Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 4
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The concept of the existence of the absolute being can be characterized by four criteria which correspond to four existential aspects of the ultimate reality. In volume one of the Controversy over the Existence of the World Roman Ingarden argues that the absolute being is to be characterized as self-sustained, primary, self‑activated and independent. When some general remarks are put aside, the article focuses on arguments that have been adduced by the author in support of three claims. (1) Ingarden accepts the existence of the absolute being and flanks it by additional seven kinds of relative beings. The author finds the abundance supernumerary in the material world. (2) No material (or physical) object possesses properties (or existential moments) that belong to the absolute being. (3) There are fundamental reasons which exclude the possibility that the physical world (the manifold of all material objects) can be identified with the absolute being (absolute existence).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marek Łagosz
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Instytut Filozofii, ul. Koszarowa 3, 51-149 Wrocław
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper deals with elucidating the semantic changes and pragmatic effects of the precedent phenomenon in modern Ukrainian media discourse. The examples chosen for analysis have appeared within Ukrainian discourse following Ukraine’s independence in 1991. It verbalizes one of the valuable concepts – ‘patriotism’. Taken into consideration is the phrase coined by Yevhen Chykalenko, about “love to the depth of a pocket” with references to its use in contemporary discourse. The research is based on the 13th version of the General Regionally Annotated Corpus of Ukrainian and on the Ukrainian Language Corpus test version. The functional variant peculiarities of this expression are described, and its truncated derivatives and its lexical shifts as well. The difference between the origin of Chykalenko’s phrase and its current modifications is deduced from the semantic-pragmatic point of view. The paper reveals the role the above mentioned phrase plays in the formatting of new expressions. Outlined is the manipulative potential of this precedent expression in the realization of the author’s intentions.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Natalia Kobchenko
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article presents a pragmatic analysis of precedent units in Ukrainian religious media discourse based on the publications from websites “RISU”, “Religion in Ukraine”, “The Catholic Observer” for the period 2014 to 2016. The sample comprises analytical articles and interviews focused on inter‑confessional relations, Catholic-‑Orthodox dialogue and interfaith dialogue in general. It has been found that precedent units, as verbal equivalents of precedent phenomena, play a crucial role in exerting a persuasive influence upon one’s audience, particularly in terms of verbal aggression within the communicative discrediting strategy. This type of verbal aggression is implemented via the verbal tactics of taunting, mocking, accusation, indirect insult, criticism, defamation through negatively‑marked comparison, and irony. Based on our data, references to precedent phenomena correlate with an author’s intentions of swaying the readers’ opinion on controversial issues in interfaith relations along with undermining the authority of representatives of other confessions by associating their deeds and words with negatively marked precedent names, phrases, texts and situations. It is argued that precedent units subjected to structural transformations in the text (such as truncation and extension) represent a particularly potent way of discrediting one’s opponent in the context of religious media discourse.
Go to article

Bibliography

Adzinova А.А., Yavleniye pretsedentnosti v zaglaviyakh kreolizovannykh tekstov (na materiale yazyka glyantsevykh zhurnalov). Dissertatsiya na soiskaniye uchenoy stepeni kandidata filologicheskikh nauk 10.02.01 – russkiy yazyk, Maykop 2007.

Arutyunova N.D., Diskurs, [v:] V.N. Yartseva (red.), Lingvisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovarʹ, Moskva 1990.

Bagayeva D.V., Gudkov D.B., Zakharenko I.V., Krasnykh V.V., Nekotoryye osobennosti funktsionirovaniya pretsedentnykh vyskazyvaniy, „Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 9: Filologiya” 1997, № 4.

Bart R., Izbrannyye raboty. Semiotika. Poetika, sost., obshch. red. i vstup. st. G.K. Kosikova, Moskva 1989.

Berestova A.A., Relіgіyna pretsedentnіstʹ u movі ukrayinsʹkoyi prozy kіntsya XX – pochatku XXІ stolіttya. Disertatsіya na zdobuttya naukovogo stupenya kandidata fіlologіchnikh nauk: 10.02.01, Kharkіv 2016.

