Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Contributor
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 12
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The conversation concerns mayor questions in the theory of historical writing, both raised or elaborated in Hayden White’s work. It focuses on the relation between history and its closest others: science and literature, as well as the issue of the function of historical studies. Conversation includes the discussion of the concepts of fiction, figure, fullfillment, figurative and conceptual language, modernism.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jakub Muchowski
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Hayden White did not directly examine the issue of the independence of history as a discipline of knowledge in his theoretical reflection. He did not ask about the subject of historical studies, the specificity of the methods used in it, the difference between history and other fields, or the economic and social conditions of historical discourse. In this article, I revise White’s writing and reconfigure the extant research using the concept of autonomy.
White — primarily in his works from the 1970s and 1980s — devoted much attention to exposing and describing cultural compulsions resulting in historical practices and violating their autonomy. These actions also brought unexpected results. At first, the use of structuralism in these practices, and then poststructuralist concepts of “the death of the author” and textualism, suggested claims that freed historiography from its links with an author’s biography and world-view, and with the social context in which a given work is produced. Using Foucault’s descrip-tion of the order of discourse, in turn, brought the image of a strict rigor of historical discipline, which, however, is not equal to the strong autonomy of history.
A stronger delimitation of the field of history appears in his — already in the twenty‑first century — offer to use Michael Oakeshott’s division into the practical past and the historical past. Whilst censuring academic historical writing as sterile and rejected by readers because it fails to answer contemporary existential, social and political questions, White, most likely unintentionally, described the independence of historians’ actions from the demands of the societies to which they belong. According to commentators, his remarks can be a productive inspiration for reflection upon the distinctiveness of the discipline of history.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jakub Muchowski
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Jagiellonian University, Kraków
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The conversation concerns mayor questions in the theory of historical writing, both raised or elaborated in Hayden White’s work. It focuses on the relation between history and its closest others: science and literature, as well as the issue of the function of history. Conversation includes the discussion of the concepts of fiction, figure, fulfillment, figurative and conceptual language, modernism.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jakub Muchowski
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article discusses recently published conference papers Memory and Politics of History. Expeciemed by Poland and her Neighbors.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jakub Muchowski
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper discusses the English language reception of Jo Guldi and David Armitage’s The History Manifesto. It relates the most important responses to this powerful book, as well as pointing out the notions of the longue durée, the public and historians craft as the main topic that marshals the vast and diverse exchange
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jakub Muchowski
ORCID: ORCID

Authors and Affiliations

Jakub Muchowski
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In the paper I only partially address questions about the social role of history: to what extent can historiography change the world? What are history's inherent practices, knowledge resources, or writing forms that allow it to be an effective instrument of political action? What relationship between historians and their readers can a responsible historical discourse establish? I critically discuss how contemporary English‑language historical theory responds to these questions draw-ing on the contributions of María Inés La Greca and Kalle Pihlainen. In doing so, I make use of the philosophy of Jacques Rancière and thus attempt to incorporate his ideas into this debate. As a result, I propose some directions for further thinking about the social role of history.
Go to article

