Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 3
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

A kinetic model to describe lovastatin biosynthesis by Aspergillus terreus ATCC 20542 in a batch culture with the simultaneous use of lactose and glycerol as carbon sources was developed. In order to do this the kinetics of the process was first studied. Then, the model consisting of five ordinary differential equations to balance lactose, glycerol, organic nitrogen, lovastatin and biomass was proposed. A set of batch experiments with a varying lactose to glycerol ratio was used to finally establish the form of this model and find its parameters. The parameters were either directly determined from the experimental data (maximum biomass specific growth rate, yield coefficients) or identified with the use of the optimisation software. In the next step the model was verified with the use of the independent sets of data obtained from the bioreactor cultivations. In the end the parameters of the model were thoroughly discussed with regard to their biological sense. The fit of the model to the experimental data proved to be satisfactory and gave a new insight to develop various strategies of cultivation of A. terreus with the use of two substrates.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marta Pawlak
Marcin Bizukojć
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This work aims at investigating the influence of the initial concentrations of carbon (glucose) and organic nitrogen (yeast extract) sources on Streptomyces rimosus ATCC10970 secondary metabolism in the stirred tank bioreactors. Additionally, glucose utilisation, biomass formation, pH, redox potential and dissolved oxygen levels, and the morphological development of S. rimosus pseudomycelium were studied. Eighteen secondary metabolites were detected by mass spectrometry and identified with the use of the authentic standard, or putatively with the use of literature and database of secondary metabolites. Varied initial yeast extract concentration acted much stronger on the formation of secondary metabolites than glucose did. For example, oxytetracycline was not biosynthesised at high yeast extract concentration while the formation of three other metabolites was enhanced under these conditions. In the case of glucose its increasing initial concentration led to higher secondary metabolite levels with the exception of an unnamed angucycline. High initial yeast extract concentration also drastically changed S. rimosus pseudomycelial morphology from the pelleted to the dispersed one. Ultimately, the cultivation media with the varied initial levels of carbon and nitrogen sources were proved to have the marked effect on S. rimosus secondary metabolism and to be the simplest way to either induce or block the formation of the selected secondary metabolites.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marcin Bizukojć
1
ORCID: ORCID
Anna Ścigaczewska
1
ORCID: ORCID
Tomasz Boruta
1
ORCID: ORCID
Agnieszka Ruda
1
Aleksandra Kawka
1

  1. Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Process and Environmental Engineering,Department of Bioprocess Engineering, Wólczańska 213, 93-005 Łódź, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The amount of solid organic waste is constantly growing. This is caused by the growth of industrial and agricultural capacities, and the inefficiency of existing waste processing technologies. Biotechnologies can provide effective environmentally friendly solutions for waste treatment. Therefore, the goal of our work was to compare the efficiency of strictly anaerobic fermentation of multi-component solid organic waste with hydrogen synthesis and waste treatment with pulsed air access in batch bioreactors.During fermentation, the following parameters were controlled: pH, redox potential (Eh), concentration of dissolved organics, and the content of H2, O2, and CO2 in the gas phase. The efficiency was evaluated via the process duration, calculation of the ratio of the initial and final weight of waste (Кd), and the yield of molecular hydrogen. Obtained results revealed high efficiency of organic waste degradation in both variants. The weight of waste 83-fold and 86-fold decreased, respectively. The time required for fermentation in strictly anaerobic conditions was 4 days, whereas 7 days were required for the mode with pulsed air access. The first variant provided a 2.8-fold higher hydrogen yield (54±4,1 L/kg of waste), and the second one provided a decrease in the concentration of dissolved organic compounds in the fermentation fluid. Fermentation is the effective approach for accelerated degradation of solid organic waste. Strictly anaerobic fermentation appeared to be useful in the need to accelerate the process. The mode with the pulsed air access can provide not only degradation of solid waste but also purification of the fermentation fluid.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Akhlaghi, N. & Najafpour-Darzi, Gh. (2020). A Comprehensive Review on Biological Hydrogen Production, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(43), pp. 22492–22512. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.182.
  2. Alwaeli, M., Alshawaf, M. & Klasik, M., (2022). Recycling of Selected Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste as Artificial Soil Substrate in Support of the Circular Economy, Archives of Environmental Protection, 48(4), pp. 68–77. DOI:10.24425/aep.2022.143710.
  3. Bakkaloglu, S., Lowry, D., Fisher, R.E., France, J.L., Brunner, D., Chen, H. & Nisbet, E.G. (2021). Quantification of Methane Emissions from UK Biogas Plants, Waste Management, 124, pp. 82–93. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2021.01.011.
