@ARTICLE{Glinkowski_Witold_P._Marx’s_2018, author={Glinkowski, Witold P.}, number={No 4}, journal={Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria}, pages={269-282}, howpublished={online}, year={2018}, publisher={Komitet Nauk Filozoficznych PAN}, publisher={Wydział Filozofii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego}, abstract={The aim of this analysis is to determine whether Marx’s diagnosis of alienated work applies to work that is performed in our time, and whether the concept itself is useful for philosophical anthropology. Marx assumes that there is a link between alienation of work and alienation of the worker. The author asks if these premises lead to further questions, such as: Is the phenomenon of alienation of work characterized unambiguously and precisely? Can it be useful for analyzing social phenomena occurring outside the proletariat? Is it relevant to apply this phenomenon to the philosophical discourse on man conducted independently of the historical perspective assumed by Marx? Will abolition of private ownership of means of production eliminate the phenomenon of alienated work? Which is more nearly true: Marx’s idea that private property is the result of alienated work, or the opposite, that private property is its cause?}, type={Artykuły / Articles}, title={Marx’s diagnosis of alienated work}, URL={http://www.czasopisma.pan.pl/Content/109524/PDF/PF%204-18%2019-W.Glinkowski.pdf}, doi={10.24425/pfns.2018.125506}, keywords={K. Marx, alienated work, philosophical anthropology}, }