Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 4
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) have the potential to alter hormone pathways that regulate life processes in humans, vertebrates and invertebrates. Besides xcnobiotics having endocrine effects, there arc naturally occurring estrogenie compounds. The limited number of studies with EDCs in invertebrates is partially due to the fact that their hormonal systems are rather poorly understood in comparison with vertebrates. It is also important, but difficult to discriminate between hormone - mediated and other toxicological modes of action. Data of the potentially adverse impact of EDCs on wildlife species are reviewed.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Maria Łebkowska
Monika Załęska-Radziwiłł
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

To test the potential harmfulness of soils fertilized with sludge-based products to plant organisms, a biotest method using the physiological/biochemical reaction of the organisms to assess their toxicity was chosen. This paper presents the results of a preliminary ecotoxicological study of different products: a sludge-based fertilizer, a plant growth promoter, and a reclamation blend. The study was conducted using Sinapis alba L., a plant used in agriculture for intercropping and recommended for toxicological testing. Toxicity tests were performed in a gradient of concentrations of the indicated products (2.5%, 5%, and 10%). For comparison purposes, a trial containing a commercial fertilizer was used alongside the control soil (without additives). The fertilizer and the crop support agent were of low toxicity, but data analysis indicated toxicity of the so-called reclamation blend, which contained heavy metals among other things. The test products showed an increase in toxicity with the increasing dose used. This research represents an important step in assessing the usefulness of products created from sewage sludge and may help overcome the „psychological barrier” that prevents potential investors from investing capital that would allow production to spread.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Borgulat, J. (2020). Zróżnicowanie zawartości metali ciężkich i wielopierścieniowych węglowodorów aromatycznych (WWA) w igłach Picea abies oraz Abies alba w Beskidzie Śląskim i Żywieckim. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Silesia
  2. Borgulat, J., Mętrak, M., Staszewski, T., Wiłkomirski, B., Suska-Malawska, M. (2018). Heavy Metals Accumulation in Soil and Plants of Polish Peat Bogs. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 27(2). DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/75823
  3. Breda, C.C., Bortolanza, M., Renan, S., Tavantic, F.R., Viana, D., Freddia, O., Piedade, A.R., Mahle, D.,Traballi, R.C., Guerrinig, I. (2020). Successive sewage sludge fertilization: Recycling for sustainable agriculture. Waste Management, 109, pp. 38-50. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.045
  4. Ciesielczuk, T., Rosik-Dulewska, C., Poluszyńska, J., Miłek, D., Szewczyk, A., & Sławińska, I. (2018). Acute toxicity of experimental fertilizers made of spent coffee grounds. Waste Biomass Valori, 9(11), pp. 2157-2164. DOI:10.1007/s12649-017-9980-3
  5. Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations: Worlds Fertilizer trends and Outlook to 2022. FAO 2019.
  6. Grobelak, A., Stępień, W., & Kacprzak, M. (2016). Sewage sludge as a component of fertilizers and soil substitutes. Inż. Ekol. (in Polish). DOI: 10.12912/23920629/63289
  7. GUS, 2019. Ochrona Środowiska. (http://stat.gov.pl, 10.11.2020)
  8. Harasimowicz-Hermann, G., Hermann J. (2006). The function of catch crops in the protection of mineral resources and soil organic matter. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol., I(512), pp. 147–155. (in Polish)
  9. Hase, T., Kawamura, K. (2012). Germination test on Komatsuna (Brassica rapa var. peruviridis) seed using water extract from compost for evaluating compost maturity: evaluating criteria for germination and effects of cultivars on germination rate. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manage., 14(4), pp. 334–340. DOI:10.1007/s10163-012-0073-x
  10. Jakubus, M. (2012). Evaluation of compost by selected chemical and biological methods. Fresen. Environ. Bull., 21(11a), pp. 3464–3472.
  11. Journal of Laws. 2016 item 1395. Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of 1 September 2016 on the manner of conducting the assessment of pollution of the earth surface.
  12. Kaszycki, P., Głodniok, M., Petryszak, P (2021), Towards a bio-based circular economy in organic waste management and wastewater treatment – the Polish perspective. N Biotechnol, 61, pp. 80–89. DOI:10.1016/j.nbt.2020.11.005
  13. Ko, H., Kim, K., Kim, H., Kim, Ch., & Umeda, M. (2008). Evaluation of compost parameters and heavy metals contents in composts made from Animals mature. Waste. Manage., 28, pp. 813–820. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.010
