TY - JOUR N2 - The aim of this analysis is to determine whether Marx’s diagnosis of alienated work applies to work that is performed in our time, and whether the concept itself is useful for philosophical anthropology. Marx assumes that there is a link between alienation of work and alienation of the worker. The author asks if these premises lead to further questions, such as: Is the phenomenon of alienation of work characterized unambiguously and precisely? Can it be useful for analyzing social phenomena occurring outside the proletariat? Is it relevant to apply this phenomenon to the philosophical discourse on man conducted independently of the historical perspective assumed by Marx? Will abolition of private ownership of means of production eliminate the phenomenon of alienated work? Which is more nearly true: Marx’s idea that private property is the result of alienated work, or the opposite, that private property is its cause? L1 - http://www.czasopisma.pan.pl/Content/109524/PDF/PF%204-18%2019-W.Glinkowski.pdf L2 - http://www.czasopisma.pan.pl/Content/109524 PY - 2018 IS - No 4 EP - 282 DO - 10.24425/pfns.2018.125506 KW - K. Marx KW - alienated work KW - philosophical anthropology A1 - Glinkowski, Witold P. PB - Komitet Nauk Filozoficznych PAN PB - Wydział Filozofii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego DA - 2019.01.30 T1 - Marx’s diagnosis of alienated work SP - 269 UR - http://www.czasopisma.pan.pl/dlibra/publication/edition/109524 T2 - Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria ER -