Bibliography

Ahlbäck, Pia M. „The Reader! The Reader! The Mimetic Challenge of Addressivity and Response in Historical Writing”. Storia della Storiografia 52 (2007): 31–48.
Ahlskog, Jonas. „Michael Oakeshott and Hayden White on the Practical and the Historical Past”. Rethinking History 20, 3 (2016): 375–394.
Czyżewski, Andrzej. „Pesymizm sprzecznych tez, czyli co dalej? Kilka uwag o «Forum Historyków Dziejów Najnowszych» (Warszawa 10.12.2016 r.)”. Sensus Historiae 24, 3 (2016): 265–276.
Davies, Olivier. Jacques Rancière. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010.
Domańska, Ewa. Historie niekonwencjonalne. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie, 2006.
Franczak, Jerzy. Błądzące słowa. Jacques Rancière i filozofia literatury. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Literackich PAN, 2017.
Guldi, Jo, David Armitage. The History Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Jacques Rancière. Key Concepts, red. Jean‑Philippe Deranty. Durham: Acumen, 2010.
Kleinberg, Ethan, Joan Scott, Gary Wilder. „Theses on Theory and History”, 2018, http://theoryrevolt.com/; pol. przekład: „Tezy o teorii i historii”, przeł. Ewa Domańska, Tomasz Wiśniewski, Historyka 49 (2019): 289–299.
La Greca, María Inés. „Hayden White and Joan W. Scott’s Feminist History: The Practical past, the Political Present and an Open Future”. Rethinking History 20, 3 (2016): 395–413.
La Greca, María Inés. „Narrative Trouble, or Hayden White’s Desire for a Progressive Historiography Refigured by Judith Butler’s Performativity Theory”. Storia Della Storiografia 65, 1 (2014): 117–129.
Lorenz, Chris. „It Takes Three to Tango: History between the «Practical» and the «Historical» Past”. Storia Della Storiografia 65, 1 (2014): 29–46.
May, Todd. The Political Thought of Jacques Rancière. Creating Equality. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2008.
Muchowski, Jakub. „Długie trwanie, warsztat historyka i publiczna rola historii. Anglojęzyczna recepcja History Manifesto”. Historyka 47 (2017): 127–135.
Muchowski, Jakub. „Heteronomizacja pola historiograficznego we współczesnej Polsce. Analiza Forum Badaczy Dziejów Najnowszych”. Res Historica 46 (2018): 321–333.
Muchowski, Jakub. „Hayden White i autonomia historii”. W Hayden White w Polsce: fakty, krytyka, recepcja, red. Ewa Domańska, Edward Skibiński, Paweł Stróżyk, 223–236. Kraków: Universitas, 2019.
Pihlainen, Kalle. „The distinction of history: on valuing the insularity of the historical past”. Rethinking History 20:3 (2016): 414–432.
Pihlainen, Kalle. The Work of History. New York: Routledge, 2017.
Pihlainen, Kalle. „Historia jako komunikacja i zobowiązanie”, przeł. Karina Jarzyńska. Historyka 50, 2020: 173–197.
Pomorski, Jan. „Polityzacja/mitologizacja historii, czyli w czym neuronauka (i metodologia) może pomóc badaczowi historii najnowszej?”. Historia@Teoria 4, 6 (2017): 15–42.
Rancière, Jacques. „Wyemancypowany widz”, przeł. Adam Ostolski. Krytyka Polityczna 13 (2007): 310–319.
Rancière, Jacques. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy, przeł. Julie Rose. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.
Rancière, Jacques. Dzielenie postrzegalnego. Estetyka i polityka, przeł. Maciej Kropiwnicki i Jan Sowa. Kraków: Korporacja Ha!art, 2007.
Rancière, Jacques. Estetyka jako polityka, przeł. Julian Kutyła, Paweł Mościcki. Warszawa: Krytyka Polityczna, 2007.
Rancière, Jacques. Figures de l'histoire. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2012.
Rancière, Jacques. La nuit des prolétaires: Archives du rêveouvrier. Paris: Fayard, 2012.
Rancière, Jacques. Le philosophe et ses pauvres. Paris: Fayard, 1983.
Rancière, Jacques. Les noms de l’histoire. Essai de poétique du savoir. Paris: Seuil, 1993.
Rancière, Jacques. Philosopher and His Poor, przeł. John Drury, Corinne Oster, Andrew Parker. Durham: Duke University Press, 2003.
Rancière, Public Education and the Taming of Democracy, red. Maarten Simons, Jan Masschelein. Oxford: Wiley‑Blackwell, 2011.
Reading Rancière, red. Paul Bowman, Richard Stamp. London: Continuum, 2011.
Rockhill, Gabriel. Interventions in Contemporary Thought: History, Politics, Aesthetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016.
Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár. „History Manifested: Making Sense of Unprecedented Change”. European Review of History 22, 5 (2015): 819–834.
Spiegel, Gabrielle M. „Above, about and beyond the Writing of History: A Retrospective View of Hayden White’s Metahistory on the 40th Anniversary of Its Publication”. Rethinking History 17, 4 (2013): 492–508.
Tamm, Marek. „Truth, Objectivity and Evidence”. Journal of the Philosophy of History 8 (2014): 265–290.
Tanke, Joseph J. Jacques Rancière: an introduction. London: Continuum, 2011.
White, Hayden. „Foreword: Rancière’s Revisionism”. W Jacques Rancière, The Names of History: On Poetics of Knowledge, przeł. Hassan Melehy, VII–XIX. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994.
White, Hayden. „Przeszłość praktyczna”, przeł. Agata Czarnacka. W Hayden White, Przeszłość praktyczna, red. Ewa Domańska, 43–66. Kraków: Universitas, 2014.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jakub Muchowski
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This text describes the contemporary teoretical refelection on the place of ethics in historical discourse. It is focused on considering the effect of arguments of ethical tum in humanities on the debate concern with historical representations of Shoah.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jakub Muchowski
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to partially capture the state of theoretical debate amongst Polish historians on their own discipline in the second half of 20th century. To achieve this we analyse the content of the first twenty five volumes of journal Historyka published in the period when Celina Bobińska was its editor-in-chief (1967–1995). We assume that Historyka – the only journal dedicated to the theory of history and history of historiography – was situated in the centre of exchanges on academic historical practices. We do not treat its content as a reflection of contemporary studies in the theory of history, but as a dominant position in the self-understanding of the discipline competing with other utterances. The paper is a reconstruction of this offer, which is composed of the definitions of subjects of historical studies, descriptions of productive methods, hierarchy of masters of historical writings and their influential books.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jakub Muchowski
ORCID: ORCID
Rafał Swakoń
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article is a commentary on the Code of Ethics of the Polish Historical Association published in March 2021. In the first part of the article, we critically discuss the Code using the metaphor of a “besieged fortress” and the categories of hierarchy and truth. In our view, by taking a defensive position, reproducing hierarchical relations within the community of historians and in relation to the public, and by placing the category of truth at the centre of the principles of the discipline, the authors of the Code do not respond to the contemporary challenges facing history. In the second part, we postulate the rebuilding of the Code on the basis of the categories of dialogue, polyphony and democracy, and we propose a number of amendments to its content.
Go to article