  14. Krzyżak, J., Pogrzeba, M., Rusinowski, S., Clifton-Brown, J., McCALMONT, J. P., Kiesel, A., & Mos, M. (2017). Heavy metal uptake by novel Miscanthus seed-based hybrids cultivated in heavy metal contaminated soil. CEER, 26(3), pp. 121–132. DOI: 10.1515/ceer-2017-0040
  15. Miaomiao, H., Wenhong, L., Xinqiang, L., Donglei, W., & Guangming, T. (2009). Effect of composting process on phytotoxicity and speciation of copper, zinc and lead in sewage sludge and swine manure. Waste Manage., 29, pp. 590–597. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2008.07.005
  16. Obidoska, G., Hadam, A. (2008). Phytotoxicity of composts produced from various urban wastes. Ann. Warsaw Univ. Life Sci. – SGGW, Horticult. Landsc. Architect., 29, pp. 65–70.
  17. OECD/ OCDE 208 ¬¬– Guidelines for the testing of chemicals. Terrestrial Plant Test: Seedling Emergence and Seedling Growth Test.
  18. PN-EN ISO 11269-1:2013-06 Soil quality. Determination of the effect of pollutants on soil flora - Method for measuring root growth inhibition. PN-EN ISO 11269-2:2013-06 Soil quality. Determination of the effect of pollutants on soil flora - Effect of chemical compounds on the emergence and growth of higher plants.
  19. Pogrzeba, M., Rusinowski, S., & Krzyżak, J. (2018). Macroelements and heavy metals content in energy crops cultivated on contaminated soil under different fertilization—case studies on autumn harvest. Environ Sci Pollut Res., 25(12), pp. 12096–12106. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-1490-8
  20. Preite, V., Sailer, C., Syllwasschy, L., Bray, S., Ahmadi, H., Krämer, U., & Yant, L. (2019). Convergent evolution in Arabidopsis halleri and Arabidopsis arenosa on calamine metalliferous soils. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B, 374, pp. 20180243. DOI:10.1098/rstb.2018.0243
  21. Ren, Y., Lin, M., Liu, Q., Zhang, Z., Fei X., Xiao R., Lv X. (2021). Contamination assessment, health risk evaluation, and source identification of heavy metals in the soil-rice system of typical agricultural regions on the southeast coast of China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(10), 12870–12880. DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-11229-6
  22. Rosik-Dulewska, C., Głowala, K., Karwaczyńska, U., & Szydło, E (2006). The mobility of chosen pollutants from ash-sludge mixtures. Polish J. Environ. Stud., 15(6), pp. 895–904.
  23. Rosik-Dulewska, Cz., Karwaczyńska, U., & Głowala, K. (2007). Natural use of municipal sewage sludge and compost from municipal waste - fertilization value and environmental hazards. Zesz. Nauk. Wydz. Bud. i Inż. Środ., 23, pp. 137–153. (in Polish)
  24. Sarkheil, H., & Azimi, Y. (2020). Evaluation of Plant Roots Ability to Remove Lead and Zink Mining Drainage Contamination by Geoelectric Surveys. In NSG2020 3rd Conference on Geophysics for Mineral Exploration and Mining, 2020(1), pp. 1–4. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. DOI:10.3997/2214-4609.202020020
  25. Sawicka, B., Kotiuk, E. (2006). Evaluation of health safety of mustards in the obligatory norms. Acta Sci. Pol., Technol. Alim., 5(2), pp. 165–177.
  26. Skubała, K. (2011). Vascular Flora of Sites Contaminated with Heavy Metals on the Expample of Two Post-Industrial Spoil Heaps Connected with Manufacturing of Zinc and Lead Products in Upper Silesia. Archives of Environmental Protection, 37(1), pp. 57–74.
  27. Smol, M., Kulczycka, J., Lelek, Ł., Gorazda, K., & Wzorek, Z. (2020). Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of the integrated technology for the phosphorus recovery from sewage sludge ash (SSA) and fertilizers production. Archives of Environmental Protection, 46(2). DOI: 10.24425/aep.2020.133473
  28. Tran, K. Q., Werle, S., Trinh, T. T., Magdziarz, A., Sobek, S., & Pogrzeba, M. (2020). Fuel characterization and thermal degradation kinetics of biomass from phytoremediation plants. Biomass and Bioenergy, 134, 105469. DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105469
  29. Vimala, T., & Poonghuzhali, T. (2015). Estimation of pigments from seaweeds by using acetone and DMSO. IJSR, 4(10), pp. 1850–1854.
  30. Wójcik, M., Gonnelli, C., Selvi, F., Dresler, S., Rostański, A., & Vangronsveld, J. (2017). Metallophytes of serpentine and calamine soils–their unique ecophysiology and potential for phytoremediation. Adv. Bot. Res, 83, pp. 1–42. DOI:10.1016/bs.abr.2016.12.002
  31. Zawadzki, P., Głodniok, M. (2021), Environmental Safety Assessment of Fertilizer Products, Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 30(1):11–22. DOI:10.15244/pjoes/120519
  32. Zeynep, G. D. (2019). Role of EDDS and ZnO-nanoparticles in wheat exposed to TiO2Ag-nanoparticles. Archives of Environmental Protection, 45(4), pp. 78–83. DOI: 10.24425/aep.2019.130244
  33. Zhang, Z., Wu, X., Wu, Q., Huang, X., Zhang, J., Fang, H. (2020). Speciation and accumulation pattern of heavy metals from soil to rice at different growth stages in farmland of southwestern China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(28), 35675–35691. DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-09711-2
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Anna Borgulat
1
Aleksandra Zagórska
1
Marcin Głodniok
1

