Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 4
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The metropolis of Barcelona is one of the first ten Europe's urban agglomerations. The geographic and natural conditions of the city - located in area between the sea and the forested mountain ranges running parallel to the coast and divided by broad river valleys - have considerably influenced the formation of its hybrid urban structure. The heart of the agglomeration is still Barcelona, established by the Phoenicians in a natural port at the foot of the Montjiuc hill, growing together with its neighbouring towns for more than two thousand years now, incessantly filling one fragment of natural landscape after another with urban fabric. Monumental edifices and high-rise buildings erected in all historic periods have been inorming visitors of the power of teh city and the same time defining places which are important for its urban composition and status. Recent decades have brought no revolutionary changes in this trend. What was changed, though, are the architectural forms of those most emblematic structures in the scale of the metropolis.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Mateusz Gyurkovich
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

W sytuacji niestabilności i zmian, które charakteryzowały Związek Radziecki w latach dwudziestych ubiegłego wieku, grupa architektów-konstruktywistów pod przewodnictwem Moisieja Ginzburga zajmowała się problemem braku mieszkań dla pracowników w dużych sowieckich miastach. Rozwiązania wypracowane przez zespół Ginzburga zostały opracowane pod patronatem Sowieckich platform OSA i Strojkom. Zostały przeprowadzone w trzech kolejnych etapach zwieńczonych budową Domu Narkomfinu. Niemniej, architektoniczna nowoczesność osiągnięta w Narkomfinie była związana z postępami w sektorze budownictwa mieszkaniowego poczynionymi przez ich kolegów z Europy. Niniejszy artykuł podejmuje analizę faktycznych powiązań pomiędzy owym moskiewskim prototypem a zachodnimi modelami, które zaczynały być opracowywane w Europie, a zwłaszcza w Niemczech. Przedmiotowa koncepcja umieszcza badania prowadzone przez zespół Ginzburga w procesie skomplikowanej i niezwykle ważnej asymilacji, która integrowała nowe modernistyczne techniki Zachodu.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Daniel Movilla Vega
Adolfo Sotoca
Mateusz Gyurkovich
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of the work is to present one of the most important structures of the last decade — the European Central Bank in Frankfurt am Main, against the background of the role which a sustainable skyscraper can play in the urban composition of a modern city. A literature query and original in situ research show that from the beginning of the 20th century, skyscrapers have become a symbol of the success and importance of cities and metropolises. At the same time, most of the historic skylines of European cities were saved from ‘Manhattanization’. One of the exceptions is Frankfurt, the financial capital of the EU. This paper discusses the construction of the ECB building, both as another important landmark in the city’s urban composition and as an innovative, sustainable structure. The results show that the location of an important high-rise building with a prestigious function in the urban structure confirms the city’s status. At the same time, it was proved that the technological and formal solutions used in the complex, together with the reuse of the built structure (recycling of architecture), may contribute to the reduction of the carbon footprint and maintaining high environmental standards.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Mateusz Gyurkovich
1
ORCID: ORCID
Zina Macri
2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Cracow University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture, Chair of Urbanism and City Structure Architecture
  2. Chair of Technical Sciences, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The ongoing period of the pandemic makes everybody focused on the matters related to fighting this immense problem posed to the societies worldwide. The governments deal with the threat by publishing regulations which should allow to mitigate the pandemic, walking on thin ice as the decision makers do not always know how to properly respond to the threat in order to save people. Computer-based simulations of e.g. parts of the city or rural area should provide significant help, however, there are some requirements to fulfill. The simulation should be verifiable, supported by the urban research and it should be possible to run it in appropriate scale. Thus in this paper we present an interdisciplinary work of urban researchers and computer scientists, proposing a scalable, HPC-grade model of simulation, which was tested in a real scenario and may be further used to extend our knowledge about epidemic spread and the results of its counteracting methods. The paper shows the relevant state of the art, discusses the micro-scale simulation model, sketches out the elements of its implementation and provides tangible results gathered for a part of the city of Krakow, Poland.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1.  I. Mironowicz, Modele transformacji miast. Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej, 2016.
  2.  A. Matusik, K. Racoń-Leja, M. Gyurkovich, and K. Dudzic-Gyurkovich, “Hydrourban spatial development model for a resilient inner-city. the example of gdańsk,” Archit. City Environ., vol. 15, no. 43, pp. 1–2, 2020.
  3.  J.L. Kriken, P. Enquist, and R. Rapaport, City building: nine planning principles for the twenty-first century. Princeton Architectural Press, 2011.
  4.  W. Kosiński, Paradigm of the City of the 21st Century. Between the Past of the Polis and the Future of the Metropolis, J. Gyurkovich, Ed. Kraków: Wydaw. PK, 2016.
