Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 2
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The longitudinal automatic carrier landing system (ACLS) control law is designed based on nonlinear dynamic inversion (NDI), which can reject air wake, decouple lateral states, and track the dynamic desired touchdown point (DTP). First of all, the nonlinear landing model of F/A−18 aircraft in the final approach is established, in which the parameters of the aerodynamic, control surfaces, and limited states are acquired. Second, the strategy of tracking the desired longitudinal trajectory through pitch angle control is adopted. The automatic power compensation system (APCS), pitch angle rate, pitch angle, and vertical position control loops are developed based on the adaptive NDI. The stable analysis and the principal description are derived in detail. Deck motion compensation (DMC) algorithm is designed by frequency response method. Third, the control parameters are optimized through the genetic algorithm. A fitness function integrated with velocity, angle of attack (AOA), pitch rate, pitch angle, and vertical position of the aircraft are proposed. Finally, integrated simulations are conducted on a semi-physical simulation platform. The results indicate that the adopted automatic landing control law can achieve both excellent performance and the ability to reject the air wake and lateral coupling.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1.  M. Ryota and S. Shinji, “Modeling of pilot landing approach control using stochastic switched linear regression model”, J. Aircr. 47(5), 1554–1558 (2010).
  2.  J. Tian, Y. Dai, H. Rong, and T.D. Zhao, “Hybrid safety analysis method based on SVM and RST: An application to carrier landing of aircraft”, Saf. Sci. 80, 56–65 (2015).
  3.  L.P. Wang, Q.D. Zhu, Z. Zhang, and R. Dong. “Modeling pilot behaviors based on discrete–time series during carrier-based aircraft landing”, J. Aircr. 53(6), 1922–1931 (2016).
  4.  J.M. Urnes and R.K. Hess, “Development of the F/A 18A automatic carrier landing system”, J. Guid. 8(3), 289-295 (1985).
  5.  Z.Y. Guan, Y.P. Ma, and Z.W. Zheng, “Prescribed performance control for automatic carrier landing with disturbance”, Nonlinear Dyn. 94(2), 1335–1349 (2018).
  6.  Z.Y. Zhen, S.Y. Jiang, and K. Ma, “Automatic carrier landing control for unmanned aerial vehicles based on preview control and particle filtering”, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 81, 99–107 (2018).
  7.  Z.Y. Zhen, S.Y. Jiang, and J. Jiang, “Preview control and particle filtering for automatic carrier landing”, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 54(6), 2662–2674 (2018).
  8.  R. Lungu and M. Lungu, “Design of automatic landing systems using the H-inf control and the dynamic inversion”, J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control- Trans. ASME. 138(2), 1–5 (2016).
  9.  R. Lungu and M. Lungu, “Automatic Landing system using neural networks and radio-technical subsystems”, Chin. J. Aeronaut. 30(1), 399–411 (2017).
  10.  M. Lungu and R. Lungu, “Automatic control of aircraft lateraldirectional motion during landing using neural networks and radio-technical subsystems”, Neurocomputing. 171, 471–481 (2016).
  11.  Q. Bian, B. Nener, T. Li, and X.M. Wang, “Multimodal control parameter optimization for aircraft longitudinal automatic landing via the hybrid particle swarm-BFGS algorithm”, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G-J. Aerosp. Eng. 233(12), 4482–4491 (2019).
  12.  F.Y. Zheng, Z.Y. Zhen, and H.J. Gong, “Observer-based backstepping longitudinal control for carrier-based UAV with actuator faults”, J. Syst. Eng. Electron. 28(2), 322–337 (2017).
  13.  Z.Y. Zhen, C.J. Yu, and S.Y. Jiang, “Adaptive super-twisting control for automatic carrier landing of aircraft”, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 56(2), 987–994 (2020).
  14.  Z.Y. Zhen, G. Tao, and C.J. Yu, “A multivariable adaptive control scheme for automatic carrier landing of UAV”, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 92, 714–721 (2019).
  15.  L.P. Wang, Z. Zhang, Q.D. Zhu, and R. Dong, “Longitudinal automatic carrier landing system guidance law using model predictive control with an additional landing risk term”, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G-J. Aerosp. Eng. 233(3), 1–17 (2019).
  16.  L.P. Wang, Z. Zhang, and Q.D. Zhu, “Automatic Flight Control Design Considering Objective and Subjective Risks during Carrier Landing”, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part I-J Syst Control Eng. 234(4), 446–461 (2020).
  17.  L.P. Wang, Z. Zhang, Q.D. Zhu, X.W. Jiang, “Lateral autonomous carrier-landing control with high-dimension landing risks consideration”, Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. 92(6), 837– 850 (2020).
  18.  T. Woodbury and J. Valasek, “Synthesis and flight test of an automatic landing controller using quantitative feedback theory”, J. Guid. Control Dyn. 39(9), 1994–2010 (2016).
  19.  B. Xu, D.W. Wang, Y.M. Zhang, and Z.K. Shi, “DOB-based neural control of flexible hypersonic flight vehicle considering wind effects”, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 64(11), 8676–8685 (2017).
  20.  D. Gawel, M. Nowak, H. Hausa, and R. Roszak, “New biomimetic approach to the aircraft wing structural design based on aeroelastic analysis”, Bull. Pol. Ac.: Tech. 65(5), 741–750 (2017).
  21.  J.N. Li and H.B. Duan, “Simplified brain storm optimization approach to control parameter optimization in F/A 18 automatic carrier landing system”, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 42, 187–195 (2015).
  22.  R. Dou and H.B. Duan, “Levy flight based pigeon-inspired optimization for control parameters optimization in automatic carrier landing system”, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 61, 11–20 (2017).
  23.  K. Lu and C.S. Liu, “A L-1 adaptive control scheme for UAV carrier landing using nonlinear dynamic inversion”, Int. J. Aerosp. Eng. 1–9 (2019).
  24.  M. Brodecki and K. Subbarao. Autonomous formation flight control system using in-flight sweet-spot estimation. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 38(6), 1083–1096 (2015).
  25.  H. Bouadi, F.M. Camino, and D. Choukroun, “Space–Indexed Control for Aircraft Vertical Guidance with Time Constraint”, J. Guid. Control Dyn. 37(4), 1103–1113 (2014).
  26.  P.K. Menon, S.S. Vaddi, and P. Sengupta, “Robust landingguidance law for impaired aircraft”, J. Guid. Control Dyn. 35(6), 1865−1877 (2012).
  27.  W.H. Chen, “Nonlinear Disturbance observer-enhanced dynamic inversion control of missiles”, J. Guid. Control Dyn. 26(1), 161–166 (2003).
  28.  I. Hameduddin and A.H. Bajodah, “Nonlinear generalised dynamic inversion for aircraft manoeuvring control”, Int. J. Control. 85(4), 437–450 (2012).
  29.  R. Lungu and M. Lungu, “Design of automatic landing systems using the H-inf control and the dynamic inversion”, J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control- Trans. ASME. 138(2), 1–5 (2016).
  30.  M. Lungu and R. Lungu, “Landing auto-pilots for aircraft motion in longitudinal plane using adaptive control laws based on neural networks and dynamic inversion”, Asian J. Control. 19(1), 302–315 (2017).
  31.  R. Lungu and M. Lungu, “Automatic control of aircraft in lateral-directional plane during landing”, Asian J. Control. 18(2), 433–446 (2016).
  32.  A. Chakraborty, P. Seiler, and G. J. Balasz, “Applications of linear and nonlinear robustness analysis techniques to the F/A-18 flight control laws”, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control conference. Chicago, USA, 2009, pp.10–13.
  33.  A. Chakraborty, P. Seiler, and G. J. Balas, “Susceptibility of F/A 18 flight controllers to the falling-leaf mode: nonlinear analysis”, J. Guid. Control Dyn. 34(1), 57–72 (2011).
  34.  J.M. Urnes, and R.K. Hess, “Development of the F/A-18A Automatic Carrier Landing System”, J. Guid. 8(3), 289–295 (1985).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Lipeng Wang
1
ORCID: ORCID
Zhi Zhang
1
Qidan Zhu
1
Zixia Wen
2