  1. Central Mining Institute, Department of Water Protection, Katowice, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Atrazine (ATR) is a widely used chlorinated herbicide from the s-triazine group. Due to the widespread use of ATR, it leaks into the environment and is detected in drinking water, exceeding the WHO-acceptable concentration of atrazine in drinking water, which is 2 μg/L. The aim of our study was to determine toxicity, protein degradation and genotoxicity of ATR at concentrations of 10; 1; 0.1; 0.01 mg/L on Chlorella vulgaris and with the application of E. coli bioluminescent biosensor strains. We measured the content of chlorophyll a, b, carotenoids in Chlorella vulgaris and the inhibition of this algae culture growth. E. coli RFM443 strains with gene constructs grpE:luxCDABE, lac:luxCDABE, recA:luxCDABE and E. coli strain MM294 trc:luxCDABE were used to determine toxicity, degradation of cellular proteins and genotoxicity. On the base of the obtained results, we concluded that ATR in the tested concentrations shows a toxic effect in relation to Chlorella vulgaris. ATR is toxic and genotoxic in E. coli RFM443 strains with grpE, lac, recA promoters and causes degradation of cellular proteins. Moreover, we have detected ATR toxicity toward the GFP protein in E. coli strain MM294-GFP. Taking into account the toxicity and genotoxicity of ATR documented in our research and in the experiments of other authors, we conclude that the presence of this herbicide in surface waters and drinking water is a serious threat to living organisms.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Akhtar, N., Khan, M. F., Tabassum, S. & Zahran, E. (2021). Adverse effects of atrazine on blood parameters, biochemical profile, and genotoxicity of snow trout (Schizothorax plagiostomus). Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 28, pp. 1999–2003. DOI:10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.01.001
  2. Ali, S.A., Mittal, D. & Kaur G. (2021). In situ monitoring of xenobiotics using genetically engineered whole cell based microbial biosensors: recent advances and outlook. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 7, pp. 37–81. DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-264683/v1
  3. Bae, J. W., Seo, H. B., Belkin, S. & Gu M. B. (2020). An optical detection module-based biosensor using fortified bacterial beads for soil toxicity assessment. Analitical and Bioanalitical Chemistry, 412, pp. 3373–3381. DOI:10.1007/s00216-020-02469-z
  4. Barsanti, L. & Gualtieri, P. (2014). Algae. Anatomy, Biochemistry, and Biotechnology (2 ed). CRC Press. Taylor & Francis Group. DOI:10.1201/b16544
  5. Camuel, A., Guieysse, B., Alcántara, C., & Béchet, Q. (2017). Fast algal ecotoxicity assessment: influence of light intensity and exposure time on Chlorella vulgaris inhibition by atrazine and DCMU. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 140, pp. 141–147. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.02.013
  6. Chen, J., Liu, J., Wu, S., Liu, W., Xia, Y., Zhao, J., Yang, Y., Peng, Y. & Zhao, S. (2021). Atrazine promoted epithelial ovarian cancer cells proliferation and metastasis by inducing low dose reactive oxygen species (ROS). Iran Journal of Biotechnology, 19, pp. 2623 – 2635. DOI:10.30498/IJB.2021.2623
  7. Dębowski, M. (2018). The use of microalgae biomass in engineering and environmental protection technologies. Polish Journal of Natural Sciences, 27, pp. 151-164. DOI:10.3390/en14196025
  8. Fareed, A., Hussain, A., Nawaz, M., Imran, M., Ali, Z. & Haq, S. U. (2021). The impact of prolonged use and oxidative degradation of Atrazine by Fenton and photo-Fenton processes. Environmental Technology and Innovation, 24, pp. 18-32. 101840. DOPI:10.1016/j.eti.2021.101840
  9. Jiang, B., Li, G., Xing, Y., Zhang, D., Jia, J., Cui, Z., Luan, X. & Tang, H. (2017). A whole cell bioreporter assay for quantitative genotoxicity evaluation of environmental samples. Chemosphere, 184, pp. 384–392. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.159
  10. Kamaz, M., Jones, S. M., Qian, X., Watts, M. J., Zhang, W. & Wickramasinghe, S. R. (2020). Atrazine removal from municipal wastewater using a membrane bioreactor. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, pp. 2567-2578. DOI:10.3390/ijerph17072567
  11. Kopcewicz, J., Lewak, S., Jaworski, K., Tretyn, A., Gniazdowska, A., Szmidt-Jaworska, A., Kęsy, J., Gabryś, H., Szymańska, M., Hawrylak-Nowak, B., Strzałka, K., Ciereszko, I., Rychter, A. M. & Tyburski, J. (2020). Plant physiology Polish Scientific Publishers PWN, Warsaw, Poland. (in Polish).