  5.  J.F.P. Rose, The well-tempered city: what modern science, ancient civilizations, and human nature teach us about the future of urban life. Harper Wave, 2017.
  6.  E. Rewers, Post-Polis. Wstęp do filozofii ponowoczesnego miasta. Kraków: Universitas, 2005, [in Polish].
  7.  M. Dymnicka, Przestrzeń publiczna, a przemiany miasta. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, 2013, [in Polish].
  8.  M. Gyurkovich et al., Hybrid Urban Structures, M. Gyurkovich, Ed. Kraków: Wydaw. PK, 2016.
  9.  S. Kostof, The City Shaped.Urban Patterns and Meanings through History. London – New York: Thames & Hudson, 1999.
  10.  A.A. Kantarek, Tkanka urbanistyczna.Wybrane zagadnienia, J. Gyurkovich, Ed. Kraków: Wydaw. PK, 2019, [in Polish].
  11.  A. Noworól, “Functional urban area as the city of the future,” Tech. Trans., vol. 111, no. 1-A, 2014.
  12.  K. Racoń-Leja, Miasto i wojna: wpływ II wojny światowej na przekształcenia struktury przestrzennej i współczesną kondycję urbanistyczną wybranych miast europejskich, J. Gyurkovich, Ed. Kraków: Wydaw. PK, 2019, [in Polish].
  13.  J. Teller, “Urban density and covid-19: towards an adaptive approach,” Build. Cities, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 150–165, 2021.
  14.  C. at Johns Hopkins University, “Covid-19 dashboard by the center for systems science and engineering,” 2021, [Online] Available: https:// coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html.
  15.  M. Castells, “Communication, power and counter-power in the network society,” Int. J. Commun., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 29, 2007.
  16.  R. Sennet, “How should we live? density in postpandemic cities,” Domus, no. 1046, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.domusweb. it/en/architecture/2020/05/09/how-should-we-live-density-in-post-pandemic-cities.html.
  17.  M. Kowicki, Rozproszenie zabudowy na obszarach Małopolski, a kryzys kreatywności opracowań planistyczno-przestrzennych. Kraków: Wydaw. PK, 2014, [in Polish].
  18.  G. Korzeniak et al., Małe i średnie miasta w policentrycznym rozwoju Polski. Kraków: Instytut Rozwoju Miast, 2014, [in Polish].
  19.  GUS, “Demographic Yearbook of Poland,” 2019.
  20.  N.A. Salingaros, “Eight city types and their interactions: the “eight-fold” model,” Techn. Trans., vol. 2, pp. 5–70, 2017.
  21.  J. Busquets and M. Corominas, Cerda and the Barcelona of the future: reality versus project. Centre de Cultura Contemporania de Barcelona, 2009.
  22.  A.A. Kantarek, K. Kwiatkowski, and I. Samuels, “From rural plots to urban superblocks,” Urban Morphology: journal of the International Seminar on Urban Form, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 155–157, 2018.
  23.  M. Gyurkovich and A. Sotoca, “Towards the Cracow Metropolis – a dream or a reality? A selected issues,” Tech. Trans., vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 5–25, 2018.
  24.  P. Lorens, Równoważenie rozwoju przestrzennego miast polskich. Gdańsk: Wydaw. PG, 2013, [in Polish].
  25. Back to the Sense of the City: 11th VCT International monograph book, Year 2016, July, Krakow. Barcelona: Centre of Land Policy and Valuations (CPSV), 2016.
  26.  A. Zwoliński, “Geometrical structure of public spaces in virtual city models. exploring urban morphology by hierarchy of open spaces,” Space Form, vol. 2019, no. 37, pp. 235–243, 2019.
  27.  K. Lynch, Good city form. MIT Press, 2001.
  28.  D.C. Duives, W. Daamen, and S.P. Hoogendoorn, “State-ofthe-art crowd motion simulation models,” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol., vol. 37, pp. 193–209, 2013.
  29.  E.D. Kuligowski, “Computer evacuation models for buildings,” in SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering. Springer, 2016, pp. 2152–2180.
  30.  B. Zhan, D.N. Monekosso, P. Remagnino, S.A. Velastin, and L.-Q.Xu, “Crowd analysis: a survey,” Mach. Vision Appl., vol. 19, no. 5‒6, pp. 345–357, 2008.
  31.  K. Teknomo, Y. Takeyama, and H. Inamura, “Review on microscopic pedestrian simulation model,” CoRR, vol. abs/1609.01808, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1609.01808.
  32.  M. Paciorek, A. Bogacz, and W. Turek, “Scalable signal-based simulation of autonomous beings in complex environments,” in Computational Science – ICCS 2020. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 144–157.
