[1] Where the Energy Goes: Electric Cars. US DOE, US EPA. https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/atv-ev.shtml (accessed 20 March 2021).
[2] Simmonds N., Pitman J., Tsoutsanis P., Jenkins K., Gaylard A., Jansen W.: Complete body aerodynamic study of three vehicles. SAE Tech. Pap. (2017), 2017-01-1529.
[3] Ahmed S.R. Ramm G., Faltin G.: Some salient features of the time-averaged ground vehicle wake. SAE Transactions 93(1984), 2, 840222–840402, 473–503.
[4] Buchheim R., Deutenbach K.-R., Lückoff H.-J.: Necessity and premises for reducing the aerodynamic drag of future passenger cars. SAE Transactions 90(1981), 1, 810010–810234, 758–771.
[5] Cooper K.R., Bertenyi T., Dutil G. Syms, J. Sovran G.: The aerodynamic performance of automotive underbody diffusers. SAE Tech. Pap. (1998), 980030, 150–179.
[6] Potthoff J.: The aerodynamic layout of UNICAR research vehicle. In: Proc. Int. Symp. on Vehicle Aerodynamics, Wolfsburg, 1982.
[7] Katz J.: Race Car Aerodynamics: Designing for Speed. Bentley, 1995.
[8] Hucho W.: Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles. From Fluid Mechanics to Vehicle Engineering. Butterworth-Heinemann, 1987.
[9] Katz J.: Automotive Aerodynamics. Wiley, 2016. [10] Shinde, Gopal, Aniruddha Joshi, Kishor Nikam.: Numerical investigations of the drivAer car model using opensource CFD solver OpenFOAM. Tata Consult. Serv., Pune, 2013.
[11] DrivAer Model. https://www.mw.tum.de/en/aer/research-groups/automotive/drivaer/ (accessed 15 Apr. 2021).
[12] Jakirlic S., Kutej L., Hanssmann D., Basara B., Tropea C.: Eddy-resolving simulations of the notchback ‘DrivAer’ model: Influence of underbody geometry and wheels rotation on aerodynamic behaviour. SAE Tech. Pap. (2016), 2016-01-1602.
[13] abois M., Lakehal D.: Very-large eddy simulation (V-LES) of the flow across a tube bundle. Nucl. Eng. Des. 241(2011), 6, 2075–2085.
[14] Heft A.: Aerodynamic investigation of the cooling requirements of electric vehicles. PhD thesis, Technische Universität München, Munich 2014.
[15] Heft A.I., Indinger T. Adams N.A.: Introduction of a new realistic generic car model for aerodynamic investigations. SAE Tech. Pap. (2012), 2012-01-0168.
[16] Janssen L.J., Hucho W.H.: The effect of various parameters on the aerodynamic drag of passenger cars. In: Advances in Road Vehicle Aerodynamics (H.S. Stevens, Ed.), 1973. 223-254.
[17] Wright P.G.: The influence of aerodynamics on the design of Formula One racing cars. Int. J. Vehicle Des. 3(1982), 4, 383–397.
[18] Eagle Two. http://lodzsolarteam.p.lodz.pl/index.php/eagle-two/ (accessed 3 May 2021).
[19] Lanfrit M.: Best Practice Guidelines for Handling Automotive External Aerodynamics with Fluent. Fluent Deutschland, Darmstadt 2005.
[20] Ansys Fluent Mosaic – new mesh generation technology incorporating hexahedral and polyhedral elements. Symkom, Łódz 2019. https://symkom.pl/ansys-fluent-mosaic/ (accessed 16 March 2021).
[21] Ansys: Ansys Fluent User’s Guide. 2013.
[22] Schlichting H.: Boundary-Layer Theory. McGraw Hill, 1979.
[23] Miao L., Mack S., Indinger T.: Experimental and numerical investigation of automotive aerodynamics using DrivAer model. In: Proc. ASME 2015 Int. Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., Boston, Aug. 2–5, 2015. V003T01A039. ASME.
[24] Heft A.I., Indinger T., Adams N.A.: Experimental and numerical investigation of the DrivAer model. In: Proc. Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, Rio Grande, July 8–12, 2012, FEDSM2012-72272, 41–51. ASME.
[25] Heft A.I., Indinger T., Adams N.: Investigation of unsteady flow structures in the wake of a realistic generic car model. In: Proc. 29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conf., June 2011, 3669.
[26] Ashton N., West A., Lardeau S., Revell A.: Assessment of RANS and DES methods for realistic automotive models. Comput. Fluids 128(2016), 1–15.
[27] Guilmineau E., Deng G., Leroyer A., Queutey P., Wackers J., Visonneau M. (2016, June): Assessment of RANS and DES methods for the Ahmed body. In: Proc. ECCOMAS Cong. 2016 VII Eur. Cong. on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering (M. Papadrakakis, V. Papadopoulos, G. Stefanou, V. Plevris, Eds.), Crete Island, 5-10 June 2016.
[28] Menter F.R.: Zonal two equation k − ! turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. In: Proc. 23rd Fluid Dynamics, Plasmadynamics, and Lasers Conf., Orlando, 6–9 July 1993, AIAA-93-2906.
[29] Ansys Inc.: Ansys Fluent 12.0 Theory Guide, 2009.
[30] Menter F.R.: Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 32(1994), 8, 1598–1605.
[31] Sobczak K.: Numerical investigations of an influence of the aspect ratio on the Savonius rotor performance. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1101(2018), 1, 012034.