  12. Lu, Q., Zhou, X., Liu, R., Shi, G., Zheng, N., Gao, G. & Wang, Y. (2023). Impacts of a bacterial algicide on metabolic pathways in Chlorella vulgaris. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 249, pp. 1–13. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.114451
  13. Majewska, M., Harshkova, D., Pokora, W., Baścik-Remisiewicz, A., Tułodziecki, S. & Aksmann, A. (2021). Does diclofenac act like a photosynthetic herbicide on green algae? Chlamydomonas reinhardtii synchronous culture-based study with atrazine as reference. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 208, 111630. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111630
  14. Malcata, F. X. (2019). Marine macro- and microalgae: an overview. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group. DOI:10.1201/9781315119441
  15. Matejczyk, M., Ofman, P., Dąbrowska, K., Świsłocka, R. & Lewandowski, W. (2020a). The study of biological activity of transformation products of dicoflenac and its interaction with chlorogenic acid. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 91, pp. 128–141. DOI:10.1016/j.jes.2020.01.022
  16. Matejczyk, M., Ofman, P., Dąbrowska, K., Świsłocka, R. & Lewandowski, W. (2020b). Evaluation of the biological impact of the mixtures of diclofenac with its biodegradation metabolites 4’-hydroxydiclofenac and 5-hydroxydiclofenac on Escherichia coli. DCF synergistic effect with caffeic acid. Archives of Environmental Protection, 46, pp. 32–53. DOI:10.24425/aep.2020.135760
  17. Matejczyk, M., Ofman, P., Dąbrowska, K., Świsłocka, R. & Lewandowski, W. (2020c). Synergistic interaction of diclofenac and its metabolites with selected antibiotics and amygdalin in wastewaters. Environmental Research, 186, 109511. DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2020.109511
  18. Matejczyk, M., Ofman, P., Parcheta, M., Świsłocka, R. & Lewandowski, W. (2022). The study of biological activity of mandelic acid and its alkali metal salts in wastewaters. Environmental Research, 205, 112429. DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2021.112429
  19. Melamed, S., Lalush, C., Elad, T., Yagur-Krol, S., Belkin, S. & Pedahzur, R. (2012). A bacterial reporter panel for the detection and classification of antibiotic substances: Detection and classification of antibiotics. Microbiology and Biotechnology, 5, pp. 536–548. DOI:10.1111/j.1751-7915.2012.00333.x
  20. Mofeed, J. & Moshleh, Y. (2013). Toxic responses and antioxidative enzymes activity of Scenedesmus obliquus exposed to fenhexamid and atrazine, alone and in mixture. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 95, pp. 234–240. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.05.023
  21. Moraskie, M., Roshid, H., O’Connor, G., Dikici, E., Zings, J. M., Deo, S. & Daunert, S. (2021). Microbial whole-cell biosensors: current applications, challenges, and future perspectives. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 191, 113359. DOI:10.1016/j.bios.2021.113359
  22. Ozturk, M., Coskuner, K. A., Serdar, B., Atar, F. & Bilgili, E. (2022). Impact of white mistletoe (Viscum album ssp. abietis) infection severity on morphology, anatomy and photosynthetic pigment content of the needles of cilicican fir (Abies cilicica). Flora, 294, 152135. DOI:10.1016/j.flora.2022.152135
  23. Qian, H., Sheng, G., Liu, W., Lu, Y., Liu, Z. & Fu, Z. (2008). Inhibitory effects of atrazine on Chlorella vulgaris as assessed by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 27, pp. 182–187. DOI:10.1897/07-163.1
  24. Rojas-Villacorta, W., Rojas-Flores, S., De La Cruz-Noriega, M., Espino, H. C., Diaz, F. & Cardenas, M. G. (2022). Microbial biosensors for wastewater monitoring: mini review. Processes, 10, pp. 2-13. DOI:10.3390/pr10102002
  25. Roustan, A., Aye, M., De Meo, M. & Giorgio, C. D. (2014). Genotoxicity of mixtures of glyphosate and atrazine and their environmental transformation products before and after photoactivation. Chemosphere, 108, pp. 93-100. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.02.079
  26. Santos, K. C. & Martinez, C. B. R. (2014). Genotoxic and biochemical effects of atrazine and Roundups, alone and in combination, on the Asian clam Corbicula fluminea. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 100, pp. 7-14. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.11.014
