@ARTICLE{Grygianiec_Mariusz_The_2019,
 author={Grygianiec, Mariusz},
 number={No 4},
 journal={Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria},
 pages={131-160},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2019},
 publisher={Komitet Nauk Filozoficznych PAN},
 publisher={Wydział Filozofii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego},
 abstract={For Peter F. Strawson, transcendental arguments were an important part of his philosophical method, referred to as a connective analysis. Both Strawson and his critical commentators have devoted a lot of effort to determining the nature, scope and purpose of those arguments. In this text, I intend, first of all, to reconstruct and characterize the basic elements of transcendental argumentation, specifying its general form, features and purpose. Secondly, I reconstruct some of the most representative examples of this argumentation. Thirdly, I refer to the basic objections against transcendental arguments formulated in the literature. Finally, I point to a few peculiarities in those arguments, commonly omitted by commentators and interpreters. The overall message of the paper is moderately positive: transcendental arguments are a legitimate way of reasoning in philosophy, and in particular, they constitute a comprehensible and well-founded part of Strawson’s connective analysis.},
 type={Artykuły / Articles},
 title={The status of transcendental arguments},
 URL={http://www.czasopisma.pan.pl/Content/114336/PDF/P.Filoz.%204-19%2010-M.Grygianiec.pdf},
 doi={10.24425/pfns.2019.130914},
 keywords={P.F. Strawson, B. Stroud, transcendental argument, transcendental premise, conceptual scheme, skepticism, necessary condition, modality},
}