Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 3
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this work, safety analysis at the railway level crossings is presented using advanced mathematical modelling. Resistivity of track subgrade panels is taken into account. The analysis does not refer to the assessment of the current regulations. Specific cases of generalized dynamic system are considered by introducing operations S=Δ, S=P defined in space C(N) of real sequences. In this model, generalized discrete exponential and trigonometric functions that reflect the oscillatory nature of the analysed quantities are used. The advantage of the analyzes is the avoidance of numerical errors. We show also the importance of the resistivity of track subgrade panels in safety at the level crossings. The safety at the level crossings can be increased through providing track subgrade panels with appropriate resistivity to minimize negative effect of stray currents. The results may be used to evaluate selected safety indicators as well as to predict safety levels and to determine the ways of improving safety.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Eligiusz Mieloszyk
1
ORCID: ORCID
Anita Milewska
2
ORCID: ORCID
Sławomir Grulkowski
3

  1. Prof., DSc., PhD., Eng., Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, G. Narutowicza Str. 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland
  2. PhD., Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, G. Narutowicza Str. 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland
  3. PhD., Eng., Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, G. Narutowicza Str. 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Promoted by many cities to meet the commute needs of their residents (for work, education, etc.), urban rail transport is a spatially expanding system. The safety of rail passengers and road users is one of the most important factors to consider when designing the infrastructure and assessing the operation of the urban tram system. One of the unsolved issues in the functioning of tram transport are sections of tramways with large longitudinal slopes. The article presents an attempt to use risk management for assessing the operational safety of tramways located on road sections with large longitudinal gradients. This particular problem occurs on a tram route in Gdansk. It runs along a street (partly on an overpass) with a gradient above 5% and a small horizontal curve. Risk was assessed using TRANS-RISK, a risk management method. In the first stage, a risk analysis was carried out using the Bow–Tie methods and error trees. The main risks of serious accidents on the analysed section of the tramway were identified. Three sub-concepts were used to assess risk: individual, societal and collective. Although not generally used for assessments of urban transport infrastructure, the latter was found most useful for assessing the safety of the analysed infrastructure. The results of the analyses and assessments helped to formulate design and maintenance principles for tram infrastructure located on sections with steep gradients.
Go to article

Bibliography

[1] Accident Investigation Board, “Collision of trams on Mäkelänkatu in Helsinki, Finland, on 13 June”, Raport B2/2008R, June 2008.
[2] N. Candappa, B. Corben, and J. Yuen, “Addressing the conflict potential between motor vehicles and trams at cut-through locations”, Monash University Accident Research Centre, Clayton Campus, Victoria, Australia, Report no. 317, 2013.
[3] L. Collis, “Cross-industry working group on freight derailment bowtie risk analysis report”, RSBB – Rail Safety and Standards Board, Report no. RSSB/P1500134/RSK/RPT/00001 Rev 1.0, 2016.
[4] Department for Transport, “Derailment of a tram at Pomona, Manchester 17 January 2007”, The Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Report 09/2008, UK, 2008.
[5] V. De Labonnefonm and J.M. Passelaigue, “Analysis of reported events – year 2012 – evolution 2004–2012”, Tram Division, Ministère de l’Écologie, de l’Énergie, Paris, 2014.
[6] S. Dindar et al., “Derailment-based fault tree analysis on risk management of railway turnout systems”, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 245, no. 4, 2017. DOI: 10.1088/1757- 899X/245/4/042020.
[7] “Największa katastrofa tramwajowa w historii Polski wydarzyła się w Szczecinie, 48 rocznica”, Gazeta Wyborcza. pl, 07 grudzien 2015.
[8] K. Jamroz, et al., “Trans-Risk – An integrated method for risk management in transport”, Journal of KONBiN, vol. 1, no. 13, 2010. DOI: 10.2478/v10040-008-0149-9.
[9] K. Jamroz, “Metoda zarz˛adzania ryzykiem w inzynierii drogowej” (in Polish), “Method of risk management in highway engineering”, Wydawnictwo Politechnika Gdanskiej, Gdansk, Poland, 2011.
[10] K. Jamroz, et al., “Analiza i ocena bezpieczenstwa ruchu tramwajowego na estakadzie tramwajowej w ulicy Rakoczego w Gdansku”, Raport, Politechnika Gdanska, Fundacja Rozwoju Inzynierii Lądowej, Gdansk 2015.