  27. Shan, W., Hu, W., Wen, Y., Ding, X., Ma, X., Yan, W. & Xia, Y. (2021). Evaluation of atrazine neurodevelopment toxicity in vitro-application of hESC-based neural differentiation model. Reproductive Toxicology, 103, pp. 149-158. DOI:10.1016/j.reprotox.2021.06.009
  28. Silveyra, G. R., Medesani, D. A. & Rodríguez, E. M. (2022). Effects of the herbicide atrazine on Crustacean Reproduction. Mini-Review. Frontiers in Physiology, 13, pp. 1-5. DOI:10.3389/fphys.2022.926492
  29. Sivathanu, B. & Palaniswamy, S. (2012). Purification and characterization of carotenoids from green algae Chlorococcum humicola by HPLC-NMR and LC-MS-APCI. Biomedical Prevention and Nutrition, 2, pp. 276-282. DOI:10.1016/j.bionut.2012.04.006
  30. Song,Y., Jiang, B., Tian, S., Tang, H., Liu, Z., Li, C., Jia, J., Huang, W. E., Zhang, X. & Li, G. (2014). A whole cell bioreporter approach for the genotoxicity assessment of bioavailability of toxic compounds in contaminated soil in China. Environmental Pollution, 195, pp. 178–184. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2014.08.024
  31. Su, Y., Cheng, Z., Chou, Y., Lin, S., Gao, L., Wang, Z., Bao, R. & Peng, L. (2022). Biodegradable and conventional microplastics posed similar toxicity to marine algae Chlorella vulgaris. Aquatic Toxicology, 244, 106097. DOI:10.1016/j.aquatox.2022.106097
  32. Sun, C., Xu, Y., Hu, N., Ma, J., Sun, S., Cao, W., Klobučar, G., Hu, C. & Zhao, Y. (2020). To evaluate the toxicity of atrazine on the freshwater microalgae Chlorella sp. using sensitive indices indicated by photosynthetic parameters. Chemosphere, 244, 125514. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125514
  33. Węgrzyn, A. & Mazur, R. (2020). Regulatory mechanisms of photosynthesis light reactions in higher plants. Postępy Biochemii (Advances in biochemistry), 66, pp. 134-42. (in Polish). DOI:10.18388/pb.2020_325
  34. Woutersen, M., Belkin, S., Brouwer, B., Wezel, A. P. & Heringa, M. B. (2011). Are luminescent bacteria suitable for online detection and monitoring of toxic compounds in drinking water and its sources? Analitical and Bioanalitical Chemistry, 400, pp. 915-929. DOI:10.1007/s00216-010-4372-6
  35. Xiong, J. Q., Kurade, M. B., Abou-Shanab, R. A. J., Ji, M. K., Choi, J., Kim, J. O. & Jeon, B. H. (2016). Biodegradation of carbamazepine using freshwater microalgae Chlamydomonas mexicana and Scenedesmus obliquus and the determination of its metabolic fate. Bioresources Technology, 205, pp. 183-90. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.038
  36. Yang, F., Gao, M., Lu, H., Wei, Y., Chi, H., Yang, T., Yuan, M., Fu, H., Zeng, W. & Liu, C. (2021). Effects of atrazine on chernozem microbial communities evaluated by traditional detection and modern sequencing technology. Microorganisms, 9, 1832. DOI:10.3390/microorganisms9091832
  37. Yang, H., Jiang, Y., Lu, K., Xiong, H., Zhang, Y. & Wei, W. (2021a). Herbicide atrazine exposure induce oxidative stress, immune dysfunction and WSSV proliferation in red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii. Chemosphere, 283, 131227. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131227
  38. Zappi, D., Coronado, E., Soljan, V., Basile, G., Varani, G., Turems, M. & Giardi, M. (2021). A microbial sensor platform based on bacterial bioluminescence (luxAB) and green fluorescent protein (gfp) reporters for in situ monitoring of toxicity of wastewater nitrification process dynamics. Talanta, 221, pp. 1-8. DOI:10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121438
  39. Zhang, Y., Meng, D., Wang, Z., Guo, H. & Wang, Y. (2012). Oxidative stress response in two representative bacteria exposed to atrazine. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 334, pp. 95–101. DOI:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02625.x
  40. Zhao, Y., Yunyang, L., Bao, H., Nan, J. & Xu, G. (2023). Rapid biodegradation of atrazine by a novel Paenarthrobacter ureafaciens ZY and its effects on soil native microbial community dynamic. Frontiers in Microbiology, 4, pp. 1-13. DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2022.1103168
  41. Zhu, Y., Elcin, E., Jiang, M., Li, B., Wang, H., Zhang, X. & Wang, Z. (2022). Use of whole-cell bioreporters to assess bioavailability of contaminants in aquatic systems. Frontiers in Chemistry, 10, 1018124. DOI:10.3389/fchem.2022.1018124
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marzena Matejczyk
1
Paweł Kondzior
1
Piotr Ofman
2
Edyta Juszczuk-Kubiak
3
Renata Świsłocka
1
Grażyna Łaska
4
Józefa Wiater
5
Włodzimierz Lewandowski
1

