Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 2
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this study, NiCrBSi-B4C (wt. %5, %10 ve %15 B4C) powder mixtures are coated on the stainless steel surface of AISI304 by tungsten inert gas (TIG) method. We use optic microscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM) for the coating layer analysis, energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS) for element distribution analysis and X-ray diffractogram (XRD) for the analysis of phase components. The measurements of hardness are determined by the microhardness tester. Based on the results obtained by the examination of microstructure and phases, it has been observed that while B and C elemets are more intense in the middle and upper parts of the coating layer, the parts close to the interface have a higher intensity of Ni and Fe. Moreover, there are phases such as Cr7C3, γ – Ni, CrFeB, Ni3B, CrB ve Fe2B are formed in the coating layer. The increasing ratio of B4C results in increasing on the measurement values of microhardness. The maximum hardness value (430,8 HV0.2) is obtained from the coating layer of S4 sample while the minimum value (366,9 HV0.2) is observed from the NiCrBSi coated sample.
Go to article

Bibliography

[1] R. Rachidi, B. El Kihel, F. Delaunois, Mater. Sci. Eng. B-Adv. 241, 13-21 (2019).
[2] H. Zhao, J. Li, Z. Zheng, A. Wang, D. Zeng, Y. Miao, Surf. Coat. Tech. 286, 303-312 (2016).
[3] C.K. Sahoo, M. Masanta, J. Mater Process Tech. 240, 126-137 (2017).
[4] Q. An, L. Huang, S. Jiang, X. Li, Y. Gao, Y. Liu, L. Geng, Vacuum. 145, 312-319 (2017).
[5] J.-S. Meng, G. Jin, X.-P. Shi, Appl. Surf. Sci. 431, 135-142 (2018).
[6] S . Buytoz, M. Ulutan, M.M. Yildirim, Appl. Surf. Sci. 252, 1313- 1323 (2005).
[7] J. Yin, D. Wang, L. Meng, L. Ke, Q. Hu, X. Zeng, Surf. Coat. Tech. 325, 120-126 (2017).
[8] J. Rodriguez, A. Martı́n, R. Fernández, J.E. Fernández, Wear. 255, 950-955 (2003).
[9] N.L. Parthasarathi, M. Duraiselvam, J. Alloy Compd. 505, 824- 831 (2010).
[10] S . Abdi, S. Lebaili, Phys. Procedia. 2, 1005-1014 (2009).
[11] M.J. Tobar, C. Álvarez, J.M. Amado, G. Rodríguez, A. Yáñez, Surf. Coat. Tech. 200, 6313-6317 (2006).
[12] N.Y. Sari, M. Yilmaz, Surf. Coat. Tech. 202, 3136-3141 (2008).
[13] E. Fernández, M. Cadenas, R. González, C. Navas, R. Fernández, J. de Damborenea, Wear 259, 870-875 (2005).
[14] S . Buytoz, GU J. Sci., Part C. 8, 51-63 (2020).
[15] X.-N. Wang, X.-M. Chen, Q. Sun, H.-S. Di, Mater. Lett. 206, 143-145 (2017).
[16] K.A. Habib, D.L. Cano, José Antonio Heredia, J.S. Mira, Surf. Coat. Tech. 358, 824-832 (2019).
[17] L.-Y. Chen, T. Xu, H. Wang, P. Sang, L.-C. Zhang, Surf Coat Tech. 358, 467-480(2019).
[18] Q.W. Meng, T.L. Geng, B.Y. Zhang, Surf. Coat. Tech. 200, 4923- 4928 (2006).
[19] Y.-X. Zhou, J. Zhang, Z.-G. Xing, H.-D.Wang, Z.-L. Lv, Surf. Coat. Tech. 361, 270-279 (2019).
[20] M. Kilic, A. Imak, I Kirik, JMEPEG. 30, 1411-1419 (2021).
[21] K. Kılıçay, S. Buytoz, M. Ulutan, Surf. Coat. Tech. 397, 125974 (2020).
[22] M.-J.Chao, X. Niu, B. Yuan, E.-J. Liang, D.-S. Wang, Surf. Coat. Tech. 201, 1102-1108 (2006).
[23] Y. Z., T. Yu, L. Chen, Y. Chen, C. Guan, J. Sun, Ceram. Int. 46, 25136-25148 (2020).
[24] L. Guo-lu, L. Ya-long, D. Tian-shun, F. Bin-Guo, Wang Hai-dou, Zheng Xiao-dong, Zhou Xiu-kai, Vacuum. 156, 440-448 (2018).
[25] S. Buytoz, M. Ulutan, M.M. Yıldırım, Eng. & Arch. Fac .Osmangazi University XVIII, 93-107 ( 2005).
[26] M. Kilic, European Journal of Technique (EJT) 10, 106-118 (2020).
[27] Guo-lu Li, Ya-long Li, Tian-shun Dong, Hai-dou Wang, Xiao-dong Zheng, Xiu-kai Zhou, Hindawi Advances in Materials Science and Engineering 2018, Article ID 8979678, 1-10 (2018).
[28] M. Storozhenko, O. Umanskyi, V. Krasovskyy, M. Antonov, O. Terentjev, J. Alloy Compd. 778, 15-22 (2019).
[29] A. Zabihi, R. Soltani, Surf. Coat. Tech. 349, 707-718 (2018).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Musa Kiliҫ
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Batman University, Faculty of Technology, Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Batman, Turkey
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The resistance of cast iron to abrasive wear depends on the metal abrasive hardness ratio. For example, hardness of the structural

constituents of the cast iron metal matrix is lower than the hardness of ordinary silica sand. Also cementite, the basic component of

unalloyed white cast iron, has hardness lower than the hardness of silica. Some resistance to the abrasive effect of the aforementioned

silica sand can provide the chromium white cast iron containing in its structure a large amount of (Cr, Fe)7C3 carbides characterised by

hardness higher than the hardness of the silica sand in question. In the present study, it has been anticipated that the white cast iron

structure will be changed by changing the type of metal matrix and the type of carbides present in this matrix, which will greatly expand

the application area of castings under the harsh operating conditions of abrasive wear. Moreover, the study compares the results of

abrasive wear resistance tests performed on the examined types of cast iron. Tests of abrasive wear resistance were carried out on a Miller

machine. Samples of standard dimensions were exposed to abrasion in a double to-and-fro movement, sliding against the bottom of

a trough filled with an aqueous abrasive mixture containing SiC + distilled water. The obtained results of changes in the sample weight

were approximated with a power curve and shown further in the study.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

D. Kopyciński
M. Kawalec
S. Piasny
A. Madizhanova

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more