Bobyreva E.V., Pretsedentnyye vyskazyvaniya religioznogo diskursa, „Izvestiya VGPU” 2007, № 2.

Bohdanova I.V., Suhestyvnyy potentsial pretsedentnykh odynytsʹ v ukrayinsʹkomu mediynomu dyskursi pochatku XXI st., Vinnytsya 2016.

Borshch M., Pretsedentni fenomeny v tekstakh elektronnykh ZMI, „Filolohichni studiyi” 2016, vyp. 7.

Boyarskikh O.S., Pretsedentnoye vyskazyvaniye v gazetnom tekste: osobennosti chitatelʹskogo vospriyatiya, „Politicheskaya lingvistika” 2007, № 21.

Boyarskikh O.S., Pretsedentnyye fenomeny so sferoy‑istochnikom „Literatura” v diskurse rossiyskikh pechatnykh SMI (2004‑2007 gg.). Dissertatsiya na soiskaniye stepeni kandidata filologicheskikh nauk: 10.02.01 – russkiy yazyk, Nizhniy Tagil 2008.

Bykova L.V., Eliseyeva S.V., Pretsedentnyye fenomeny, voskhodyashchiye k nemetskoy i frantsuzskoy kulʹture, v sovremennoy rossiyskoy presse, „Vestnik Yuzhno‑Uralʹskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika” 2009, № 25 (158).

Bykova L.V., Sfery‑istochniki pretsedentnykh fenomenov, svyazannykh s nemetskoy kulʹturoy, v rossiyskikh SMI, „Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universi-teta im. A.I. Gertsena” 2009, № 101.

Cherhovyy posthavansʹkyy prypadok antyuniatsʹkoyi isteryky v RPTs, [v:] http://catholicnews.org.ua/chergoviy‑postgavanskiy‑pripadok‑antiuniatskoyi‑isteriki‑v‑rpc.

Chornomoretsʹ Yu., Zhesty smyrennya, [v:] https://risu.org.ua/ua/index/monitoring/society_di-gest/58406.

Chornovol‑Tkachenko R.S., Pretsedentnyy tekst yak pidgruntya intertekstualʹnosti, Kharkiv 2008.

Derkach T., Omnes viae Romam ducunt, [v:] https://risu.org.ua/ua/index/expert_thought/authors_columns/tderkach_column/63332.

Dzera O., Bibliyna intertekstualʹnistʹ i pereklad: anhlo‑ukrayinsʹkyy kontekst, Lʹviv 2017.

Egorova E.N., Rechevaya agressiya i strategiya diskreditatsii (na primere analiza gazetnykh publikatsiy), „Yazyk i tekst” 2015, № 2 (3).

Gudkov D.B., Pretsedentnyye imena i paradigma sotsialʹnogo povedeniya, [v:] Lingvistiches-kiye i lingvodidakticheskiye problemy kommunikatsii, Moskva 1996.

Hart C., Argumentation meets adapted cognition: manipulation in media discourse on immigration, „Journal of Pragmatics” 2013, № 59 (B).

Ilʹchenko O.A., Intertekstualʹnistʹ i pretsedentnistʹ v ukrayinomovnykh ZMI pochatku XXI st. (na materiali metaforychnykh slovospoluchenʹ), „Linhvistychni doslidzhennya” 2013, vyp. 35.

Issers O.S., Kommunikativnyye strategii i taktiki russkoy rechi, Moskva 2003.

Issers O.S., Pasha‑”Mersedes” ili rechevaya strategiya diskreditatsii, „Vestnik Omskogo universiteta” 1997, № 2, [v:] http://www.omsu.omskreg.ru/vestnik/articles/y1997‑i2/a051/ article.html.

Karaulov Yu.N., Russkiy yazyk i yazykovaya lichnost', Moskva 1987.

