Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 4
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Due to the coexistence of continuity and discreteness, energy management of a multi-mode power split hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) can be considered a typical hybrid system. Therefore, the hybrid system theory is applied to investigate the optimum energy distribution strategy of a power split multi-mode HEV. In order to obtain a unified description of the continuous/discrete dynamics, including both the steady power distribution process and mode switching behaviors, mixed logical dynamical (MLD) modeling is adopted to build the control-oriented model. Moreover, linear piecewise affine (PWA) technology is applied to deal with nonlinear characteristics in MLD modeling. The MLD model is finally obtained through a high level modeling language, i.e. HYSDEL. Based on the MLD model, hybrid model predictive control (HMPC) strategy is proposed, where a mixed integer quadratic programming (MIQP) problem is constructed for optimum power distribution. Simulation studies under different driving cycles demonstrate that the proposed control strategy can have a superior control effect as compared with the rule-based control strategy.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1.  J.J. Hu, B. Mei, H. Peng, and X.Y. Jiang, “Optimization design and analysis for a single motor hybrid powertrain configuration with dual planetary gears”, Appl. Sci. 9(4), 707 (2019).
  2.  S.H. Wang, S. Zhang, D.H. Shi, X.Q. Sun, and J.Q. He, “Research on instantaneous optimal control of the hybrid electric vehicle with planetary gear sets”, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 41(1), 51 (2019).
  3.  J. Kim, J. Kang, Y. Kim, T. Kim, B. Min, and H. Kim, “Design of power split transmission: design of dual mode power split transmission”, Int. J. Automot. Technol. 11(4), 565‒571 (2010).
  4.  F. Wang, J. Zhang, X. Xu, Y.F. Cai, Z.G. Zhou, and X.Q. Sun, “New method for power allocation of multi-power sources considering speed-up transient vibration of planetary power-split HEVs driveline system”, Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 128, 1‒18 (2019).
  5.  J.M. Miller, “Hybrid electric vehicle propulsion system architectures of the E-CVT type”, IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 21(3), 756‒767 (2006).
  6.  D.H. Shi, S.H. Wang, P. Pisu, L. Chen, R.C. Wang, and R.G. Wang, “Modeling and optimal energy management of a power split hybrid electric vehicle”, Sci. China Technol. Sci. 60(5), 1‒13 (2017).
  7.  J.D. Wishart, L. Zhou, and Z. Dong, “Review, modelling and simulation of two-mode hybrid vehicle architecture”, Proceedings of the ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Nevada, USA, 2007, pp. 1091‒1112.
  8.  L. Chen, F.T. Zhu, M.M. Zhang, Y. Huo, C.L. Yin, and H. Peng, “Design and analysis of an electrical variable transmission for a series– parallel hybrid electric vehicle”, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 60(5), 2354‒2363 (2011).
  9.  P. Aishwarya and O.B. Hari, “A review of optimal energy management strategies for hybrid electric vehicle”, Int. J. Veh. Tech. 160510 (2014).
  10.  B.L.C. Cezar and O. Alexandru, “A dynamic programming control strategy for HEV”, Appl. Mech. Mater. 263, 541‒544 (2013).
  11.  J. Park, “Development of equivalent fuel consumption minimization strategy for hybrid electric vehicles”, Int. J. Automot. Technol. 13(5), 835‒843 (2012).
  12.  D.H. Shi, P. Pisu, and L. Chen, “Control design and fuel economy investigation of power split HEV with energy regeneration of suspension”, Appl. Energy. 182, 576‒589 (2016).
  13.  T. Tarczewski, M. Skiwski, L.J. Niewiara, and L.M. Grzesiak, “High-performance PMSM servo-drive with constrained state feedback position controller”, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 66(1), 49‒58 (2018).
  14.  H. Borhan, A. Vahidi, A.M. Phillips, M.L. Kuang, I.V. Kolmanovsky, and S.D. Cairano, “MPC-based energy management of a power-split hybrid electric vehicle”, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 20(3), 593‒603 (2012).
