Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Contributor
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 7
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Keywords civil society
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Dr. Artur Kościański from the PAS Institute of Philosophy and Sociology explains how civil society works in Poland and how the Internet contributes to its development.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Artur Kościański
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper emphasizes the contemporary relevance of civility, understood as a respectful way of treating the other and recognition of people’s differences and sensibilities. It outlines the sociological importance of civility as being connected with its role as both a normative guidance orienting us towards prescriptive ideals and as an empirical concept with important social impact on identities and actions. The paper examines Adam Smith’s theory which roots civility in a commercial society, analyses Elias’s (1994) history of civility as the folding of the logic of the civilizing process, and it debates theories linking the idea of civility to civil society. In conclusion, emphases are put on the importance of civility, seen as the act of respectful engaging with people across deep divisions, for the quality of democracy.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. University of Chicago Press.
  2. Bauman, Zygmunt. 2000. Am I my brother’s keeper? European Journal of Social Work, 3, 1: 5-11.
  3. Baumgarten, Britta, Dieter Gosewinkel, Dieter Rucht. 2011. Civility: introductory notes on the history and systematic analysis of a concept. European Review of History, 18, 3: 289-312.
  4. Berger, Peter. 1998. Conclusion: general observations on normative conflicts and mediation. In: The Limits of Social Cohesion, ed., P.L. Berger. Boulder: Westview Press, 352-72.
  5. Boyd, Robert. 2006. The value of civility? Urban Studies, 43, 5-6: 863-878.
  6. Bryant, Christopher G.A. 1992. Sociology without philosophy? The case of Giddens’s structuration theory. Sociological Theory, 10, 2: 137-149.
  7. Campbell, John L., John A. Hall. 2022. What Capitalism Needs: Forgotten Lessons of Great Economists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Chambers, Simone, Jeffrey Kopstein. 2001. Bad civil society. Political Theory, 29, 6: 837-865.
  9. Cohen, John, Andrew Arato. 1992. Civil Society. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  10. Elias, Norbert. 1996. The Germans. Power Struggles and the Development of Habitus in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  11. Elias, Norbert. 1994. The Civilizing Process. Trans. Edmund Jephcott. Oxford: Blackwell.
  12. Elias, Norbert. 1982. State Formation and Civilization. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  13. Elias, Norbert. 1978. On the transformation of aggressiveness. Theory and Society, 5, 2: 229-242.
  14. Ferguson, Adam. [1759]1995. On Essay on the History of Civil Society. Ed. by F. Oz-Salzberger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Fleischacker, Samuel. 2022. Being Me Being You: Adam Smith and Empathy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  16. Goldfarb, Jeffrey. 1998. Civility and Subversion. The Intellectual in Democratic Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Goldfarb, Jeffrey. 1992. After the Fall: The Pursuit of Democracy in Central Europe. New York: Basic Books.
  18. Goody, Jack. 2006. The Theft of History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Gornicka, Barbara, Stephen Mennell. 2021. Processes and figurational (or process) sociology. In: P. Kivisto, ed. Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory. Cambridge University Press, vol. 1, 272-291.
  20. Hall, John A. 2013. The Importance of Being Civil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  21. Hall, John A., Frank Trentmann. 2005. Contests over civil society. In : J.A. Hall, F. Trentmann, eds. Civil Society: A Reader in History, Theory and Global Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 1-25.
  22. Hansen, Kasper. 1997. Rediscovering the social. In : J. Weintraub,K. Kumar, eds. Public and Private in Thought and Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 268-302. 
  23. Harrel, Cyd. 2020. A Civic Technologist’s Practice Guide. San Francisco: Seven Five Books.
  24. Heilbron, Johan. 2022. The emergence of social theory. In: P. Kivisto, ed. Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory. Cambridge University Press, vol.1, 1-24.
  25. Keane, John. 1988. Civil Society and the State. London: Verso.
  26. Koselleck, Reinhart. 2004. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Trans. K. Tribe. New York: Columbia University Press.
  27. Kumar, Krishan. 1993. Civil Society: An Inquiry into the usefulness of an historical term. British Journal of Sociology, 44: 375-96.
  28. Melucci, Alberto. 1989. Nomads of the Present. Social Movement and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society. London: Century Hutchinson.
  29. Mennell, Stephan. 2001. The other side of the coin. In : T. Salumets, ed. Norbert Elias and Human Independencies. Montréal: McGill-Queens’s University Press, 32-49.
  30. Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat. [1748]1988. The Spirit of the Laws. A. Cohler et al. eds. Cambridge University Press.
  31. Nehring, Holger. 2011. Civility in history: some observations on th history of the concept. European Review of History, 18, 3: 313-333.
  32. Nussbaum, Martha. 2001. Anger and Forgiveness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  33. Putnam, Robert T. 1995. Tuning in, tuning out. Political Science and Politics, 28: 664-683.
  34. Robin, Corey. 2022. Empathy & the economy. New York Review of Books, December 8: 43-46.
  35. Rucht, Dieter. 2011. Civil Society and civility. European Review of History, 18, 3: 387-407.
  36. Seligman, Adam, 1992. The Idea of Civil Society. New York: Free Press.
  37. Sennett, Richard. 2012. Together the rituals, pleasures and politics of co-operation. London: Allen Lane.
  38. Shapin, Steven. 1994. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in SeventeenthCentury England. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  39. Shils, Edward. 1992. The virtue of civil society. Government and Opposition, 26: 3-20.