Karyakin A.V, Strategiya diskreditatsii kak sposob realizatsii rechevoy agressii, „Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2: Yazykoznaniye” 2009, № 2.

Khabekirova Z.S., Strategiya diskreditatsii i priyemy eye realizatsii v politicheskom diskurse demokraticheskoy oppozitsii, „Vestnik Adygeyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2: Filologiya i iskusstvovedeniye” 2011, № 2, [v:] http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ strategiya‑diskreditatsii‑i‑priemy‑ee‑realizatsii‑v‑politicheskom‑diskurse‑demokra ticheskoy‑oppozitsii.

Khrystokin H., Perspektyvy UPTs, [v:] http://www.religion.in.ua/main/daycomment/26538-‑perspektivi‑upc.html.

Kondratenko N.V., Pretsedentni komponenty v zaholovkakh publitsystychnykh tekstiv (na materiali hazetnykh statey), „Mova i kulʹtura” 2004, vyp. 7 (IV/1).

Kosarev M.I., Pretsedentnyye fenomeny so sferoy‑istochnikom „Kino” v pechatnykh SMI Germanii, „Izvestiya Uralʹskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 1: Voprosy obrazovaniya, nauki i kulʹtury” 2007, № 50 (21).

Kosmeda T., Khaliman O., Yavyshche pretsedentnosti v aspekti hramatyky otsinky (na prykladi analizu hramatychnoho znachennya mynuloho chasu), „Linhvistychni studiyi” 2013, vyp. 26.

Kostomarov V.G., Burvikova N.D., Kak teksty stanovyatsya pretsedentnymi, „Russkiy yazyk za rubezhom” 1994, № 1.

Krasnykh V.V., Sistema pretsedentnykh fenomenov v kontekste sovremennykh issledovaniy, [v:] Yazyk, soznaniye, kommunikatsiya, Moskva 1997.

Kristeva J., Bakhtine, le mot, le dialogue et le roman, „Critique” 1967, № 23 (239).

Krokosh M., Ekumenichnyy imperatyv: Chomu UHKTs ne pidtrymuye ni Kyyivsʹkoho, ani Moskovsʹkoho Patriarkhatu, [v:] http://www.religion.in.ua/main/analitica/29049-‑ekumenichnij‑imperativ‑chomu‑ugkc‑ne‑pidtrimuye‑ni‑kiyivskogo‑ani‑moskovskogo-‑patriarxatu.html.

Krutʹko T.V., Pretsedentni fenomeny u tekstakh anhlomovnoyi reklamy (na materiali banernoyi reklamy), „Linhvistyka XXI stolittya: novi doslidzhennya i perspektyvy” 2011, № 5.

Kryachkova A.P., Realizatsiya strategii diskreditatsii opponenta v politicheskom diskurse Germanii, „Vestnik MGIMO‑Universiteta” 2015, № 3 (42).

Levchenko O.A., Intertekstualʹnistʹ ukrayinsʹkoho internet‑dyskursu porevolyutsiynoho perio-du, [v:] Lyudyna. Kompʺyuter. Komunikatsiya, Lʹviv 2015.

Levko O.V., Manipulyatyvni pryyomy v ukrayinsʹkomu relihiynomu mediadyskursi, „Aktualʹni problemy ukrayinsʹkoyi linhvistyky: teoriya i praktyka” 2017, № 35.

Levko O., Pretsedentni odynytsi yak zasoby manipulyatsiyi v ukrayinsʹkomu relihiynomu mediadyskursi: psykholinhvistychnyy vymir, „Psycholinguistics” 2020, № 28 (2).

Lyashko O.V., Stylistychnyy aspekt pretsedentnykh fenomeniv u pravoslavniy propovidi, „Naukovyy visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Seriya: Filolohiya” 2018, 33 (1).

Maillat D., Oswald S., Biases and constraints in communication: Argumentation, persuasion and manipulation, „Journal of Pragmatics” 2013, 59 (B).