  1. Bialystok University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences,Department of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology, Bialystok, Poland
  2. Bialystok University of Technology, Department of Environmental Engineering Technology,Bialystok, Poland
  3. Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology-State Research Institute, Laboratory of Biotechnologyand Molecular Engineering, Warsaw, Poland
  4. Department of Agri-Food Engineering and Environmental Management,Bialystok University of Technology, Bialystok, Poland
  5. Bialystok University of Technology, Department of Agricultural and Food Engineeringand Environmental Management, Bialystok, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Petroleum products are complex mixture of compounds of varied biological properties. They can

cause harmful changes in contaminated ecosystems and threaten humans and living organisms as well. Bioremediation (including bioremediation stimulated by biogenic substances and inoculation with biopreparations

from autochthonous bacteria and fungi) can result in creation of metabolites of a varied structure and biological

activeness, which has been partly recognised. Some of them are more toxic than an initial substrate. Besides,

they might have mutagenic features and be responsible for cancer. Estimation of bioremediation effectiveness in

waste pits was completed with toxicological monitoring. It was led with the use of living organisms as biomarkers representing all trophic levels of a chosen ecosystem: producers, consumers and reducers. This process enables total estimation of natural environment conditions. The aim of the research was to determine the influence

of petroleum contaminants and indirect metabolites (produced during bioremediation) on soil biocenose. The

results of biotests (toxicity, phytotoxicity and genotoxity) have been taken into account. The following biotests,

prepared and produced by Microbiotest, have been applied: PhytotoxkitTM, Ostracodtoxkit FTM, acute toxicity

tests Microtox® Solid Phase and Ames mutagenicity tests. The obtained results enabled observation of changes

in toxic properties during purification of the soil taken from waste pits. In addition, it can be claimed whether

the areas are suitable for forest usage.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

T. Steliga

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more