[11] K. Jamroz, et al., “Audyt bezpieczenstwa ruchu tramwajowego w Gdansku w ramach zadania, Dokumentacja dla przyszłych projektów”, Raport, Fundacja Rozwoju Inzynierii L˛adowej, Transprojekt Gdanski, TRAFIK, Gdansk 2017.
[12] A Kadzinski, “Studium wybranych aspektów niezawodnosci systemów oraz obiektów pojazdów szynowych”, Politechnika Poznanska, Rozprawy nr 511, Poznan 2013.
[13] A. Kobaszynska-Twardowska, “Zarządzanie ryzykiem zagrozeń na przejazdach kolejowych”, Praca doktorska, WydziałMaszyn Roboczych i Transportu, Politechnika Poznanska, Poznan 2017.
[14] A. Kobaszynska-Twardowska, et al., “Methodology of research on drivers at level crossings”, 12th International Road Safety Conference GAMBIT 2018, Gdansk, Poland MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 231, 2018. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201823101011.
[15] “The tram accident in Gothenburg”, Report 62, KOMEDO: March 12, 1992.
[16] Z. Konopacki-Maciuk, “Trams as tools of urban transformation in French cities”, Technical Transactions Architecture, vol. 10-A, 2014.
[17] L. Menetrieux, “Tram accidents’ analysis – France”, STRMTG, French Guided Transport Technical Service –Ministère de l’Écologie, de l’Énergie, Paris 2011.
[18] RAIB, “Rail accident report: Overturning of a tram at Sandilands junction”, Croydon 9 December 2016. Report 18/2017, December 2017.
[19] NSW Government: Transport Roads and Traffic Authority, “Railway crossing safety series. Evaluate: Applying the railway crossing cause consequence bow tie models”, RTA/Pub. 11.377, Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales, Australia, 2011.
[20] J. Szmaglinski, S. Grulkowski, and K. Birr, “Identification of safety hazards and their sources in tram transport”, 12th International Road Safety Conference GAMBIT 2018, Gdansk, Poland MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 231, 2018. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201823105008.
[21] V. Trbojevic, “Risk criteria in EU. Advances in safety and reliability”, Taylor and Francis Group, London 2005.
[22] X. Liu, P.L.Ch. Barkan, and M.R. Saat, “Analysis of derailments by accident cause: evaluating railroad track upgrades to reduce transportation risk”, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, no. 2261, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 178–185, 2011. DOI: 10.3141/2261-21.
[23] A. Kahlouche and R. Chaib, “Analysis of the tram safety: case study of Algeria”, Procedia Engineering, vol. 178, pp. 401–408, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.076.
[24] M. Schmitz, Ch. Hessel, and U. Stahlberg, “Operation of autonomous tramways”, Verband Deutscher Verkehrsunternehmen e. V.(VDV), Position paper, Cologne, Germany, August 2019.
[25] M. Teixeira, J. Baptista, and C. Gaïvoto, “Operation and safety of tramways in interaction with public space”, COST – European Cooperation in Science and Technology, TU1103 Action final report, September 2015.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Kazimierz Jamroz
1
ORCID: ORCID
Sławomir Grulkowski
1
Krystian Birr
1
ORCID: ORCID
Łukasz Jeliński
1
ORCID: ORCID
Marcin Budzyński
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Gdansk University of Technology, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article discusses the applicability of a novel method to determine horizontal curvature of the railway track axis based on results of mobile satellite measurements. The method is based on inclination angle changes of a moving chord in the Cartesian coordinate system. In the presented case, the variant referred to as the method of two virtual chords is applied. It consists in maneuvering with only one GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) receiver. The assumptions of the novel method are formulated, and an assessment of its application in the performed campaign of mobile satellite measurements is presented. The shape of the measured railway axis is shown in the national spatial reference system PL-2000, and the speed of the measuring trolley during measurement is calculated based on the recorded coordinates. It has been observed that over the test section, the curvature ordinates differ from the expected waveform, which can be caused by disturbances of the measuring trolley trajectory. However, this problem can easily be overcome by filtering the measured track axis ordinates to obtain the correct shape – this refers to all track segments: straight sections, circular arcs and transition curves. The virtual chord method can also constitute the basis for assessing the quality of the recorded satellite signal. The performed analysis has shown high accuracy of the measuring process.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. British railway track design, construction and maintenance. 6th ed., The Permanent Way Institution, London, UK, 1993.
