TY - JOUR N2 - The paper summarizes the debate concerning the divine hiddenness argument. First, it presents two versions of the argument that was initially formulated by J.L. Schellenberg and subsequently discussed over the last twenty years and it marks its most important theses. Then the author indicates some possible rebuttals, segregating them according to the challenged premises. Particularly noteworthy, he argues, are these theistic answers that accuse the images of God assumed by the hiddenness argument of excessive anthropomorphism and those that try to point out higher goods justifying divine hiddenness. In conclusion the author claims that the hiddenness argument proves atheism only if by theism one understands theistic personalism. Other positions, such as ultimism or theism of transcendence, are not threatened by the argument. L1 - http://www.czasopisma.pan.pl/Content/110516/PDF/P.Filoz.%201-19%202-M.Dobrzeniecki.pdf L2 - http://www.czasopisma.pan.pl/Content/110516 PY - 2019 IS - No 1 EP - 32 DO - 10.24425/pfns.2019.126632 KW - hiddenness argument KW - theism KW - atheism KW - ultimism KW - theistic personalism KW - freewill defence KW - J.L. Schellenberg A1 - Dobrzeniecki, Marek PB - Komitet Nauk Filozoficznych PAN PB - Wydział Filozofii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego DA - 2019.04.15 T1 - The divine hiddenness argument. The state of debate SP - 17 UR - http://www.czasopisma.pan.pl/dlibra/publication/edition/110516 T2 - Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria ER -