How to search?
advanced search

Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 1
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:

Effect of SiO2 flux on the depth of penetration, microstructure, texture and mechanical behavior of AA6063 T6 aluminum alloy using activated TIG welding

Rajiv Kumar S.C. Vettivel Harmesh Kumar Kansal
Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Technical Sciences | 2021 | 69 | No. 1 | e136215 | DOI: 10.24425/bpasts.2020.136215
Keywords aluminum alloy depth of penetration tensile strength texture
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Activated tungsten inert gas (ATIG) welding has a good depth of penetration (DOP) as compared to the conventional tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding. This paper is mainly focused on ATIG characterization and mechanical behavior of aluminum alloy (AA) 6063-T6 using SiO2 flux. The characterization of the base material (BM), fusion zone (FZ), heat affected zone (HAZ) and, partially melted zone is carried out using the suitable characterization methods. The weld quality is characterized using ultrasonic-assisted non-destructive evaluation. A-scan result confirms that the ATIG welded samples have more DOP and less bead width as compared to conventional TIG. The recorded tensile strength of ATIG with SiO2 is better than the conventional TIG welding. The failure mode is ductile for ATIG welding with larger fracture edges and is brittle in the case of conventional TIG welding.

Go to article

Bibliography

  1.  S. Jannet, P.K. Mathews, and R. Raja, “Comparative investigation of friction stir welding and fusion welding of 6061T6 – 5083 O aluminum alloy based on mechanical properties and microstructure”, Bull. Pol. Ac.: Tech. 62(4), 791‒795 (2014), doi: 10.2478/bpasts-2014-0086.
  2.  S.T. Amancio-Filho, S. Sheikhi, J.F. dos Santos, and C. Bolfarini, “Preliminary study on the microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar friction stir welds in aircraft aluminium alloys 2024-T351 and 6056-T4”, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 206. 132–142 (2008), doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.008.
  3.  P. Mukhopadhyay, “Alloy Designation, Processing, and Use of AA6XXX Series Aluminium Alloys”, ISRN Metall. 2012, 165082 (2012), doi: 10.5402/2012/165082.
  4.  B. Choudhury and M. Chandrasekaran, “Investigation on welding characteristics of aerospace materials – A review”, Mater. Today Proc. 4, 7519–7526 (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.07.083.
  5.  R.R. Ambriz and V. Mayagoitia, “Welding of Aluminum Alloys”, in Welding, Brazing and Soldering, pp. 722–739, ASM International, 2018. doi: 10.31399/asm.hb.v06.a0001436.
  6. [6]  P.J. Modenesi, “The chemistry of TIG weld bead formation”, Weld. Int. 29, 771–782 (2015), doi: 10.1080/09507116.2014.932990.
  7.  A.K. Singh, V. Dey, and R.N. Rai, “Techniques to improveweld penetration in TIG welding (A review)”, Mater. Today Proc. 4, 1252–1259 (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.01.145.
  8.  R.S. Vidyarthy and D.K. Dwivedi, “Activating flux tungsten inert gas welding for enhanced weld penetration”, J. Manuf. Process. 22, 211–228 (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.03.012.
  9.  R.S. Vidyarthy and D.K. Dwivedi, “Microstructural and mechanical properties assessment of the P91 A-TIG weld joints”, J. Manuf. Process. 31, 523–535 (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.12.012.
  10.  K.D. Ramkumar, V. Varma, M. Prasad, N.D. Rajan, and N.S. Shanmugam, “Effect of activated flux on penetration depth, microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V TIG welds”, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 261, 233–241 (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.06.024.
  11.  H. Kumar and N.K. Singh, “Performance of activated TIG welding in 304 austenitic stainless steel welds”, Mater. Today Proc. 4, 9914–9918 (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.06.293.
  12.  R.S. Vidyarthy, A. Kulkarni, and D.K. Dwivedi, “Study of microstructure and mechanical property relationships of A-TIG welded P91–316L dissimilar steel joint”, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 695, 249–257 (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.04.038.
  13.  E.R. Imam Fauzi, M.S. Che Jamil, Z. Samad, and P. Muangjunburee, “Microstructure analysis and mechanical characteristics of tungsten inert gas and metal inert gas welded AA6082-T6 tubular joint: A comparative study”, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China (English Ed.) 27, 17–24 (2017), doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(17)60003-7.
  14.  R.S. Coelho, A. Kostka, J.F. dos Santos, and A. Kaysser-Pyzalla, “Friction-stir dissimilar welding of aluminium alloy to high strength steels: Mechanical properties and their relation to microstructure”, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 556, 175–183 (2012), doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.06.076.
  15.  A.S. Zoeram, S.H.M. Anijdan, H.R. Jafarian, and T. Bhattacharjee, “Welding parameters analysis and microstructural evolution of dissimilar joints in Al/Bronze processed by friction stir welding and their effect on engineering tensile behavior”, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 687, 288–297, (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.01.071.
  16.  K.H. Dhandha and V.J. Badheka, “Effect of activatingfluxes on weld bead morphology of P91 steelbead-on-platewelds by flux assisted tungsteninert gas welding process”, J. Manuf. Process. 17, 48–57 (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2014.10.004.
  17.  A. Krajewski, W. Włosiński, T. Chmielewski, and P. Kołodziejczak, “Ultrasonic-vibration assisted arc-welding of aluminum alloys”, Bull. Pol. Ac.: Tech. 60(4), 841‒852 (2012), doi: 10.2478/v10175-012-0098-2.
  18.  H.S. Patil and S.N. Soman, “Effect of tool geometry and welding speed on mechanical properties and microstructure of friction stir welded joints of aluminum alloys AA6082-T6”, Arch. Mech. Eng. 61, 455‒468 (2014), doi: 10.2478/meceng-2014-0026.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Rajiv Kumar
1
S.C. Vettivel
2
Harmesh Kumar Kansal
1
  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, UIET, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India
  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chandigarh College of Engineering and Technology (Degree Wing), Chandigarh, India

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more