N2 - The graphical user interface (GUI) and the functionality of various global map services in the context of responsive web design were compared in the article. The analysis included: the number and arrangement of buttons on the start screen, available map layers, waypoints and means of transport for searched routes on four screens of various sizes: the desktop computer, laptop, tablet, and smartphone screen. Having compared the interface and the functionality of eight global map services (Baidu Maps, Google Maps, HereWeGo, Bing Maps, Open Street Map, Map Quest, 2Gis, Yandex Maps), authors draw conclusions concerning responsive web design. Despite the fact that specific map services differ, there are some common features making a good example of the adaptation of the graphical user interface to the device on which the map is presented. Global map services, regardless of the display size, use the same interactive tools that are graphically similar. Among those graphic similarities, one can distinguish two or three graphical styles representing a single function. Two versions of the interface can be observed – the desktop and mobile type. Adaptation to devices such as laptops or tablets assumes that only the screen decreases but the interface and the functionality remains relatively unchanged. Real responsiveness occurs only when service is displayed on a smartphone display. L1 - http://www.czasopisma.pan.pl/Content/103275/PDF/art_1%20geodesy-2.pdf L2 - http://www.czasopisma.pan.pl/Content/103275 PY - 2018 IS - No 2 EP - 159–177 KW - responsive web design KW - graphical user interface KW - web mapping services KW - geomatics KW - interactive map A1 - Horbiński, Tymoteusz A1 - Cybulski, Paweł PB - Commitee on Geodesy PAS VL - vol. 67 DA - 2018.12.27 T1 - Similarities of global web mapping services functionality in the context of responsive web design SP - 159–177 UR - http://www.czasopisma.pan.pl/dlibra/publication/edition/103275 T2 - Geodesy and Cartography