Maillat D., Oswald S., Constraining context: A pragmatic account of cognitive manipula-tion, [in:] C. Hart (ed.), Critical discourse studies in context and cognition, Amsterdam 2001.

Marynovych M., Koly dyplomatiya perevazhaye nad zasadamy viry, [v:] https://risu.ua/koli‑diplomatiya‑perevazhaye‑nad‑zasadami‑viri_n72939.

Menz F., Manipulation strategies in newspapers: a program for critical linguistics, [in:] R. Wodak (ed.), Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse, Amsterdam, Philadelphia 1989.

Mytropolyt Oleksandr (Drabynko), Ukrayinsʹke pravoslavʺya: shlyakh do vidnovlennya tserkovnoyi yednosti, [v:] https://www.religion.in.ua/main/analitica/33367‑ukrayinske-‑pravoslavya‑shlyax‑do‑vidnovlennya‑cerkovnoyi‑yednosti.html.

Naidiuk O.V., Semantychni ta funktsionalni osoblyvosti pretsedentnykh fenomeniv u nimetsko-movnomu dyskursi. Dysertatsiya na zdobuttya naukovoho stupenya kandydata filolohich-nykh nauk za spetsialʹnistyu 10.02.04, Kyiv 2009.

Nemirova N.V., Pretsedentnostʹ i intertekstualʹnostʹ politicheskogo diskursa, „Lingvistika: byulletenʹ Uralʹskogo lingvisticheskogo obshchestva” 2003, № 11.

O’Keeffe A., Media and Discourse Analysis, [in:] J. Gee, M. Handford (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, London 2011.

Parenti M., Methods of media manipulation, [in:] C. Jensen, 20 years of Censored News, New York 1997.

Petrenko A.S., Frazeolohichni pretsedentni fenomeny u suchasnykh hazetnykh zaholov-kakh yak zasoby vyyavlennya movno‑kulʹturnoho kodu natsiyi, „Mova i kulʹtura” 2019, vyp. 22 (III).

Petrenko A.S., Istoriya yak sfera‑dzherelo pretsedentnykh fenomeniv u movi ukrayinsʹkykh ZMK, [v:] Ucrainica VIII. Současná Ukrajinistika. Problémy jazyka, literatury a kultury, Olomouc 2020.

Piddubna N.V., Teoriya teolinhvistyky: fenomen bibliynosti v ukrayinsʹkiy linhvokulʹturi ta omovlennya relihiynoyi kartyny svitu (analiz dyskursyvnoyi praktyky XIX st.), Kharkiv 2019.

Piddubna N., Pretsedentni onimy yak interdyskursyvnyy element suchasnoyi ukrayinsʹkoyi propovidi, „Volynʹ filolohichna: tekst i kontekst” 2013, vyp. 15.

Piddubna N., Pretsedentni relihiyni imena v ego‑tekstakh Tarasa Shevchenka, „Linhvostylis-tychni studiyi” 2017, vyp. 6.

Piegay‑Gros N., Vvedeniye v teoriyu intertekstualʹnosti, per. s fr. G.K. Kosikova, V.Yu. Lukasik, B.P. Narumova, Moskva 2008.

Postnova T.E., Pretsedentnyye teksty v pechatnoy reklame, „Vestnik MGU” 2001, № 2.

Reisigl M., Wodak R., Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and Antisemitism, London 2001.

Riabinina O.K., Intertekstualnist u dyskursi suchasnoi ukrainskoi presy: linhvistychnyi aspekt: dys ... kand. filol. nauk, Kharkiv 2007.

Riffaterre M., La trace de l’intertexte, „La Pensée: Revue du rationalisme moderne” 1980, № 215.

Romanchenko Yu.V., Pretsedentnost v nemetskoiazychnom religioznom diskurse (na materiale tipa teksta „kalendar veruiushchego” („Andachtsbuch”), „Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriia: Lingvistika” 2008, № 3.

