  19.  F. Gebhardt, S. Seuss, M.C. Turhan, H. Hornberger, S. Virtanen, and A.R. Boccaccini, “Characterization of electrophoretic chitosan coatings on stainless steel”, Mater. Lett. 66, 302–304 (2012).
  20.  E. Husain, A. Abdel Nazeer, J. Alsarraf, K. Al-Awadi, M. Murad, and A. Al-Naqi, A. Shekeban,Corrosion behavior of AISI 316 stainless steel coated with modified fluoropolymer in marine condition, J. Coat. Technol. Res. 302–304 (2018).
  21.  L. Sun and C.C. Berndt, “Characterization and Mechanical Properties of Flame Sprayed Hydroxyapatitel Polymer Composite Coatings”, in Thermal Spray 2001: New Surfaces for a New Millennium, Eds. C.C. Berndt, K.A. Khor, and EX Lugscheider, ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, USA, 2001.
  22.  A.K. Rajih, N.M. Dawood, and F. Rasheed, “Corrosion Protection of 316 L Stainless Steel by HA Coating Via Pulsed Laser Deposition Technique”, J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 13(24), 10221‒10231 (2018).
  23.  H.-F. Guo, Z.-S. Li, S.-W. Dong, W.-J. Chen, L. Deng, Y.-F. Wang, and D-J. Ying, “Piezoelectric PU/PVDF electrospun scaffolds for wound healing applications”, Colloid Surf. B-Biointerfaces 96, 29–36 (2012).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Asra Ali Hussein
1
Nawal Mohammed Dawood
2
Ammar Emad Al-kawaz
1

  1. College of Materials Engineering, Polymer and Petrochemical Industries Department, Babylon University, Iraq
  2. College of Materials Engineering, Metallurgical Engineering department, Babylon University, Iraq

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more