TY - JOUR N2 - Henri Bergson as well as Gaston Milhaud undertake a radical critique of the conception of radical determinism because they both think that mind is able to act in a free and creative manner. In the article, I examine to what degree their arguments, aimed to prove this autonomy, converge. I inquire whether their endorsement of freedom of the mental acts led the two philosophers to the same conclusions regarding the cognitive extent of the intellect and therefore the parallel description of the status of scientific cognition. L1 - http://www.czasopisma.pan.pl/Content/113270/PDF/P.Filoz.%203-19%2011Walerich.pdf L2 - http://www.czasopisma.pan.pl/Content/113270 PY - 2019 IS - No 3 EP - 138 DO - 10.24425/pfns.2019.129764 KW - universal determinism KW - mind’s creative activity KW - contingency KW - consciousness freedom KW - rational knowledge KW - scientific constructions A1 - Walerich, Elżbieta PB - Komitet Nauk Filozoficznych PAN PB - Wydział Filozofii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego DA - 2019.09.27 T1 - Milhaud versus Bergson – the problem of mind’s freedom and scientific knowledge SP - 123 UR - http://www.czasopisma.pan.pl/dlibra/publication/edition/113270 T2 - Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria ER -