Sahan O., Pravoslavʺya v Ukrayini i natsionalʹna bezpeka, [v:] http://www.religion.in.ua/main/analitica/26321‑pravoslavya‑v‑ukrayini‑i‑nacionalno‑bezpeka.html.

Sakharuk I.V., Manipuliatyvna funktsiia pretsedentnykh fenomeniv u tekstakh ukrainskykh drukovanykh ZMI, „Visnyk Cherkaskoho universytetu. Seriya: Filolohichni nauky” 2013, № 7 (260).

Sakharuk I.V., Pretsedentni odynytsi yak zasib realizatsii suhestii v ukrainskomu mediinomu dyskursi, „Filolohichni studii: Naukovyi visnyk Kryvorizkoho natsionalnoho universytetu” 2015, № 13.

Sakharuk I.V., Sfery‑dzherela pretsedentnosti v tekstakh ukrayinsʹkykh drukovanykh ZMI, „Linhvistychni studiyi” 2012, vyp. 25.

Sakharuk I.V., Status of Precedent Units in the System of Intertextual Means of Contemporary Ukrainian Media Discourse, „Jazykovedný Časopis” 2015, № 66 (2).

Sakharuk I., Functions of Precedent Phenomena in Ukrainian Printed Media Texts, „Linhvokompiuterni doslidzhennia” 2012, № 5.

Sakharuk I., Typolohiia pretsedentnykh fenomeniv u suchasnomu ukrainskomu dyskursi, „Linhvistychni studii” 2011, vyp. 23.

Samigulina F.G., Spetsifika funktsionirovaniya modifitsirovannykh pretsedentnykh vyskazyva-niy v sovremennom reklamnom diskurse, [v:] Slavyanskiye yazyki i sovremennyye sredstva massovoy kommunikatsii, Moskva 2009.

Selivanova O.O., Linhvistychna entsyklopediya, Poltava 2010. Selivanova O.O., Pretsedentna motyvatsiia nominatyvnykh odynyts (na materiali ukrainskoi movy), [v:] Filolohichni studii, Kharkiv 2009.

Shibayev M.V., Manipulyativnoye ispolʹzovaniye pretsedentnykh tekstov v religioznom diskurse, „Vestnik KGPU im. V.P. Astafʹyeva” 2013, № 3.

Sudus Yu., Movlennievi taktyky realizatsii stratehii dyskredytatsii v dyskursi dyplomativ USA, „East European Journal of Psycholinguistics”, № 5 (1).

Sunʹko N.O., Intertekstualʹnistʹ ta pretsedentnistʹ yak reprezentanty publitsystychnoho dyskursu (na materiali zaholovkiv anhlomovnykh statey), „Visnyk Zhytomyrsʹkoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Filolohichni nauky” 2011, vyp. 58.

Synytsya A.S., Do pytannya rozriznennya intertekstualʹnosti ta pretsedentnosti, [v:] Ucrainica VIII. Současná Ukrajinistika. Problémy jazyka, literatury a kultury, Olomouc 2018.

Sytar H.V., Syntaksychni frazeolohizmy i pretsedentni fenomeny: zony peretynu, „Linhvistychni studiyi” 2006, vyp. 31.

Syzonov D., Frazeolohichni innovatsiyi ukrayinsʹkoyi movy v medialinhvistychnomu vysvitle- nni, „Studia Slavica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae” 2018, № 63 (2).

Tereshchuk H., RPTs yak spivuchasnyk zlochynu maye viddaty te, shcho nechesno zabrala, [v:] http://catholicnews.org.ua/rpc‑yak‑spivuchasnik‑zlochinu‑maie‑viddati‑te‑shcho-‑nechesno‑zabrala‑yurist.

Van Dijk T.A., Discourse and manipulation, „Discourse & Society” 2006, № 17 (3).

Van Dijk T.A., Discourse, Power and Access, [in:] Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, London 1996.

Van Dijk T.A., How Globo media manipulated the impeachment of Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff, „Discourse & Communication” 2017, № 11 (2).

