Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 5
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Every year Poland emits more CO2 into the atmosphere than can be absorbed by all the forests in the country.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Paweł Kojs
Romuald Zabielski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Polska rocznie emituje do atmosfery więcej CO2, niż mogłyby pochłonąć lasy pokrywające cały kraj.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Paweł Kojs
Romuald Zabielski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Five years ago, the Act on the protection of animals used for scientific or educational purposes entered into force. It is the implementation of Directive 2010/63/ EU into the Polish legal system. During the work on the Directive, most scientists were convinced that the previous Act on animal experiments of 2005 was in line with the new EU law and only minor modifications would be necessary. Legislators, however, decided to create a completely new legal act. Already at the time of the Act's creation, the scientific community made many critical comments regarding the law. Significant discrepancies between the Directive and the proposed provisions of the Act were far more stringent, and in many places with imprecise provisions which could have resulted in difficulties in conducting research using animals. Unfortunately, most of the postulates of the scientific community were not considered at that time. What does the Act look like 5 years after its adoption? Instead of a transparent and balanced law modeled on the EU Directive, which provides real protection for experimental animals, while safeguarding the intellectual rights of animal testing units, a patch of underdeveloped, sometimes mutually exclusive provisions has been issued. Instead of raising the welfare of the animals used for research to a higher level, it significantly increased the costs of operating research units and increased bureaucracy. Instead of rationalizing the system of issuing consents for research, it has been weakened and entangled in administrative and legal disputes without the provision of basic administrative facilities. Instead of increasing the international mobility of scientists and technicians working with experimental animals, the implementation of the law created a training “system” that is not recognized in any other EU country. In the light of the 5-year experience of the scientific community and the expert part of the composition of local ethics committees, we postulate to introduce a number of significant changes to the act so that its amended version actually ensures animal protection, respect for researchers and returns to the current of European legislation.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Małgorzata Gajewska
Joanna Gromadzka-Ostrowska
Jan Konopacki
Krzysztof Turlejski
Cezary W. Watała
Krzysztof Wąsowicz
Anna Wesołowska
Marek Wieczorek
Piotr Wlaź
Romuald Zabielski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This is response of the authors of the article published in the “Nauka” (3/2020) to the polemic note published in the issue 1/2021. In the response, authors signaled the progressive difficulties in conducting research on animals, attributed to the practices of applying the “Act on the protection of animals used for scientific or educational purposes” of January 15, 2015. The use of animals for research in accordance with the provisions of the Act of 2015 was paid for by a number of ambiguities in the interpretation of the provisions of the Act, increased official reporting without any real effect on animal welfare, and increased pressure from some non-governmental organizations, whose aim is to completely block the conduct of animal research.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marta Gajewska
1 2
Joanna Gromadzka-Ostrowska
3
Jan Konopacki
4
Krzysztof Turlejski
5
Cezary W. Watała
6
Krzysztof Wąsowicz
7
Anna Wesołowska
8
Marek Wieczorek
9
Piotr Wlaź
10
Romuald Zabielski
2

  1. Narodowy Instytut Onkologii im. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
  2. Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie
  3. Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie (II LKE w Warszawie)
  4. Uniwersytet Łódzki
  5. Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
  6. Uniwersytet Medyczny w Łodzi
  7. Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie (LKE w Olsztynie)
  8. Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Collegium Medicum w Krakowie
  9. Uniwersytet Łódzki (LKE w Łodzi)
  10. Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie (LKE w Lublinie)

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more