  15.  A. Babiarz, A. Czornik, J. Klamka, and M. Niezabitowski, “The selected problems of controllability of discrete-time switched linear systems with constrained switching rule”, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 63(3), 657‒666 (2015).
  16. [6]  S.G. Olsen and G.M. Bone, “Model-based control of three degrees of freedom robotic bulldozing”, J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control. 136(136), 729‒736 (2014).
  17.  X.Q. Sun, Y.F. Cai, S.H. Wang, X. Xu, and L. Chen, “Optimal control of intelligent vehicle longitudinal dynamics via hybrid model predictive control”, Rob. Auton. Syst. 112, 190‒200 (2019).
  18.  S.G. Olsen and G.M. Bone, “Development of a hybrid dynamic model and experimental identification of robotic bulldozing”, J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control. 135(2), 450‒472 (2013).
  19.  F.T. Zhu, L. Chen, and C.L. Yin, “Design and analysis of a novel multimode transmission for a hev using a single electric machine”, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 62(3), 1097‒1110 (2013).
  20.  R.J. Zhang and Y.B. Chen, “Control of hybrid dynamical systems for electric vehicles”, Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference. (Cat. No.01CH37148), Arlington, VA, USA, 2001, pp. 2884‒2889.
  21.  J. Lygeros, S. Sastry, and C. Tomlin, Hybrid Systems: foundations, advanced topics and applications, University of California, Berkeley, 2012.
  22.  X.Q. Sun, Y.F. Cai, S.H. Wang, X.Xu, and L. Chen, “Piecewise affine identification of tire longitudinal properties for autonomous driving control based on data-driven”, IEEE Access 6, 47424‒47432 (2018).
  23.  A. Bemporad, A. Garulli, S. Paoletti, and A. Vicino, “A bounded-error approach to piecewise affine system identification”, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 50(10), 1567‒1580 (2005).
  24.  G. Ferrari-Trecate, M. Muselli, and D. Liberati, “A clustering technique for the identification of piecewise affine systems”, Automatica. 39(2), 205‒217 (2003).
  25.  F.D. Torrisi and A. Bemporad, “Hysdel-a tool for generating computational hybrid models for analysis and synthesis problems”, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 12(2), 235‒249 (2004).
  26.  M. Abdullah and M. Idres, “Constrained model predictive control of proton exchange membrane fuel cell”, J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 28(9), 3855‒3862 (2014).
  27.  D. Jolevski and O. Bego, “Model predictive control of gantry/bridge crane with anti-sway algorithm”, J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 29(2), 827‒834 (2015).
  28.  G. Ripaccioli, A. Bemporad, F. Assadian, C. Dextreit, S.D. Cairano, and I.V. Kolmanovsky, “Hybrid modeling, identification, and predictive control: An application to hybrid electric vehicle energy management”, International conference on hybrid systems computation and control(HSCC), San Francisco, CA, USA, 2009, pp. 321‒335.
  29.  A. Bemporad and D. Mignone, “Miqp.m: a matlab function for solving mixed integer quadratic programs version 1.02 user guide”, ETH–Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETHZ–ETL, (2000).
  30.  M. Tutuianu et al., “Development of the World-wide harmonized Light duty Test Cycle (WLTC) and a possible pathway for its introduction in the European legislation”, Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 40, 61‒75 (2015).