Van Dijk T.A., Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach, London 1998.

Velykoroda Yu.M., Manipuliatyvna funktsiia pretsedentnykh fenomeniv v amerykanskomu media dyskursi (na materiali statei iz zhurnaliv „Time” ta „Newsweek”), „Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu „Ostrozka akademiia”. Seriya: Filolohichna” 2010, № 16.

Vilʹchynsʹkyy O.‑D., Havansʹka deklaratsiya, [v:] http://catholicnews.org.ua/gavanska- ‑deklaraciya. Vilʹchynsʹkyy O.‑D., Havansʹka deklaratsiya (Chastyna II), [v:] http://catholicnews.org.ua/gavanska‑deklaraciya‑chastina‑ii.

Vorontsova O.A., Zaytseva A.B., Pretsedentnyye imena v rossiyskoy i amerikanskoy pechati, „Izvestiya Uralʹskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya 1: Problemy obrazovaniya, nauki i kulʹtury” 2006, № 45 (20).

Yatsiv I., „Zustrich, yaka ne vidbulasya?” – Blazhennishyy Svyatoslav, [v:] http://catholicnews.org.ua/zustrich‑yaka‑ne‑vidbulasya‑blazhennishiy‑svyatoslav.

Zakharenko I.V., Krasnykh V.V., Gudkov D.B., Bagayeva D.V., Pretsedentnoye vyskazyvaniye i pretsedentnoye imya kak simvoly pretsedentnykh fenomenov, [v:] Yazyk, soznaniye, kommunikatsiya, Moskva 1997.

Zakharenko I.V., Pretsedentnyye vyskazyvaniya i ikh funktsionirovaniye v tekste, [v:] Lingvokognitivnyye problemy mezhkulʹturnoy kommunikatsii, Moskva 1997.

Zyryanova I.P., Pragmaticheskiy potentsial pretsedentnykh fenomenov v zagolovkakh brit- anskoy pressy, „Izvestiya Uralʹskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 1: Voprosy obrazovaniya, nauki i kulʹtury” 2010, № 1 (71).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Олександр Левко
1

  1. Київський національний університет імені Тараса Шевченка
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this article we pay attention to some theoretical backgrounds for the redesign of nineteenth-century public parks in Central and Eastern Europe. The research is part of a larger project ‘The design history of nineteenth-century public parks in Central and Eastern Europe; contemporary use and future development’ (HYPPE), initiated by the Faculty of Landscape Architecture and Urbanism in Budapest, in which nine schools of landscape architecture in nine different countries in Central and Eastern Europe participate and collaborate.

We will focus here on some theoretical backgrounds, that form the foundation for a research and design approach, in which the diversity and similarity of the sites, contexts and design problems can be assured. Product (plan and realisation) and process (design) play a role in the parks as object of planning and design; on the one hand we distinguish between land, landscape and landscape architecture, on the other one — at the same time the difference in approaches between science and design play a role in the relation between research and design.

In the second part backgrounds and principles, that underpin the relation between conservation and development in historical settings of parks are dealt with. Different design approaches — from restoration to complete reconstruction are highlighted. Applying these principles to nineteenth-century public parks in Central and Eastern Europe shows, where generic backgrounds and specifics of site, history and culture meet.

In the third part the new challenges for landscape architecture, that society requires from contemporary planning and design is elaborated. Energy transition, water management and the creation of healthy environments for people are as such not new for landscape architecture, but in this stage new steps have to be taken, that reach beyond, what is already practised. Here the explorative and experimental character of the design approach comes to the surface because for these aspects there are no precedents yet, they have to be developed by practice, research on evidence and imagining solutions, that are beyond the usual practice of energy transition, water management and the creation of healthy environments for people. For landscape architecture a synthetical and coherent design concept forms the core of the contribution; the search for a meaningful new order.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Albert Fekete
ORCID: ORCID
Martin Van Den Toorn

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more