  33.  J. Wąs and R. Lubaś, “Towards realistic and effective agentbased models of crowd dynamics,” Neurocomputing, vol. 146, pp. 199–209, 2014.
  34.  P. Wittek and X. Rubio-Campillo, “Scalable agent-based modelling with cloud hpc resources for social simulations,” in 4th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science Proceedings. IEEE, 2012, pp. 355–362.
  35.  J. Bujas, D. Dworak, W. Turek, and A. Byrski, “Highperformance computing framework with desynchronized information propagation for large-scale simulations,” J. Comput. Sci, vol. 32, pp. 70–86, 2019.
  36.  Y. Mohamadou, A. Halidou, and P.T. Kapen, “A review of mathematical modeling, artificial intelligence and datasets used in the study, prediction and management of covid-19,” Appl. Intell, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 3913–3925, 2020.
  37.  M. Fuentes and M. Kuperman, “Cellular automata and epidemiological models with spatial dependence,” Physica A, vol. 267, no. 3, pp. 471‒486, 1999.
  38.  I. Tiwari, P. Sarin, and P. Parmananda, “Predictive modeling of disease propagation in a mobile, connected community using cellular automata,” Chaos: Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci., vol. 30, no. 8, p. 081103, 2020.
  39.  M. Dascalu, M. Malita, A. Barbilian, E. Franti, and G.M. Stefan, “Enhanced cellular automata with autonomous agents for covid-19 pandemic modeling,” Rom. J. Inf. Sci. Technol, vol. 23, pp. S15–S27, 2020.
  40.  Y. Xiao, M. Yang, Z. Zhu, H. Yang, L. Zhang, and S. Ghader, “Modeling indoor-level non-pharmaceutical interventions during the covid-19 pandemic: a pedestrian dynamics-based microscopic simulation approach,” Transp. Policy, vol. 109, pp. 12–23, 2021.
  41.  T. Kapecki, “Elements of sustainable development in the context of the environmental and financial crisis and the covid-19 pandemic,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 15, pp. 1–12, 2020.
  42.  A. Jasiński, “Public space or safe space–remarks during the covid-19 pandemic,” Tech. Trans., vol. 117, no. 1, 2020.
  43.  S. Gzell, “Urban design and the sense of the city,” Tech. Trans., vol. 113, no. 2-A, pp. 15–19, 2016.
  44.  M. Hanzl, “Urban forms and green infrastructure–the implications for public health during the covid-19 pandemic,” Cities Health, pp. 1–5, 2020, doi: 10.1080/23748834.2020.1791441.
  45.  M.D. Pinheiro and N.C. Luís, “Covid-19 could leverage a sustainable built environment,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 14, p. 5863, 2020.
  46.  M.R. Fatmi, “Covid-19 impact on urban mobility,” J. Urban Manage., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 270–275, 2020.
  47.  A. Porębska, P. Rizzi, S. Otsuki, and M. Shirotsuki, “Walkability and resilience: A qualitative approach to design for risk reduction,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 10, p. 2878, 2019.
  48.  F. Vergara Perucich, J. Correa Parra, and C. Aguirre-Nuñez, Atlas de indicadores espaciales de vulnerabilidad ante el covid-19 en Chile, F. Vergara, Ed. Centro Producción del Espacio, 2020.
  49.  W.H. Whyte et al., The social life of small urban spaces. Conservation Foundation Washington, DC, 1980.
  50.  A. Białkiewicz, B. Stelmach, and M.J. Żychowska, “Dobra kultury współczesnej. zarys problemu ochrony,” Wiadomości Konserwatorskie – J. Heritage Conserv., no. 63, pp. 152–162, 2020, [in Polish].
  51.  E. Szczerek, Rewitalizacja osiedli wielkopłytowych a ciągłośc´ i komplementarność przestrzeni publicznej miasta, A. Franta, Ed. Kraków: Wydaw. PK, 2018, [in Polish].
  52.  B. Malinowska-Petelenz, Sacrum in civitas: wybrane zagadnienia, A.A. Kantarek, Ed. Kraków: Wydaw. PK, 2018, [in Polish].
  53.  J. Gehl and B. Svarre, How to study public life. Washington, DC: Island press, 2013.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Mateusz Paciorek
1
ORCID: ORCID
Damian Poklewski-Koziełł
2
ORCID: ORCID
Kinga Racoń-Leja
2
ORCID: ORCID
Aleksander Byrski
1
ORCID: ORCID
Mateusz Gyurkovich
2
ORCID: ORCID
Wojciech Turek
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. AGH University of Science and Technology, al. Adama Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
  2. Cracow University of Technology, ul. Warszawska 24, 31-155 Krakow, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more