The subject of the performed experiments comprised standard XR 110 02, XR 110 04 nozzles, TT 110 02, TT 110 04 nozzles and AI 110 02, AI 110 04 air induction nozzles. The working speed of spraying was v_p = 7 km/h. Each nozzle was tested at the following three levels of working pressures: p₁ = 0.2 MPa, p₂ = 0.4 MPa ad p₃ = 0.6 MPa. The spray liquid was pure water at the temperature of 20°C. The plant coverage was determined: s_k – spray coverage, n_k – number of droplets per 1 cm². The analysis of results of maize spraying showed that both standard nozzles and both TT nozzles achieved better results with number of droplets and degree of surface coverage for each of applied operating pressure. The lowest results from all examined kind of nozzles for number of droplets achieved injector nozzles (AI). For operating pressure 0.4 MPa nozzles fulfilled agrotechnical requirements for using insecticids, herbicides and fungicides.

The subject of the performed experiments comprised standard RSMM 110-02, RSMM 110-02 nozzles, AI 110-02, AI 110-02 air induction nozzles as well as AZMM 110-02, AZMM 110-03 low drift nozzles. The working speed during spraying was v_p = 7 km/h. Each sprayer was tested at the following three levels of working pressures: p₁ = 0.2 MPa, p₂ = 0.4 MPa and p₃ = 0.6 MPa. The spray liquid was pure water at the temperature of 20°C. The plant coverage was determined: s_k – spray coverage, n_k – number of droplets per 1 cm² of the leaf.