  40. Sloss, David L. 2022. Tyrants on Twitter: Protecting Democracies from Information Warfare. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  41. Smith, Adam. [1776]1999. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of Wealth of Nations. intro A. Skinner: London: Penguin Books.
  42. Smith, Adam. [1759]1982. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund Press.
  43. Susen, Simon. 2021. Civil Society. In: P. Kivisto, ed.) Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory. Cambridge University Press, vol. 2, 379-406.
  44. Swann, Abram de. 2001. Dyscivilization, mass extermination, and the state. Theory, Culture and Society, 12, 2: 25-39.
  45. Taylor, Charles. 2018. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  46. Thiranagama, Sharika, Tobias Kelly, Carlos Forment. 2018. Introduction: Whose civility? Anthropological Theory, 18, 2-3: 153-174. 
  47. Thomas, Keith. 2018. In Pursuit of Civility Manners and Civilization in Early Modern England. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  48. Tocqueville, Alexis de. [1856]1969. Democracy in America. Trans. S. Gillbert. London: Fontana.
  49. Touraine, Alain, Francois Dubet, Michel Wieviorka, Jan Strzelecki. 1983. Solidarity: Poland 1980-81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  50. Walzer, Michal. 1992. The civil society argument. In: C. Mouffe, ed.. Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community. New York: Verso, 89-107.
  51. Wirth, Morand. 2022. Saint Francis de Sales. Roma: Centro Studi de Bosco.
  52. Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Public Affairs.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Barbara Misztal
1

  1. University of Leicester
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Contemporary Polish historiography tends to focus predominantly on the main actors of the political transformation of 1989 and there are communist and opposition elites considered as such. In that perspective, Polish society remains a community on which the views of the elites are projected, and the myth about the birth of ci-vil society on the ruins of communism as early as 1989 may serve as a perfect example of such process. In reality, however, the Polish society was overwhelmingly apolitical, uninterested in political par-ticipation and to a large extent socially inactive. There are many reasons which caused this situation: starting from the martial law, which in December 1981 broke the backbone of the mass social movement that was the legal ‘Solidarity’, as well as the very 45 years of communism themselves, during which a social initiative was na-tionalized, and citizens were in fact deprived of it. As a result, the interpretations of the events of 1989 should be demythologized, al-so in order to understand the popularity of the slogans about “end-ing the 1989 revolution”, which still tend to appear in the public discourse in Poland.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Michał Przeperski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Cities are changing before our eyes. Civilization trends should be accompanied by the appropriate management styles of local development. The crisis of civil policy and the power of representation undermines the essence of the current model of democracy and the effectiveness of local policy. Therefore, it evolves towards governance. The influence of civic activity is mostly visible at the local level. Its importance is multidimensional and it shapes the social, economic and environmental conditions of urban life. The article guides the reader through various meanders of research and public debate on engaging inhabitants in local policy. Its aim is to indicate the scope of resident’s influence on the current policy of Polish cities, in particular with regard to the investment policy. The paper is based on the extensive literature studies and the primary research carried out in all of the cities in Silesia voidvoship.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Agnieszka Sobol
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The term “comfort women” refers to the women, mainly from the Korean Peninsula and China, who had been forced to serve as sexual slaves by the Japanese Imperial Army during the Second World War. The problem emerged at the beginning of the 1990s and became an impediment especially in relations between Japan and South Korea. The article analyzes how the “comfort women” issue was approached to by nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in both countries. It is argued that while the problem led to invigoration of civil society institutions, it also incited strong nationalist movements. Anti-Japanese feelings in South Korea contributed to lack of flexibility in negotiations with Japan and rejection of the apologies by the government of that country. Such reaction, in turn, weakened the position of moderate NGOs in Japan that tried to compensate the victims, and made them prone to criticism from right-wing movements. The paper examines these complex developments.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Karol Żakowski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The Polish political transformation of 1989 brought significant changes not only on the political and social levels but also on the economic level. The Polish economy, which until then had been a centrally planned economy, had to be rapidly changed into a free market economy. As a result of this, a lot of areas of the economy had to be transformed including the mining industry, especially hard-coal mining. In 1990, there were seventy-one mines in operation in Poland, employing nearly 400,000 people. The process of decommissioning these mines, which continues to this day, began in 1994. Walbrzych coal mines were among the first to be liquidated. Poland has long been dependent on coal for energy production, but the country is facing increasing pressure in the transition to cleaner and more sustainable energy sources in order to reduce carbon emissions and mitigate the effects of climate change in order to fulfil EU climate policy assumptions. Civil society organizations in Poland were associated with the political transformation, as the changes in the system has opened the doors for the social participation in decision-making processes. Civil society organizations in Poland have been actively pushing for policies and initiatives that promote renewable energy, energy efficiency, and the phasing out of coal. However, it should be underlined that the role of civil society in energy transformation is crucial as on the one hand, it should be an advocate of change, but on the other hand, civil society has to take an active part in the discussion on the challenges of the transformation, such a change in the employment structure which is an inevitable consequence of the energy transition. The scope of the paper is to provide a set of tools for the civil society participating in energy transformation processes.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Olga Julita Janikowska
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. The Division of Strategic Research, Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute of the Polish Academy ofSciences, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more