  1. College of Intelligent Systems Science and Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China
  2. AVIC Xi’an Flight Automatic Control Research Institute, Xi’an, 710065, China
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

A global path-planning algorithm for robots is proposed based on the critical-node diffusion binary tree (CDBT), which solves the problems of large memory consumption, long computing time, and many path inflection points of the traditional methods. First of all, the concept of Quad-connected, Tri-connected, Bi-connected nodes, and critical nodes are defined, and the mathematical models of diverse types of nodes are established. Second, the CDBT algorithm is proposed, in which different planning directions are determined due to the critical node as the diffusion object. Furthermore, the optimization indices of several types of nodes are evaluated in real-time. Third, a path optimization algorithm based on reverse searching is designed, in which the redundant nodes are eliminated, and the constraints of the robot are considered to provide the final optimized path. Finally, on one hand, the proposed algorithm is compared with the A* and RRT methods in the ROS system, in which four types of indicators in the eight maps are analysed. On the other hand, an experiment with an actual robot is conducted based on the proposed algorithm. The simulation and experiment verify that the new method can reduce the number of nodes in the path and the planning time and is suitable for the motion constraints of an actual robot.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Zhiyong Yang
1
ORCID: ORCID
Lipeng Wang
1
ORCID: ORCID
Zejun Cao
1
Zhi Zhang
1
Zhuang Xu
1

  1. College of Intelligent Systems Science and Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more