  4. Berezkin, V.G. (1983). Chemical Methods in Gas Chromatography. Elsevier, The Netherlands 1983.
  5. Bernstad, A.K., Cánovas, A. & Valle, R. (2017). Consideration of Food Wastage along the Supply Chain in Lifecycle Assessments: A Mini-Review Based on the Case of Tomatoes, Waste Management & Research, 35(1), pp. 29–39. DOI:10.1177/0734242X16666945.
  6. Chaijak, P. & Sola, P. (2023). ‘The New Report of Domestic Wastewater Treatment and Bioelectricity Generation Using Dieffenbachia Seguine Constructed Wetland Coupling Microbial Fuel Cell (CW-MFC)’. Archives of Environmental Protection; 2023; 49(1), pp. 57-62. DOI:10.24425/aep.2023.144737.
  7. Chen, T., Zhang, Sh. & Yuan, Z. (2020). Adoption of Solid Organic Waste Composting Products: A Critical Review, Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122712. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122712.
  8. El Bari, H., Lahboubi, N., Habchi, S., Rachidi, S., Bayssi O., Nabil N., Mortezaei Y. & Villa, R. (2022). Biohydrogen Production from Fermentation of Organic Waste, Storage and Applications, Cleaner Waste Systems, 3, 100043. DOI:10.1016/j.clwas.2022.100043.
  9. Erdiwansyah, E., Gani, A., Mamat, R., Mahidin, M., Sudhakar, K., Rosdi, S.M. & Husin H. (2022). Biomass and Wind Energy as Sources of Renewable Energy for a More Sustainable Environment in Indonesia: A Review, Archives of Environmental Protection, 48(3), pp. 57–69. DOI:10.24425/aep.2022.142690.
  10. Erses, A.S., Onay, T.T. & Yenigun, O. (2008). Comparison of aerobic and anaerobic degradation of municipal solid waste in bioreactor landfills, Bioresource technology, 99(13), pp. 5418–5426. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.008.
  11. Gill, S.S., Jana, A.M. & Shrivastav, A. (2014). Aerobic bacterial degradation of kitchen waste: A review, Journal of microbiology, biotechnology and food sciences, 3(6), pp. 477–483. https://office2.jmbfs.org/index.php/JMBFS/article/view/7661.
  12. Havryliuk, O., Hovorukha, V., Bida, I., Gladka G., Tymoshenko, A., Kyrylov, S., Mariychuk, R. & Tashyrev O. (2023). Anaerobic Degradation of the Invasive Weed Solidago canadensis L. (Goldenrod) and Copper Immobilization by a Community of Sulfate-Reducing and Methane-Producing Bacteria, Plants, 12(1), pp. 198–213. DOI:10.3390/plants12010198.
  13. Hovorukha, V., Tashyrev, O., Matvieieva, N., Tashyreva, H., Havryliuk, O., Bielikova O. & Sioma, I. (2019). Integrated Approach for Development of Environmental Biotechnologies for Treatment of Solid Organic Waste and Obtaining of Biohydrogen and Lignocellulosic Substrate, Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 74(4), pp. 31–42. |DOI:10.5755/j01.erem.74.4.20723.
  14. Hovorukha, V., Tashyrev, O., Havryliuk, O. & Iastremska, L. (2020). High Efficiency of Food Waste Fermentation and Biohydrogen Production in Experimental-Industrial Anaerobic Batch Reactor, The Open Agriculture Journal, 14(1), pp. 174–186. DOI:10.2174/1874331502014010174.
  15. Katinas, V., Marčiukaitis, M., Perednis, E. & Dzenajavičienė, E.F. (2019). Analysis of Biodegradable Waste Use for Energy Generation in Lithuania, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 101, pp. 559–567. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.022.
  16. Khan, M.A., Ngo H.H., Guo, W., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Guo, J., Chang, S.W., Nguyen, D.D. & Wang, J. (2018). Biohydrogen Production from Anaerobic Digestion and Its Potential as Renewable Energy, Renewable Energy, 1st International Conference on Bioresource Technology for Bioenergy, Bioproducts & Environmental Sustainability, 129, pp. 754–768. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.029.
  17. Lim, J.X., Zhou, Y. & Vadivelu, V.M. (2020). Enhanced Volatile Fatty Acid Production and Microbial Population Analysis in Anaerobic Treatment of High Strength Wastewater, Journal of Water Process Engineering, 33, 101058. DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101058.
  18. Marone, A., Izzo, G., Mentuccia, L., Massini, G., Paganin, P., Rosa, S., Varrone, C. & Signorini, A. (2014). Vegetable Waste as Substrate and Source of Suitable Microflora for Bio-Hydrogen Production, Renewable Energy, 68, pp. 6–13. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2014.01.013.