[32] Huang P.G., Bardina J., Coakley T.: Turbulence modeling validation, testing, and development. NASA Tech. Memorand. (1997), 110446, 147.
[33] Pawłucki M., Krys M.: CFD for Engineers. Helion, Gliwice 2020.

Allison H. (2016), Transcendental Deduction and Transcendental Idealism, „European Journal of Philosophy” 4 (24), s. 920–933.
Ameriks K. (2001), Text and Context: Hermeneutical Prolegomena to Interpreting a Kant Text, w: D. Schönecker, T. Zwenger (red.), Kant verstehen / Understanding Kant. Über die Interpretation philosophischer Texte, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, s. 11–31.
Białek P. (2017), Pycha i skromność rozumu. Współczesny spór o argumenty transcendentalne a filozofia Kanta i Fichtego, Kraków: Universitas.
Callanan J.J. (2011), Making Sense of Doubt: Strawson’s Anti‑Scepticism, „Theoria” 77 (3), s. 261–278.
Grygianiec M. (2019), Status argumentacji transcendentalnej, „Przegląd Filozoficzny – Nowa Seria” 4 (112), s. 131–160.
Guyer P. (2001), Naturalizing Kant, w: D. Schönecker, T. Zwenger (red.), Kant verstehen / Understanding Kant. Über die Interpretation philosophischer Texte, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, s. 59–84.
Kant I. (1957), Krytyka czystego rozumu, przeł. R. Ingarden, t. I, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Kant I. (1999), Critique of Pure Reason, przeł. i opr. P. Guyer, A.W. Wood, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kędziora K. (2019), John Rawls. Uzasadnienie, sprawiedliwość i rozum publiczny, Bibliotheca Philosophica 5, Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Korsgaard Ch. (1995), Rawls and Kant: On the Primacy of the Practical, „Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress”, t. I, Memphis 1999, s. 1165–1173.
Palmer H. (1985), Presupposition and Transcendental Inference, New York: Routledge.
Poręba M. (2008), Możliwość rozumu. Ćwiczenia z metafizyki, Warszawa: Fundacja Aletheia.
Rawls J. (1977), The Basic Structure as Subject, „American Philosophical Quarterly” 2 (14), s. 159–165.
Rawls J. (1980), Kantian Constructivism in Moral Philosophy, „The Journal of Philosophy” 9 (77), s. 515–572.
Rawls J. (1985), Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 3 (14), s. 223–251.
Rawls J. (1989), Themes in Kant’s Moral Philosophy, w: E. Förster (red.), Kant’s Transcendental Deductions. The Three Critiques and the Opus postumum, Stanford: Stanford University Press, s. 81–113.
Rawls J. (1993), Political Liberalism, New York: Harvard University Press.
Rawls J. (2000), Lectures on the history of moral philosophy, red. B. Herman, Cambridge, MA – London: Harvard University Press.
Rawls J. (2001), Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, red. E. Kelly, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls J. (2013), Teoria sprawiedliwości, przeł. M. Panufnik, J. Pasek, A. Romaniuk, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Rorty R. (1999), Pierwszeństwo demokracji wobec filozofii, w: tenże, Obiektywność, relatywizm i prawda. Pisma filozoficzne, przeł. J. Margański, t. I, Warszawa: Fundacja Aletheia, s. 261–291.
Russell B. (2000), Dzieje filozofii Zachodu i jej związki z rzeczywistością polityczno-‑społeczną od czasów najdawniejszych do dnia dzisiejszego, przeł. T. Baszniak, A. Lipszyc, M. Szczubiałka, Warszawa: Fundacja Aletheia.
Sandel M. (1982), Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sellars W. (1956), Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, „Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science” I, s. 253–329.
Sellars W. (1967), Some Remarks on Kant’s Theory of Experience, „Journal of Philosophy” 64, s. 633–647.
Sellars W. (1968), Science and Metaphysics. Variations on Kantian Themes, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Strawson P.F. (1959), Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics, London: Methuen.
Strawson P.F. (1966), The Bounds of Sense, London: Methuen. Tampio N. (2007), Rawls and the Kantian Ethos, „Polity” 1 (39), s. 79–102.
Wolniewicz B. (2017), Aksjomat Elzenberga, „Przegląd Filozoficzny – Nowa Seria” 4 (110), s. 277–288.

Dupuy J.P. (1988), Les paradoxes de «Théorie de la justice». Introduction à l'oeuvre de John Rawls, „Esprit” 134 (1).
Kant I. (1984), Krytyka praktycznego rozumu, przeł. J. Gałecki, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Mann M.H. (2012), Ricoeur, Rawls and Capability Justice. Civic Phronēsis and Equality, London – New York: Continuum Studies in Political Philosophy.
Michel J. (2006), Paul Ricoeur. Une philosophie de l’agir humain, Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf.
Rawls J. (1994), Teoria sprawiedliwości, przeł. M. Panufnik, J. Pasek, A. Romaniuk, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Ricoeur P. (1950), Philosophie de la volonté, t. 1: Le volontaire et l’involontaire, Paris: Aubier.
Ricoeur P. (1991), Lectures, t. 1: Autour du politique, Paris: Éditions du Seuil. Ricoeur P. (1995), Le Juste, t. 1, Paris: Éditions Esprit.
Ricoeur P. (2003), O sobie samym jako innym, przeł. B. Chełstowski, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Ricoeur P. (2005), Le juste, la justice et son échec, Paris: Éditions de L’Herne.
Welsen P. (2006), Principes de justice et sens de justice. Ricoeur critique du formalisme rawlsien, „Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale” 50 (2).