  2. 883.2000 DB_REF-Festpunktfeld, DB Netz AG, Berlin, Germany, 2016.
  3. Railway applications—Track—Track alignment design parameters—Track gauges 1435 mm and wider—Part 1: Plain line, EN 13803-1, CEN, Brussels, Belgium, 2010.
  4. Code of federal regulations title 49 transportation, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
  5. Standard: Railway Surveying, Version 1.0, T HR TR 13000 ST, NSW Government (Transport for NSW), Sydney, Australia, 2016.
  6. NR/L3/TRK/0030 NR_Reinstatement of Absolute Track Geometry (WCRL Routes), no. 1, NR, London, UK, 2008.
  7. Standardy Techniczne – Szczegółowe warunki techniczne dla modernizacji lub budowy linii kolejowych do predkości Vmax   200 km/h (dla taboru konwencjonalnego) / 250 km/h (dla taboru z wychylnym pudłem) – TOM I – DROGA SZYNOWA – Załącznik ST-T1_A6: Układy geometryczne torów, PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe, Warszawa, 2018.
  8.  L. Wang et al., “Validation and assessment of multi-GNSS real-time Precise Point Positioning in simulated kinematic mode using IGS real-time service,” Remote. Sensing, vol. 10, pp. 1‒19, 2018, doi: 10.3390/rs10020337.
  9.  Y. Quan, and L. Lau, “Development of a trajectory constrained rotating arm rig for testing GNSS kinematic positioning,” Measurement, vol. 140, pp. 479–485, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.04.013.
  10.  R.M. Alkan, “Cm-level high accurate point positioning with satellite-based GNSS correction service in dynamic applications,” J. Spatial Sci., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 351‒359, 2019, doi: 10.1080/14498596.2019.1643795.
  11.  W. Domski, and A. Mazur, “Input-output decoupling for a 3D free-floating satellite with a 3R manipulator with state and input disturbances,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol.  67, no. 6, pp. 1031‒1039, 2019, doi: 10.24425/bpasts.2019.130885.
  12.  S. Wu et al., ”Improving ambiguity resolution success rate in the joint solution of GNSS-based attitude determination and relative positioning with multivariate constraints,” GPS Solutions, vol. 24, no. 1, article number: 31, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10291-019-0943-y.
  13.  W. Koc and C. Specht, “Application of the Polish active GNSS geodetic network for surveying and design of the railroad,” in Proc. First International Conference on Road and Rail Infrastructure – CETRA 2010, Opatija, Croatia, Univ. of Zagreb, 2010, pp. 757‒762.
  14.  W. Koc and C. Specht, “Selected problems of determining the course of railway routes by use of GPS network solution,” Arch. Transp., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 303‒320, 2011.
  15.  W. Koc, C. Specht, and P. Chrostowski, “Finding deformation of the straight rail track by GNSS measurements,” Annu. Navig., no. 19, part 1, pp. 91‒104, 2012, doi: 10.2478/v10367-012-0008-6.
  16.  W. Koc, C. Specht, P. Chrostowski, and J. Szmagliński, “Analysis of the possibilities in railways shape assessing using GNSS mobile measurements,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 262, no. 4, p.  11004(1‒6), 2019, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201926211004.
  17.  W. Koc, C. Specht, J. Szmagliński, and P. Chrostowski, “A method for determination and compensation of a cant influence in a track centerline identification using GNSS methods and inertial measurement,” Appl. Sci., vol. 9, no. 20, p.  4347(1‒16), 2019, doi: 10.3390/ app9204347.
  18.  C. Specht and W. Koc, “Mobile satellite measurements in designing and exploitation of rail roads,” Transp. Res. Procedia, vol. 14, pp. 625‒634, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.310.
  19.  C. Specht, W. Koc, P. Chrostowski, and J. Szmagliński, “The analysis of tram tracks geometric layout based on mobile satellite measurements,” Urban Rail Transit, vol. 3, no. 4, pp.  214‒226, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s40864-017-0071-3.