  19. Mata-Alvarez, J., Macé, S. & Llabrés P. (2000). Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Solid Wastes. An Overview of Research Achievements and Perspectives, Bioresource Technology, 74(1), pp. 3–16. DOI:10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00023-7.
  20. Meegoda, J.N., Li, B., Patel, K. & Wang, L.B. (2018). A Review of the Processes, Parameters, and Optimization of Anaerobic Digestion, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10), 2224. DOI:10.3390/ijerph15102224.
  21. Parthiba Karthikeyan, O., Trably, E., Mehariya, S., Bernet, N., Wong, J.W.C. & Carrere, H. (2018). Pretreatment of Food Waste for Methane and Hydrogen Recovery: A Review, Bioresource Technology, 249, pp. 1025–1039. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.105.
  22. Pawnuk, M., Szulczyński, B., den Boer, E. & Sówka I. (2022). Preliminary Analysis of the State of Municipal Waste Management Technology in Poland along with the Identification of Waste Treatment Processes in Terms of Odor Emissions, Archives of Environmental Protection, 48(3), pp. 3–20. DOI:10.24425/aep.2022.142685.
  23. Rubežius, M., Venslauskas, K., Navickas, K. & Bleizgys R. (2020). Influence of Aerobic Pretreatment of Poultry Manure on the Biogas Production Process, Processes, 8(9), 1109. DOI:10.3390/pr8091109.
  24. Scarlat, N., Dallemand J.-F. & Fahl F. (2018). Biogas: Developments and Perspectives in Europe, Renewable Energy, 129, pp. 457–472. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.006.
  25. Shimizu, S., Fujisawa, A., Mizuno, O., Kameda, T. & Yoshioka, T. (2008). Fermentative Hydrogen Production From Food Waste Without Inocula, AIP Conference Proceedings, 987(1), pp. 171–174. DOI:10.1063/1.2896968.
  26. Suslova, O., Govorukha, V., Brovarskaya, O., Matveeva, N., Tashyreva, H. & Tashyrev O. (2014). Method for Determining Organic Compound Concentration in Biological Systems by Permanganate Redox Titration, International Journal Bioautomation, 18(1), pp. 45–52. https://biomed.bas.bg/bioautomation/2014/vol_18.1/files/18.1_05.pdf
  27. Tashyrev, O., Hovorukha, V., Havryliuk, O., Sioma, I., Gladka, G., Kalinichenko, O., Włodarczyk, P., Suszanowicz, D., Zhuk, H. & Ivanov, Y. (2022). Spatial Succession for Degradation of Solid Multicomponent Food Waste and Purification of Toxic Leachate with the Obtaining of Biohydrogen and Biomethane, Energies, 15(3), 911. DOI:10.3390/en15030911.
  28. Wang, X. & Zhao Y.-C. (2009). A Bench Scale Study of Fermentative Hydrogen and Methane Production from Food Waste in Integrated Two-Stage Process, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34(1), pp. 245–254. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.09.100.
  29. Wu, X., Zhu, J., Dong, C., Miller, C., Li Y., Wang, L. & Yao, W. (2009). Continuous Biohydrogen Production from Liquid Swine Manure Supplemented with Glucose Using an Anaerobic Sequencing Batch Reactor, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 4th Dubrovnik Conference, 34(16), pp. 6636–6645. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.06.058.
  30. Xiao, M. & Wu, F. (2014). A Review of Environmental Characteristics and Effects of Low-Molecular Weight Organic Acids in the Surface Ecosystem, Journal of Environmental Sciences, 26(5), pp. 935–954. DOI:10.1016/S1001-0742(13)60570-7.
  31. Xue, S., Song, J., Wang, X., Shang, Z., Sheng, C., Li, C., Zhu, Y. & Liu, J. (2020). A Systematic Comparison of Biogas Development and Related Policies between China and Europe and Corresponding Insights, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 117, 109474. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109474.
  32. Zhang, J., Kan, X., Shen, Y., Loh, K.-C., Wang, C.-H., Dai, Y. & Tong, Y.W. (2018). A Hybrid Biological and Thermal Waste-to-Energy System with Heat Energy Recovery and Utilization for Solid Organic Waste Treatment, Energy, 152, pp. 214–222. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.143.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Vira Hovorukha
1 2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Institute of Environmental Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Opole, Poland
  2. Department of Extremophilic Microorganisms Biology, D.K. Zabolotny Institute of Microbiologyand Virology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more