  31.  N. Kim, S.W. Cha, and H. Peng, “Optimal equivalent fuel consumption for hybrid electric vehicles”, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 20(3), 817‒825 (2011).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Shaohua Wang
1
Sheng Zhang
1
Dehua Shi
1 2 3
Xiaoqiang Sun
1
Tao Yang
3
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Automotive Engineering Research Institute, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
  2. Vehicle Measurement, Control and Safety Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China
  3. Jiangsu Chunlan Clean Energy Research Institute Co., Ltd., Taizhou 225300, China
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In order to study the sensitivity of multiple karst cave factors on surface settlement during Tunnel Boring Machine(referred to TBM hereinafter) tunnelling, a three-dimensional numerical model is built by taking a subway project as an example and combining MIDAS GTS NX finite element software. Secondly, the influence of the radius, height, angle, vertical net distance, and horizontal distance of the karst cave on the maximum surface settlement is studied and sorted under the two working conditions of treatment and untreated using the grey correlation analysis method. Additionally, a multi-factor numerical model of the untreated karst cave is established. Finally, based on the preceding research, a multi-factor prediction model for the maximum surface settlement is proposed and tested. The results reveal that when the karst cave is not treated, the radius and height of the karst cave have a significant effect on the maximum surface settlement. After the cave treatment, the influence of the cave parameters on the maximum settlement of the surface is greatly reduced. The calculating modelcreated in this study offers excellent prediction accuracy and good adaptability.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Bichang Dong
Tao Yang
ORCID: ORCID
Binbin JU
Zhongying QU
Chao Yi
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The carbothermic reduction of calcined magnesite in vacuum was studied. By thermodynamic analysis, the starting temperature of reduction reaction dropped from 2173K to 1523K when system pressure dropped from 1 atmosphere to 100 Pa. The experiments were carried out at different conditions under 10~100 Pa and the experimental results shown that the reduction extent of MgO improved by increasing the reaction temperature and time, the pellet forming pressure as well as adding fluoride as catalyst. The rate-determining step of carbothermic reduction process was gas diffusion with the apparent activation energy of 241.19~278.56 kJ/mol.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Qifeng Tang
1
ORCID: ORCID
Jinqing Ao
1
ORCID: ORCID
Biyou Peng
1
ORCID: ORCID
Biao Guo
1
ORCID: ORCID
Tao Yang
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Xihua University, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Chengdu 610039, PR China
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The roadway surrounding rock is often subjected to severe damage under dynamic loading at greater mining depths. To study the dynamic response of prestressed anchors, the damage characteristics of anchor solids with different prestresses and number of impacts under dynamic and static loads were investigated by improving the Hopkinson bar equipment. The effect of prestress on stress wave transmission was obtained, and the laws and reasons for axial force loss under static and dynamic loads were analyzed. The damage characteristics of anchor solids were determined experimentally. The results show that with an increase in prestress from 15 to 30 MPa, the peak value of the stress wave gradually increases and the decay rate gradually decreases. Shear damage occurred at the impact end of the specimen, combined tension and shear damage occurred at the free end, and fracture occurred in the middle. With an increase in the number of impacts, the damage to the anchor solid specimens gradually increased, and the prestressing force gradually decreased. After impact, the axial force of the various prestressed anchor solid specimens gradually increased; however, the anchor bar with a 17 MPa prestressing force had the slowest rate of axial force loss during impact, withstanding a greater number of impacts. In on-site applications, after three explosions, the displacement on both sides of the tunnel supported by 17 MPa prestressed anchor rods could be controlled within 0.3 m, with an average displacement of 206, 240, and 283 mm, respectively, increasing by 16.5% and 17.9%. This study, based on theoretical analysis and laboratory research combined with field application provides guidance for the anchor support of a dynamic loading tunnel.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Zhiqiang Yin
1
ORCID: ORCID
Chao Wang
1
ORCID: ORCID
Zhiyu Chen
2
ORCID: ORCID
Youxun Cao
3
ORCID: ORCID
Tao Yang
3
ORCID: ORCID
Deren Chen
4
ORCID: ORCID
Dengke Wang
4
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Anhui University of Science and Technology, School of Mining Engineering, Anhui ProvinceCoal Mine Safety Mining Equipment Manufacturing Innovat ion Center, Huainan 232001,China
  2. Industrial and Energy Administrat ion of Xishui County, Zunyi 564699, China
  3. Great Wall No.6 Mining Co. LTD, Etuokeqianqi 016200, China
  4. Shandong Huakun Geological Engineering Co. LTD, Taian 271413, China

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more