  20.  C. Specht, W. Koc, P. Chrostowski, and J. Szmagliński, “Accuracy assessment of mobile satellite measurements in relation to the geometrical layout of rail tracks,” Metrol. Meas. Syst., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 309‒321, 2019, doi: 10.24425/mms.2019.128359.
  21.  P. Dąbrowski et al., “Installation of GNSS receivers on a mobile platform – methodology and measurement aspects,” Scientific Journals of the Maritime University of Szczecin, vol. 60, no.  132, pp. 18‒26, 2019, doi: 10.3390/jmse8010018.
  22.  A. Wilk et al., “Research project BRIK: development of an innovative method for determining the precise trajectory of a railway vehicle,” Transp. Oveview – Przegląd Komunikacyjny, vol. 74, no. 7, pp. 32‒47, 2019, doi: 10.35117/A_ENG_19_07_04.
  23.  L. Marx, “Satellitengestützte Gleisvermessung – auch beim Oberbau,” EI – Eisenbahningenieur, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 9‒14, 2007.
  24.  Y. Naganuma, T. Yasukuni, and T. Uematsu, “Development of an inertial track geometry measuring trolley and utilization of its high- precision data,” Int. J. Transp. Dev. Integr., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 271–285, 2019, doi: 10.2495/TDI-V3-N3-271-285.
  25.  C. Qijin et al., “A railway track geometry measuring trolley system based on aided INS,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 538, 2018, doi: 10.3390/ s18020538.
  26.  T. Strübing, “Kalibrierung und Auswertung von lasertriangulations-basierten Multisensorsystemen am Beispiel des Gleisvermessungs- systems RACER II,” Schriften des Instituts für Geodäsie der Universität der Bundeswehr München, Dissertationen, Heft 91, 2015.
  27.  T. Weinold and A. Grimm-Pitzinger, “Die Lagerung der Gleisvermessungen der ÖBB,” Vermessung & Geoinformation, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 348–352, 2012.
  28. Rail design in Civil 3D, Autodesk, San Rafael, USA, 2019.
  29. An application for preliminary and detailed 3D design of rail infrastructure V8i PL, Bentley Systems, Exton, USA, 2019.
  30. BIM-ready railway design solution, CGS Labs, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2018.
  31.  W. Koc, “The method of determining horizontal curvature in geometrical layouts of railway track with the use of moving chord,” Arch. Civil Eng., vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 579–591, 2020, doi: 10.24425/ace.2020.135238.
  32.  W. Koc, “Design of rail-track geometric systems by satellite measurement,” J. Transp. Eng., vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 114‒122, 2012, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000303.
  33.  A. Wilk, C. Specht, K. Karwowski et al., “Correction of determined coordinates of railway tracks in mobile satellite measurements,” Diagnostyka, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 77‒85, 2020, doi: 10.29354/diag/125626.
  34.  A. Wilk et al., “Innovative mobile method to determine railway track axis position in global coordinate system using position measurements performed with GNSS and fixed base of the measuring vehicle,” Measurement, vol. 175, p. 109016, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j. measurement.2021.109016.
  35.  A. Wilk, W. Koc, C. Specht, S. Judek et al., “Digital filtering of railway track coordinates in mobile multi–receiver GNSS measurements,” Sensors, vol. 20, p. 5018(1–20), 2020, doi: 10.3390/s20185018.
  36.  C. Specht et al., “Verification of GNSS measurements of the railway track using standard techniques for determining coordinates,” Remote Sensing, vol. 12, p. 2874(1‒24), 2020, doi: 10.3390/rs12182874.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Władysław Koc
1
ORCID: ORCID
Andrzej Wilk
1
ORCID: ORCID
Cezary Specht
2
Krzysztof Karwowski
1
Jacek Skibicki
1
Krzysztof Czaplewski
2
Slawomir Judek
1
Piotr Chrostowski
3
Jacek Szmagliński
3
Paweł Dąbrowski
2
ORCID: ORCID
Mariusz Specht
2
Sławomir Grulkowski
3
Roksana Licow
3

  1. Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Electrical and Control Engineering, ul. G. Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland
  2. Gdynia Maritime University, Faculty of Navigation, al. Jana Pawła II 3, 81-345 Gdynia, Poland
  3. Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, ul. G. Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more