Bibliography

American Historical Association. „Statement on Standards of Professional Conduct”. https://www.historians.org/jobs‑and‑professional‑development/statements‑standards‑and-guidelines‑of‑the‑discipline/statement‑on‑standards‑of‑professional‑conduct (ostatnia aktualizacja: 2019; dostęp: 29.04.2021).
Assmann, Aleida. Między historią a pamięcią. Antologia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, 2014.
Europejski kodeks postępowania w zakresie rzetelności badawczej. Berlin 2020. https://allea.org/wp‑content/uploads/2020/09/Polish_European_Code_of_Conduct_for_Research_Integrity_2010.pdf (dostęp: 14.06.2021).
Historia w przestrzeni publicznej, red. Joanna Wojdon. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2018.
Kodeks Narodowego Centrum Nauki dotyczący rzetelności badań naukowych i starania o fundusze na badania. Kraków 2016. https://www.ncn.gov.pl/sites/default/files/pliki/uchwaly-rady/2016/uchwala39_2016‑zal1.pdf (dostęp: 14.06.2021).
Marsh, Herbert W., John Hattie. „The Relation between Research Productivity and Teaching Effectiveness: Complementary, Antagonistic, or Independent Constructs?”. The Journal of Higher Education 73, 5 (2002): 603–641.
Nie‑miejscapamięci 1. Nekrotopografie, red. Roma Sendyka, Maria Kobielska, Jakub Muchowski, Aleksandra Szczepan. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Badań Literackich PAN, 2020.
Pomian, Krzysztof. O autonomii uniwersytetu. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 2020.
Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Geschichte. Ethik‑Kodex und Grundsätze zur Freiheit der wissenschaftlichen historischen Forschung und Lehre. 2004. www.sgg‑ssh.ch/sites/default/ files/files/SGG‑EthikKodex_Grundsaetze.pdf; www.sgg‑ssh.ch/sites/default/files/files/ethikkodex_grundsaetze_layout_f_erg_0.pdf (dostęp: 29.04.2021).
Topolski, Jerzy. Wprowadzenie do historii, wyd. 2. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie, 2001.
Werner, Wiktor, Adrian Trzoss, Dawid Gralik. „Historia i YouTube. Narracja historyczna w dobie Web 2.0”. Nauka 3 (2020): 119–140.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Anna Brzezińska
1
ORCID: ORCID
Tomasz Falkowski
2
ORCID: ORCID
Piotr Kowalewski Jahromi
3
ORCID: ORCID
Artur Kula
4 5
ORCID: ORCID
Aleksandra Kuligowska
4
ORCID: ORCID
Jakub Muchowski
6
ORCID: ORCID
Katarzyna Nowak
7
ORCID: ORCID
Marcin Stasiak
8
ORCID: ORCID
Agata Tatarenko
9
ORCID: ORCID
Tomasz Wiśniewski
10
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet Łódzki
  2. Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza, Poznań
  3. Uniwersytet Śląski, Katowice
  4. Uniwersytet Warszawski
  5. EHESS, Paryż
  6. Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków
  7. University of Manchester
  8. Uniwersytet Jagielloński
  9. Instytut Europy Środkowej, Lublin
  10. Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more